Prosecution Insights
Last updated: October 27, 2026
Application No. 17/950,293

BACKSIDE SIGNAL INTEGRATION THROUGH VIA TO SIGNAL LINE CONNECTION

Non-Final OA §103
Filed
Sep 22, 2022
Examiner
ENAD, CHRISTINE A
Art Unit
2811
Tech Center
2800 — Semiconductors & Electrical Systems
Assignee
International Business Machines Corporation
OA Round
3 (Non-Final)
84%
Grant Probability
Favorable
3-4
OA Rounds
0m
Est. Remaining
95%
With Interview

Examiner Intelligence

Grants 84% — above average
84%
Career Allowance Rate
1155 granted / 1367 resolved
+16.5% vs TC avg
Moderate +10% lift
Without
With
+10.2%
Interview Lift
resolved cases with interview
Fast prosecutor
1y 12m
Avg Prosecution
40 currently pending
Career history
1410
Total Applications
across all art units

Statute-Specific Performance

§101
1.7%
-38.3% vs TC avg
§103
64.3%
+24.3% vs TC avg
§102
19.5%
-20.5% vs TC avg
§112
8.2%
-31.8% vs TC avg
Black line = Tech Center average estimate • Based on career data from 1367 resolved cases

Office Action

§103
DETAILED ACTION Notice of Pre-AIA or AIA Status The present application, filed on or after March 16, 2013, is being examined under the first inventor to file provisions of the AIA . Continued Examination Under 37 CFR 1.114 A request for continued examination under 37 CFR 1.114, including the fee set forth in 37 CFR 1.17(e), was filed in this application after final rejection. Since this application is eligible for continued examination under 37 CFR 1.114, and the fee set forth in 37 CFR 1.17(e) has been timely paid, the finality of the previous Office action has been withdrawn pursuant to 37 CFR 1.114. Applicant's submission filed on August 5, 2026, has been entered. Claim Rejections - 35 USC § 103 The following is a quotation of 35 U.S.C. 103 which forms the basis for all obviousness rejections set forth in this Office action: A patent for a claimed invention may not be obtained, notwithstanding that the claimed invention is not identically disclosed as set forth in section 102, if the differences between the claimed invention and the prior art are such that the claimed invention as a whole would have been obvious before the effective filing date of the claimed invention to a person having ordinary skill in the art to which the claimed invention pertains. Patentability shall not be negated by the manner in which the invention was made. Claim 1-6, 8-20 are rejected under 35 U.S.C. 103 as being unpatentable over Cho et al (US Publication No. 2022/0020859) in view of Alptekin et al (US Publication No. 2024/0070365). PNG media_image1.png 511 778 media_image1.png Greyscale PNG media_image2.png 656 472 media_image2.png Greyscale Regarding claim 1, Cho discloses a semiconductor device, comprising: an isolation region Fig 15B, ST or Fig 20, ST; at least one transistor Fig 15B, PR1 or Fig 20, TR2 comprising a gate region Fig 15B, GE or Fig 20, GE, wherein the gate region is disposed on the first surface of the isolation region Fig 15B, ST or Fig 20, ST; a signal line Fig 20, SI disposed on a second side of the isolation region Fig 20 ST opposite the first side of the isolation region Fig 20, ST; a via Fig 15B or Fig 20, TV/LP/MC ¶0094 extending through the isolation region and in contact with the signal line Fig 15B, SI or Fig 20, SI on the second side of the isolation region ¶0094-0095; and a gate contact Fig 15B, GC or Fig 16, UP disposed on the gate region Fig 15B or Fig 16, wherein the via ¶0089 Fig 15B or Fig 16, LP is connected to the gate contact Fig 15B, GC or Fig 16, UP and the signal line Fig 15B, SI or Fig 20, SI is connected to the gate region through the via ¶0094-0095 Fig 15B or Fig 20, TV/LP/MC and the gate contact Fig 15B, GC or Fig 20, UP. Cho discloses all the limitations but silent on the arrangement of the via and the signal line. Whereas Alptekin discloses a signal line disposed on a second surface of the isolation region opposite the first surface of the isolation region Fig 4 ¶0036-0037; a via Fig 4, 228 and Fig 8, 228 extending through the isolation region from the first surface to the second surface of the isolation region and in contact with the signal line disposed on the second surface of the isolation region Fig 4 and Fig 8. Cho and Alptekin are analogous art because they are directed to semiconductor devices and one of ordinary skill in the art would have had a reasonable expectation of success to modify the device of Cho because they are from the same field of endeavor. Therefore it would have been obvious to one having ordinary skill of the art before the effective filing date of the claimed invention to modify the device of Cho and incorporate the teachings of Alptekin to improve device performance. Regarding claim 2, Cho discloses wherein the signal line Fig 15B, SI or Fig 20, SI is disposed in a same metallization level as a power element Fig 15B, POR1/POR2 ¶0095. Regarding claim 3, Cho