Office Action Predictor
Last updated: April 16, 2026
Application No. 17/846,842

DISPLAY APPARATUS AND METHOD OF PROVIDING THE SAME

Final Rejection §103
Filed
Jun 22, 2022
Examiner
JUNGE, BRYAN R.
Art Unit
2897
Tech Center
2800 — Semiconductors & Electrical Systems
Assignee
Samsung Display Co., LTD.
OA Round
2 (Final)
58%
Grant Probability
Moderate
3-4
OA Rounds
2y 7m
To Grant
81%
With Interview

Examiner Intelligence

Grants 58% of resolved cases
58%
Career Allow Rate
353 granted / 613 resolved
-10.4% vs TC avg
Strong +23% interview lift
Without
With
+23.0%
Interview Lift
resolved cases with interview
Typical timeline
2y 7m
Avg Prosecution
35 currently pending
Career history
648
Total Applications
across all art units

Statute-Specific Performance

§101
0.1%
-39.9% vs TC avg
§103
60.4%
+20.4% vs TC avg
§102
18.7%
-21.3% vs TC avg
§112
17.2%
-22.8% vs TC avg
Black line = Tech Center average estimate • Based on career data from 613 resolved cases

Office Action

§103
DETAILED ACTION Notice of Pre-AIA or AIA Status The present application, filed on or after March 16, 2013, is being examined under the first inventor to file provisions of the AIA . Election/Restrictions Applicant’s election without traverse of Group I, claims 1-15 in the reply filed on 08/13/2025 is acknowledged. Claims 16-30 are withdrawn from consideration. Response to Arguments Applicant’s amendments and the accompanying arguments, filed 12/08/2025, with respect to the second conductive layer which is in the second groove extends along the fourth portion of the first planarization layer to define a fourth conductive pattern of the second conductive layer which overlaps the first groove have been fully considered and are persuasive. Therefore, the rejection has been withdrawn. However, upon further consideration, a new ground(s) of rejection is made in view of Wang (US 2024/0155899). Claim Rejections - 35 USC § 103 The following is a quotation of 35 U.S.C. 103 which forms the basis for all obviousness rejections set forth in this Office action: A patent for a claimed invention may not be obtained, notwithstanding that the claimed invention is not identically disclosed as set forth in section 102, if the differences between the claimed invention and the prior art are such that the claimed invention as a whole would have been obvious before the effective filing date of the claimed invention to a person having ordinary skill in the art to which the claimed invention pertains. Patentability shall not be negated by the manner in which the invention was made. Claims 1-9, and 15 are rejected under 35 U.S.C. 103 as being unpatentable over Xin et al. (CN 113345923 A) in view of Wang (US 2024/0155899). In reference to claim 1, Xin et al. (CN 113345923), hereafter “Xin,” for which Xin et al. (US 2021/0384226) is used as an English language equivalent and cited herein, discloses a display apparatus comprising: an insulating layer, 13 in Figure 26, comprising a first portion CA2 defining a first groove 131 and a second portion PA3 which is adjacent to the first portion, paragraphs 99-101; and in order from the insulating layer: a first conductive layer 22 comprising a first conductive pattern in the first groove of the insulating layer and a second conductive pattern which is on the second portion of the insulating layer, paragraph 102; a first planarization layer 12, paragraph 52; and a second conductive layer 21, paragraph 43, the second conductive layer extends along a fourth portion of the first planarization layer to define a fourth conductive pattern, 212 of the second conductive layer which overlaps the first groove 131, paragraph 102. Xin does not disclose the first planarization layer comprises a third portion defining a second groove and a fourth portion which is adjacent to the third portion, the second conductive layer comprises a third conductive pattern in the second groove of the first planarization layer, wherein the second conductive layer which is in the second groove extends along the fourth planarization layer to define a fourth conductive pattern of the second conductive layer. Wang (US 2024/0155899), hereafter “Wang 2024,” discloses a display device including teaching a first planarization layer, 270 in Figure15A, comprising a third portion defining a second groove 271 and a fourth portion which is adjacent to the third portion, the second conductive layer 250/DATA comprising a third conductive pattern in the second groove 271 of the first planarization layer, the second conductive layer, 250/DATA, which is in the second groove 271 extends along the fourth planarization layer 270 to define a fourth conductive pattern of the second conductive layer, paragraph 160. It would have been obvious to one of ordinary skill in the art before the effective filing date of the invention to modify the data line 212/DATA of Xin such that the first planarization layer comprises a third portion defining a second groove and a fourth portion which is adjacent to the third portion, the second conductive layer comprises a third conductive pattern in the second groove of the first planarization layer, wherein the second conductive layer which is in the second groove extends along the fourth planarization layer to define a fourth conductive pattern of the second conductive layer which overlaps the first groove. One would have been motivated to do so in order to form a light emitting layer over a surface with improved flatness, paragraph 162. In reference