Prosecution Insights
Last updated: October 01, 2026
Application No. 17/744,585

INSULATED-GATE BIPOLAR TRANSISTOR (IGBT) DEVICE WITH 3D ISOLATION

Non-Final OA §103
Filed
May 13, 2022
Examiner
NADAV, ORI
Art Unit
2811
Tech Center
2800 — Semiconductors & Electrical Systems
Assignee
Taiwan Semiconductor Manufacturing Company, Ltd.
OA Round
5 (Non-Final)
60%
Grant Probability
Moderate
5-6
OA Rounds
0m
Est. Remaining
81%
With Interview

Examiner Intelligence

Grants 60% of resolved cases
60%
Career Allowance Rate
426 granted / 710 resolved
-8.0% vs TC avg
Strong +21% interview lift
Without
With
+21.2%
Interview Lift
resolved cases with interview
Typical timeline
3y 9m
Avg Prosecution
52 currently pending
Career history
778
Total Applications
across all art units

Statute-Specific Performance

§101
0.4%
-39.6% vs TC avg
§103
55.5%
+15.5% vs TC avg
§102
9.8%
-30.2% vs TC avg
§112
30.9%
-9.1% vs TC avg
Black line = Tech Center average estimate • Based on career data from 710 resolved cases

Office Action

§103
The present application, filed on or after March 16, 2013, is being examined under the first inventor to file provisions of the AIA DETAILED ACTION Claim Rejections - 35 USC § 103 In the event the determination of the status of the application as subject to AIA 35 U.S.C. 102 and 103 (or as subject to pre-AIA 35 U.S.C. 102 and 103) is incorrect, any correction of the statutory basis for the rejection will not be considered a new ground of rejection if the prior art relied upon, and the rationale supporting the rejection, would be the same under either status. The following is a quotation of 35 U.S.C. 103 which forms the basis for all obviousness rejections set forth in this Office action: A patent for a claimed invention may not be obtained, notwithstanding that the claimed invention is not identically disclosed as set forth in section 102 of this title, if the differences between the claimed invention and the prior art are such that the claimed invention as a whole would have been obvious before the effective filing date of the claimed invention to a person having ordinary skill in the art to which the claimed invention pertains. Patentability shall not be negated by the manner in which the invention was made. Claims 1-14, 17-18 and 21-24 are rejected under 35 U.S.C. 103 as being unpatentable over Takei et al. (2005/0082640) in view of Mori et al. (EP 0338312 B1).Regarding claims 1, 17 and 21, Takei et al. teach in figure 1b and related text an insulated gate bipolar transistor (IGBT) comprising: a semiconductor substrate 100 having a top surface extending in a horizontal plane; a collector region 15/2 of a first conductive type P disposed on and in direct contact with the substrate wherein the collector region comprises a continuous region of the first conductive type and is free of regions of a second conductive type; a collector electrode 16 disposed on and in direct contact with the collector region; a buffer region (the bottom region of element 1) of the second conductive type N opposite to the first conductive type disposed on the collector region; a drift region (the top region of element 1) of the second conductive type N disposed on the buffer region; a body region 3 of the first conductive type P disposed in the drift region; and at least one source region 6 of the second conductive type N disposed in the body region, wherein the collector electrode 16 is spaced apart from the buffer region 1 in the horizontal plane. Takei et al. do not teach having a three-dimensional (3D) isolation region comprising a silicon compound having a bottom portion and a sidewall portion, wherein the collector region disposed on and in direct contact with the 3D isolation region. Mori et al. teach in figure 7A and related text a three-dimensional (3D) isolation region (located between substrate 2 and collector 21) comprising a compound having a bottom portion and a sidewall portion, wherein the collector region 21 disposed on and in direct contact with the 3D isolation region. Mori et al. and Takei et al. are analogous art because they are directed to IGBT semiconductor devices and one of ordinary skill in the art would have had a reasonable expectation of success to modify Takei et al. because they are from the same field of endeavor. It would have been obvious to a person of ordinary skill in the art, before the effective filling date of the claimed invention, to form a three-dimensional (3D) isolation region having a bottom portion and a sidewall portion, wherein the collector region disposed on and in direct contact with the 3D isolation region, as taught by Mori et al., and to form the three-dimensional (3D) isolation region comprising a silicon compound, in Takei et al.’s device, in order to improve isolation of the device and in order to simplify the processing steps of the device. In the combined device, the 3D isolation region and the top surface of the semiconductor substrate enclose the collector region, the buffer region, the drift region, the body region, and the at least one source region. Regarding claim 17, the combined device teaches substantially the entire claimed structure including a 3D isolation region having a bottom portion and a sidewall portion and wherein the sidewall portion separates the collector region, the buffer region, the drift region, the body region, and the at least one source region from the semiconductor substrate in the horizontal plane, while the bottom portion separates the collector region, the buffer region, the drift region, the body region, and the at least one source region from the semiconductor substrate in a vertical direction. The combined device does not teach an integrated circuit (IC) embedded in the semiconductor substrate. It would have been obvious to a person of ordinary skill in the art, before the effective filling date of the claimed