Prosecution Insights
Last updated: August 18, 2026
Application No. 17/132,215

METHOD FOR METAL VAPOR INFILTRATION OF CMC PARTS AND ARTICLES CONTAINING THE SAME

Non-Final OA §112
Filed
Dec 23, 2020
Examiner
TUROCY, DAVID P
Art Unit
1718
Tech Center
1700 — Chemical & Materials Engineering
Assignee
RTX Corporation
OA Round
11 (Non-Final)
47%
Grant Probability
Moderate
11-12
OA Rounds
0m
Est. Remaining
82%
With Interview

Examiner Intelligence

Grants 47% of resolved cases
47%
Career Allowance Rate
424 granted / 904 resolved
-18.1% vs TC avg
Strong +36% interview lift
Without
With
+35.6%
Interview Lift
resolved cases with interview
Typical timeline
3y 6m
Avg Prosecution
64 currently pending
Career history
978
Total Applications
across all art units

Statute-Specific Performance

§101
0.4%
-39.6% vs TC avg
§103
57.0%
+17.0% vs TC avg
§102
14.9%
-25.1% vs TC avg
§112
19.7%
-20.3% vs TC avg
Black line = Tech Center average estimate • Based on career data from 904 resolved cases

Office Action

§112
CTNF 17/132,215 CTNF 80448 DETAILED ACTION Notice of Pre-AIA or AIA Status 07-03-aia AIA 15-10-aia The present application, filed on or after March 16, 2013, is being examined under the first inventor to file provisions of the AIA. Continued Examination Under 37 CFR 1.114 07-42-04 AIA A request for continued examination under 37 CFR 1.114, including the fee set forth in 37 CFR 1.17(e), was filed in this application after final rejection. Since this application is eligible for continued examination under 37 CFR 1.114, and the fee set forth in 37 CFR 1.17(e) has been timely paid, the finality of the previous Office action has been withdrawn pursuant to 37 CFR 1.114. Applicant's submission filed on 4/28/2026 has been entered. Response to Amendment Applicants amendments, filed 4/28/2026, have been fully considered and reviewed by the examiner. The examiner notes the amendment to claims and the cancellation of claim 5. Claims 1, 3, 6-17 remain pending, with claim 13-16 withdrawn from consideration. Response to Arguments 07-37 AIA Applicant's arguments filed 4/28/2026 have been fully considered but they are not persuasive as they are directed to newly added claim requirements addressed in the prior art rejection that follows . Claim Rejections - 35 USC § 112 07-30-01 AIA The following is a quotation of the first paragraph of 35 U.S.C. 112(a): (a) IN GENERAL.—The specification shall contain a written description of the invention, and of the manner and process of making and using it, in such full, clear, concise, and exact terms as to enable any person skilled in the art to which it pertains, or with which it is most nearly connected, to make and use the same, and shall set forth the best mode contemplated by the inventor or joint inventor of carrying out the invention. The following is a quotation of the first paragraph of pre-AIA 35 U.S.C. 112: The specification shall contain a written description of the invention, and of the manner and process of making and using it, in such full, clear, concise, and exact terms as to enable any person skilled in the art to which it pertains, or with which it is most nearly connected, to make and use the same, and shall set forth the best mode contemplated by the inventor of carrying out his invention. 07-31-01 Claim 1, 3, 6-12 and 17 are rejected under 35 U.S.C. 112(a) or 35 U.S.C. 112 (pre-AIA), first paragraph, as failing to comply with the written description requirement. The claim(s) contains subject matter which was not described in the specification in such a way as to reasonably convey to one skilled in the relevant art that the inventor or a joint inventor, or for applications subject to pre-AIA 35 U.S.C. 112, the inventor(s), at the time the application was filed, had possession of the claimed invention. Claim 1 requires “depositing a rare earth metal in the partly completed densified preform to produce a diffusion barrier”; however, a full review of the specification fails to illustrate or disclose that the rare earth metal as generically referenced by the original disclosure functions as a diffusion barrier or can be used as claimed. Claim 6 requires the diffusion barrier layer to comprise silver and rare earth metal (as required by the combination of claim 1 with 6); however, there is no disclosure that these two can be used together to for the diffusion barrier. Dependent claims do not cure the deficiencies of the claims from which they depend and are similarly rejected. 07-30-02 AIA The following is a quotation of 35 U.S.C. 112(b): (b) CONCLUSION.—The specification shall conclude with one or more claims particularly pointing out and distinctly claiming the subject matter which the inventor or a joint inventor regards as the invention. The following is a quotation of 35 U.S.C. 112 (pre-AIA), second paragraph: The specification shall conclude with one or more claims particularly pointing out and distinctly claiming the subject matter which the applicant regards as his invention. 07-34-01 Claim 6 is rejected under 35 U.S.C. 112(b) or 35 U.S.C. 112 (pre-AIA), second paragraph, as being indefinite for failing to particularly point out and distinctly claim the subject matter which the inventor or a joint inventor (or for applications subject to pre-AIA 35 U.S.C. 112, the applicant), regards as the invention. Claim 6 recites the limitation "the diffusion barrier layer". There is insufficient antecedent basis for this limitation in the claim as the claims from which claim 6 depends merely requires “to produce a diffusion barrier” and it’s unclear if the diffusion barrier layer is limiting this diffusion barrier or is some other unreferenced layer. Conclusion Any inquiry concerning this communication or earlier communications from the examiner should be directed to DAVID P TUROCY whose telephone number is (571)272-2940. The examiner can normally be reached Mon, Tues, Thurs, and Friday, 7:00 a.m. to 5:30 p.m. Examiner interviews are available via telephone, in-person, and video conferencing using a USPTO supplied web-based collaboration tool. To schedule an interview, applicant is encouraged to use the USPTO Automated Interview Request (AIR) at http://www.uspto.gov/interviewpractice. If attempts to reach the examiner by telephone are unsuccessful, the examiner’s supervisor, Gordon Baldwin can be reached on 571-272-5166. The fax phone number for the organization where this application or proceeding is assigned is 571-273-8300. Information regarding the status of published or unpublished applications may be obtained from Patent Center. Unpublished application information in Patent Center is available to registered users. To file and manage patent submissions in Patent Center, visit: https://patentcenter.uspto.gov. Visit https://www.uspto.gov/patents/apply/patent-center for more information about Patent Center and https://www.uspto.gov/patents/docx for information about filing in DOCX format. For additional questions, contact the Electronic Business Center (EBC) at 866-217-9197 (toll-free). If you would like assistance from a USPTO Customer Service Representative, call 800-786-9199 (IN USA OR CANADA) or 571-272-1000. /DAVID P TUROCY/ Primary Examiner, Art Unit 1718 Application/Control Number: 17/132,215 Page 2 Art Unit: 1718 Application/Control Number: 17/132,215 Page 3 Art Unit: 1718 Application/Control Number: 17/132,215 Page 4 Art Unit: 1718 Application/Control Number: 17/132,215 Page 5 Art Unit: 1718
Read full office action

