Prosecution Insights
Last updated: May 29, 2026
Application No. 17/811,804

LEADLESS SEMICONDUCTOR PACKAGE WITH DE-METALLIZED POROUS STRUCTURES AND METHOD FOR MANUFACTURING THE SAME

Non-Final OA §112
Filed
Jul 11, 2022
Priority
Jul 30, 2021 — provisional 63/227,859
Examiner
ARROYO, TERESA M
Art Unit
2893
Tech Center
2800 — Semiconductors & Electrical Systems
Assignee
STMicroelectronics
OA Round
2 (Non-Final)
72%
Grant Probability
Favorable
2-3
OA Rounds
0m
Est. Remaining
95%
With Interview

Examiner Intelligence

Grants 72% — above average
72%
Career Allowance Rate
353 granted / 491 resolved
+3.9% vs TC avg
Strong +23% interview lift
Without
With
+22.9%
Interview Lift
resolved cases with interview
Typical timeline
3y 0m
Avg Prosecution
25 currently pending
Career history
533
Total Applications
across all art units

Statute-Specific Performance

§101
0.1%
-39.9% vs TC avg
§103
80.4%
+40.4% vs TC avg
§102
9.4%
-30.6% vs TC avg
§112
7.3%
-32.7% vs TC avg
Black line = Tech Center average estimate • Based on career data from 491 resolved cases

Office Action

§112
DETAILED ACTION Notice of Pre-AIA or AIA Status The present application, filed on or after March 16, 2013, is being examined under the first inventor to file provisions of the AIA . Claim Objections Claims 15-29 is/are objected to because of the following informalities: Claim 21 is more of a “package” since like claim 15, it includes a die. Appropriate correction is required. Claim Rejections - 35 USC § 112 The following is a quotation of 35 U.S.C. 112(b): (b) CONCLUSION.—The specification shall conclude with one or more claims particularly pointing out and distinctly claiming the subject matter which the inventor or a joint inventor regards as the invention. The following is a quotation of 35 U.S.C. 112 (pre-AIA ), second paragraph: The specification shall conclude with one or more claims particularly pointing out and distinctly claiming the subject matter which the applicant regards as his invention. Claim limitations “by filling” in claims and “interlocking with” in claims 15, 21 has been evaluated under the three-prong test set forth in MPEP § 2181, subsection I, but the result is inconclusive. Thus, it is unclear whether this limitation should be interpreted under 35 U.S.C. 112(f) or pre-AIA 35 U.S.C. 112, sixth paragraph, because the claim limitation uses a generic placeholder (by and with) coupled with functional language (filling and interlocking), but it is modified by some structure or material that is ambiguous regarding whether that structure or material is sufficient for performing the claimed function;. The boundaries of this claim limitation are ambiguous; therefore, the claim is indefinite and is rejected under 35 U.S.C. 112(b) or pre-AIA 35 U.S.C. 112, second paragraph. In response to this rejection, applicant must clarify whether this limitation should be interpreted under 35 U.S.C. 112(f) or pre-AIA 35 U.S.C. 112, sixth paragraph. Mere assertion regarding applicant’s intent to invoke or not invoke 35 U.S.C. 112(f) or pre-AIA 35 U.S.C. 112, sixth paragraph is insufficient. Applicant may: (a) Amend the claim to clearly invoke 35 U.S.C. 112(f) or pre-AIA 35 U.S.C. 112, sixth paragraph, by reciting “means” or a generic placeholder for means, or by reciting “step.” The “means,” generic placeholder, or “step” must be modified by functional language, and must not be modified by sufficient structure, material, or acts for performing the claimed function; (b) Present a sufficient showing that 35 U.S.C. 112(f) or pre-AIA 35 U.S.C. 112, sixth paragraph, should apply because the claim limitation recites a function to be performed and does not recite sufficient structure, material, or acts to perform that function; (c) Amend the claim to clearly avoid invoking 35 U.S.C. 112(f) or pre-AIA 35 U.S.C. 112, sixth paragraph, by deleting the function or by reciting sufficient structure, material or acts to perform the recited function; or (d) Present a sufficient showing that 35 U.S.C. 112(f) or pre-AIA 35 U.S.C. 112, sixth paragraph, does not apply because the limitation does not recite a function or does recite a function along with sufficient structure, material or acts to perform that function. Examiner suggests claims 15 and 21 (and any corresponding dependent claims) be amended as follows to clearly avoid invoking 35 U.S.C. 112(f) or pre-AIA 35 U.S.C. 112, sixth paragraph: 15. (Currently Amended) A semiconductor package, comprising: a first part of a substrate having a first surface transverse to a second surface; a second part of the substrate having a third surface transverse to a fourth surface, the fourth surface facing the second surface; a semiconductor die on the first surface of the first part of the substrate; a first conductive layer on the third surface of the second part of the substrate; an intermetallic compound at the second surface of the first part of the substrate and the fourth surface of the second part of the substrate, the intermetallic compound having a porous surface at the second surface and the fourth surface including a plurality of pores; a second conductive layer having a first end opposite of a second end, the first end of the second conductive layer electrically coupled to the first conductive layer and the second end of the second conductive layer electrically coupled to the semiconductor die; a molding substance interlocked with the irregular surface of the intermetallic compound at the second surface of the first part of the substrate and the fourth surface of the second part of the substrate and fills pores of the porous surface of the intermetallic compound. 21. (Currently Amended) A device, comprising: a substrate including: a first portion having a first surface and a second surface transverse to the first surface; and a second portion having a third surface and a fourth surface transverse to the third surface; a die on the first surface; a conductive layer on the third surface; a wire electrically coupled between the die and the conductive layer; an intermetallic compound on the second surface and the fourth surface, the intermetallic compound having a porous surface at the second and fourth surface including a plurality of pores; and a molding substance on the substrate, the die, the conductive layer, the wire, and the intermetallic compound and interlocked with the irregular surface of the intermetallic compound at the second surface of the first part of the substrate and the fourth surface of the second part of the substrate and fills pores of the porous surface of the intermetallic compound. Conclusion The prior art made of record and not relied upon is considered pertinent to applicant's disclosure. U.S. Patent Application Publication Nos. 2010/0129157 (Reddy), 2005/0207929 (Yamada), 2024/0208180 (Gerngross), U.S. Patent Nos. 5,667,742 (Dwivedi), 6,123,878 (Nagel), JP Publication No. 2000-173612 (Nakamoto) teach a package with an intermetallic compound / textured surface. Applicant's amendment necessitated the new ground(s) of rejection presented in this Office action. Accordingly, THIS ACTION IS MADE FINAL. See MPEP § 706.07(a). Applicant is reminded of the extension of time policy as set forth in 37 CFR 1.136(a). A shortened statutory period for reply to this final action is set to expire THREE MONTHS from the mailing date of this action. In the event a first reply is filed within TWO MONTHS of the mailing date of this final action and the advisory action is not mailed until after the end of the THREE-MONTH shortened statutory period, then the shortened statutory period will expire on the date the advisory action is mailed, and any nonprovisional extension fee (37 CFR 1.17(a)) pursuant to 37 CFR 1.136(a) will be calculated from the mailing date of the advisory action. In no event, however, will the statutory period for reply expire later than SIX MONTHS from the mailing date of this final action. Any inquiry concerning this communication or earlier communications from the examiner should be directed to TERESA M ARROYO whose telephone number is (703)756-1576. The examiner can normally be reached Monday - Friday (8:30 A.M. E.T. - 5:00 P.M. E.T.). Examiner interviews are available via telephone, in-person, and video conferencing using a USPTO supplied web-based collaboration tool. To schedule an interview, applicant is encouraged to use the USPTO Automated Interview Request (AIR) at http://www.uspto.gov/interviewpractice. If attempts to reach the examiner by telephone are unsuccessful, the examiner’s supervisor, Sue Purvis can be reached at 571.272.1236. The fax phone number for the organization where this application or proceeding is assigned is 571-273-8300. Information regarding the status of published or unpublished applications may be obtained from Patent Center. Unpublished application information in Patent Center is available to registered users. To file and manage patent submissions in Patent Center, visit: https://patentcenter.uspto.gov. Visit https://www.uspto.gov/patents/apply/patent-center for more information about Patent Center and https://www.uspto.gov/patents/docx for information about filing in DOCX format. For additional questions, contact the Electronic Business Center (EBC) at 866-217-9197 (toll-free). If you would like assistance from a USPTO Customer Service Representative, call 800-786-9199 (IN USA OR CANADA) or 571-272-1000. /TERESA M. ARROYO/Primary Examiner, Art Unit 2893
Read full office action

