Prosecution Insights
Last updated: April 19, 2026
Application No. 17/905,754

APPARATUS AND PROCESS FOR EUV DRY RESIST SENSITIZATION BY GAS PHASE INFUSION OF A SENSITIZER

Final Rejection §102
Filed
Sep 06, 2022
Examiner
WALKE, AMANDA C
Art Unit
1722
Tech Center
1700 — Chemical & Materials Engineering
Assignee
Lam Research Corporation
OA Round
2 (Final)
88%
Grant Probability
Favorable
3-4
OA Rounds
2y 7m
To Grant
97%
With Interview

Examiner Intelligence

Grants 88% — above average
88%
Career Allow Rate
1488 granted / 1681 resolved
+23.5% vs TC avg
Moderate +8% lift
Without
With
+8.2%
Interview Lift
resolved cases with interview
Typical timeline
2y 7m
Avg Prosecution
52 currently pending
Career history
1733
Total Applications
across all art units

Statute-Specific Performance

§101
0.2%
-39.8% vs TC avg
§103
51.0%
+11.0% vs TC avg
§102
23.1%
-16.9% vs TC avg
§112
15.2%
-24.8% vs TC avg
Black line = Tech Center average estimate • Based on career data from 1681 resolved cases

Office Action

§102
DETAILED ACTION Notice of Pre-AIA or AIA Status The present application, filed on or after March 16, 2013, is being examined under the first inventor to file provisions of the AIA . Claim Rejections - 35 USC § 102 In the event the determination of the status of the application as subject to AIA 35 U.S.C. 102 and 103 (or as subject to pre-AIA 35 U.S.C. 102 and 103) is incorrect, any correction of the statutory basis (i.e., changing from AIA to pre-AIA ) for the rejection will not be considered a new ground of rejection if the prior art relied upon, and the rationale supporting the rejection, would be the same under either status. The following is a quotation of the appropriate paragraphs of 35 U.S.C. 102 that form the basis for the rejections under this section made in this Office action: A person shall be entitled to a patent unless – (a)(2) the claimed invention was described in a patent issued under section 151, or in an application for patent published or deemed published under section 122(b), in which the patent or application, as the case may be, names another inventor and was effectively filed before the effective filing date of the claimed invention. Claim(s) 1-3 is/are rejected under 35 U.S.C. 102(a)(2) as being anticipated by Ma et al (2020/0096870). Ma et al disclose a device stack comprising a substrate 234 having a resist underlayer 250 and an EUV resist layer coated thereon, wherein the resist is implanted with a to increase EUV sensitivity (figure 1, [0036]) which the element implanted is uniformly dispersed throughout the resist layer (instant claims 1 and 2). The element is preferably Xe, and while the reference is silent with respect to the isotope, those listed in claim 3 are common for ion implantation, and one of ordinary skill in the art would have been motivated to use any common Xe isotope used in ion implantation (instant claims 1-3). The resist preferably comprises an organometallic resist comprising SN, C, H, and O ([0029]-[0031]). Claim(s) 1-3 is/are rejected under 35 U.S.C. 102(a)(2) as being anticipated by Maes et al (2019/0163056 US equivalent of JP2019-095794 as cited by applicant). Maes et al disclose a resist stack comprising a substrate and a EUV resist sensitized by first and second precursor materials. The precursor is permeated into the resist (throughout the resist uniformly to increase the sensitivity of the unexposed resist layer, [0020]-[0024]), and the precursor includes a tin iodide or stannous iodide ([0045]; instant claims 1-3). The material further includes an organometallic material such as a metal alkylamide ([0046]-[0048]). Allowable Subject Matter Claim 6 is objected to as being dependent upon a rejected base claim, but would be allowable if rewritten in independent form including all of the limitations of the base claim and any intervening claims. As amended, the claim requires the organometallic material to have an iodine-substituted alkyl group. Neither of the references fairly teach or suggest an additive in addition to the sensitizer to have a iodine substituent. Response to Arguments Applicant's arguments filed 12/5/2025 have been fully considered but they are not persuasive. Applicant has amended the claims to include the limitation of claim 6 wherein the resist material comprises organometallic material, and further limited claim 6 to now require that the material includes an iodo-substituted alkyl group to limit the amended claim 1. In response, the rejections over Shiobara have been withdrawn upon reconsideration of the teachings of the reference. Applicant argues that the Ma et al reference fails to fairly teach an organometallic material, and argues that an organometallic material must have a carbon-metal (M-R) bond. However, the claims and specification broad, and organometallic material in the art is broad enough to include material comprising both organic and metallic components, not limited to an organometallic compound having a M-R bond. It is known in the art for metal complexes having M(-OR) bonds are also referred to broadly as organometallic, wherein the compounds include elements such as carbon, oxygen, hydrogen, nitrogen, and a metal, but wherein there is no carbon-metal bond. For example, 2022/0317572 includes compounds wherein the metal is bonded to R groups, wherein at least one R group is a polymerizable group, which includes methacrylate and methacrylamide, wherein the bond would include O-M or N-M, and further teaches that the R groups are separated from the metal by an -O-, -S-, -C-, -CO-, -SO, thus teaching that organometallic resists are broad and do not specifically require an M-R bond. Additional references including organotin compounds include 2017/0146909, 2022/0299877, 2024/0045332, KR20220155111, and 2021/0063871, as examples which broadly demonstrate that organometallic is used broadly in the art for resists comprising metal and organic components. That said, with respect to Ma et al, the reference teaches a metal-based photoresist comprising metal-oxides (which are known in the art and as seen in examples above) to comprise M-OR groups, thus including carbon groups as one of ordinary skill in the art would have understood, with the further teaching of implanting carbon into the resist, further leading to a resist comprising metal and organic components ([0003]-[0006], [0023], [0029]), an detaches wherein tin can be implanted into a CAR resist. Both are be resist comprising organic and metallic components, and would comprise a stack having a resist layer comprising a sensitizer and a resist comprising organometallic components. Regarding Maes et al, applicant has argued that the reference only teaches thew tin iodide, but as noted above, the reference clearly teaches an organomeallic resist material ([0048]) such as triethylaluminum, tetraethyltin, and more which clearyl comprises a M-R bond. Therefore the rejections are maintained. Conclusion Applicant's amendment necessitated the new ground(s) of rejection presented in this Office action. Accordingly, THIS ACTION IS MADE FINAL. See MPEP § 706.07(a). Applicant is reminded of the extension of time policy as set forth in 37 CFR 1.136(a). A shortened statutory period for reply to this final action is set to expire THREE MONTHS from the mailing date of this action. In the event a first reply is filed within TWO MONTHS of the mailing date of this final action and the advisory action is not mailed until after the end of the THREE-MONTH shortened statutory period, then the shortened statutory period will expire on the date the advisory action is mailed, and any nonprovisional extension fee (37 CFR 1.17(a)) pursuant to 37 CFR 1.136(a) will be calculated from the mailing date of the advisory action. In no event, however, will the statutory period for reply expire later than SIX MONTHS from the mailing date of this final action. Any inquiry concerning this communication or earlier communications from the examiner should be directed to AMANDA C WALKE whose telephone number is (571)272-1337. The examiner can normally be reached Monday to Thursday 5:30am to 4pm. Examiner interviews are available via telephone, in-person, and video conferencing using a USPTO supplied web-based collaboration tool. To schedule an interview, applicant is encouraged to use the USPTO Automated Interview Request (AIR) at http://www.uspto.gov/interviewpractice. If attempts to reach the examiner by telephone are unsuccessful, the examiner’s supervisor, Niki Bakhtiari can be reached at 571-272-3433. The fax phone number for the organization where this application or proceeding is assigned is 571-273-8300. Information regarding the status of published or unpublished applications may be obtained from Patent Center. Unpublished application information in Patent Center is available to registered users. To file and manage patent submissions in Patent Center, visit: https://patentcenter.uspto.gov. Visit https://www.uspto.gov/patents/apply/patent-center for more information about Patent Center and https://www.uspto.gov/patents/docx for information about filing in DOCX format. For additional questions, contact the Electronic Business Center (EBC) at 866-217-9197 (toll-free). If you would like assistance from a USPTO Customer Service Representative, call 800-786-9199 (IN USA OR CANADA) or 571-272-1000. /AMANDA C. WALKE/Primary Examiner, Art Unit 1722
Read full office action

