Prosecution Insights
Last updated: April 18, 2026
Application No. 17/887,292

GAP FILL ENHANCEMENT WITH THERMAL ETCH

Non-Final OA §102§103
Filed
Aug 12, 2022
Examiner
GREWAL, HEIM KIRIN
Art Unit
2812
Tech Center
2800 — Semiconductors & Electrical Systems
Assignee
Applied Materials, Inc.
OA Round
3 (Non-Final)
92%
Grant Probability
Favorable
3-4
OA Rounds
3y 4m
To Grant
93%
With Interview

Examiner Intelligence

Grants 92% — above average
92%
Career Allow Rate
23 granted / 25 resolved
+24.0% vs TC avg
Minimal +1% lift
Without
With
+0.6%
Interview Lift
resolved cases with interview
Typical timeline
3y 4m
Avg Prosecution
29 currently pending
Career history
54
Total Applications
across all art units

Statute-Specific Performance

§103
54.1%
+14.1% vs TC avg
§102
29.4%
-10.6% vs TC avg
§112
11.8%
-28.2% vs TC avg
Black line = Tech Center average estimate • Based on career data from 25 resolved cases

Office Action

§102 §103
Detailed Action Notice of Pre-AIA or AIA Status The present application, filed on or after March 16, 2013, is being examined under the first inventor to file provisions of the AIA . Continued Examination Under 37 CFR 1.114 A request for continued examination under 37 CFR 1.114, including the fee set forth in 37 CFR 1.17(e), was filed in this application after final rejection. Since this application is eligible for continued examination under 37 CFR 1.114, and the fee set forth in 37 CFR 1.17(e) has been timely paid, the finality of the previous Office action has been withdrawn pursuant to 37 CFR 1.114. Applicant's submission filed on 2/16/2026 has been entered. Status of Claims The following is in response to the communication filed 2/16/2026. Claims 1-20 are currently pending. Claims 1 and 11 have been amended. Claims 17-20 have been withdrawn. Claims 1-16 have been examined. Response to Arguments Applicant’s arguments, see page 6, filed 2/16/2026, with respect to 35 U.S.C. §112 have been fully considered and are persuasive. The rejections of 2/16/2026 of claims 1-16 with regards to 112(a) and 112(b) has been withdrawn. Applicant’s arguments, see page 7, filed 2/16/2026, with respect to the rejections of claims 1-16 in specific to claims 1 and 11 under 35 U.S.C. §103 have been fully considered and are persuasive. Therefore, the rejection has been withdrawn. However, upon further consideration, a new grounds of rejection is made in view of Chandrashekar et al. US 20130302980 A1. See below for more detail. Claim Objections Claim 10 is objected to because of the following informalities: Claim 10 recites “the etchant gas comprises an inert gas,” but for clarity should recite “the etchant gas further comprises an inert gas”. As written claim 10 could reasonable be interpreted to be further broadening in a dependent claim instead of further narrowing. Appropriate correction is required. Claim Rejections - 35 USC § 102 The text of those sections of Title 35, U.S. Code not included in this action can be found in a prior Office action. Claims 1-3 are rejected under 35 U.S.C. 102(a)(1) as being anticipated by Chandrashekar et al. US 20130302980 A1 (hereinafter Chandrashekar). Regarding claim 1, Chandrashekar discloses: A method of forming an interconnect structure over a substrate (Chandrashekar, Fig. 1B and 2A, Summary), comprising: forming a nucleation layer (Fig. 1B, [0043] under-layer 113 being a nucleation layer.) over a surface of the substrate (substrate 103), wherein the surface of the substrate comprises a plurality of openings,(hole 105) and the process of forming the nucleation layer (Process in Fig. 2A.) comprises: (a) exposing the substrate to a tungsten-containing precursor gas to form a tungsten-containing layer over a surface of each of the plurality of openings; (Fig. 2A, step 201a includes introducing a tungsten-containing precursor.) (b) exposing the formed tungsten-containing layer to an etchant gas, (Fig. 2A, step 201a includes introducing a reducing agent) wherein exposing the tungsten-containing layer to the etchant gas etches at least a portion of the tungsten-containing layer disposed at a top region of each of the plurality of openings; and ([0070], [the] process involves etching a pinched-off via to remove tungsten from the pinch point (i.e. top region of the opening).) (c) repeating (a) and (b) one or more times; and ([0068], the process is done by sequentially pulsing the precursor gas and the reducing/etching agent.) forming a bulk layer over the formed nucleation layer. (Step 201b forming the bulk layer.) Regarding claim 2, Chandrashekar further discloses: wherein the tungsten-containing precursor gas is selected from the group consisting of tungsten hexafluoride (WF6), tungsten hexachloride (WC16), and a combination thereof. ([0159], the tungsten containing precursor is WCL6.) Regarding claim 3, Chandrashekar further discloses: wherein exposing the formed tungsten- containing layer to the etchant gas to etch the formed tungsten-containing layer is a thermal based etching process that is performed at a temperature between 20 °C and 550 C. ([0094], etch of tungsten can be done at 100 °C or less.) Claim Rejections - 35 USC § 103 The text of those sections of Title 