invention, to embed an integrated circuit (IC) in the semiconductor substrate in prior art’s device in order to reduce the size of the device. Regarding claims 2 and 22, in the combined device, the sidewall portion extends upwardly from a perimeter of the bottom portion and reaches the top surface of the semiconductor substrate. Regarding claim 3, in the combined device, the sidewall portion and the bottom portion define an angle. Regarding claims 4-5, it would have been obvious to a person of ordinary skill in the art, before the effective filling date of the claimed invention, to form the angle is between 85 degrees and 120 degrees in prior art’s device in order to adjust the device characteristics according to the requirements of the application at hand. Regarding claims 6-7, it would have been obvious to a person of ordinary skill in the art, before the effective filling date of the claimed invention, to form the sidewall portion and the bottom portion define a round corner wherein a radius of the round corner is larger than 0.05 pm, in prior art’s device in order to adjust the device characteristics according to the requirements of the application at hand. Regarding claims 8-10, in the combined device, the sidewall portion encircles the collector region, the buffer region, the drift region, the body region, and the at least one source region in the horizontal plane, and wherein the collector region and the top surface of the semiconductor substrate enclose the buffer region, the drift region, the body region, and the at least one source region, and wherein the buffer region and the top surface of the semiconductor substrate enclose the drift region, the body region, and the at least one source region. Regarding claims 11-12, it would have been obvious to a person of ordinary skill in the art, before the effective filling date of the claimed invention, to form the silicon compound to be silicon dioxide and silicon nitride in prior art’s device in order to simplify the processing steps of making the device. Regarding claim 13, Takei et al. teach in figure 1b and related text that the semiconductor substrate is a silicon substate. Regarding claim 14, Takei et al. teach in figure 1b and related text at least one emitter electrode 6 disposed on the top surface of the semiconductor substrate; at least one collector electrode 14 disposed on the top surface of the semiconductor substrate; at least one gate dielectric structure 7 disposed on the top surface of the semiconductor substrate; and at least one gate electrode 8 disposed on the at least one gate dielectric structure. Regarding claim 18, it would have been obvious to a person of ordinary skill in the art, before the effective filling date of the claimed invention, to form the integrated circuit lateral to the IGBT in the horizontal plane, and the integrated circuit and the IGBT are separated by a shallow trench isolation structure and the 3D isolation region in prior art’s device in order to prevent current interference from the IGBT and the IC. Regarding claim 23, in the combined device, the sidewall portion encircles the collector region, the buffer region, the drift region, the body region, and the at least one source region in the horizontal plane. Regarding claim 24, in the combined device, the collector region and the top surface of the semiconductor substrate enclose the buffer region, the drift region, the body region, and the at least one source region. Response to Arguments Applicants argue that prior art does not teach that the collector electrode is spaced apart from the buffer region in the horizontal plane, because “Mori explicitly teaches that the collector electrode (4) must short- circuit the p-type collector (11) and the n-type buffer (34/21). Mori states this is essential to "shorten the lifetime of minority carriers thereby enhancing the switching speed" and to prevent latch-up. In contrast, amended claim 1 recites that the collector electrode is "spaced apart from the buffer region in the horizontal plane". This structural limitation physically prevents the short- circuiting that Mori teaches is necessary”. Mori was not cited to teach that the collector electrode is spaced apart from the buffer region in the horizontal plane. Mori was cited to teach an artisan that Takei et al.’s structure can be surrounded by a three-dimensional (3D) isolation region which comprises a silicon compound having a bottom portion and a sidewall portion, and wherein the collector region disposed on and in direct contact with the 3D isolation region. The primary reference to Takei teaches collector electrode 16 is spaced apart from the buffer region 1 in the horizontal plane, as required by the claims. Any inquiry concerning this communication or earlier communications from the examiner should be directed to ORI NADAV whose telephone number is 571-272-1660. The examiner can normally be reached between the hours of 7 AM to 4 PM (Eastern Standard Time) Monday through Friday. If attempts to reach the examiner by telephone are unsuccessful, the examiner’s supervisor, Lynne Gurley can be reached on 571-272-1670. The fax phone number for the organization where this application or proceeding is assigned is 571-273-8300. Information regarding the status of an application may be obtained from the Patent Application Information Retrieval (PAIR) system. Status information for published applications may be obtained from either Private PAIR or Public PAIR. Status information for unpublished applications is available through Private PAIR only. For more information about the PAIR system, see http://pair-direct.uspto.gov. Should you have questions on access to the Private PAIR system, contact the Electronic Business Center (EBC) at 866-217-9197 (toll-free). O.N. /ORI NADAV/ 4/27/2026 PRIMARY EXAMINER TECHNOLOGY CENTER 2800
Read full office action

