Prosecution Insights
Last updated: April 19, 2026
Application No. 17/721,723

Semiconductor Structure And Method For Forming The Same

Non-Final OA §102
Filed
Apr 15, 2022
Examiner
FOX, BRANDON C
Art Unit
2818
Tech Center
2800 — Semiconductors & Electrical Systems
Assignee
Taiwan Semiconductor Manufacturing Company Ltd.
OA Round
3 (Non-Final)
86%
Grant Probability
Favorable
3-4
OA Rounds
2y 5m
To Grant
96%
With Interview

Examiner Intelligence

Grants 86% — above average
86%
Career Allow Rate
686 granted / 800 resolved
+17.8% vs TC avg
Moderate +10% lift
Without
With
+10.0%
Interview Lift
resolved cases with interview
Typical timeline
2y 5m
Avg Prosecution
24 currently pending
Career history
824
Total Applications
across all art units

Statute-Specific Performance

§101
0.4%
-39.6% vs TC avg
§103
56.9%
+16.9% vs TC avg
§102
33.9%
-6.1% vs TC avg
§112
5.9%
-34.1% vs TC avg
Black line = Tech Center average estimate • Based on career data from 800 resolved cases

Office Action

§102
DETAILED ACTION Notice of Pre-AIA or AIA Status The present application, filed on or after March 16, 2013, is being examined under the first inventor to file provisions of the AIA . This is a Non-Final office action in response to reply filed March 2, 2026. Claims 1-2, 4-10, 12-22 are currently pending and have been considered below. Continued Examination Under 37 CFR 1.114 A request for continued examination under 37 CFR 1.114, including the fee set forth in 37 CFR 1.17(e), was filed in this application after final rejection. Since this application is eligible for continued examination under 37 CFR 1.114, and the fee set forth in 37 CFR 1.17(e) has been timely paid, the finality of the previous Office action has been withdrawn pursuant to 37 CFR 1.114. Applicant's submission filed on March 2, 2026 has been entered. Claim Rejections - 35 USC § 102 The following is a quotation of the appropriate paragraphs of 35 U.S.C. 102 that form the basis for the rejections under this section made in this Office action: A person shall be entitled to a patent unless – (a)(1) the claimed invention was patented, described in a printed publication, or in public use, on sale, or otherwise available to the public before the effective filing date of the claimed invention. Claim(s) 16-20 is/are rejected under 35 U.S.C. 102(a)(1) as being anticipated by Tsai (Pre-Grant Publication 2021/0125875). Regarding claim 16, Tsai discloses a semiconductor device comprising: a substrate having a base (Fig. 18b, 20), a first semiconductor fin structure (24), and a second semiconductor fin structure (24) over the base; an isolation structure (22) over the base, wherein the first semiconductor fin structure and the second semiconductor fin structure are partially in the isolation structure; a dielectric fin structure (25) partially embedded in the isolation structure and between the first semiconductor fin structure and the second semiconductor fin structure; a first gate stack (94) wrapping around the first semiconductor fin structure and over a first side of the dielectric fin structure; a second gate stack (94) wrapping around the second semiconductor fin structure and over a second side of the dielectric fin structure; and a gate cut isolation structure (60) over the dielectric fin structure, wherein the dielectric fin structure and the gate cut isolation structure electrically insulate the first gate stack from the second gate stack, wherein a top surface of the dielectric fin structure is level with top surfaces of the first and second semiconductor fin structures, wherein the gate cut isolation structure (60) is spaced apart from the isolation structure (22) (Paragraph [0021]). Regarding claim 17, Tsai further discloses: the dielectric fin structure has an upper portion between the first gate stack and the second gate stack, and a sum of a first thickness of the upper portion and a second thickness of the gate cut isolation structure is greater than a third thickness of the first gate stack (Fig. 18b). Regarding claim 18-20, Tsai further discloses: A gate cut isolation structure opening (Fig. 12, 56) to be filled by dielectric material (60’) and a dielectric fin (25) wherein the bottom portion of the gate cut isolation structure extends into the dielectric fin structure and the top portion of the dielectric fin extends into the bottom portion of the gate cut isolation structure. Tsai further discloses the dielectric fin (25) extends through isolation material (22) (Paragraph [0021]). Allowable Subject Matter Claims 1-2, 4-10, 12-15 & 21-22 allowed. The following is an examiner’s statement of reasons for allowance: Claim 1 is allowed because none of the prior art either alone or in combination discloses a semiconductor structure comprising: a gate cut isolation structure over the dielectric fin structure and between the first gate stack and the second gate stack, wherein the gate cut isolation structure comprises a protection layer and a fill layer over the protection layer, and the protection layer and the fill layer are made of different materials, wherein the protection layer of the gate cut isolation structure comprises an upper portion and a lower portion wider than the upper portion, in combination with the other limitations of claim 1. Claims 2, 4-8, & 21 are also allowed based on their dependency from claim 1. Claim 9 is allowed because none of the prior art either alone or in combination discloses a semiconductor structure comprising: an interlayer dielectric layer over the source/drain feature, wherein the protection layer includes a first portion between the fill layer and the interlayer dielectric layer and a second portion between the fill layer and the first gate stack, the first portion of the protection layer has a first thickness as measured in a first horizontal direction, the second portion of the protection layer has a second thickness as measured in a second horizontal direction perpendicular to the first horizontal direction, and the first thickness is greater than the second thickness, in combination with the other limitations of claim 9. Claims 10, 12-15 & 22 are also allowed based on their dependency from claim 9. Any comments considered necessary by applicant must be submitted no later than the payment of the issue fee and, to avoid processing delays, should preferably accompany the issue fee. Such submissions should be clearly labeled “Comments on Statement of Reasons for Allowance.” Response to Arguments Applicant’s arguments with respect to claim(s) 16 have been considered but are moot because the new ground of rejection does not rely on any reference applied in the prior rejection of record for any teaching or matter specifically challenged in the argument. Conclusion Any inquiry concerning this communication or earlier communications from the examiner should be directed to BRANDON C FOX whose telephone number is (571)270-5016. The examiner can normally be reached M-F 9:00AM-6:00PM. Examiner interviews are available via telephone, in-person, and video conferencing using a USPTO supplied web-based collaboration tool. To schedule an interview, applicant is encouraged to use the USPTO Automated Interview Request (AIR) at http://www.uspto.gov/interviewpractice. If attempts to reach the examiner by telephone are unsuccessful, the examiner’s supervisor, Jeff W Natalini can be reached at 571-272-2266. The fax phone number for the organization where this application or proceeding is assigned is 571-273-8300. Information regarding the status of published or unpublished applications may be obtained from Patent Center. Unpublished application information in Patent Center is available to registered users. To file and manage patent submissions in Patent Center, visit: https://patentcenter.uspto.gov. Visit https://www.uspto.gov/patents/apply/patent-center for more information about Patent Center and https://www.uspto.gov/patents/docx for information about filing in DOCX format. For additional questions, contact the Electronic Business Center (EBC) at 866-217-9197 (toll-free). If you would like assistance from a USPTO Customer Service Representative, call 800-786-9199 (IN USA OR CANADA) or 571-272-1000. /BRANDON C FOX/Examiner, Art Unit 2818 /DAVID VU/Primary Examiner, Art Unit 2818
Read full office action

