Prosecution Insights
Last updated: May 29, 2026
Application No. 17/912,202

SYSTEMS AND METHODS FOR FORMING STRUCTURES ON A SURFACE

Non-Final OA §102
Filed
Sep 16, 2022
Priority
Apr 03, 2020 — provisional 63/004,694 +1 more
Examiner
CHACKO DAVIS, DABORAH
Art Unit
1737
Tech Center
1700 — Chemical & Materials Engineering
Assignee
ASML Holding N.V.
OA Round
1 (Non-Final)
72%
Grant Probability
Favorable
1-2
OA Rounds
0m
Est. Remaining
92%
With Interview

Examiner Intelligence

Grants 72% — above average
72%
Career Allowance Rate
698 granted / 973 resolved
+6.7% vs TC avg
Strong +21% interview lift
Without
With
+20.6%
Interview Lift
resolved cases with interview
Typical timeline
3y 4m
Avg Prosecution
26 currently pending
Career history
1014
Total Applications
across all art units

Statute-Specific Performance

§101
0.4%
-39.6% vs TC avg
§103
48.0%
+8.0% vs TC avg
§102
22.4%
-17.6% vs TC avg
§112
17.4%
-22.6% vs TC avg
Black line = Tech Center average estimate • Based on career data from 973 resolved cases

Office Action

§102
DETAILED ACTION The present application, filed on or after March 16, 2013, is being examined under the first inventor to file provisions of the AIA . Election/Restrictions Applicant's election with traverse of Group I, claims 1-18, in the reply filed on November 18, 2025 is acknowledged. The traversal is on the ground(s) that the technical feature of claim 1 is not a special technical feature. This is not found persuasive because the feature in claim that recites iteratively repeating the masking and removing can be a resist mask that is in surface contact with substrate to be etched and can be performed lithographically, and the non-elected claims require separate masks with at least two different masks that are not in surface contact with the substrate and requires an etcher and requires a computer readable medium with instructions to be executed by a computer and cause a computer system to perform masking and etching. Claims 19-20, are withdrawn from further consideration pursuant to 37 CFR 1.142(b), as being drawn to a nonelected invention, there being no allowable generic or linking claim. The requirement is still deemed proper and is therefore made FINAL. Claim Rejections - 35 USC § 102 The following is a quotation of the appropriate paragraphs of 35 U.S.C. 102 that form the basis for the rejections under this section made in this Office action: A person shall be entitled to a patent unless – (a)(1) the claimed invention was patented, described in a printed publication, or in public use, on sale, or otherwise available to the public before the effective filing date of the claimed invention. Claim(s) 1-18, is/are rejected under 35 U.S.C. 102(a)(1) as being anticipated by U. S. Patent Application Publication No. 2017/0062181 (hereinafter referred to as Berry). Berry, in the abstract, and [0013], discloses providing a substrate on a substrate holder (wafer table), and providing a mask layer over a semiconductor material on the substrate, wherein the patterned mask layer forms a plurality of masked portions i.e., the remaining portion of the underlying substrate surface are exposed (unmasked), and conducting a removing process via ion beam etching (dry etching) so as to etch the semiconductor material in the unmasked portions and forming peaks in the masked portions and holes or vias in the unmasked portions as illustrated in figure 3C. Berry discloses repeating the process of masking and etching through the mask layer, and Berry, in figure 1, [0030]-[0031], discloses the use of plural masks (ion beam figuring masks) positioned above the semiconductor layer to be etched, and in [0035], Berry discloses removing at least one of the electrodes (mask with apertures) to direct and focus the ions to the surface as desired, and thereby Berry teaches the same claimed repeated masking and etching process in cycles ([0009]) to make desired shapes (target characteristic, desired topography) in the channel ([0042]) i.e., the claimed skewness and is illustrated in figures 3C to 3E, and discloses the taper in the etched structures formed, and the top surface having etched surfaces that are coplanar as disclosed in reference 302 (figure 3D) (claims 1-3, 6, 8, 9, 10, 13-14). Berry, in [0004]-[0006], discloses that the etched portions that are repeatedly etched include trenches i.e., they possess dimensional separation, and discloses etching anisotropically to obtain the desired direction of ion impinging the substrate so as to form an array of channels (having height of a desired dimension), and discloses adjusting the trajectory of the ions impinging the substrate surface i.e., adjusting the angle or taper of the ions during the etching, and is the same as the claimed removing material (claims 4-5, 7). Berry, in [0043], discloses that the semiconductor material portions to be etched, prior to etching or masking, is substantially planar, and the upper surface of the patterned mask layer (301, figure 3B) that is positioned on the semiconductor material on the substrate has burls i.e., linear mask segments that have varying height between 5-500nm or even as low as 10-50nm such that each individual mask segment shadow the underlying semiconductor material and the dimensions of the mask segments (length or width) determines the eventual dimensions of the underlying semiconductor material after the repeated etchings, and thereby the target characteristics includes roughness of the surface, at least of about 10-50nm, and is in the claimed range of less than 100nm (claims 11-12, 15-17). Berry, in [0043], discloses the mask segment separation can be at least about 200nm and Berry, in [0047], discloses that the ion can be impinged at an angle to undercut the mask segments i.e., width of the etch portions that are formed (hole/trench) can be greater than 200nm i.e., greater than 0.2 micron and includes the claimed 1micron (claim 18). Conclusion Any inquiry concerning this communication or earlier communications from the examiner should be directed to Daborah Chacko-Davis whose telephone number is (571) 272-1380. The examiner can normally be reached on 9:30AM-6:00PM EST Mon-Fri. If attempts to reach the examiner by telephone are unsuccessful, the examiner’s supervisor, Mark F. Huff can be reached on (571) 272-1385. The fax phone number for the organization where this application or proceeding is assigned is 571-272-8300. Information regarding the status of published or unpublished applications may be obtained from Patent Center. Unpublished application information in Patent Center is available to registered users. To file and manage patent submissions in Patent Center, visit: https://patentcenter.uspto.gov. Visit https://www.uspto.gov/patents/apply/patent-center for more information about Patent Center and https://www.uspto.gov/patents/docx for information about filing in DOCX format. For additional questions, contact the Electronic Business Center (EBC) at 866-217-9197 (toll-free). If you would like assistance from a USPTO Customer Service Representative, call 800-786-9199 (IN USA OR CANADA) or 571-272-1000. /DABORAH CHACKO-DAVIS/Primary Examiner, Art Unit 1737 January 10, 2026.
Read full office action