35, U.S. Code not included in this action can be found in a prior Office action. Claims 4, 5, 7, 8, and 11-16 are rejected under 35 U.S.C. 103 as being unpatentable over Chandrashekar in view of Toda et al. US 20220020601 A1 (hereinafter Toda). Regarding claim 4, Chandrashekar discloses the elements of claim 3 as recited above. Chandrashekar does not appear to disclose "the etchant gas comprises a molybdenum halide or a molybdenum oxy-halide". Toda, which teaches depositing molybdenum or tungsten films (Abstract), discloses: the etchant gas comprises a molybdenum halide or a molybdenum oxy-halide (Abstract; [0042]: ST3-supplying MoF6 as the first etching gas; Fluorine (F) is a halide). It would have been obvious to one of ordinary skill in the art before the effective filing date of the claimed invention to modify the device of Chandrashekar to use a molybdenum-based etchant gas as taught by Toda for purpose of selectively etching a tungsten film due to the high selectivity of etching tungsten films with respect to silicon. (Toda, [0031].) Regarding claim 5, Chandrashekar and Toda disclose the elements of claim 4 as recited above. Toda further discloses: the etchant gas comprises molybdenum fluoride (MoF6) (Abstract; [0042]: ST3- supplying MoF6 as the first etching gas; Fluorine (F) is a halide). Regarding claim 7, Chandrashekar and Toda disclose the elements of claim 1 as recited above. Chandrashekar does not appear to disclose "the etchant gas comprises a molybdenum halide or a molybdenum oxy-halide". Toda, which teaches depositing molybdenum or tungsten films (Abstract), discloses: the etchant gas comprises a molybdenum halide or a molybdenum oxy-halide (Abstract; [0042]: ST3-supplying MoF6 as the first etching gas; Fluorine (F) is a halide). It would have been obvious to one of ordinary skill in the art before the effective filing date of the claimed invention to modify the device of Chandrashekar to use a molybdenum-based etchant gas as taught by Toda for purpose of selectively etching a tungsten film due to the high selectivity of etching tungsten films with respect to silicon. (Toda, [0031].) Regarding claim 8, Chandrashekar and Toda disclose the elements of claim 7 as recited above. Toda further discloses: the etchant gas comprises molybdenum fluoride (MoF6) ([0042]: ST3-supplying MoF6 as the first etching gas; Fluorine (F) is a halide). Regarding claim 11, Chandrashekar discloses: A method of depositing a tungsten-containing layer, (Chandrashekar, Fig. 1B and 2A, Summary) comprising: performing a nucleation process (process in Fig. 2A.) in a processing chamber, (Fig. 24, [0200], chamber 2418 for fabricating a device with the process.) the nucleation process comprising: forming a tungsten-containing layer (Fig. 1B, under-layer 113) on a substrate (substrate 103) to by exposing a surface of the substrate a first tungsten-containing precursor gas, (Fig. 2A, step 201a includes introducing a tungsten-containing precursor. [0159], the tungsten containing precursor is WCL6.) wherein the surface of the substrate comprises a plurality of openings; etching a portion of the formed tungsten-containing layer disposed at a top region of each of the plurality of openings ([0070], [the] process involves etching a pinched-off via to remove tungsten from the pinch point (i.e. top region of the opening).) by delivering …etchant gas to the substrate, (Fig. 2A, step 201a includes introducing a reducing agent.) repeating forming of the tungsten-containing layer and etching the formed tungsten-containing layer; ([0068], the process is done by sequentially pulsing the precursor gas and the reducing/etching agent.) and performing a deposition process (Step 201b forming the bulk layer.) in the processing chamber, (Fig. 24, [0200], chamber 2418 for fabricating a device with the process.) the deposition process comprising forming a bulk layer by flowing a second tungsten-containing precursor gas. ([0163], the tungsten-containing precursor for bulk deposition is WF6.) Chandrashekar does not appear to specifically disclose that the etch gas is “a molybdenum-based etchant gas.” Toda, which teaches depositing molybdenum or tungsten films (Abstract), discloses: the etchant gas comprises a molybdenum halide or a molybdenum oxy-halide (Abstract; [0042]: ST3-supplying MoF6 as the first etching gas; Fluorine (F) is a halide) It would have been obvious to one of ordinary skill in the art before the effective filing date of the claimed invention to modify the device of Chandrashekar to use a molybdenum-based etchant gas as taught by Toda for purpose of selectively etching a tungsten film due to the high selectivity of etching tungsten films with respect to silicon. (Toda, [0031].) Regarding claim 12, Chandrashekar and Toda disclose all the elements of claim 11. Chandrashekar further discloses: repeating the nucleation process. ([0068], the process is done by sequentially pulsing the precursor gas and the reducing/etching agent.) Regarding claim 13, Chandrashekar and Toda disclose all the elements of claim 11. Chandrashekar further discloses: wherein the first and second tungsten-containing precursor gases are each selected