Prosecution Timeline

Jul 11, 2022
Application Filed
Jul 02, 2025
Non-Final Rejection mailed — §112
Oct 02, 2025
Response Filed
Nov 25, 2025
Final Rejection mailed — §112
Feb 02, 2026
Response after Non-Final Action

Precedent Cases

Applications granted by this same examiner with similar technology

Patent 12635276
SEMICONDUCTOR PACKAGES WITH RELIABLE COVERS
3y 7m to grant Granted May 19, 2026
Patent 12635552
Ag ALLOY BONDING WIRE FOR SEMICONDUCTOR DEVICE
3y 1m to grant Granted May 19, 2026
Patent 12628663
LEAD FRAME, METHOD OF MAKING LEAD FRAME, SEMICONDUCTOR APPARATUS, AND METHOD OF MAKING SEMICONDUCTOR APPARATUS
3y 5m to grant Granted May 12, 2026
Patent 12622285
SEMICONDUCTOR MODULE AND METHOD FOR MANUFACTURING SEMICONDUCTOR MODULE
3y 1m to grant Granted May 05, 2026
Patent 12621975
STATIC RANDOM ACCESS MEMORY WITH PRE-CHARGE CIRCUIT
2y 9m to grant Granted May 05, 2026
Study what changed to get past this examiner. Based on 5 most recent grants.

Strategy Recommendation AI-generated — please review before filing

Get a prosecution strategy drawn from examiner precedents, rejection analysis, and claim mapping.
Typically takes 5-10 seconds — AI-generated, attorney review required before filing

Prosecution Projections

2-3
Expected OA Rounds
72%
Grant Probability
95%
With Interview (+22.9%)
3y 0m (~0m remaining)
Median Time to Grant
Moderate
PTA Risk
Based on 491 resolved cases by this examiner. Grant probability derived from career allowance rate.

Sign in with your work email

Enter your email to receive a magic link. No password needed.

Personal email addresses (Gmail, Yahoo, etc.) are not accepted.

Free tier: 3 strategy analyses per month