Prosecution Insights
Last updated: October 02, 2026
Application No. 17/986,579

TRANSFER OF WIDE AND ULTRAWIDE BANDGAP LAYERS TO ENGINEERED SUBSTRATE

Final Rejection §103
Filed
Nov 14, 2022
Priority
Jan 19, 2022 — provisional 63/300,729
Examiner
VALENZUELA, PATRICIA D
Art Unit
2812
Tech Center
2800 — Semiconductors & Electrical Systems
Assignee
University of South Carolina
OA Round
2 (Final)
90%
Grant Probability
Favorable
3-4
OA Rounds
0m
Est. Remaining
92%
With Interview

Examiner Intelligence

Grants 90% — above average
90%
Career Allowance Rate
652 granted / 722 resolved
+22.3% vs TC avg
Minimal +2% lift
Without
With
+2.0%
Interview Lift
resolved cases with interview
Typical timeline
2y 2m
Avg Prosecution
82 currently pending
Career history
804
Total Applications
across all art units

Statute-Specific Performance

§101
1.4%
-38.6% vs TC avg
§103
68.2%
+28.2% vs TC avg
§102
15.8%
-24.2% vs TC avg
§112
6.2%
-33.8% vs TC avg
Black line = Tech Center average estimate • Based on career data from 722 resolved cases