from the group consisting of tungsten hexafluoride (WF6), tungsten hexachloride (WC16), and a combination thereof. ([0159] and [0163], the tungsten containing precursor is WCL6 and the tungsten-containing precursor for bulk deposition is WF6.) Regarding claim 14, Chandrashekar and Toda disclose all the elements of claim 11. Chandrashekar further discloses: wherein the etching of the formed tungsten- containing layer is performed at a temperature between 20 °C and 550 °C. ([0094], etch of tungsten can be done at 100 °C or less.) Regarding claim 15, Chandrashekar and Toda teach the elements of claim 11 as recited above. Toda further disclose: the etchant gas comprises a molybdenum halide or a molybdenum oxy-halide ([0042]: ST3-supplying MoF6 as the first etching gas; Fluorine (F) is a halide). Regarding claim 16, Chandrashekar and Toda teach the elements of claim 14 as recited above. Toda further discloses: the etchant gas comprises molybdenum fluoride (MoF6). ([0042]: ST3-supplying MoF6 as the first etching gas; Fluorine (F) is a halide). Claims 6, 9, and 10 are rejected under 35 U.S.C. 103 as being unpatentable over Chandrashekar and Toda as applied to claims 5 and 8 above, and further in view of Kong et al. “First principles study of inert-gas (helium, neon, and argon) interactions with hydrogen in tungsten” (hereinafter Kong). Regarding claim 6, Chandrashekar and Toda disclose the elements of claim 5 as recited above. Chandrashekar further discloses that “the etchant gas comprises argon (Ar)” (Chandrashekar, [0170].) While Chandrashekar does disclose using other inert gases as well as argon. (Chandrashekar, [0170].) Neither Chandrashekar or Toda specifically disclose the etchant gas comprises argon (Ar) “and a hydrogen containing gas.” Kong, which teaches the ion incident energy of hydrogen and inert-gas in a plasma generator (Kong, Introduction, p. 128.) discloses using an inert gas such as argon and others. (Abstract, page 128, hydrogen gas is used with an inert-gas like argon.) It would have been obvious to one of ordinary skill in the art before the effective filing date of the claimed invention to modify the device of Chandrashekar and Toda to have the etchant gas comprises argon (Ar) and a hydrogen containing gas as taught by Kong for purposes of having the inert gas interrupt the diffusion of hydrogen into tungsten. (Kong, Abstract.) Regarding claim 9, Chandrashekar and Toda disclose the elements of claim 8 as recited above. While Chandrashekar does disclose using other inert gases as well as argon. (Chandrashekar, [0170].) Neither Chandrashekar or Toda specifically disclose the etchant gas comprises “wherein the etchant gas comprises a hydrogen containing gas.” Kong, which teaches the ion incident energy of hydrogen and inert-gas in a plasma generator (Kong, Introduction, p. 128.) discloses the etchant gas comprises a hydrogen containing gas. (Abstract, page 128, hydrogen gas is used with an inert-gas like argon.) It would have been obvious to one of ordinary skill in the art before the effective filing date of the claimed invention to modify the device of Chandrashekar and Toda to have the etchant gas comprises a hydrogen containing gas as taught by Kong for purposes of having the inert gas interrupt the diffusion of hydrogen into tungsten. (Kong, Abstract.) Regarding claim 10, Chandrashekar, Toda, and Kong disclose the elements of claim 9 as recited above. Chandrashekar further discloses: wherein the etchant gas comprises an inert gas. (Chandrashekar, [0170] the etchant gas includes argon. ) Conclusion Any inquiry concerning this communication or earlier communications from the examiner should be directed to HEIM KIRIN GREWAL whose telephone number is (703)756-1515. The examiner can normally be reached Monday - Thursday 9:30 a.m. - 5:30 p.m. EST. Examiner interviews are available via telephone, in-person, and video conferencing using a USPTO supplied web-based collaboration tool. To schedule an interview, applicant is encouraged to use the USPTO Automated Interview Request (AIR) at http://www.uspto.gov/interviewpractice. If attempts to reach the examiner by telephone are unsuccessful, the examiner’s supervisor, DAVIENNE MONBLEAU can be reached at (571) 272-1945. The fax phone number for the organization where this application or proceeding is assigned is 571-273-8300. Information regarding the status of published or unpublished applications may be obtained from Patent Center. Unpublished application information in Patent Center is available to registered users. To file and manage patent submissions in Patent Center, visit: https://patentcenter.uspto.gov. Visit https://www.uspto.gov/patents/apply/patent-center for more information about Patent Center and https://www.uspto.gov/patents/docx for information about filing in DOCX format. For additional questions, contact the Electronic Business Center (EBC) at 866-217-9197 (toll-free). If you would like assistance from a USPTO Customer Service Representative, call 800-786-9199 (IN USA OR CANADA) or 571-272-1000. /HEIM KIRIN GREWAL/ Examiner, Art Unit 2812 /DAVIENNE N MONBLEAU/ Supervisory Patent Examiner, Art Unit 2812
Read full office action

