Prosecution Insights
Last updated: April 18, 2026
Application No. 17/898,796

LANTHANUM NITRIDE AS A DRAM MOLYBDENUM LINER

Non-Final OA §103
Filed
Aug 30, 2022
Examiner
TRAN, TONY
Art Unit
2893
Tech Center
2800 — Semiconductors & Electrical Systems
Assignee
Applied Materials, Inc.
OA Round
3 (Non-Final)
70%
Grant Probability
Favorable
3-4
OA Rounds
2y 11m
To Grant
99%
With Interview

Examiner Intelligence

Grants 70% — above average
70%
Career Allow Rate
597 granted / 850 resolved
+2.2% vs TC avg
Strong +34% interview lift
Without
With
+34.0%
Interview Lift
resolved cases with interview
Typical timeline
2y 11m
Avg Prosecution
61 currently pending
Career history
911
Total Applications
across all art units

Statute-Specific Performance

§101
0.2%
-39.8% vs TC avg
§103
59.0%
+19.0% vs TC avg
§102
35.2%
-4.8% vs TC avg
§112
3.9%
-36.1% vs TC avg
Black line = Tech Center average estimate • Based on career data from 850 resolved cases

Office Action

§103
Notice of Pre-AIA or AIA Status The present application, filed on or after March 16, 2013, is being examined under the first inventor to file provisions of the AIA . Continued Examination Under 37 CFR 1.114 A request for continued examination under 37 CFR 1.114, including the fee set forth in 37 CFR 1.17(e), was filed in this application after final rejection. Since this application is eligible for continued examination under 37 CFR 1.114, and the fee set forth in 37 CFR 1.17(e) has been timely paid, the finality of the previous Office action has been withdrawn pursuant to 37 CFR 1.114. Applicant's submission filed on 02/20/2026 has been entered. Claim Rejections - 35 USC § 103 The following is a quotation of 35 U.S.C. 103 which forms the basis for all obviousness rejections set forth in this Office action: A patent for a claimed invention may not be obtained, notwithstanding that the claimed invention is not identically disclosed as set forth in section 102, if the differences between the claimed invention and the prior art are such that the claimed invention as a whole would have been obvious before the effective filing date of the claimed invention to a person having ordinary skill in the art to which the claimed invention pertains. Patentability shall not be negated by the manner in which the invention was made. Claim(s) 1, 6-8, 10-11, 13-15, 17, 19 and 20, 21-22, 23-25 is/are rejected under 35 U.S.C. 103 as being unpatentable over PARK (Pub. No.: US 2019/0292207) in view of Wrench (Pub. No.: US 2020/0373318). PNG media_image1.png 604 822 media_image1.png Greyscale Re claim 1, PARK, FIG. 12C [as shown above] teaches a method of forming a buried word line, the method comprising: conformally depositing a metal nitride layer on a substrate [S], the metal nitride layer (324+326A) comprising lanthanum nitride (324, FIG. 12C, ¶¶ [0024]-[0245], note that this lanthanum-containing film 324 could be lanthanum nitride film, [0180]) and the substrate [S] comprising at least one feature having a bottom [B] and at least one sidewall [OS], the metal nitride layer (324+326A) being deposited on the bottom and on the at least one sidewall; and depositing a molybdenum conductor layer (326B, [0250]) by an atomic layer deposition (ALD) process [0246] directly on the metal nitride layer (324+326A) to fill the at least one feature. Re claim 15, PARK, FIG. 12C teaches a method of forming a buried word line, the method comprising: conformally depositing a first metal nitride layer (324) on a substrate [S], the first metal nitride layer comprising lanthanum nitride (324) and the substrate comprising at least one feature having a bottom [B] and at least one sidewall [S], the metal nitride layer (324) being deposited on the bottom [B] and on the least one sidewall [OS]; depositing a second metal nitride layer (326A) directly on the first metal nitride layer (324); and depositing a molybdenum conductor layer (326B) by an atomic layer deposition (ALD) process directly on the first metal nitride layer. In re claims 1 and 15, PARK fails to teach the molybdenum conductor layer having a thickness in a range of from 10 Å to 200 Å. Wrench teaches the molybdenum conductor layer having a thickness in a range of from 10 A to 200 Å (“followed by deposition of bulk tungsten (W) at thicknesses of about 100 Å to about 300 Å, ¶ [0064], note that “The metal layer can comprise any suitable metal. In some embodiments, the metal layer comprises one or more of tungsten or molybdenum”, [0058]). It would have been obvious for a person of ordinary skill in the art before the effective filing date of the claim invention to include the above said teaching for the purpose of reducing stack resistivity while providing good barrier performance as taught by Wrench, [0003]. Re claim 6, PARK, FIG. 12C teaches the method of claim 1, wherein the ALD process is a thermal process [0226]. Re claim 7, PARK, FIG. 12C teaches the method of claim 1, wherein the molybdenum conductor layer (326B, [0250]) is deposited selectively on the metal nitride layer (326A+324). Re claim 8, PARK, FIG. 12C teaches the method of claim 1, wherein the ALD process comprises exposing the substrate sequentially to a reactant and a molybdenum precursor (326B, [0250]). Re claim 10, PARK, FIG. 12C teaches the method of claim 1, wherein the ALD process occurs at a temperature in a range of 350 °C to 550 °C [0226]. Re claim 11/21, in the combination, Wrench, FIG. 7 teaches the method of claim 1/15, wherein