discloses wherein the power element comprises a power rail ¶0041-0042. Regarding claim 4, Cho discloses wherein the at least one transistor further comprises a source/drain region Fig 15A, SD1, and the semiconductor device further comprises an additional via disposed through another portion of the isolation region and on the power element Fig 15A. Regarding claim 5, Cho discloses further comprising a source/drain contact disposed on the source/drain region, wherein the additional via Fig 15A, EP is connected to the source/drain contact Fig 15A. Regarding claim 6, Cho discloses wherein the via contacts a side surface of the gate region Fig 14A. Regarding claim 8, Cho discloses wherein the via is disposed adjacent the gate region Fig 15B and Fig 16. Regarding claim 9, Cho discloses further comprising at least one additional transistor comprising an additional gate region, wherein the additional gate region is disposed on the first side of the isolation region, and wherein the via is disposed between the gate region and the additional gate region Fig 15B, Fig 16 and Fig 20. Regarding claim 10, Cho discloses wherein the gate contact is further disposed on the additional gate region, and wherein the signal line is connected to the additional gate region through the via and the gate contact Fig 15B, Fig 16 and Fig 20. Regarding claim 11, Cho discloses a semiconductor device, comprising: an isolation region Fig 15B, ST or Fig 20, ST; at least one transistor Fig 15B, PR1 or Fig 20, TR2 comprising a gate region Fig 15B, GE or Fig 20, GE and a source/drain region Fig 15A, SD1; wherein the gate region Fig 15B, GE or Fig 20, GE and the source/drain region Fig 15A, SD1 are disposed on a first surface of the isolation region Fig 15B, ST or Fig 20, ST; a signal line Fig 20, SI and a power element Fig 15B, POR1/POR2 disposed on a second surface of the isolation region Fig 20 ST opposite the first surface of the isolation region Fig 20, ST ¶0095; a first via Fig 15B or Fig 20, TV/LP/MC ¶0094 extending through the isolation region and in contact with the signal line Fig 15B, SI or Fig 20, SI; wherein the first via ¶0089,0094-0095 Fig 15B or Fig 20, TV/LP/MC connects the signal line Fig 15B, SI or Fig 20, SI to the gate region Fig 15B, GE or Fig 16, GE; and a second via Fig 15A, EP extending through the isolation region and in contact with the power element Fig 15A, POR1/POR2 ¶0095, wherein the second via connects the power element to the source/drain region Fig 15A. Cho discloses all the limitations but silent on the arrangement of the via and the signal line. Whereas Alptekin discloses a signal line disposed on a second surface of the isolation region opposite the first surface of the isolation region Fig 4 ¶0036-0037; a first and second via Fig 4, 228 and Fig 8, 228 extending through the isolation region from the first surface to the second surface of the isolation region and in contact with the signal line disposed on the second surface of the isolation region Fig 4 and Fig 8. Cho and Alptekin are analogous art because they are directed to semiconductor devices and one of ordinary skill in the art would have had a reasonable expectation of success to modify the device of Cho because they are from the same field of endeavor. Therefore it would have been obvious to one having ordinary skill of the art before the effective filing date of the claimed invention to modify the device of Cho and incorporate the teachings of Alptekin to improve device performance. Regarding claim 12, Cho discloses wherein the signal line is disposed in a same metallization level as the power element Fig 15A-15B and Fig 16. Regarding claim 13, Cho discloses wherein the power element comprises a power rail¶0041-0042. Regarding claim 14, Cho discloses a gate contact Fig 15B, GC or Fig 20, UP on the gate region, wherein the first via Fig 15B, LP or Fig 20, LP/TV/MC is connected to the gate contact Fig 15B, GC or Fig 20, UP on and the signal line Fig 15B, SI or Fig 20, SI on is connected to the gate region through the first via and the gate contact Fig 15A-15B and Fig 16. Regarding claim 15, Cho discloses wherein the first via contacts a side surface of the gate region Fig 14A. Regarding claim 16, Cho discloses a source/drain contact on the source/drain region, wherein the second via Fig 15A, EP is connected to the source/drain contact and the power element Fig 15A, POR1/POR2 is connected to the source/drain region through the second via and the source/drain contact Fig 15A. Regarding claim 17, Cho discloses an integrated circuit, comprising: at least one transistor Fig 15B, PR1 comprising a gate region Fig 15B, GE and source/drain region Fig 15A, SD1 which are disposed on a first surface of an isolation region Fig 15B, ST or Fig 20, ST;a signal line Fig 20, SI and a power element Fig 15B, POR1/POR2 disposed in a same metallization level on a second