Prosecution Insights
Last updated: April 19, 2026
Application No. 17/841,178

DISPLAY DEVICE

Non-Final OA §102§103
Filed
Jun 15, 2022
Examiner
YEMELYANOV, DMITRIY
Art Unit
2891
Tech Center
2800 — Semiconductors & Electrical Systems
Assignee
Samsung Display Co., Ltd.
OA Round
3 (Non-Final)
73%
Grant Probability
Favorable
3-4
OA Rounds
2y 8m
To Grant
92%
With Interview

Examiner Intelligence

Grants 73% — above average
73%
Career Allow Rate
393 granted / 538 resolved
+5.0% vs TC avg
Strong +19% interview lift
Without
With
+18.7%
Interview Lift
resolved cases with interview
Typical timeline
2y 8m
Avg Prosecution
43 currently pending
Career history
581
Total Applications
across all art units

Statute-Specific Performance

§101
0.2%
-39.8% vs TC avg
§103
52.4%
+12.4% vs TC avg
§102
23.2%
-16.8% vs TC avg
§112
22.4%
-17.6% vs TC avg
Black line = Tech Center average estimate • Based on career data from 538 resolved cases

Office Action

§102 §103
DETAILED ACTION Notice of Pre-AIA or AIA Status The present application, filed on or after March 16, 2013, is being examined under the first inventor to file provisions of the AIA . Claim Rejections - 35 USC § 102 The following is a quotation of the appropriate paragraphs of 35 U.S.C. 102 that form the basis for the rejections under this section made in this Office action: A person shall be entitled to a patent unless – (a)(1) the claimed invention was patented, described in a printed publication, or in public use, on sale, or otherwise available to the public before the effective filing date of the claimed invention. Claim(s) 1, 2, 5-20 is/are rejected under 35 U.S.C. 102(A1) as being anticipated by Lee et al. (KR 20200085977 A, Published 07/16/2020; hereinafter, for clarity, all figure and paragraph references are taken from US equivalent application US 2022/0069003 A1). Regarding Claim 1, Lee (Fig. 7, 10-12, 14) discloses a display device comprising: a first electrode (ET1) and a second electrode (ET2), spaced apart from each other; light emitting elements (LD) disposed between the first electrode (ET1) and the second electrode (ET2); a first connection electrode (CE1) electrically contacting the first electrode (ET1) and a first end portions portion of a light emitting element (LD1) from among the light emitting elements (LD); a second connection electrode (CE2) electrically contacting the first (CE1) and second electrodes (CE2) and a second end portions portion of the light emitting element (LD1) from among the light emitting elements (LD); and a conductive pattern (SCE1-2) disposed between the first connection electrode (CE1) and the second connection electrode (CE2), wherein a first end portion of the conductive pattern (SCE1-2) electrically contacts the first connection electrode (CE1), and a second end portion of the conductive pattern electrically contacts the second connection electrode (CE2). (See Fig. 10-14) [0147] Regarding Claim 2, Lee (Fig. 10-14) discloses the display device of claim 1, wherein a length of the conductive pattern (SCE1-2) is greater than or equal to lengths of the light emitting elements. (LD) Regarding Claim 5, Lee (Fig. 10-14) discloses the display device of claim 1, further comprising: a first insulating layer (INS1) disposed over the first electrode and the second electrode; and a second insulating layer (INS2) disposed on the light emitting elements, wherein the second insulating layer (INP) exposes the first and second end portions of the light emitting elements. (Fig. 11, 12, 14). The Examiner notes that the first and second end portions of the light emitting elements are exposed to CE1 and CE2 Regarding Claim 6, Lee (Fig. 10-14) discloses the display device of claim 5, wherein the conductive pattern (SCE1-2) is disposed between the first insulating layer (INS1) and the second insulating layer. (INS2) Regarding Claim 7, Lee (Fig. 10-14) discloses the display device of claim 6, wherein the second insulating layer (INS2) exposes the first and second end portions of the conductive pattern. (SCE 1-2) The Examiner notes that end portions of SCE 1-2 directly connected to CE1 and CE2 and thereby exposed by (INS2). Regarding Claim 8, Lee (Fig. 10-14) discloses the display device of claim 7, wherein the first connection electrode (CE1) electrically contacts the first end portion of the conductive pattern (SCE 1-2) which is exposed by the second insulating layer (INS2). Regarding Claim 9, Lee (Fig. 10-14) discloses the display device of claim 8, further comprising: a third insulating layer (INS3) disposed on the first connection electrode (CE1), wherein the third insulating layer (INS3) exposes the second end portion of the conductive pattern (SCE 1-2). (See Fig. 12, 14) Regarding Claim 10, Lee (Fig. 10-14) discloses the display device of claim 9, wherein the second connection electrode (CE2) electrically contacts the second end portion of the conductive pattern (SCE 1-2) which is exposed by the third insulating layer. (INS3) (See Fig. 12, 14). Regarding Claim 11, Lee (Fig. 7, 10-14, 16B) discloses a display device comprising: pixels (PXL); first light emitting elements (LD1 left) and second light emitting elements (LD1 right) disposed in each of the pixels; a first connection electrode (CE11 right) electrically contacting a first end portions portion of a light emitting element (LD1) from among the first light emitting elements (LD1 left) (See Fig. 14); a second connection electrode (CE21 left) electrically contacting a second end portions portion of a first light emitting element (LD1) from among the first light emitting elements (LD1 left) and a first end portions portion of a second light emitting element (LD2) from among the second light emitting elements (LD1 right);(See connections through SCE1-2 in Fig. 14, 16B) a third connection electrode (CE22, SCE2-3, CE13, CE22) electrically contacting second end portions of the second light emitting elements (LD2); a first conductive pattern (SCE1-2 left) electrically contacting the first connection electrode (CE21) and the second connection electrode (CE2); and a second conductive pattern (SCE1-2 right and connection between ALE2 in SAR1 and SAR2 regions) electrically contacting the second connection electrode (CE21) and the third connection electrode (CE22, SCE2-3, CE13, CE22), wherein the third connection electrode has a U-shape in a plan view. (See CE22, SCE2-3, CE13, CE22 in Fig. 16 creating “U-shape). Regarding Claim 12, Lee (Fig. 7, 10-14, 16B) discloses the display device of claim 11, wherein the first light emitting elements and the second light emitting elements are electrically connected in series to each other. (Fig. 16B) Regarding Claim 13, Lee (Fig. 7, 10-14, 16B) discloses the display device of claim 11, wherein the first conductive pattern and the second conductive pattern include a same material. [0218-0220] Regarding Claim 14, Lee (Fig. 7, 10-14, 16B) discloses the display device of claim 11, wherein the first connection