Prosecution Insights
Last updated: July 17, 2026
Application No. 17/819,482

POWER VIAS FOR BACKSIDE POWER DISTRIBUTION NETWORK

Non-Final OA §103
Filed
Aug 12, 2022
Examiner
OH, JIYOUNG
Art Unit
2818
Tech Center
2800 — Semiconductors & Electrical Systems
Assignee
Taiwan Semiconductor Manufacturing Company, Ltd.
OA Round
3 (Non-Final)
77%
Grant Probability
Favorable
3-4
OA Rounds
0m
Est. Remaining
99%
With Interview

Examiner Intelligence

Grants 77% — above average
77%
Career Allowance Rate
30 granted / 39 resolved
+8.9% vs TC avg
Strong +24% interview lift
Without
With
+24.5%
Interview Lift
resolved cases with interview
Typical timeline
3y 6m
Avg Prosecution
30 currently pending
Career history
90
Total Applications
across all art units

Statute-Specific Performance

§103
87.6%
+47.6% vs TC avg
§102
6.8%
-33.2% vs TC avg
§112
4.8%
-35.2% vs TC avg
Black line = Tech Center average estimate • Based on career data from 39 resolved cases

Office Action

§103
DETAILED ACTION Notice of Pre-AIA or AIA Status The present application, filed on or after March 16, 2013, is being examined under the first inventor to file provisions of the AIA . Continued Examination Under 37 CFR 1.114 A request for continued examination under 37 CFR 1.114, including the fee set forth in 37 CFR 1.17(e), was filed in this application after final rejection. Since this application is eligible for continued examination under 37 CFR 1.114, and the fee set forth in 37 CFR 1.17(e) has been timely paid, the finality of the previous Office action has been withdrawn pursuant to 37 CFR 1.114. Applicant's submission filed on 12/19/2025 has been entered. Status of the Application Acknowledgement is made of the amendment received on 12/19/2025. Claims 1-15 and 21-25 are pending in this application. Claims 1, 12, and 21 are amended. Claim Rejections - 35 USC § 103 In the event the determination of the status of the application as subject to AIA 35 U.S.C. 102 and 103 (or as subject to pre-AIA 35 U.S.C. 102 and 103) is incorrect, any correction of the statutory basis (i.e., changing from AIA to pre-AIA ) for the rejection will not be considered a new ground of rejection if the prior art relied upon, and the rationale supporting the rejection, would be the same under either status. The following is a quotation of 35 U.S.C. 103 which forms the basis for all obviousness rejections set forth in this Office action: A patent for a claimed invention may not be obtained, notwithstanding that the claimed invention is not identically disclosed as set forth in section 102, if the differences between the claimed invention and the prior art are such that the claimed invention as a whole would have been obvious before the effective filing date of the claimed invention to a person having ordinary skill in the art to which the claimed invention pertains. Patentability shall not be negated by the manner in which the invention was made. Claims 1-6, 8, and 10-11 are rejected under 35 U.S.C. 103 as being unpatentable over Liu (US 2021/0358901) in view of Hensel et al. (US 2017/0358565; hereinafter ‘Hensel’) and Chen et al. (US 2020/0303551; hereinafter ‘Chen’). Regarding claim 1, Liu teaches a device (100, [0017]), comprising: a first row of active areas (120AA-120AH, FIG. 1, [0020]; hereinafter ‘AA’) including first active areas (the leftmost part 210A of 120AA-120AH, FIG. 2, [0022]; hereinafter ‘FAA’) that extend in a first direction (FAA extends in the X-direction) and second active areas (the rightmost part 210A of 120AA-120AH; hereinafter ‘SAA’) that extend in the first direction (SAA extends in the X-direction), each of the first active areas has a first width in a second direction (the width of FAA in Y-direction) and each of the second active areas has a second width in the second direction (the width of the SAA in Y-direction); a second row of active areas (120CA-120CH, FIG. 1, [0020]; hereinafter ‘CA’) situated adjacent the first row of active areas (shown in FIG. 1) and including third active areas (210A of 120CA-120CH; hereinafter ‘TAA’) that extend in the first direction (TAA extends in the X-direction), each of the third active areas has the second width in the second direction (the width of the TAA is the same as the width of SAA in Y-direction), wherein the third active areas are adjacent the first active areas and the second active areas (TAA is adjacent FAA and SAA) and spaced apart from the first active areas and the second active areas (TAA is spaced apart from FAA and SAA); and a first power via (445 of 120BA, FIGS. 1 and 4, [0029]; hereinafter ‘445-BA’) that extends in a third direction (445-BA extends in the Z-direction) between a transistor level of the device (AL includes transistors) and a backside metal layer of the device (BM1, [0025]) the first power via situated between the third active areas and the first active areas or between the third active areas and the second active areas without overlapping the first active areas, the second active areas, or the third areas (445-BA is located between TAA and FAA and TAA and SAA without overlapping FAA, SAA, and TAA). Liu does not teach the device comprising: the second width of the second active areas