Prosecution Insights
Last updated: October 02, 2026
Application No. 17/584,716

MEMORY DEVICE WITH DUAL CHANNEL TRANSISTOR

Non-Final OA §103
Filed
Jan 26, 2022
Examiner
BAUMAN, SCOTT E
Art Unit
2815
Tech Center
2800 — Semiconductors & Electrical Systems
Assignee
Taiwan Semiconductor Manufacturing Company, Ltd.
OA Round
4 (Non-Final)
47%
Grant Probability
Moderate
4-5
OA Rounds
0m
Est. Remaining
74%
With Interview

Examiner Intelligence

Grants 47% of resolved cases
47%
Career Allowance Rate
89 granted / 189 resolved
-20.9% vs TC avg
Strong +27% interview lift
Without
With
+27.1%
Interview Lift
resolved cases with interview
Typical timeline
3y 7m
Avg Prosecution
33 currently pending
Career history
231
Total Applications
across all art units

Statute-Specific Performance

§103
45.4%
+5.4% vs TC avg
§102
24.4%
-15.6% vs TC avg
§112
26.5%
-13.5% vs TC avg
Black line = Tech Center average estimate • Based on career data from 189 resolved cases

Office Action

§103
DETAILED ACTION Notice of Pre-AIA or AIA Status The present application, filed on or after March 16, 2013, is being examined under the first inventor to file provisions of the AIA . Status of Claims This office action is response amendment filed May 26, 2026. Claims 1-4,8,10-13 ,23-24 and 27-32 are pending. Claims 14, 21 and 22 are withdrawn. Claim 22 has been amended. Claims 5-7, 9, 15-20, 25, 26 have been cancelled. Claim Rejections - 35 USC § 103 In the event the determination of the status of the application as subject to AIA 35 U.S.C. 102 and 103 (or as subject to pre-AIA 35 U.S.C. 102 and 103) is incorrect, any correction of the statutory basis (i.e., changing from AIA to pre-AIA ) for the rejection will not be considered a new ground of rejection if the prior art relied upon, and the rationale supporting the rejection, would be the same under either status. The following is a quotation of 35 U.S.C. 103 which forms the basis for all obviousness rejections set forth in this Office action: A patent for a claimed invention may not be obtained, notwithstanding that the claimed invention is not identically disclosed as set forth in section 102, if the differences between the claimed invention and the prior art are such that the claimed invention as a whole would have been obvious before the effective filing date of the claimed invention to a person having ordinary skill in the art to which the claimed invention pertains. Patentability shall not be negated by the manner in which the invention was made. The factual inquiries for establishing a background for determining obviousness under 35 U.S.C. 103 are summarized as follows: 1. Determining the scope and contents of the prior art. 2. Ascertaining the differences between the prior art and the claims at issue. 3. Resolving the level of ordinary skill in the pertinent art. 4. Considering objective evidence present in the application indicating obviousness or nonobviousness. Claims 11 and 32 are rejected under 35 U.S.C. 103 as being unpatentable over Wu et al (U.S. 2021/0408117), and Yin et al (U.S. 2009/0057745). Regarding claim 11. Wu et al discloses a memory device (FIG. 2N, item 200), comprising: a first transistor (FIG. 2N, item 210) including a gate electrode (FIG. 2N, item 120A and 120B) formed over a surface (FIG. 2N, surface of item 100) a semiconductor substrate (FIG. 2N, item 100), a first drain electrode (FIG. 2N, item 122A), a second drain electrode (FIG. 2N, item 122B) and a source electrode (FIG. 2N, item 124) formed in one layer (FIG. 2N, item 122A, 122B and 124 are in the same layer), arranged in an X-axis direction (FIG. 2N, left/right) that is parallel (FIG. 2N, surface of item 100) to the surface (FIG. 2N, surface of item 100) of the semiconductor substrate (FIG. 2N, item 100), and disposed above the gate electrode (FIG. 2N, item 120A and 120B) in a Z-axis direction (FIG. 2N, up/down) that is transverse to the X-axis direction (FIG. 2N, left/right), wherein the source electrode (FIG. 2N, item 124) is disposed between the first drain electrode (FIG. 2N, item 122A) and the second drain electrode (FIG. 2N, item 122B), a channel feature (FIG. 2N, item 140) disposed between the gate electrode (FIG. 2N, item 120A and 120B) and said one layer (FIG. 2N, item 122A, 122B and 124 are in the same layer) where the first drain electrode (FIG. 2N, item 122A), the second drain electrode (FIG. 2N, item 122B) and the source electrode (FIG. 2N, item 124) are formed, and extending (FIG. 2N, item 140 