electrode and the third connection electrode are disposed on a same layer. (The Examiner notes that all electrodes are on PSV) Regarding Claim 15, Lee (Fig. 7, 10-14, 16B) discloses the display device of claim 11, further comprising: third light emitting elements (LDrv left) and fourth light emitting elements disposed (LDrv right) in each of the pixels; a fourth connection electrode (CE13) electrically contacting second end portions of the third light emitting elements (LDrv left) and first end portions of the fourth light emitting elements (LcRv right); and a fifth connection electrode (CE23) electrically contacting second end portions of the fourth light emitting elements (LDrv). Regarding Claim 16, Lee (Fig. 7, 10-14, 16B) discloses the display device of claim 15, further comprising: a third conductive pattern (SCE 2-3) electrically contacting the third connection electrode (CE22, SCE2-3, CE13, CE22) and the fourth connection electrode. (CE13) Regarding Claim 17, Lee (Fig. 7, 10-14, 16B) discloses the display device of claim 15, further comprising: a fourth conductive pattern ( electrically contacting the fourth connection electrode (CE13) and the fifth connection electrode. (CE23) Regarding Claim 18, Lee (Fig. 7, 10-14, 16B) discloses the display device of claim 15, wherein the first to fourth light emitting elements are electrically connected in series to each other. (Fig. 16B) Regarding Claim 19, Lee (Fig. 7, 10-14, 16B) discloses the display device of claim 15, wherein the second connection electrode and the fourth connection electrode are disposed on a same layer. (The Examiner notes that all electrodes are on PSV) Regarding Claim 20, Lee (Fig. 7, 10-14, 16B) discloses the display device of claim 15, wherein the fifth connection electrode, the first connection electrode, and the third connection electrode are disposed on a same layer. (The Examiner notes that all electrodes are on PSV). Claim Rejections - 35 USC § 103 The following is a quotation of 35 U.S.C. 103 which forms the basis for all obviousness rejections set forth in this Office action: A patent for a claimed invention may not be obtained, notwithstanding that the claimed invention is not identically disclosed as set forth in section 102, if the differences between the claimed invention and the prior art are such that the claimed invention as a whole would have been obvious before the effective filing date of the claimed invention to a person having ordinary skill in the art to which the claimed invention pertains. Patentability shall not be negated by the manner in which the invention was made. Claim(s) 4 is/are rejected under 35 U.S.C. 103 as being unpatentable over Lee et al. (KR 20200085977 A, Published 07/16/2020; hereinafter, for clarity, all figure and paragraph references are taken from US equivalent application US 2022/0069003 A1) in view of Hosono et al. (US 2017/0186989 A1). Regarding Claim 3, Lee (Fig. 10-14) discloses the display device of claim 1, Lee does not explicitly disclose the conductive pattern has a resistance higher than resistances of the light emitting elements. Hosono discloses a conductive pattern has a resistance (bridge layer is formed of a material having a resistance that falls within a range of 100 kΩ to 100 MΩ) higher than resistances of a light emitting elements. (91.4 kΩ) [0039-0040, 0177, 0115] It would have been obvious to one of ordinary skill in the art before the effective filing date of the claimed invention to modify the display device in Lee in view of Hosono such that the conductive pattern has a resistance higher than resistances of the light emitting elements in order to e prevented from being significantly damaged by electrostatic discharge [0061]. Claim(s) 4 is/are rejected under 35 U.S.C. 103 as being unpatentable over Lee et al. (KR 20200085977 A, Published 07/16/2020; hereinafter, for clarity, all figure and paragraph references are taken from US equivalent application US 2022/0069003 A1) in view of Kashiwabara et al. (US 2015/0144914 A1). Regarding Claim 4, Lee (Fig. 10-14) discloses the display device of claim 1. Lee does not explicitly disclose the conductive pattern has a resistance of about 100 kΩ or more. Kashiwabara discloses a conductive pattern (connection) has a resistance of about 100 kΩ or more. (“the electrical resistance of the connection between the auxiliary wiring part 200 and the upper electrode 500 may be about 200 k.Ω. or less, and the voltage drop at the connection between the auxiliary wiring part 200 and the upper electrode 500 may be controlled to 2 V or less.”) [0061] It would have been obvious to one of ordinary skill in the art before the effective filing date of the claimed invention to modify the display device in Lee in view of Kashiwabara such that the conductive pattern has a resistance of about 100 kΩ or more in order to have uniform brightness of the display device and reduce power consumption of the display device [0041]. Response to Arguments Applicant’s arguments, see Pages 6-7, filed 9/15/2025, with respect to the rejection(s) of claim(s) 1-3 and 5-20 under 35 U.S.C. 102(A1) as being anticipated by Oh et al. (US 2021/0288220 A) have been fully considered and are persuasive. Therefore, the rejection has been withdrawn. However, upon further consideration, a new ground(s) of rejection is made under 35 U.S.C. 102(A1) as being anticipated by Lee et al. (KR 20200085977 A, Published 07/16/2020) Conclusion Any inquiry concerning this communication or earlier communications from the examiner should be directed to DMITRIY YEMELYANOV whose telephone number is (571)270-7920. The examiner can normally be reached M-F 9a.m.-6p.m. Examiner interviews are available via telephone, in-person, and video conferencing using a USPTO supplied web-based collaboration tool. To schedule an interview, applicant is encouraged to use the USPTO Automated Interview Request (AIR) at http://www.uspto.gov/interviewpractice. If attempts to reach the examiner by telephone are unsuccessful, the examiner’s supervisor, Matthew Landau can be reached at (571) 272-1731. The fax phone number for the organization where this application or proceeding is assigned is 571-273-8300. Information regarding the status of published or unpublished applications may be obtained from Patent Center. Unpublished application information in Patent Center is available to registered users. To file and manage patent submissions in Patent Center, visit: https://patentcenter.uspto.gov. Visit https://www.uspto.gov/patents/apply/patent-center for more information about Patent Center and https://www.uspto.gov/patents/docx for information about filing in DOCX format. For additional questions, contact the Electronic Business Center (EBC) at 866-217-9197 (toll-free). If you would like assistance from a USPTO Customer Service Representative, call 800-786-9199 (IN USA OR CANADA) or 571-272-1000. /DMITRIY YEMELYANOV/Examiner, Art Unit 2891
Read full office action