is smaller than the first width of the first active areas. Hensel teaches a device (100, FIG. 2, [0039]) comprising: the second width of the second active areas is smaller than the first width of the first active areas (the width of 130d is smaller than the width of 130c, FIG. 2, [0035]). As taught by Hensel, one of ordinary skill in the art would utilize and modify the above teaching into Liu to obtain and achieve the device comprising: the second width of the second active areas is smaller than the first width of the first active areas as claimed, because the width of active areas is known to affect device behavior such as current drive and threshold voltage, as well as influence the overall cell size and layout density, it would depend on the desired functionality, performance targets, and area constraints of the design [0033]. Thus, it would have been obvious to one of ordinary skill in the art before the effective filling date of the claimed invention to employ the teaching as taught by Hensel in combination with Liu due to above reason. Liu in view of Hensel does not teach the device comprising: without an intervening active area situated between the third active areas and the first active areas or between the third active areas and the second active areas. Chen teaches a device (600, FIG. 6, [0068]) comprising: without an intervening active area situated between the third active areas and the first active areas or between the third active areas and the second active areas (adjacent fin structures 304 corresponding to active areas with a power connection structure 502 corresponding to a power via disposed therebetween, without another active region interposed between the adjacent active regions, FIG. 6, [0058, 0066]). As taught by Chen, one of ordinary skill in the art would utilize and modify the above teaching into Liu in view of Hensel to obtain and achieve the device comprising: without an intervening active area situated between the third active areas and the first active areas or between the third active areas and the second active areas as claimed, because it increases the available contact area to the power connection structure, thereby minimizing contact resistance [0072]. Thus, it would have been obvious to one of ordinary skill in the art before the effective filling date of the claimed invention to employ the teaching as taught by Chen in combination with Liu in view of Hence due to above reason. Regarding claim 2, Liu in view of Hensel and Chen the device of claim 1, comprising a second power via that extends in the third direction (Liu: BV0 of 120BA, FIGS. 1 and 4, [0028]; hereinafter ‘BV0-BA’) between the transistor level and the backside metal layer (BV0-BA is between AL and BM1), the second power via situated between the first row of active areas and the second row of active areas (BV0-BA is located between AA and CA), wherein the first power via is a longer power via (FPV is a longer power via) and the second power via is a shorter power via island (shown in FIG. 4). Note: “power via island” denotes a relatively shorter power via. Regarding claim 3, Liu in view of Hensel and Chen the device of claim 1, comprising a gate (Liu: a one gate of 475, FIG. 4, [0029]) that intersects the third active areas at a line of intersection (220A and 220B intersects 210A and 210b, FIG. 2, [0021]), wherein the first power via has a length that extends in the first direction across the line of intersection to on both sides of the line of intersection (445-BA has a length that extends in X-direction across the line of intersection to both sides of the line of intersection, FIG. 4). Regarding claim 4, Liu in view of Hensel and Chen the device of claim 1, comprising a gate (Liu: one gate of 470, FIG. 4, [0029]) that intersects the third active areas at a line of intersection (220A and 220B intersects 210A and 210b, FIG. 2, [0021]), wherein the first power via is situated next to and on only one side of the line of intersection (445-BA is situated next to and on only one side of the line of intersection). Regarding claim 5, Liu in view of Hensel and Chen the device of claim 1, comprising a second power via (Liu: BV0, FIG. 4, [0029]) and a first gate (first gate of 475; hereinafter ‘FG475’) that intersects the third active areas at a line of intersection of the first gate (220A and 220B intersects 210A and 210b, FIG. 2, [0021]) and a second gate (second gate of 475; hereinafter ‘SG475’) that intersects the third active areas at a line of intersection of the second gate (220A and 220B intersects 210A and 210b), wherein the first power via has a length that extends across the line of intersection of the first gate to both sides of the line of intersection of the first gate in the first direction (445-BA has a length that extends across the line of intersection of FG475 in X-direction) and the second power via is situated adjacent and on only one side of the line of intersection of the second gate (BV0 is situated adjacent and on only side of the line of intersection of SG475). Regarding claim 6, Liu in view of Hensel and Chen the device of claim 1, comprising a metal over diffusion layer (Liu: VDB, FIG. 