the buried word line has a resistance less than or equal to 20 µΩ-cm (note that “The electrical resistivity of molybdenum is approximately 5.7×10-8 Ω-m at room temperature”) at a total thickness of 100 Å (“deposition of bulk tungsten (W) at thicknesses of about 100 Å to about 300 Å”, [0064]). Re claim 13, in the combination, Wrench, FIG. 7 teaches the method of claim 1, wherein the at least one feature has a width in a range of 10 nm to 12 nm (“deposition of bulk tungsten (W) at thicknesses of about 100 Å to about 300 Å”, [0064]). Re claim 14, PARK, FIG. 12C teaches the method of claim 1, wherein the at least one feature is filled with the molybdenum conductor layer (326B in Y-Y’ view) in a bottom-up manner. Re claim 17, PARK, FIG. 12C teaches the method of claim 15, wherein the second metal nitride layer comprises one or more of titanium nitride (TiN), tantalum nitride (TaN), yttrium nitride (YN), zirconium nitride (ZrN), hafnium nitride (HfN), and barium nitride (BaN) (326A, [0245]). Re claim 19, PARK, FIG. 12C teaches the method of claim 15, wherein the ALD process is a thermal process [0226]. Re claim 20, PARK, FIG. 12C teaches the method of claim 15, wherein the molybdenum conductor layer (326B) is deposited selectively on the second metal nitride layer (326A). Re claim 22, PARK, FIG. 12C teaches the method of claim 15, wherein the at least one feature is filled with the molybdenum conductor layer (326B in Y-Y’ view) in a bottom-up manner. Re claim 23, PARK, FIG. 12C teaches the method of claim 1, wherein the molybdenum conductor layer (326B) is in contact with the metal nitride layer (324/326A) with no intervening layers between the molybdenum conductor layer and the metal nitride layer. Re claim 24, in the combination, Wrench, FIG. 6A teaches the method of claim 1, wherein the metal nitride layer consists of lanthanum nitride (120, [0049]). Re claim 25, in the combination, Wrench, FIG. 6A teaches the method of claim 15, wherein the first metal nitride layer consists of lanthanum nitride. Claim(s) 2, 16 and 18 is/are rejected under 35 U.S.C. 103 as being unpatentable over PARK/Wrench in view of CHANG (Pub. No.: US 2024/0249948). Re claim 2/16/18, PARK/Wrench teaches all the limitation of claim 1/15. PARK/Wrench fails to teach the limitation of claim 2/16/18. CHANG teaches wherein the metal nitride layer has a thickness of less than 20 Å (claim 2); wherein the first metal nitride layer has a thickness of less than 20 Å (119’, FIG. 5/6, [0056]) (claim 2/16). wherein the first metal nitride layer and the second metal nitride layer have a combined thickness in a range of from 15 Å to 30 Å (119’/122=123, FIG. 5/6, [0056]) (claim 18). It would have been obvious for a person of ordinary skill in the art before the effective filing date of the claim invention to include the above said teaching in order to increasing production efficiency and lowering associated costs as taught by CHANG, [0002]. Response to Arguments Applicant's arguments with respect to claims 1-2, 6-8, 10-11 and 13-22 on the remarks filed on 02/20/2026 have been considered but they are not persuasive because Applicant is using the broad language such as: the metal nitride layer comprising lanthanum nitride, therefore, PARK, FIG. 12C [as shown above] still reads on: conformally depositing a metal nitride layer on a substrate [S], the metal nitride layer (324+326A) comprising lanthanum nitride (324, FIG. 12C, ¶¶ [0024]-[0245], note that this lanthanum-containing film 324 could be lanthanum nitride film, [0180]) and the substrate [S] comprising at least one feature having a bottom [B] and at least one sidewall [OS], the metal nitride layer (324+326A) being deposited on the bottom and on the at least one sidewall; and depositing a molybdenum conductor layer (326B, [0250]) by an atomic layer deposition (ALD) process [0246] directly on the metal nitride layer (324+326A) to fill the at least one feature. Conclusion Any inquiry concerning this communication or earlier communications from the examiner should be directed to TONY TRAN whose telephone number is (571)270-1749. The examiner can normally be reached Monday-Friday, 8AM-5PM, EST. Examiner interviews are available via telephone, in-person, and video conferencing using a USPTO supplied web-based collaboration tool. To schedule an interview, applicant is encouraged to use the USPTO Automated Interview Request (AIR) at http://www.uspto.gov/interviewpractice. If attempts to reach the examiner by telephone are unsuccessful, the examiner’s supervisor, Britt Hanley can be reached at 571-270-3042. The fax phone number for the organization where this application or proceeding is assigned is 571-273-8300. Information regarding the status of published or unpublished applications may be obtained from Patent Center. Unpublished application information in Patent Center is available to registered users. To file and manage patent submissions in Patent Center, visit: https://patentcenter.uspto.gov. Visit https://www.uspto.gov/patents/apply/patent-center for more information about Patent Center and https://www.uspto.gov/patents/docx for information about filing in DOCX format. For additional questions, contact the Electronic Business Center (EBC) at 866-217-9197 (toll-free). If you would like assistance from a USPTO Customer Service Representative, call 800-786-9199 (IN USA OR CANADA) or 571-272-1000. /TONY TRAN/Primary Examiner, Art Unit 2893
Read full office action