Office Action

§103
DETAILED ACTION Notice of Pre-AIA or AIA Status The present application, filed on or after March 16, 2013, is being examined under the first inventor to file provisions of the AIA . Claim Rejections - 35 USC § 103 The following is a quotation of 35 U.S.C. 103 which forms the basis for all obviousness rejections set forth in this Office action: A patent for a claimed invention may not be obtained, notwithstanding that the claimed invention is not identically disclosed as set forth in section 102, if the differences between the claimed invention and the prior art are such that the claimed invention as a whole would have been obvious before the effective filing date of the claimed invention to a person having ordinary skill in the art to which the claimed invention pertains. Patentability shall not be negated by the manner in which the invention was made. Claim(s) 1-19 is/are rejected under 35 U.S.C. 103 as being unpatentable over Gaevski(USPGPUB DOCUMENT: 2018/0315886, hereinafter Gaevski) in view of Pinnington(USPATENT: 7732301, hereinafter Pinnington) and Wierer(USPATENT: 9595616, hereinafter Wierer). Re claim 1 Gaevski discloses a method for transferring wide and ultrawide bandgap (WBG and UWBG) layers to an engineered substrate, comprising: performing laser-based lift-off[0071,0072] (LLO) on high-electron mobility transistors[0042] HEMTs[0042] with AIN heat spreading buffer layers(22A/22B)[0045] grown over sapphire substrate material(20)[0044], to remove the sapphire substrate material(20)[0044]; Gaevski does not disclose applying a carrier substrate to the heat spreading buffer layers(22A/22B)[0045] using a bonding agent, to collectively form an engineered substrate; performing laser-based lift-off (LLO) on high-electron mobility transistors (HEMTs) comprising the WBG and UWBG layers, to remove the sapphire substrate material to expose the AIN heat spreading buffer layers attached to the HEMTs; and applying a carrier substrate to the exposed AIN heat spreading buffer layers using a bonding agent, to collectively form an engineered substrate. Pinnington discloses in Fig 2A-2N applying a carrier substrate (50)[col 41, lines 30-55] to the heat spreading buffer layers(30) [col 41, lines 30-55] using a bonding agent (51)[col42,lines 20-30], to collectively form an engineered substrate. It would have been obvious to one of ordinary skill in the art before the effective filling date of the invention to apply the teachings of Pinnington to the teachings of Gaevski in order to enable development of smaller light-emitting devices with longer life time, higher output power, and lower cost relative to conventional devices [col1 lines 35-45, Pinnington]. Gaevski and Pinnington does not disclose performing laser-based lift-off (LLO) on high-electron mobility transistors (HEMTs) comprising the WBG and UWBG layers, to remove the sapphire substrate material to expose the AIN heat spreading buffer layers attached to the HEMTs; and applying a carrier substrate to the exposed AIN heat spreading buffer layers using a bonding agent, to collectively form an engineered substrate. Wierer disclose performing laser-based lift-off (LLO) [col1, lines 45-65] on high-electron mobility transistors (HEMTs) comprising the WBG and UWBG layers [col1, lines 15-40], to remove the sapphire substrate material[col2, lines 5-15] to expose the AIN heat spreading buffer layers attached to the HEMTs[col3, lines 50-65](since AlGaN comprises AlN, this may be interpreted as remove the sapphire substrate material to expose the AIN heat spreading buffer layers attached to the HEMTs); It would have been obvious to one of ordinary skill in the art before the effective filling date of the invention to apply the teachings of Wierer to the teachings of Gaevski in order to enable the fabrication of smaller devices delivering high output power at high frequencies [col1 lines 30-45, Wierer]. In doing so, applying a carrier substrate to the exposed[col1, lines 15-40 of Wierer] AIN heat spreading buffer layers(22A/22B)[0045] using a bonding agent, to collectively form an engineered substrate. Re claim 2 Gaevski and Pinnington and Wierer disclose the method according to claim 1, wherein: the HEMTs[0042] comprise AlGaN/GaN HEMTs[0042]; the laser-based lift-off[0071,0072] (LLO) includes use of an excimer laser having a wavelength of less than 250 nm; and the AIN heat spreading buffer layers(22A/22B)[0045] are at least 10 um thick. Re claim 3 Gaevski and Pinnington and Wierer disclose the method according to claim 2, wherein: the HEMTs[0042] comprise Alo.26Gao.74N/GaN high-electron mobility transistors[0042]; the laser-based lift-off[0071,0072] (LLO) includes use of a 193-nm excimer laser; and the AIN heat spreading buffer layers(22A/22B)[0045] are about 16 yum thick. Re claim 4 Gaevski and Pinnington and Wierer disclose the method according to claim 1, wherein the carrier substrate(50)[col 41, lines 30-55 of Pinnington] comprises a heat sink layer. Re claim 5 Gaevski and Pinnington and Wierer disclose the method according to claim 4, where the heat sink layer comprises copper[col 41, lines 30-55 of Pinnington] and the bonding agent comprises solder. Re claim 6 Gaevski and Pinnington and Wierer disclose the method according to claim 1, wherein the laser-based lift-off[0071,0072] (LLO) includes using an ultraviolet laser light passed through the sapphire substrate material(20)[0044] to ablate an interface between the AIN heat spreading buffer layers [col2, lines 5-15 of Wierer] and the sapphire substrate material(20)[0044] to release the sapphire substrate material(20)[0044]. Re claim 7 Gaevski and Pinnington and Wierer disclose an engineered substrate made according to the method of claim 1(Fig 2A-2N of Pinnington). Re claim 8 Gaevski discloses a double transfer method for fabricating WBG and UWBG semiconductor devices without requiring a final polishing step, comprising: forming AIGaN/GaN HEMTs on a layer of AIN heat spreaders(22A/22B)[0045] having a thickness of at least 10 pm, grown over sapphire substrate material(20)[0044]s; applying excimer laser lift-off[0071,0072] to remove the sapphire substrate material(20)[0044]s to expose the layer of AIN heat spreaders(22A/22B)[0045] ; Gaevski does not disclose using a bonding agent to apply a heat sink layer to the exposed layer of AIN heat spreaders(22A/22B)[0045] ; whereby first transferring off the sapphire substrate material(20)[0044]s and subsequently transferring on a heat sink layer results in engineered formation of WBG and UWBG power devices; forming AIGaN/GaN HEMTs comprising the WBG and UWBG semiconductor devices ; applying excimer laser lift-off to remove the sapphire substrate materials to expose the layer of AIN heat spreaders attached to the AIGaN/GaN HEMTs; Pinnington discloses in Fig 2A-2N using a bonding agent(51)[col42,lines 20-30] to apply a heat sink layer(50)[col 41, lines 30-55] to the exposed layer of AIN heat spreaders(30) [col 41, lines 30-55] ; It would have been obvious to one of ordinary skill in the art before the effective filling date of the invention to apply the teachings of Pinnington to the teachings of Gaevski in order to enable development of smaller light-emitting devices with longer life time, higher output power, and lower cost relative to conventional devices [col1 lines 35-45, Pinnington]. In doing so, whereby first transferring off the sapphire substrate material(20)[0044]s and subsequently transferring on a heat sink layer(50)[col 41, lines 30-55 of Pinnington] results in engineered formation of WBG and UWBG power devices. Gaevski and Pinnington does not disclose forming AIGaN/GaN HEMTs comprising the WBG and UWBG semiconductor devices ; applying excimer laser lift-off to remove the sapphire substrate materials to expose the layer of AIN heat spreaders attached to the AIGaN/GaN HEMTs; Wierer disclose forming AIGaN/GaN HEMTs comprising the WBG and UWBG semiconductor devices [col1, lines 15-40]; applying laser lift-off to remove the sapphire substrate materials [col2, lines 5-15] to expose the layer of AIN[col3, lines 50-65](since AlGaN comprises AlN, this may be interpreted as remove the sapphire substrate materials [col2, lines 5-15] to expose the layer