surface of the isolation region opposite the first side ¶0095 Fig 15A-15B;a first via Fig 15B or Fig 20, TV/LP/MC ¶0094 extending through the isolation region and connecting the gate region Fig 15B, GE or Fig 16, GE to the signal line Fig 15B, SI or Fig 20, SI; and a second via Fig 15A, EP extending through the isolation region and connecting the source/drain region Fig 15A, SD1 to the power element Fig 15A-15B ¶0094-0095. Cho discloses all the limitations but silent on the arrangement of the via and the signal line. Whereas Alptekin discloses a signal line disposed on a second surface of the isolation region opposite the first surface of the isolation region Fig 4 ¶0036-0037; a first and second via Fig 4, 228 and Fig 8, 228 extending through the isolation region from the first surface to the second surface of the isolation region and in contact with the signal line disposed on the second surface of the isolation region Fig 4 and Fig 8. Cho and Alptekin are analogous art because they are directed to semiconductor devices and one of ordinary skill in the art would have had a reasonable expectation of success to modify the device of Cho because they are from the same field of endeavor. Therefore it would have been obvious to one having ordinary skill of the art before the effective filing date of the claimed invention to modify the device of Cho and incorporate the teachings of Alptekin to improve device performance. Regarding claim 18, Cho discloses a gate contact Fig 15B, GC on the gate region Fig 15B, GE1, wherein the first via ¶0089 Fig 15B or Fig 20, TV/LP/MC is connected to the gate contact Fig 15B, GC and the signal line Fig 15B, SI is connected to the gate region through the first via and the gate contact Fig 15A-15B. Regarding claim 19, Cho discloses wherein the first via contacts a side surface of the gate region Fig 14A. Regarding claim 20, Cho discloses a source/drain contact on the source/drain region, wherein the second via Fig 15A, EP is connected to the source/drain contact and the power element Fig 15A, POR1/POR2 is connected to the source/drain region through the second via and the source/drain contact Fig 15A. Claim 7 is rejected under 35 U.S.C. 103 as being unpatentable over Cho et al (US Publication No. 2022/0020859) and Alptekin et al (US Publication No. 2024/0070365) in further view of Chen et al (US Publication No. 2023/0036522). Regarding claim 7, Cho discloses all the limitations but is silent on the clock signal line. Whereas Chen discloses wherein the signal line comprises a clock signal line ¶0097-0099. Cho and Chen are analogous art because they are directed to semiconductor devices and one of ordinary skill in the art would have had a reasonable expectation of success to modify the device of Cho because they are from the same field of endeavor. Therefore it would have been obvious to one having ordinary skill of the art before the effective filing date of the claimed invention to modify the device of Cho and incorporate the teachings of Chen to improve device synchronization and timing. Response to Arguments Applicant’s arguments with respect to claims 1-20 have been considered but are moot because the new ground of rejection does not rely on any reference applied in the prior rejection of record for any teaching or matter specifically challenged in the argument. Conclusion Any inquiry concerning this communication or earlier communications from the examiner should be directed to CHRISTINE A ENAD whose telephone number is (571)270-7891. The examiner can normally be reached Monday-Friday, 7:30 am -4:30 pm. Examiner interviews are available via telephone, in-person, and video conferencing using a USPTO supplied web-based collaboration tool. To schedule an interview, applicant is encouraged to use the USPTO Automated Interview Request (AIR) at http://www.uspto.gov/interviewpractice. If attempts to reach the examiner by telephone are unsuccessful, the examiner’s supervisor, Lynne Gurley can be reached at 571 272 1670. The fax phone number for the organization where this application or proceeding is assigned is 571-273-8300. Information regarding the status of published or unpublished applications may be obtained from Patent Center. Unpublished application information in Patent Center is available to registered users. To file and manage patent submissions in Patent Center, visit: https://patentcenter.uspto.gov. Visit https://www.uspto.gov/patents/apply/patent-center for more information about Patent Center and https://www.uspto.gov/patents/docx for information about filing in DOCX format. For additional questions, contact the Electronic Business Center (EBC) at 866-217-9197 (toll-free). If you would like assistance from a USPTO Customer Service Representative, call 800-786-9199 (IN USA OR CANADA) or 571-272-1000. /CHRISTINE A ENAD/Primary Examiner, Art Unit 2811
Read full office action