Prosecution Timeline

Aug 30, 2022
Application Filed
Jul 08, 2025
Non-Final Rejection — §103
Oct 10, 2025
Response Filed
Nov 25, 2025
Final Rejection — §103
Feb 20, 2026
Request for Continued Examination
Feb 28, 2026
Response after Non-Final Action
Apr 06, 2026
Non-Final Rejection — §103 (current)

Precedent Cases

Applications granted by this same examiner with similar technology

Patent 12604527
DISPLAY PANEL AND DISPLAY DEVICE
2y 5m to grant Granted Apr 14, 2026
Patent 12598731
MEMORY DEVICE USING SEMICONDUCTOR ELEMENT
2y 5m to grant Granted Apr 07, 2026
Patent 12593677
SEMICONDUCTOR DEVICE STRUCTURE WITH ENERGY REMOVABLE STRUCTURE AND METHOD FOR PREPARING THE SAME
2y 5m to grant Granted Mar 31, 2026
Patent 12588395
Display Substrate and Preparation Method thereof, and Display Apparatus
2y 5m to grant Granted Mar 24, 2026
Patent 12588288
ACTIVE DEVICE SUBSTRATE
2y 5m to grant Granted Mar 24, 2026
Study what changed to get past this examiner. Based on 5 most recent grants.

AI Strategy Recommendation

Get an AI-powered prosecution strategy using examiner precedents, rejection analysis, and claim mapping.
Powered by AI — typically takes 5-10 seconds

Prosecution Projections

3-4
Expected OA Rounds
70%
Grant Probability
99%
With Interview (+34.0%)
2y 11m
Median Time to Grant
High
PTA Risk
Based on 850 resolved cases by this examiner. Grant probability derived from career allow rate.

Sign in with your work email

Enter your email to receive a magic link. No password needed.

Personal email addresses (Gmail, Yahoo, etc.) are not accepted.

Free tier: 3 strategy analyses per month