Prosecution Timeline

Jun 15, 2022
Application Filed
Dec 28, 2024
Non-Final Rejection — §102, §103
Apr 02, 2025
Response Filed
Jul 12, 2025
Final Rejection — §102, §103
Sep 15, 2025
Response after Non-Final Action
Jan 07, 2026
Request for Continued Examination
Jan 23, 2026
Response after Non-Final Action
Feb 25, 2026
Non-Final Rejection — §102, §103 (current)

Precedent Cases

Applications granted by this same examiner with similar technology

Patent 12604565
MICRO LIGHT-EMITTING COMPONENT
2y 5m to grant Granted Apr 14, 2026
Patent 12581773
INDIUM GALLIUM NITRIDE LIGHT EMITTING DIODES WITH REDUCED STRAIN
2y 5m to grant Granted Mar 17, 2026
Patent 12575096
THREE-DIMENSIONAL MEMORY DEVICES AND METHODS FOR FORMING THE SAME
2y 5m to grant Granted Mar 10, 2026
Patent 12568724
DISPLAY DEVICE AND MANUFACTURING METHOD THEREOF
2y 5m to grant Granted Mar 03, 2026
Patent 12568716
WAFER-SCALE SEPARATION AND TRANSFER OF GAN MATERIAL
2y 5m to grant Granted Mar 03, 2026
Study what changed to get past this examiner. Based on 5 most recent grants.

AI Strategy Recommendation

Get an AI-powered prosecution strategy using examiner precedents, rejection analysis, and claim mapping.
Powered by AI — typically takes 5-10 seconds

Prosecution Projections

3-4
Expected OA Rounds
73%
Grant Probability
92%
With Interview (+18.7%)
2y 8m
Median Time to Grant
High
PTA Risk
Based on 538 resolved cases by this examiner. Grant probability derived from career allow rate.

Sign in with your work email

Enter your email to receive a magic link. No password needed.

Personal email addresses (Gmail, Yahoo, etc.) are not accepted.

Free tier: 3 strategy analyses per month