Prosecution Timeline

Aug 12, 2022
Application Filed
May 16, 2025
Non-Final Rejection — §102, §103
Jul 24, 2025
Interview Requested
Aug 05, 2025
Applicant Interview (Telephonic)
Aug 06, 2025
Response Filed
Aug 07, 2025
Examiner Interview Summary
Oct 15, 2025
Final Rejection — §102, §103
Feb 16, 2026
Request for Continued Examination
Feb 25, 2026
Response after Non-Final Action
Mar 20, 2026
Non-Final Rejection — §102, §103 (current)

Precedent Cases

Applications granted by this same examiner with similar technology

Patent 12575175
MULTIPLE GATE-ALL-AROUND SEMICONDUCTOR DEVICES WITH GATE SEPARATION
2y 5m to grant Granted Mar 10, 2026
Patent 12575206
IMAGE SENSOR, METHOD OF MANUFACTURING IMAGE SENSOR, AND ELECTRONIC DEVICE INCLUDING IMAGE SENSOR
2y 5m to grant Granted Mar 10, 2026
Patent 12568620
SEMICONDUCTOR DEVICE INCLUDING NITRIDE SPACERS
2y 5m to grant Granted Mar 03, 2026
Patent 12568683
SINGLE STACK DUAL CHANNEL GATE-ALL-AROUND NANOSHEET WITH STRAINED PFET AND BOTTOM DIELECTRIC ISOLATION NFET
2y 5m to grant Granted Mar 03, 2026
Patent 12550344
SCHOTTKY DIODE AND MANUFACTURING METHOD THEREOF
2y 5m to grant Granted Feb 10, 2026
Study what changed to get past this examiner. Based on 5 most recent grants.

AI Strategy Recommendation

Get an AI-powered prosecution strategy using examiner precedents, rejection analysis, and claim mapping.
Powered by AI — typically takes 5-10 seconds

Prosecution Projections

3-4
Expected OA Rounds
92%
Grant Probability
93%
With Interview (+0.6%)
3y 4m
Median Time to Grant
High
PTA Risk
Based on 25 resolved cases by this examiner. Grant probability derived from career allow rate.

Sign in with your work email

Enter your email to receive a magic link. No password needed.

Personal email addresses (Gmail, Yahoo, etc.) are not accepted.

Free tier: 3 strategy analyses per month