to claim 2, Xin discloses at the first groove of the insulating layer, the first conductive pattern of the first conductive layer, 22 at CA2, faces the fourth conductive pattern of the second conductive layer, 212 of 21, with the first planarization layer 12 therebetween, Figure 26. In reference to claim 3, Xin discloses the first conductive pattern of the first conductive layer, 22 at CA2, and the second conductive pattern of the first conductive layer, 22 at PA3 are integral with each other, Figure 26 and paragraph 102. In reference to claim 4, Wang 2024 discloses the third conductive pattern of the second conductive layer, 250/DATA in 271 in Figure 15A, and the fourth conductive pattern of the second conductive layer, 250/DATA outside 271. are integral with each other, Figure 15A. In reference to claim 5, Xin discloses each of the first conductive pattern of the first conductive layer, the second conductive pattern of the first conductive layer and the first planarization layer has an upper surface, and a distance from the upper surface of the first conductive pattern of the first conductive layer to the upper surface of the first planarization layer, is greater than a distance from the upper surface of the second conductive pattern of the first conductive layer to the upper surface of the first planarization layer, Figure 26. In reference to claim 6, Xin does not disclose, in order from the insulating layer: the second conductive layer; a second planarization layer; and a third conductive layer. Wang (US 2024/0155899), hereafter “Wang 2024” discloses a display device including teaching, in order from the insulating layer: the second conductive layer 250; a second planarization layer 280 (unlabeled in Figure 15A); and a third conductive layer 310, Figure 15A. It would have been obvious to one of ordinary skill in the art before the effective filing date of the invention for the display device to comprise in order from the insulating layer: the second conductive layer; a second planarization layer; and a third conductive layer. One would have been motivated to do so in order to form a light emitting layer over a surface with improved flatness, paragraphs 162. In reference to claim 7, Wang 2024 discloses at the second groove, 271 in Figure 15A, of the first planarization layer 270, the third conductive pattern of the second conductive layer, 250/DATA in 271, faces the third conductive layer 310 with the second planarization layer 280 therebetween. In reference to claim 8, Wang 2024 discloses each of the third conductive pattern of the second conductive layer, the fourth conductive pattern of the second conductive layer and the second planarization layer has an upper surface, and a distance from the upper surface of the third conductive pattern of the second conductive layer to the upper surface of the second planarization layer, is greater than a distance from the upper surface of the fourth conductive pattern of the second conductive layer to the upper surface of the second planarization layer, paragraph 97, see also Figure 2B. In reference to claim 9, Xin discloses the first groove located where the data line 212 and the power line 221 overlap, Figures 15 and 26, and Wang 2024 teaches the second groove located where the data line 250/DATA and the anode/pixel electrode 310/31 overlap, Figure 15A, and Wang 2024 further teaches a pixel layout where the location where the data line and power line overlap is spaced from the location where the data line and the anode/pixel electrode overlap, see annotated Figure 3 below. It results naturally from the combination of the Xin and Wang 2024 that the first groove and the second groove are spaced apart from each other in a direction along the second conductive layer. PNG media_image1.png 534 499 media_image1.png Greyscale [AltContent: textbox (Overlap of data line DATA and power line Vdd2 (first groove) spaced from overlap of data line and anode 31 (second groove) in a direction M1 along the second conductive layer. )][AltContent: oval][AltContent: oval][AltContent: arrow][AltContent: arrow][AltContent: oval][AltContent: oval][AltContent: arrow][AltContent: arrow] In reference to claim 15, Xin discloses the first conductive layer 22 extends in a first direction (horizontal direction in Figure 26), the second conductive layer 21 extends in a second direction (in and out of the page) crossing the first direction, and at the first groove CA2 of the insulating layer, the first conductive layer which extends in the first direction faces the second conductive layer which extends in the second direction, with the first planarization layer 12 therebetween. Claims 10-14 are rejected under 35 U.S.C. 103 as being unpatentable over Xin et al. (CN 113345923 A) in view of Wang (US 2024/0155899) as applied to claim 1 above and further in view of Wang et al. (US 2020/0083309). In reference to claim 10, Xin does not disclose a first transistor comprising a first semiconductor layer and a first electrode which overlaps the first semiconductor layer; and a capacitor comprising the first electrode and a second electrode which overlaps the first electrode. Wang et al. (US 2020/0083309), hereafter “Wang 2020,” discloses a display device including teaching a first transistor T1, comprising a first semiconductor layer, A1 in Figure 12, and a first electrode G1(Cst1) which overlaps the first semiconductor layer, paragraph 150; and a capacitor comprising the first electrode G1 (Cst1) and