extends from item 122A to item 122B) from the first drain electrode (FIG. 2N, item 122A) to the second drain electrode (FIG. 2N, item 122B), and a gate dielectric layer (FIG. 2N, item 104) disposed between the gate electrode (FIG. 2N, item 120A and 120B) and the channel feature (FIG. 2N, item 140); and a first capacitor (FIG. 2N, item 150) electrically connected to the source electrode (FIG. 2N, item 124) of the first transistor (FIG. 2N, item 210); wherein the channel feature (FIG. 2N, item 140) has a first channel portion (FIG. 2N, item 140C1) extending between and interconnecting the first drain electrode (FIG. 2N, item 122A) and the source electrode (FIG. 2N, item 124), and a second channel portion (FIG. 2N, item 140C2) extending between and interconnecting the second drain electrode (FIG. 2N, item 122B) and the source electrode (FIG. 2N, item 140C1), and the gate electrode (FIG. 2N, item 120A and 120B) overlaps both of the first channel portion (FIG. 2N, item 140C1) and the second channel portion (FIG. 2N, item 140C2) of the channel feature (FIG. 2N, item 140). Wu et al fails to explicitly disclose a gate electrode formed in one piece, and a projection of the source electrode in the Z-axis direction is fully contained within the gate electrode. However, Yin et al teaches a gate electrode (FIG. 2, item 110) formed in one piece ([0047], i.e. a direction in which the bottom gate electrodes 110 extend may be referred to as a word line direction), and a projection (FIG. 2, item 140) of the source electrode (FIG. 2, item 140) in the Z-axis direction ([0057], i.e. The source electrode 140 and the drain electrode 145 may be extended across the bottom gate electrodes 110) contained within the gate electrode (FIG. 2, item 110). Since Wu et al and Yin et al teach transistors, it would have been obvious to one having ordinary skill in the art of semiconductors before the effective filing date of the claimed invention to have combined the memory device as disclosed to modify Wu et al with the teachings of a gate electrode formed in one piece, and a projection of the source electrode in the Z-axis direction is fully contained within the gate electrode as disclosed by Yin et al. The use of a direction in which the bottom gate electrodes extend may be referred to as a word line direction and the source electrode and the drain electrode may be extended across the bottom gate electrodes in Kuo provides for a nonvolatile memory device having a higher programming and/or erasing efficiency (Yin et al, [0021]). Regarding claim 32. Wu et al and Yin et al discloses all the limitations of the memory device according to claim 11 above. Wu et al further discloses wherein the first drain electrode (FIG. 2N, item 122A) has a first edge (FIG 2N, item first edge) and a second edge (FIG 2N, item second edge) that are opposite to each other in the X-axis direction (FIG. 2N, left/right), and the first edge (FIG 2N, item first edge) is closer to the source electrode (FIG. 2N, item 124) than the second edge; and wherein an edge (FIG 2N, item an edge) of the gate electrode (FIG. 2N, item 120A and 120B) is aligned (FIG 2N, shows an edge is aligned with the first edge) with the first edge (FIG 2N, item first edge) of the first drain electrode (FIG. 2N, item 122A) in the Z-axis direction (FIG. 2N, item up/down), PNG media_image1.png 507 683 media_image1.png Greyscale Yin et al further disclose the gate electrode (FIG. 2, item 110) overlaps the second drain electrode (FIG. 2, item 145a on right) in the Z-axis direction ([0057], i.e. The source electrode 140 and the drain electrode 145 may be extended across the bottom gate electrodes 110). Claims 11-13, and 27 are rejected under 35 U.S.C. 103 as being unpatentable over Petti et al (U.S. 2023/0077181) with priority to U.S. Provisional Patent Application No. 63/240,715 filed Sep. 3, 2021, and Yin et al (U.S. 7,994,588). Regarding claim 11. Petti et al discloses a memory device (FIG. 1), comprising: a first transistor (FIG. 1, item 11-5, 11-4) including a gate electrode (FIG. 1, item 28) formed in one piece over a surface (FIG. 1, item a semiconductor substrate (FIG. 1, item 12), a first drain electrode (FIG. 1, item 11-4, item BL), a second drain electrode (FIG. 1, item 11-5, item BL) and a source electrode (FIG. 1, item SL) formed in one layer (FIG. 1, item 11; [0037]-[0038]), arranged in an X-axis direction (FIG. 1, item Z), and disposed above the gate electrode (FIG. 1, item 28) in a