Prosecution Timeline

Show 24 earlier events
Jul 07, 2025
Response after Non-Final Action
Sep 02, 2025
Non-Final Rejection mailed — §112
Dec 01, 2025
Response Filed
Dec 19, 2025
Final Rejection mailed — §112
Feb 10, 2026
Response after Non-Final Action
Apr 28, 2026
Request for Continued Examination
Apr 29, 2026
Response after Non-Final Action
Jun 05, 2026
Non-Final Rejection mailed — §112 (current)

Precedent Cases

Applications granted by this same examiner with similar technology

Patent 12698559
METHOD FOR DEPOSITING A FILM
4y 1m to grant Granted Aug 04, 2026
Patent 12681382
METHOD AND APPARATUSES FOR DISPOSING OF EXCESS MATERIAL OF A PHOTOLITHOGRAPHIC MASK
4y 1m to grant Granted Jul 14, 2026
Patent 12673449
MULTI-TOW CARBON FIBER SPREADING AND PRE-IMPREGNATION SYSTEM
3y 0m to grant Granted Jul 07, 2026
Patent 12668551
PROTECTIVE COATING AND APPLICATION METHOD
1y 8m to grant Granted Jun 30, 2026
Patent 12635079
DONOR PLATE, DEPOSITION DEVICE AND DEPOSITION METHOD
2y 9m to grant Granted May 19, 2026
Study what changed to get past this examiner. Based on 5 most recent grants.

Strategy Recommendation AI-generated — please review before filing

Get a prosecution strategy drawn from examiner precedents, rejection analysis, and claim mapping.
Typically takes 5-10 seconds — AI-generated, attorney review required before filing

Prosecution Projections

11-12
Expected OA Rounds
47%
Grant Probability
82%
With Interview (+35.6%)
3y 6m (~0m remaining)
Median Time to Grant
High
PTA Risk
Based on 904 resolved cases by this examiner. Grant probability derived from career allowance rate.

Sign in with your work email

Enter your email to receive a magic link. No password needed.

Personal email addresses (Gmail, Yahoo, etc.) are not accepted.

Free tier: 3 strategy analyses per month