Prosecution Insights
Last updated: May 29, 2026
Application No. 17/974,385

PIXEL DEFINING ENCAPSULATING BARRIER FOR RGB COLOR PATTERNING

Final Rejection §102
Filed
Oct 26, 2022
Examiner
MANDALA, MICHELLE
Art Unit
2893
Tech Center
2800 — Semiconductors & Electrical Systems
Assignee
Applied Materials, Inc.
OA Round
2 (Final)
91%
Grant Probability
Favorable
3-4
OA Rounds
0m
Est. Remaining
99%
With Interview

Examiner Intelligence

Grants 91% — above average
91%
Career Allowance Rate
906 granted / 995 resolved
+23.1% vs TC avg
Moderate +8% lift
Without
With
+7.8%
Interview Lift
resolved cases with interview
Typical timeline
2y 2m
Avg Prosecution
19 currently pending
Career history
1009
Total Applications
across all art units

Statute-Specific Performance

§101
0.5%
-39.5% vs TC avg
§103
75.4%
+35.4% vs TC avg
§102
13.3%
-26.7% vs TC avg
§112
4.3%
-35.7% vs TC avg
Black line = Tech Center average estimate • Based on career data from 995 resolved cases

Office Action

§102
DETAILED ACTION Notice of Pre-AIA or AIA Status The present application, filed on or after March 16, 2013, is being examined under the first inventor to file provisions of the AIA . Claim Rejections - 35 USC § 102 In the event the determination of the status of the application as subject to AIA 35 U.S.C. 102 and 103 (or as subject to pre-AIA 35 U.S.C. 102 and 103) is incorrect, any correction of the statutory basis (i.e., changing from AIA to pre-AIA ) for the rejection will not be considered a new ground of rejection if the prior art relied upon, and the rationale supporting the rejection, would be the same under either status. The following is a quotation of the appropriate paragraphs of 35 U.S.C. 102 that form the basis for the rejections under this section made in this Office action: A person shall be entitled to a patent unless – (a)(1) the claimed invention was patented, described in a printed publication, or in public use, on sale, or otherwise available to the public before the effective filing date of the claimed invention. Claim(s) 1-6 and 31 are rejected under 35 U.S.C. 102(a)(1) as being anticipated by Choung et al. (2022/0077257). Re claim 1, Choung et al. disclose (Fig. 1A) a substrate (102); a plurality of adjacent pixel-defining layer structures (126) disposed over the substrate, the PDL structure having a top surface coupled to adjacent sidewalls of the PDL structure (Fig. 1A); a plurality of sub-pixels (106) defined by the PDL structures, each sub-pixel comprising: an anode (104), wherein an anode (104) of a sub-pixel (108a) of the plurality of sub-pixels is separated from an adjacent anode of an adjacent sub-pixel (108b)(Fig. 1A ([0027] & [0029]); an organic light emitting diode (OLED) material (112) disposed over the anode (104), the OLED material having a first OLED end and a second OLED end that extend over the top surface of the PDL structure (126) past the adjacent sidewalls (Fig. 1A); a cathode (114) disposed over the OLED material (112), the cathode (114) having a first cathode end and a second cathode end that extend over the top surface of the PDL structure (126) past the adjacent sidewalls; and an encapsulation layer (116) disposed over the cathode (114), wherein the encapsulation layer (116) has a first sidewall and a second sidewall, wherein the first sidewall and the second sidewall extend past the first OLED end (112), the second OLED end (112), the first cathode end (114), and the second cathode end (114) (Fig. 1A). Re claim 2, Choung et al. disclose wherein the anode includes one or more layers comprising a transparent conductive oxide material, chromium, titanium, gold, silver, copper, aluminum, ITO, or a combination thereof ([0027]). Re claim 3, Choung et al. disclose wherein: the first OLED end and the second OLED end (112) extend over the top surface of the PDL structure (126) past an endpoint of the anode (104); and the first cathode end and the second cathode end (114) extend over the top surface of the PDL structure (126) past an endpoint of the anode (104). Re claim 4, Choung et al. disclose wherein the plurality of sub-pixels (106) includes a first sub-pixel (114) and a second sub-pixel (114) (as shown in Fig. 1A), wherein a gap (gap on 115) separates the first sidewall of the encapsulation layer (116) of the second sub-pixel from the second sidewall of the encapsulation layer (116) of the first sub-pixel (Fig. 1A). Re claim 5, Choung et al. disclose further comprising a global passivation layer (118) disposed over the encapsulation layer (116), wherein the global passivation layer is disposed over the first sidewall and second sidewall of the encapsulation layer and a portion of the top surface of the PDL structures in the gap (Fig. 1A). Re claim 6, Choung et al. disclose wherein the global passivation layer (118) contacts the first sidewall and second sidewall of the encapsulation layer (116) and the portion of the top surface of the PDL structures in the gap (gap over 115). Re claim 31, Choung et al. disclose wherein the PDL structure (116) is disposed on the substrate (102) between the anode (104) and the adjacent anode (104) of the adjacent sub-pixel (sub-pixels 108a and 108b). Conclusion All arguments are directed to the claims as amended which are addressed herewith. Applicant's amendment necessitated the new ground(s) of rejection presented in this Office action. Accordingly, THIS ACTION IS MADE FINAL. See MPEP § 706.07(a). Applicant is reminded of the extension of time policy as set forth in 37 CFR 1.136(a). A shortened statutory period for reply to this final action is set to expire THREE MONTHS from the mailing date of this action. In the event a first reply is filed within TWO MONTHS of the mailing date of this final action and the advisory action is not mailed until after the end of the THREE-MONTH shortened statutory period, then the shortened statutory period will expire on the date the advisory action is mailed, and any nonprovisional extension fee (37 CFR 1.17(a)) pursuant to 37 CFR 1.136(a) will be calculated from the mailing date of the advisory action. In no event, however, will the statutory period for reply expire later than SIX MONTHS from the mailing date of this final action. Any inquiry concerning this communication or earlier communications from the examiner should be directed to MICHELLE MANDALA whose telephone number is (571)272-1858. The examiner can normally be reached 8:00-5:00 PM. Examiner interviews are available via telephone, in-person, and video conferencing using a USPTO supplied web-based collaboration tool. To schedule an interview, applicant is encouraged to use the USPTO Automated Interview Request (AIR) at http://www.uspto.gov/interviewpractice. If attempts to reach the examiner by telephone are unsuccessful, the examiner’s supervisor, Sue Purvis can be reached at 571-272-1236. The fax phone number for the organization where this application or proceeding is assigned is 571-273-8300. Information regarding the status of published or unpublished applications may be obtained from Patent Center. Unpublished application information in Patent Center is available to registered users. To file and manage patent submissions in Patent Center, visit: https://patentcenter.uspto.gov. Visit https://www.uspto.gov/patents/apply/patent-center for more information about Patent Center and https://www.uspto.gov/patents/docx for information about filing in DOCX format. For additional questions, contact the Electronic Business Center (EBC) at 866-217-9197 (toll-free). If you would like assistance from a USPTO Customer Service Representative, call 800-786-9199 (IN USA OR CANADA) or 571-272-1000. /MICHELLE MANDALA/Primary Examiner, Art Unit 2893 April 7, 2026
Read full office action