Z-axis direction (FIG. 1, item X) that is transverse to the X-axis direction (FIG. 1, item Z), wherein the source electrode (FIG. 1, item SL) is disposed between the first drain electrode (FIG. 1, item 11-4, item BL) and the second drain electrode (FIG. 1, item 11-5, item BL), a channel feature (FIG. 1, item 25) disposed between the gate electrode (FIG. 1, item 28) and said one layer (FIG. 1, item 11; [0037]-[0038]) where the first drain electrode (FIG. 1, item 11-4, item BL), the second drain electrode (FIG. 1, item 11-5, item BL) and the source electrode (FIG. 1, item SL) are formed, and extending ([0039]-[0040]) from the first drain electrode (FIG. 1, item 11-4, item BL) to the second drain electrode (FIG. 1, item 11-5, item BL), and a gate dielectric layer (FIG. 1, item 26) disposed between ([0039]-[0040]) the gate electrode (FIG. 1, item 28) and the channel feature (FIG. 1, item 25); and a first capacitor ([0062]) electrically ([0062]) connected to the source electrode (FIG. 1, item SL) of the first transistor (FIG. 1, item 11-4, 11-5); wherein the channel feature (FIG. 1, item 25) has a first channel portion (FIG. 1, item 11-4, item 25) extending between and interconnecting the first drain electrode (FIG. 1, item 11-4, item BL) and the source electrode (FIG. 1, item SL), and a second channel portion (FIG. 1, item 11-5, item 25) extending between and interconnecting the second drain electrode (FIG. 1, item 11-5, item BL) and the source electrode (FIG. 1, item SL), and the gate electrode (FIG. 1, item 28) overlaps both of the first channel portion (FIG. 1, item 11-4, item 25) and the second channel portion (FIG. 1, item 11-5, item 25) of the channel feature (FIG. 1, item 25). Petti et al fails to explicitly disclose X-axis is parallel to the surface of the semiconductor wafer and a projection of the source electrode in the Z-axis direction is fully contained within the gate electrode However, Yin et al teaches a first drain (FIG. 2, item 145a on left), second drain (FIG. 2, item 145a on right) and a source electrode (FIG. 2, item 140) in the X-axis ([0047], i.e. a direction in which the bottom gate electrodes 110 extend may be referred to as a word line direction) is parallel (FIG. 2 shows items 145a on left, 145a on right, and 140 are parallel to the surface of item 105) to the surface (FIG. 2, surface of item 105) of the semiconductor wafer (FIG. 2, item 105) and a projection (FIG. 1, item 140) of the source electrode (FIG. 2, item 140) in the Z-axis direction ([0057], i.e. The source electrode 140 and the drain electrode 145 may be extended across the bottom gate electrodes 110) contained within the gate electrode (FIG. 2, item 110). Since Petti et al and Yin et al teach transistors, it would have been obvious to one having ordinary skill in the art of semiconductors before the effective filing date of the claimed invention to have combined the memory device as disclosed to modify Petti et al with the teachings of parallel to the surface of the semiconductor wafer and a projection of the source electrode in the Z-axis direction is fully contained within the gate electrode as disclosed by Yin et al. The use of the horizontally redundant thin film transistors (TFTS) are disclosed having a U-shaped split gate in Kuo provides for horizontally redundant has large W/L and Ion /Ioff ratios, and occupies a small area (Kuo, [ABSTRACT]). Regarding claim 12. Petti et al and Yin et al discloses all the limitations of the memory device according to claim 11 above. Petti et al further discloses further comprising: a second transistor (FIG. 1, item 11-6, 11-7) including a gate electrode (FIG. 1, item 28) formed on the semiconductor substrate (FIG. 1, item 12), a first drain electrode (FIG. 1, item 11-6, item BL), a second drain electrode (FIG. 1, item 11-7, item BL) and a source electrode (FIG. 1, item SL) formed in said one layer (FIG. 1, item 11; [0037]-[0038]), arranged in the X-axis direction (FIG. 1, item Z), and disposed above the gate electrode (FIG. 1, item 28), wherein the source electrode (FIG. 1, item SL) of the second transistor (FIG. 1, item 11-6, 11-7) is disposed between the first drain electrode (FIG. 1, item 11-6, item BL) of the second transistor (FIG. 1, item 11-6, 11-7) and the second drain electrode (FIG. 1, item 11-7, item BL) of the second transistor (FIG. 1, item 11-6, 11-7), a channel feature (FIG. 1, item 25) disposed between the gate electrode (FIG. 1, item 28) and said one layer (FIG. 