Prosecution Timeline

Apr 15, 2022
Application Filed
Jun 24, 2025
Non-Final Rejection — §102
Sep 23, 2025
Response Filed
Nov 26, 2025
Final Rejection — §102
Mar 02, 2026
Request for Continued Examination
Mar 11, 2026
Response after Non-Final Action
Mar 21, 2026
Non-Final Rejection — §102 (current)

Precedent Cases

Applications granted by this same examiner with similar technology

Patent 12598785
Semiconductor Devices and Methods of Manufacturing
2y 5m to grant Granted Apr 07, 2026
Patent 12593476
FIN FIELD-EFFECT TRANSISTOR DEVICE WITH HYBRID CONDUCTION MECHANISM
2y 5m to grant Granted Mar 31, 2026
Patent 12588213
SEMICONDUCTOR MEMORY STRUCTURE HAVING ENHANCED MEMORY WINDOW AND METHOD FOR MANUFACTURING THE SAME
2y 5m to grant Granted Mar 24, 2026
Patent 12588291
SUBSTRATES INCLUDING MICRO-STRUCTURED THIN FILM CAPACITORS
2y 5m to grant Granted Mar 24, 2026
Patent 12581635
INTEGRATED CIRCUIT DEVICE AND METHOD
2y 5m to grant Granted Mar 17, 2026
Study what changed to get past this examiner. Based on 5 most recent grants.

AI Strategy Recommendation

Get an AI-powered prosecution strategy using examiner precedents, rejection analysis, and claim mapping.
Powered by AI — typically takes 5-10 seconds

Prosecution Projections

3-4
Expected OA Rounds
86%
Grant Probability
96%
With Interview (+10.0%)
2y 5m
Median Time to Grant
High
PTA Risk
Based on 800 resolved cases by this examiner. Grant probability derived from career allow rate.

Sign in with your work email

Enter your email to receive a magic link. No password needed.

Personal email addresses (Gmail, Yahoo, etc.) are not accepted.

Free tier: 3 strategy analyses per month