Prosecution Timeline

Show 2 earlier events
Nov 06, 2025
Non-Final Rejection (signed) — §103
Jan 12, 2026
Non-Final Rejection mailed — §103
Apr 13, 2026
Response Filed
May 14, 2026
Final Rejection mailed — §103
Jul 14, 2026
Response after Non-Final Action
Aug 05, 2026
Request for Continued Examination
Aug 07, 2026
Response after Non-Final Action
Oct 15, 2026
Non-Final Rejection mailed — §103 (current)

Precedent Cases

Applications granted by this same examiner with similar technology

Patent 12772488
SEMICONDUCTOR DEVICE AND METHODS OF FORMATION
3y 3m to grant Granted Oct 20, 2026
Patent 12772549
SEMICONDUCTOR DEVICE WITH WORK FUNCTION LAYER
3y 0m to grant Granted Oct 20, 2026
Patent 12772485
SEMICONDUCTOR DEVICE AND METHOD FOR FABRICATING THE SAME
2y 12m to grant Granted Oct 20, 2026
Patent 12765347
SEMICONDUCTOR DEVICE AND METHOD FOR MANUFACTURING THE SAME
3y 3m to grant Granted Oct 13, 2026
Patent 12765049
SEMICONDUCTOR STRUCTURE AND METHOD FOR FORMING THE SAME
3y 4m to grant Granted Oct 13, 2026
Study what changed to get past this examiner. Based on 5 most recent grants.

Strategy Recommendation AI-generated — please review before filing

Get a prosecution strategy drawn from examiner precedents, rejection analysis, and claim mapping.
Typically takes 5-10 seconds — AI-generated, attorney review required before filing

Prosecution Projections

3-4
Expected OA Rounds
84%
Grant Probability
95%
With Interview (+10.2%)
1y 12m (~0m remaining)
Median Time to Grant
High
PTA Risk
Based on 1367 resolved cases by this examiner. Grant probability derived from career allowance rate.

Sign in with your work email

Enter your email to receive a magic link. No password needed.

Personal email addresses (Gmail, Yahoo, etc.) are not accepted.

Free tier: 3 strategy analyses per month