4, [0030]) disposed over at least one of the first active areas and at least one of the third active areas (VDB disposed over FAA and TAA, FIGS. 1 and 4), wherein the first power via is electrically coupled to the metal over diffusion layer (445-BA is electrically coupled to VBD). Regarding claim 8, Liu in view of Hensel and Chen the device of claim 1, comprising a metal over diffusion layer (Liu: VDB, FIG. 4, [0030]) disposed over at least one of the second active areas and at least one of the third active areas (VDB disposed over SAA and TAA, FIGS. 1 and 4), wherein the first power via is electrically coupled to the metal over diffusion layer (445-BA is electrically coupled to VBD). Regarding claim 10, Liu in view of Hensel and Chen the device of claim 1, comprising a via over gate layer (Liu: VDB, FIG. 4, [0030]) that is disposed on the first power via (VDE is disposed on 445-BA) and that is electrically coupled to a frontside metal layer (VDB is electrically coupled to 482, [0030]). Regarding claim 11, Liu in view of Hensel and Chen the device of claim 1, wherein the first power via is electrically connected to the backside metal layer (Liu: 445-BA is electrically connected to BM1, FIG. 4) and to a metal over diffusion layer (VDB, [0030]) that is disposed over at least one of the first active areas (VDB is disposed over FAA, FIGS. 1 and 4). Claims 7 and 9 are rejected under 35 U.S.C. 103 as being unpatentable over Liu (US 2021/0358901) in view of Hensel (US 2017/0358565) and Chen (US 2020/0303551), and further in view of Liu (US 2021/0225830; hereinafter ‘Liu830’). Regarding claim 7, Liu in view of Hensel and Chen teaches the device of claim 6, but does not teach the device comprising a via over diffusion layer disposed on the metal over diffusion layer and electrically coupled to a frontside metal layer. Liu830 teaches a device (10, FIGS. 1A and 1B, [0045]) comprising a via over diffusion layer (via0, [0048]) disposed on the metal over diffusion layer (via0 disposed on MD) and electrically coupled to a frontside metal layer (via0 is electrically coupled to M0). As taught by Liu830, one of ordinary skill in the art would utilize and modify the above teaching into Liu in view of Hensel and Chen to obtain and achieve the device comprising a via over diffusion layer disposed on the metal over diffusion layer and electrically coupled to a frontside metal layer as claimed, because it enables vertical electrical connection between the local interconnect layer and the frontside metal layers, allowing power or signal to be routed efficiently from the device region to broader distribution networks [0069, 0076]. Thus, it would have been obvious to one of ordinary skill in the art before the effective filling date of the claimed invention to employ the teaching as taught by Liu830 in combination with Liu in view of Hensel and Chen due to above reason. Regarding claim 9, Liu in view of Hensel and Chen teaches the device of claim 8, but does not teach the device comprising a via over diffusion layer disposed on the metal over diffusion layer and electrically coupled to a frontside metal layer. Liu830 teaches a device (10, FIGS. 1A and 1B, [0045]) comprising a via over diffusion layer (via0, [0048]) disposed on the metal over diffusion layer (via0 disposed on MD) and electrically coupled to a frontside metal layer (via0 is electrically coupled to M0) As taught by Liu830, one of ordinary skill in the art would utilize and modify the above teaching into Liu in view of Hensel and Chen to obtain and achieve the device comprising a via over diffusion layer disposed on the metal over diffusion layer and electrically coupled to a frontside metal layer as claimed, because it enables vertical electrical connection between the local interconnect layer and the frontside metal layers, allowing power or signal to be routed efficiently from the device region to broader distribution networks [0069, 0076]. Thus, it would have been obvious to one of ordinary skill in the art before the effective filling date of the claimed invention to employ the teaching as taught by Liu830 in combination with Liu in view of Hensel and Chen due to above reason. Claims 12-14 are rejected under 35 U.S.C. 103 as being unpatentable over Liu830 (US 2021/0225830) in view of Chen (US 2020/0303551). Regarding claim 12, Liu830 teaches a device (10, FIGS. 1A and 1B, [0045]), comprising: first active areas (the Nth RX from the top, [0047-0048]; hereinafter referred to as ‘RXN’) that extend in a first direction (RXN extends in the X-direction); second active areas (the N+2nd RX from the top, [0047-0048]; hereinafter referred to as ‘RXN+2’) that extend in the first direction (RXN+2 extends in the X-direction), the second active areas adjacent the first active area (shown in FIGS. 1A and 1B) and spaced apart from the first active areas in a second direction (RXN and RXN+2 are spaced in the Y-direction); a metal over diffusion layer (MD, [0048]) that is disposed over (MD is disposed over RXN, FIG. 3C) and electrically coupled to at least one of the first active areas (MD is electrically connected to RXN, FIG. 3C, [0076]); a backside metal layer (BM0, [0059]); and a power