Prosecution Timeline

Sep 06, 2022
Application Filed
Jul 13, 2025
Non-Final Rejection — §102
Nov 17, 2025
Response Filed
Nov 17, 2025
Response after Non-Final Action
Dec 05, 2025
Response Filed
Feb 13, 2026
Final Rejection — §102 (current)

Precedent Cases

Applications granted by this same examiner with similar technology

Patent 12597614
HYBRID ELECTRODES FOR BATTERY CELLS AND METHODS OF PRODUCTION THEREOF
2y 5m to grant Granted Apr 07, 2026
Patent 12596306
PHOTOCHEMICAL AND THERMAL RELEASE LAYER PROCESSES AND USES IN DEVICE MANUFACTURING
2y 5m to grant Granted Apr 07, 2026
Patent 12597635
ELECTROCHEMICAL DEVICE
2y 5m to grant Granted Apr 07, 2026
Patent 12586855
Battery Module and Battery Pack Including the Same
2y 5m to grant Granted Mar 24, 2026
Patent 12584023
COMPOSITION FOR FORMING ORGANIC FILM, PATTERNING PROCESS, AND COMPOUND
2y 5m to grant Granted Mar 24, 2026
Study what changed to get past this examiner. Based on 5 most recent grants.

AI Strategy Recommendation

Get an AI-powered prosecution strategy using examiner precedents, rejection analysis, and claim mapping.
Powered by AI — typically takes 5-10 seconds

Prosecution Projections

3-4
Expected OA Rounds
88%
Grant Probability
97%
With Interview (+8.2%)
2y 7m
Median Time to Grant
Moderate
PTA Risk
Based on 1681 resolved cases by this examiner. Grant probability derived from career allow rate.

Sign in with your work email

Enter your email to receive a magic link. No password needed.

Personal email addresses (Gmail, Yahoo, etc.) are not accepted.

Free tier: 3 strategy analyses per month