Prosecution Timeline

Oct 26, 2022
Application Filed
Jun 11, 2025
Response after Non-Final Action
Oct 10, 2025
Non-Final Rejection mailed — §102
Feb 10, 2026
Response Filed
Apr 09, 2026
Final Rejection mailed — §102 (current)

Precedent Cases

Applications granted by this same examiner with similar technology

Patent 12641992
DISPLAY SUBSTRATES, METHODS FOR MANUFACTURING DISPLAY SUBSTRATES, DISPLAY PANELS AND DISPLAY APPARATUSES
3y 8m to grant Granted May 26, 2026
Patent 12641959
DISPLAY APPARATUS AND METHOD OF MANUFACTURING DISPLAY APPARATUS
3y 5m to grant Granted May 26, 2026
Patent 12641891
SEMICONDUCTOR CAPACITOR FOR IMAGE SENSOR PIXEL CIRCUITRY
2y 11m to grant Granted May 26, 2026
Patent 12635553
SEMICONDUCTOR DEVICE HAVING A REDISTRIBUTION LINE
3y 11m to grant Granted May 19, 2026
Patent 12635251
DISPLAY DEVICE
2y 8m to grant Granted May 19, 2026
Study what changed to get past this examiner. Based on 5 most recent grants.

Strategy Recommendation AI-generated — please review before filing

Get a prosecution strategy drawn from examiner precedents, rejection analysis, and claim mapping.
Typically takes 5-10 seconds — AI-generated, attorney review required before filing

Prosecution Projections

3-4
Expected OA Rounds
91%
Grant Probability
99%
With Interview (+7.8%)
2y 2m (~0m remaining)
Median Time to Grant
Moderate
PTA Risk
Based on 995 resolved cases by this examiner. Grant probability derived from career allowance rate.

Sign in with your work email

Enter your email to receive a magic link. No password needed.

Personal email addresses (Gmail, Yahoo, etc.) are not accepted.

Free tier: 3 strategy analyses per month