Prosecution Timeline

Sep 16, 2022
Application Filed
Jan 14, 2026
Non-Final Rejection mailed — §102 (current)

Precedent Cases

Applications granted by this same examiner with similar technology

Patent 12631961
MONOALKYL TIN TRIALKOXIDES AND/OR MONOALKYL TIN TRIAMIDES WITH LOW METAL CONTAMINATION AND/OR PARTICULATE CONTAMINATION, AND CORRESPONDING METHODS
3y 1m to grant Granted May 19, 2026
Patent 12613462
RESIST PATTERN FORMING METHOD AND SEMICONDUCTOR DEVICE MANUFACTURING METHOD
4y 2m to grant Granted Apr 28, 2026
Patent 12613468
METHOD FOR FORMING PATTERNED PHOTORESIST
2y 5m to grant Granted Apr 28, 2026
Patent 12610788
METHOD OF PROCESSING PHOTORESIST LAYER, AND PHOTORESIST LAYER
3y 9m to grant Granted Apr 21, 2026
Patent 12607925
PELLICLE, EXPOSURE ORIGINAL PLATE, EXPOSURE DEVICE, METHOD OF MANUFACTURING PELLICLE, AND METHOD OF MANUFACTURING SEMICONDUCTOR DEVICE
3y 3m to grant Granted Apr 21, 2026
Study what changed to get past this examiner. Based on 5 most recent grants.

Strategy Recommendation AI-generated — please review before filing

Get a prosecution strategy drawn from examiner precedents, rejection analysis, and claim mapping.
Typically takes 5-10 seconds — AI-generated, attorney review required before filing

Prosecution Projections

1-2
Expected OA Rounds
72%
Grant Probability
92%
With Interview (+20.6%)
3y 4m (~0m remaining)
Median Time to Grant
Low
PTA Risk
Based on 973 resolved cases by this examiner. Grant probability derived from career allowance rate.

Sign in with your work email

Enter your email to receive a magic link. No password needed.

Personal email addresses (Gmail, Yahoo, etc.) are not accepted.

Free tier: 3 strategy analyses per month