Prosecution Timeline

Show 8 earlier events
Sep 24, 2025
Non-Final Rejection mailed — §103
Nov 20, 2025
Examiner Interview Summary
Nov 20, 2025
Applicant Interview (Telephonic)
Dec 23, 2025
Response Filed
Jan 09, 2026
Final Rejection mailed — §103
Mar 09, 2026
Request for Continued Examination
Mar 16, 2026
Response after Non-Final Action
Sep 23, 2026
Non-Final Rejection mailed — §103 (current)

Precedent Cases

Applications granted by this same examiner with similar technology

Patent 12733260
DISPLAY APPARATUS
3y 2m to grant Granted Sep 08, 2026
Patent 12726559
DISPLAY DEVICE
4y 8m to grant Granted Sep 01, 2026
Patent 12727316
Light-Emitting Device, Light-Emitting Apparatus, Light-Emitting Module, Electronic Device, and Lighting Device
4y 9m to grant Granted Sep 01, 2026
Patent 12727154
SEMICONDUCTOR DEVICE
3y 10m to grant Granted Sep 01, 2026
Patent 12720969
ORGANIC LIGHT EMITTING PANEL AND ORGANIC LIGHT EMITTING DISPLAY DEVICE
4y 9m to grant Granted Aug 25, 2026
Study what changed to get past this examiner. Based on 5 most recent grants.

Strategy Recommendation AI-generated — please review before filing

Get a prosecution strategy drawn from examiner precedents, rejection analysis, and claim mapping.
Typically takes 5-10 seconds — AI-generated, attorney review required before filing

Prosecution Projections

5-6
Expected OA Rounds
60%
Grant Probability
81%
With Interview (+21.2%)
3y 9m (~0m remaining)
Median Time to Grant
High
PTA Risk
Based on 710 resolved cases by this examiner. Grant probability derived from career allowance rate.

Sign in with your work email

Enter your email to receive a magic link. No password needed.

Personal email addresses (Gmail, Yahoo, etc.) are not accepted.

Free tier: 3 strategy analyses per month