a second electrode Cst2 which overlaps the first electrode, paragraph 123. It would have been obvious to one of ordinary skill in the art before the effective filing date of the invention for the display to further comprise a first transistor comprising a first semiconductor layer and a first electrode which overlaps the first semiconductor layer; and a capacitor comprising the first electrode and a second electrode which overlaps the first electrode. To do so would have merely been to apply a known technique to improve similar devices in the same way, KSR International Co. v. Teleflex Inc. (KSR), 550 U.S. 398, 82 USPQ2d 1385 (2007), MPEP 2143 I. C. In this case, applying the wiring and wire spacing technique taught in the display of Xin to the display of Wang 2020. In reference to claim 11, Xin teaches power line 21/211/PVDD, on the same layer as the data line 21/212/DATA, on the planarization layer 12, and power line 221/22 on the insulating layer 13, as addressed above, and Figure 26. Wang 2020 includes the data line 171 (not pictured) on planarization layer 17, paragraph 172, and power line ELVDD 161 in Figures 7 and 12 on insulating layer 16. Wang 2020 further teaches the second electrode of the capacitor, Cst2 in Figure 12, faces the first planarization layer 17 with the insulating layer 16 therebetween. It results naturally from the combination of Xin and Wang 2020 that the second electrode of the capacitor, Cst2 in Figure 12, faces the first planarization layer 17 with the insulating layer 16 therebetween. In reference to claim 12, Wang 2020 discloses a second transistor T4 spaced apart from the first transistor in a direction along the insulating layer, and comprising: a second semiconductor layer, A4 in Figure 12, in a different layer than the first semiconductor layer A1 of the first transistor, and a third electrode G4 which overlaps the second semiconductor layer and is in a different layer than the second electrode of the capacitor Cst2, paragraphs 160 and 163. In reference to claim 13, Xin teaches power line 21/211/PVDD, on the same layer as the data line 21/212/DATA, on the planarization layer 12, and power line 221/22 on the insulating layer 13, as addressed above, and Figure 26. Wang 2020 includes the data line 171 (not pictured) on planarization layer 17, paragraph 172, and power line ELVDD 161 in Figures 7 and 12 on insulating layer 16. Wang 2020 further teaches the third electrode G4 of the second transistor faces the first planarization layer 17 with the insulating layer 16 therebetween. In reference to claim 14, Wang 2020 discloses the first semiconductor layer A1 (poly-silicon) of the first transistor and the second semiconductor layer A3 (oxide semiconductor) of the second transistor comprise different materials from each other, paragraphs 144, 150, and 162. Conclusion The prior art made of record and not relied upon is considered pertinent to applicant's disclosure. Tanaka et al. (WO 2020/065962) and Adachi (WO 2009116177 A1) disclose related wiring structures. Applicant's amendment necessitated the new ground(s) of rejection presented in this Office action. Accordingly, THIS ACTION IS MADE FINAL. See MPEP § 706.07(a). Applicant is reminded of the extension of time policy as set forth in 37 CFR 1.136(a). A shortened statutory period for reply to this final action is set to expire THREE MONTHS from the mailing date of this action. In the event a first reply is filed within TWO MONTHS of the mailing date of this final action and the advisory action is not mailed until after the end of the THREE-MONTH shortened statutory period, then the shortened statutory period will expire on the date the advisory action is mailed, and any nonprovisional extension fee (37 CFR 1.17(a)) pursuant to 37 CFR 1.136(a) will be calculated from the mailing date of the advisory action. In no event, however, will the statutory period for reply expire later than SIX MONTHS from the mailing date of this final action. Any inquiry concerning this communication or earlier communications from the examiner should be directed to BRYAN R. JUNGE whose telephone number is (571)270-5717. The examiner can normally be reached M-F 8:00-4:30 CT. Examiner interviews are available via telephone, in-person, and video conferencing using a USPTO supplied web-based collaboration tool. To schedule an interview, applicant is encouraged to use the USPTO Automated Interview Request (AIR) at http://www.uspto.gov/interviewpractice. If attempts to reach the examiner by telephone are unsuccessful, the examiner’s supervisor, Chad Dicke can be reached at (571)270-7996. The fax phone number for the organization where this application or proceeding is assigned is 571-273-8300. Information regarding the status of published or unpublished applications may be obtained from Patent Center. Unpublished application information in Patent Center is available to registered users. To file and manage patent submissions in Patent Center, visit: https://patentcenter.uspto.gov. Visit https://www.uspto.gov/patents/apply/patent-center for more information about Patent Center and https://www.uspto.gov/patents/docx for information about filing in DOCX format. For additional questions, contact the Electronic Business Center (EBC) at 866-217-9197 (toll-free). If you would like assistance from a USPTO Customer Service Representative, call 800-786-9199 (IN USA OR CANADA) or 571-272-1000. /BRYAN R JUNGE/Primary Examiner, Art Unit 2897
Read full office action