1, item 11; [0037]-[0038]), and extending from the first drain electrode (FIG. 1, item 11-6, item BL) to the second drain electrode (FIG. 1, item 11-7, item BL), and a gate dielectric layer (FIG. 1, item 26) disposed between the gate electrode (FIG. 1, item 28) and the channel feature (FIG. 1, item 25); and a second capacitor ([0062]) electrically connected ([0062]) to the source electrode (FIG. 1, item SL) of the second transistor(FIG. 1, item 11-6, 11-7); wherein, for the second transistor (FIG. 1, item 11-6, 11-7), the channel feature (FIG. 1, item 25) has a first channel portion (FIG. 1, item 11-6, item 25) extending between and interconnecting the first drain electrode (FIG. 1, item 11-6, item BL) and the source electrode (FIG. 1, item SL), and a second channel portion (FIG. 1, item 11-7, item 25) extending between and interconnecting the second drain electrode (FIG. 1, item 11-7, item BL) and the source electrode (FIG. 1, item SL), and the gate electrode (FIG. 1, item 28) overlaps both of the first channel portion (FIG. 1, item 11-6, item 25) and the second channel portion (FIG. 1, item 11-7, item 25) of the channel feature (FIG. 1, item 25); and wherein the channel features (FIG. 1, item 25) of the first transistor (FIG. 1, item 11-4, 11-5) and the second transistor (FIG. 1, item 11-6, 11-7) are formed in one piece (FIG. 1, item 25). Regarding claim 13. Petti et al and Yin at al discloses all the limitations of the memory device according to claim 12 above. Petti et al further discloses wherein the second drain electrode (FIG. 1, item 11-5, item BL) of the first transistor (FIG. 1, item 11-4, 11-5) and the first drain electrode (FIG. 1, item 11-6, item BL) of the second transistor (FIG. 1, item 11-6, 11-7) are formed in one piece (FIG. 9(g), item 112; [0103]). Regarding claim 27. Petti et al and Yin et al discloses all the limitations of the memory device according to claim 13 above. petti et al further discloses wherein a projection of a combination of the second drain electrode (FIG. 1, item 11-4, item BL) of the first transistor (FIG. 1, item 11-4, 11-5) and the first drain electrode (FIG. 1, item 11-6, item BL) of the second transistor (FIG. 1, item 11-6, 11-7) along the Z-axis direction (FIG. 1, item X) extends from the gate electrode (FIG. 1, item 28) of the first transistor (FIG. 1, item 11-4, 11-5) to the gate electrode (FIG. 1, item 28) of the second transistor (FIG. 1, item 11-6, 11-7). Allowable Subject Matter Claims 1-4, 8, 10, 23, 24, 28-31 allowed. Response to Arguments Applicant's arguments filed May 29, 2026 have been fully considered but they are not persuasive. Applicant’s arguments with respect to claim(s) 11-13, 27 and 32 have been considered but are moot because the new ground of rejection does not rely on any reference applied in the prior rejection of record for any teaching or matter specifically challenged in the argument. Conclusion Any inquiry concerning this communication or earlier communications from the examiner should be directed to SCOTT E BAUMAN whose telephone number is (469)295-9045. The examiner can normally be reached M-F, 9-5 CST. Examiner interviews are available via telephone, in-person, and video conferencing using a USPTO supplied web-based collaboration tool. To schedule an interview, applicant is encouraged to use the USPTO Automated Interview Request (AIR) at http://www.uspto.gov/interviewpractice. If attempts to reach the examiner by telephone are unsuccessful, the examiner’s supervisor, Joshua Benitez can be reached at 571-270-1435. The fax phone number for the organization where this application or proceeding is assigned is 571-273-8300. Information regarding the status of published or unpublished applications may be obtained from Patent Center. Unpublished application information in Patent Center is available to registered users. To file and manage patent submissions in Patent Center, visit: https://patentcenter.uspto.gov. Visit https://www.uspto.gov/patents/apply/patent-center for more information about Patent Center and https://www.uspto.gov/patents/docx for information about filing in DOCX format. For additional questions, contact the Electronic Business Center (EBC) at 866-217-9197 (toll-free). If you would like assistance from a USPTO Customer Service Representative, call 800-786-9199 (IN USA OR CANADA) or 571-272-1000. /S.E.B./ Examiner, Art Unit 2815 /JOSHUA BENITEZ ROSARIO/Supervisory Patent Examiner, Art Unit 2815
Read full office action