via (VB of the N+1st RX from the top, FIG. 3C, [0061-0062]; hereinafter ‘VB1’) connected to the backside metal layer and the metal over diffusion to electrically connect the backside metal layer to the metal over diffusion layer and the at least one of the first active areas (VB1 connected to BM0 and VB1 connected MD through RX, and RXN), wherein the power via is situated in a space between the first active areas and the second active areas without overlapping the first active areas or the second active areas (VB1 is situated in a space between RXN and RXN+2 without overlapping RXN and RXN+2). Liu830 does not teach the device comprising: without an intervening active area between the second active areas and the first active areas. Chen teaches a device (600, FIG. 6, [0068]) comprising: without an intervening active area between the second active areas and the first active areas (adjacent fin structures 304 corresponding to active areas with a power connection structure 502 corresponding to a power via disposed therebetween, without another active region interposed between the adjacent active regions, FIG. 6, [0058, 0066]). As taught by Chen, one of ordinary skill in the art would utilize and modify the above teaching into Liu830 to obtain and achieve the device comprising: without an intervening active area situated between the third active areas and the first active areas or between the third active areas and the second active areas as claimed, because it increases the available contact area to the power connection structure, thereby minimizing contact resistance [0072]. Thus, it would have been obvious to one of ordinary skill in the art before the effective filling date of the claimed invention to employ the teaching as taught by Chen in combination with Liu830 due to above reason. Regarding claim 13, Liu830 in view of Chen teaches the device of claim 12, comprising a via over diffusion layer (Liu830: via0, FIG. 1A, [0048]) disposed over (via0 disposed over MD) and electrically coupled to the metal over diffusion layer (via0 is electrically coupled to MD), wherein the via over diffusion layer is electrically coupled to a frontside metal layer (via0 is electrically coupled to M0, [0048]). Regarding claim 14, Liu830 in view of Chen teaches the device of claim 12, wherein the power via is one elongated power via (Liu830: VB1 extends in the Z-direction, FIG. 3C, [0061]) that is electrically coupled to the backside metal layer and the metal over diffusion layer (VB1 is electrically coupled to BM0 and MD). Claim 15 is rejected under 35 U.S.C. 103 as being unpatentable over Liu830 (US 2021/0225830) in view of Chen (US 2020/0303551), and further in view of Liu (US 2021/0358901). Regarding claim 15, Liu830 in view of Chen teaches the device claim 12, wherein the at least one power via (VB1, FIG. 3C) is a first power via (left side VB) that is electrically coupled to the backside metal layer and the metal over diffusion layer (left side VB is electrically coupled to BM0 and left side MD) and a second power via (right side VB) that is electrically coupled to the backside metal layer (right side VB is electrically coupled to BM0) and a via over gate layer (right side MD) Note: “power via island” denotes a relatively shorter power via. Liu830 in view of Chen does not teach the device, wherein the power via is a first power via island. Liu teaches a device (100, [0017]), wherein the at least one power via is a first power via island (BV0 is the power via island, FIG. 4, [0029]). As taught by Liu, one of ordinary skill in the art would utilize and modify the above teaching into Liu830 in view of Chen to obtain and achieve the device, wherein the at least one power via is a first power via island as claimed, because power vias are strategically placed based on their roles and functions, the voltage drop across the power delivery path is reduced, contributing to up to a 20% reduction in power loss [0032, 0034]. Thus, it would have been obvious to one of ordinary skill in the art before the effective filling date of the claimed invention to employ the teaching as taught by Liu in combination with Liu830 in view of Chen due to above reason. Claims 21-25 are rejected under 35 U.S.C. 103 as being unpatentable over Liu (US 2021/0358901) in view of Chen (US 2020/0303551). Regarding claim 21, Liu teaches a device (100, [0017]), comprising: a first row of active areas (120AA-120AH, FIG. 1, [0020]; hereinafter ‘AA’) including first active areas (the leftmost part 210A of 120AA-120AH, FIG. 2, [0022]; hereinafter ‘FAA’) that extend in a first direction (FAA extends in the X-direction, FIG. 2); a second row of active areas (120CA-120CH, FIG. 1, [0020]; hereinafter ‘CA’) situated adjacent the first row of active areas (shown in FIG 1) and including second active areas (210A of 120CA-120CH; hereinafter ‘SAA’) that extend in the first direction (SAA extends in the X-direction, FIG. 2) and are spaced apart from the first active areas (shown in FIG 1); and a first power via (445 of 120BA, FIGS. 1 and 4, [0029]; hereinafter ‘445-BA’) that extends in a third direction (445-BA extends in the Z-direction) between a transistor level of the