Prosecution Timeline

Jun 22, 2022
Application Filed
Sep 05, 2025
Non-Final Rejection — §103
Nov 04, 2025
Interview Requested
Dec 01, 2025
Applicant Interview (Telephonic)
Dec 08, 2025
Examiner Interview Summary
Dec 08, 2025
Response Filed
Feb 06, 2026
Final Rejection — §103
Apr 09, 2026
Response after Non-Final Action

Precedent Cases

Applications granted by this same examiner with similar technology

Patent 12563821
Semiconductor Device and Fabricating Method Thereof
2y 5m to grant Granted Feb 24, 2026
Patent 12563795
MULTILAYER STRUCTURE
2y 5m to grant Granted Feb 24, 2026
Patent 12557661
PACKAGE STRUCTURE WITH ANTENNA ELEMENT
2y 5m to grant Granted Feb 17, 2026
Patent 12550789
LIGHT EMITTING DISPLAY APPARATUS AND MULTI-SCREEN DISPLAY APPARATUS INCLUDING THE SAME
2y 5m to grant Granted Feb 10, 2026
Patent 12543454
DISPLAY PANEL AND DISPLAY APPARATUS
2y 5m to grant Granted Feb 03, 2026
Study what changed to get past this examiner. Based on 5 most recent grants.

AI Strategy Recommendation

Get an AI-powered prosecution strategy using examiner precedents, rejection analysis, and claim mapping.
Powered by AI — typically takes 5-10 seconds

Prosecution Projections

3-4
Expected OA Rounds
58%
Grant Probability
81%
With Interview (+23.0%)
2y 7m
Median Time to Grant
Moderate
PTA Risk
Based on 613 resolved cases by this examiner. Grant probability derived from career allow rate.

Sign in for Full Analysis

Enter your email to receive a magic link. No password needed.

Free tier: 3 strategy analyses per month