of AIN) heat spreaders attached to the AIGaN/GaN HEMTs; It would have been obvious to one of ordinary skill in the art before the effective filling date of the invention to apply the teachings of Wierer to the teachings of Gaevski in order to enable the fabrication of smaller devices delivering high output power at high frequencies [col1 lines 30-45, Wierer]. In doing so, applying excimer laser lift-off[0071,0072] to remove the sapphire substrate materials [col2, lines 5-15] Re claim 9 Gaevski and Pinnington and Wierer disclose the method according to claim 8, further comprising: before applying excimer laser lift-off[0071,0072], bonding UV tape to a side of the HEMT opposite the sapphire substrate material(20)[0044]s; and after applying a heat sink layer to the exposed layer of AIN heat spreaders(22A/22B)[0045] , removing the UV bonding tape. Re claim 10 Gaevski and Pinnington and Wierer disclose the method according to claim 8, further comprising, after applying excimer laser lift-off[0071,0072] to remove the sapphire substrate material(20)[0044]s, cleaning the exposed layer of AIN heat spreaders(22A/22B)[0045] . Re claim 11 Gaevski and Pinnington and Wierer disclose the method according to claim 10, wherein the cleaning comprises cleaning with 1:1 dilute HCI and C12/Ar ICP[col46, lines 1-10 of Pinnington]. Re claim 12 Gaevski and Pinnington and Wierer disclose the method according to claim 10, wherein applying a heat sink layer to the exposed layer of AIN heat spreaders(22A/22B)[0045] comprises bonding the exposed layer of AIN heat spreaders(22A/22B)[0045] to a copper heat sink substrate using In-Pb solder by thermocompression bonding Re claim 13 Gaevski and Pinnington and Wierer disclose the semiconductor device made according to the method of claim 8(Fig 2A-2N of Pinnington). Re claim 14 Gaevski discloses a Methodology for forming a layered substrate, comprising: performing laser-based lift-off[0071,0072] (LLO) on AlGaN high-electron mobility transistors[0042] HEMTs[0042] with ceramic heat spreading buffer layers(22A/22B)[0045] having relatively high thermal conductivity, and grown over sapphire substrate material(20)[0044], to remove the sapphire substrate material(20)[0044]: Gaevski does not disclose applying a copper heat sink to the ceramic heat spreading buffer layers(22A/22B)[0045] using a bonding agent, to collectively form an engineered layered substrate; to remove the sapphire substrate material to expose the ceramic heat spreading buffer layers attached to the AIGaN HEMTs; and applying a copper heat sink to the exposed ceramic heat spreading buffer layers using a bonding agent, Pinnington discloses in Fig 2A-2N applying a copper heat sink(50)[col 41, lines 30-55] to the ceramic heat spreading buffer layers(30) [col 41, lines 30-55] using a bonding agent(51)[col42,lines 20-30], to collectively form an engineered layered substrate. It would have been obvious to one of ordinary skill in the art before the effective filling date of the invention to apply the teachings of Pinnington to the teachings of Gaevski in order to enable development of smaller light-emitting devices with longer life time, higher output power, and lower cost relative to conventional devices [col1 lines 35-45, Pinnington]. Gaevski and Pinnington does not disclose to remove the sapphire substrate material to expose the ceramic heat spreading buffer layers attached to the AIGaN HEMTs; and applying a copper heat sink to the exposed ceramic heat spreading buffer layers using a bonding agent, Wierer disclose to remove the sapphire substrate material[col2, lines 5-15] to expose the ceramic heat spreading buffer layers[col3, lines 50-65](since AlGaN comprises AlN, this may be interpreted as remove the sapphire substrate material[col2, lines 5-15] to expose the ceramic heat spreading buffer layers) attached to the AIGaN HEMTs; It would have been obvious to one of ordinary skill in the art before the effective filling date of the invention to apply the teachings of Wierer to the teachings of Gaevski in order to enable the fabrication of smaller devices delivering high output power at high frequencies [col1 lines 30-45, Wierer]. In doing so, applying a copper heat sink(50)[col 41, lines 30-55 of Pinnington] to the exposed ceramic heat spreading[col2, lines 5-15 of Wierer] buffer layers using a bonding agent, Re claim 15 Gaevski and Pinnington and Wierer disclose the methodology according to claim 14, wherein the ceramic heat spreading buffer layers(22A/22B)[0045] comprise aluminum nitride (AIN). Re claim 16 Gaevski and Pinnington and Wierer disclose the methodology according to claim 14, wherein the ceramic heat spreading buffer layers(22A/22B)[0045] comprise III nitride material. Re claim 17 Gaevski and Pinnington and Wierer disclose the methodology according to claim 14, wherein: the AlGaN high-electron mobility transistors[0042] HEMTs[0042] comprise ultrawide bandgap (UWBG) AlGaN HEMTs[0042]; and the ceramic heat spreading buffer layers(22A/22B)[0045] comprise aluminum nitride (AIN) having a thickness of at least 10 um. Re claim 18 Gaevski and Pinnington and Wierer disclose the methodology according to claim 17, wherein the laser-based lift-off[0071,0072] (LLO) is performed on Alo.26Gao.74N/GaN HEMT’s by a 193-nm ArF excimer laser and transferred onto a copper heat sink(50)[col 41, lines 30-55 of Pinnington] bonded by In-Pb solder. Re claim 19 Gaevski and Pinnington and Wierer disclose a layered substrate made according to the methodology of claim 14(Fig 2A-2N of Pinnington). Response to Arguments Applicant’s arguments with respect to claim(s) 1-19 have been considered but are moot because the arguments do not apply to any of the references being used in the current rejection. Conclusion Applicant's amendment necessitated the new ground(s) of rejection presented in this Office action. Accordingly, THIS ACTION IS MADE FINAL. See MPEP § 706.07(a). Applicant is reminded of the extension of time policy as set forth in 37 CFR 1.136(a). A shortened statutory period for reply to this final action is set to expire THREE MONTHS from the mailing date of this action. In the event a first reply is filed within TWO MONTHS of the mailing date of this final action and the advisory action is not mailed until after the end of the THREE-MONTH shortened statutory period, then the shortened statutory period will expire on the date the advisory action is mailed, and any nonprovisional extension fee (37 CFR 1.17(a)) pursuant to 37 CFR 1.136(a) will be calculated from the mailing date of the advisory action. In no event, however, will the statutory period for reply expire later than SIX MONTHS from the mailing date of this final action. Any inquiry concerning this communication or earlier communications from the examiner should be directed to PATRICIA D VALENZUELA whose telephone number is (571)272-9242. The examiner can normally be reached Monday-Friday 10am-6pm EST. Examiner interviews are available via telephone, in-person, and video conferencing using a USPTO supplied web-based collaboration tool. To schedule an interview, applicant is encouraged to use the USPTO Automated Interview Request (AIR) at http://www.uspto.gov/interviewpractice. If attempts to reach the examiner by telephone are unsuccessful, the examiner’s supervisor, William Partridge can be reached at 571-270-1402. The fax phone number for the organization where this application or proceeding is assigned is 571-273-8300. Information regarding the status of published or unpublished applications may be obtained from Patent Center. Unpublished application information in Patent Center is available to registered users. To file and manage patent submissions in Patent Center, visit: https://patentcenter.uspto.gov. Visit https://www.uspto.gov/patents/apply/patent-center for more information about Patent Center and https://www.uspto.gov/patents/docx for information about filing in DOCX format. For additional questions, contact the Electronic Business Center (EBC) at 866-217-9197 (toll-free). If you would like assistance from a USPTO Customer Service Representative, call 800-786-9199 (IN USA OR CANADA) or 571-272-1000. /PATRICIA D VALENZUELA/Primary Examiner, Art Unit 2812
Read full office action