device (AL includes transistors) and a backside metal layer of the device (BM1, [0025]), the first power via situated between the first active areas and the second active areas without overlapping the first active areas or the second active areas (445-BA is located between FAA and SAA without overlapping FAA and SAA). Liu does not teach the device comprising: without an intervening active area between the second active areas and the first active areas. Chen teaches a device (600, FIG. 6, [0068]) comprising: without an intervening active area situated between the second active areas and the first active areas (adjacent fin structures 304 corresponding to active areas with a power connection structure 502 corresponding to a power via disposed therebetween, without another active region interposed between the adjacent active regions, FIG. 6, [0058, 0066]). As taught by Chen, one of ordinary skill in the art would utilize and modify the above teaching into Liu to obtain and achieve the device comprising: without an intervening active area situated between the third active areas and the first active areas or between the third active areas and the second active areas as claimed, because it increases the available contact area to the power connection structure, thereby minimizing contact resistance [0072]. Thus, it would have been obvious to one of ordinary skill in the art before the effective filling date of the claimed invention to employ the teaching as taught by Chen in combination with Liu due to above reason. Regarding claim 22, Liu in view of Chen teaches the device of claim 21, comprising a second power via (Liu: BV0 of 120BA, FIGS. 1 and 4, [0028]; hereinafter ‘BV0-BA’) that extends in the third direction (BV0-BA extends in the Z-direction) between the transistor level (AL includes transistors) and the backside metal layer (BM1), the second power via situated between the first row of active areas and the second row of active areas (BV0-BA is located between AA and CA), wherein the first power via is a longer power via and the second power via is a shorter power via island (shown in FIG. 4). Note: “power via island” denotes a relatively shorter power via. Regarding claim 23, Liu in view of Chen teaches the device of claim 21, comprising a gate (Liu: a one gate of 475, FIG. 4, [0029]) that intersects the second active areas at a line of intersection (220A and 220B intersects 210A and 210b, FIG. 2, [0021]), wherein the first power via has a length that extends in the first direction across the line of intersection to both sides of the line of intersection (445-BA has a length that extends in X-direction across the line of intersection to both sides of the line of intersection, FIG. 4). Regarding claim 24, Liu in view of Chen teaches the device of claim 21, comprising a metal over diffusion layer (VDB, FIG. 4, [0030]) disposed over at least one of the first active areas(Liu: VDB disposed over FAA, FIGS. 1 and 4) wherein the first power via is electrically coupled to the metal over diffusion layer (445-BA is electrically coupled to VBD). Regarding claim 25, Liu in view of Chen teaches the device of claim 21, comprising a via over gate layer (Liu: VDB, FIG. 4, [0030]) that is disposed on the first power via (VDE is disposed on 445-BA) and that is electrically coupled to a frontside metal layer (VDB is electrically coupled to 482, [0030]). Response to Arguments Applicant's arguments with respect to claims have been considered but are moot in view of the new ground of rejection. Response to arguments on newly added limitations are responded to in the above rejection. Conclusion Any inquiry concerning this communication or earlier communications from the examiner should be directed to JIYOUNG OH whose telephone number is (703)756-5687. The examiner can normally be reached Monday-Friday, 9AM-5PM EST. Examiner interviews are available via telephone, in-person, and video conferencing using a USPTO supplied web-based collaboration tool. To schedule an interview, applicant is encouraged to use the USPTO Automated Interview Request (AIR) at http://www.uspto.gov/interviewpractice. If attempts to reach the examiner by telephone are unsuccessful, the examiner’s supervisor, Eva Montalvo can be reached on (571) 270-3829. The fax phone number for the organization where this application or proceeding is assigned is 571-273-8300. Information regarding the status of published or unpublished applications may be obtained from Patent Center. Unpublished application information in Patent Center is available to registered users. To file and manage patent submissions in Patent Center, visit: https://patentcenter.uspto.gov. Visit https://www.uspto.gov/patents/apply/patent-center for more information about Patent Center and https://www.uspto.gov/patents/docx for information about filing in DOCX format. For additional questions, contact the Electronic Business Center (EBC) at 866-217-9197 (toll-free). If you would like assistance from a USPTO Customer Service Representative, call 800-786-9199 (IN USA OR CANADA) or 571-272-1000. /JIYOUNG OH/Examiner, Art Unit 2818 /DUY T NGUYEN/Primary Examiner, Art Unit 2818 6/23/26
Read full office action