Prosecution Timeline

Show 2 earlier events
Jan 16, 2025
Response Filed
Jun 11, 2025
Final Rejection mailed — §103
Aug 06, 2025
Response after Non-Final Action
Sep 03, 2025
Request for Continued Examination
Sep 09, 2025
Response after Non-Final Action
Feb 25, 2026
Non-Final Rejection mailed — §103
May 26, 2026
Response Filed
Aug 20, 2026
Non-Final Rejection mailed — §103 (current)

Precedent Cases

Applications granted by this same examiner with similar technology

Patent 12696439
SEMICONDUCTOR DEVICE INCLUDING AN INSULATING STRUCTURE ON A SIDEWALL OF A LANDING PAD
4y 7m to grant Granted Jul 28, 2026
Patent 12628461
PASSIVATION METHOD FOR A PASSAGE OPENING OF A WAFER
5y 8m to grant Granted May 12, 2026
Patent 12588185
METHOD OF FABRICATING SEMICONDUCTOR MEMORY DEVICE INCLUDING CAPPING LAYER
3y 11m to grant Granted Mar 24, 2026
Patent 12506002
METHOD OF MANUFACTURING SEMICONDUCTOR DEVICE USING PLASMA TO MODIFY SURFACE OF SILICON-CONTAINING FILMS EXPOSED IN TRENCH STRUCTURE, AND RECORDING MEDIUM
8y 9m to grant Granted Dec 23, 2025
Patent 12406946
INTEGRATED CIRCUIT FOR PREVENTION OF CIRCUIT DESIGN THEFT
4y 7m to grant Granted Sep 02, 2025
Study what changed to get past this examiner. Based on 5 most recent grants.

Strategy Recommendation AI-generated — please review before filing

Get a prosecution strategy drawn from examiner precedents, rejection analysis, and claim mapping.
Typically takes 5-10 seconds — AI-generated, attorney review required before filing

Prosecution Projections

4-5
Expected OA Rounds
47%
Grant Probability
74%
With Interview (+27.1%)
3y 7m (~0m remaining)
Median Time to Grant
High
PTA Risk
Based on 189 resolved cases by this examiner. Grant probability derived from career allowance rate.

Sign in with your work email

Enter your email to receive a magic link. No password needed.

Personal email addresses (Gmail, Yahoo, etc.) are not accepted.

Free tier: 3 strategy analyses per month