Prosecution Timeline

Nov 14, 2022
Application Filed
Mar 25, 2026
Non-Final Rejection mailed — §103
Jun 23, 2026
Response Filed
Sep 08, 2026
Final Rejection mailed — §103 (current)

Precedent Cases

Applications granted by this same examiner with similar technology

Patent 12721165
SEMICONDUCTOR CIRCUIT STRUCTURE WITH DIRECT DIE HEAT REMOVAL STRUCTURE
1y 0m to grant Granted Aug 25, 2026
Patent 12708031
SEMICONDUCTOR PACKAGE AND MANUFACTURING METHOD THEREFOR
3y 1m to grant Granted Aug 11, 2026
Patent 12702000
SEMICONDUCTOR DEVICE AND MANUFACTURING METHOD THEREOF
3y 5m to grant Granted Aug 04, 2026
Patent 12701980
Layer-By-Layer Formation Of Through-Substrate Via
3y 4m to grant Granted Aug 04, 2026
Patent 12701999
SEMICONDUCTOR POWER MODULE
3y 0m to grant Granted Aug 04, 2026
Study what changed to get past this examiner. Based on 5 most recent grants.

Strategy Recommendation AI-generated — please review before filing

Get a prosecution strategy drawn from examiner precedents, rejection analysis, and claim mapping.
Typically takes 5-10 seconds — AI-generated, attorney review required before filing

Prosecution Projections

3-4
Expected OA Rounds
90%
Grant Probability
92%
With Interview (+2.0%)
2y 2m (~0m remaining)
Median Time to Grant
Moderate
PTA Risk
Based on 722 resolved cases by this examiner. Grant probability derived from career allowance rate.

Sign in with your work email

Enter your email to receive a magic link. No password needed.

Personal email addresses (Gmail, Yahoo, etc.) are not accepted.

Free tier: 3 strategy analyses per month