Prosecution Timeline

Aug 12, 2022
Application Filed
May 05, 2025
Non-Final Rejection mailed — §103
Jul 31, 2025
Response Filed
Oct 06, 2025
Final Rejection mailed — §103
Dec 19, 2025
Request for Continued Examination
Jan 08, 2026
Response after Non-Final Action
Jun 25, 2026
Non-Final Rejection mailed — §103 (current)

Precedent Cases

Applications granted by this same examiner with similar technology

Patent 12648177
Thin-Film Transistors For Detecting Miniature Targets
3y 10m to grant Granted Jun 02, 2026
Patent 12628635
SELECTIVE DEPOSITION OF LINER AND BARRIER FILMS FOR RESISTANCE REDUCTION OF SEMICONDUCTOR DEVICES
3y 9m to grant Granted May 12, 2026
Patent 12622120
DISPLAY DEVICE
4y 1m to grant Granted May 05, 2026
Patent 12610529
SEMICONDUCTOR STRUCTURE AND METHOD FOR FORMING SAME
3y 3m to grant Granted Apr 21, 2026
Patent 12568652
FORMING GATE ALL AROUND DEVICE WITH SILICON-GERMANIUM CHANNEL
3y 5m to grant Granted Mar 03, 2026
Study what changed to get past this examiner. Based on 5 most recent grants.

Strategy Recommendation AI-generated — please review before filing

Get a prosecution strategy drawn from examiner precedents, rejection analysis, and claim mapping.
Typically takes 5-10 seconds — AI-generated, attorney review required before filing

Prosecution Projections

3-4
Expected OA Rounds
77%
Grant Probability
99%
With Interview (+24.5%)
3y 6m (~0m remaining)
Median Time to Grant
High
PTA Risk
Based on 39 resolved cases by this examiner. Grant probability derived from career allowance rate.

Sign in with your work email

Enter your email to receive a magic link. No password needed.

Personal email addresses (Gmail, Yahoo, etc.) are not accepted.

Free tier: 3 strategy analyses per month