Prosecution Insights
Last updated: April 19, 2026
Application No. 17/993,252

DISPLAY DEVICE INCLUDING HEAT DISSIPATION PART AND MANUFACTURING METHOD FOR THE SAME

Non-Final OA §102§103
Filed
Nov 23, 2022
Examiner
CHEN, DAVID Z
Art Unit
2815
Tech Center
2800 — Semiconductors & Electrical Systems
Assignee
Samsung Display Co., Ltd.
OA Round
3 (Non-Final)
44%
Grant Probability
Moderate
3-4
OA Rounds
3y 9m
To Grant
94%
With Interview

Examiner Intelligence

Grants 44% of resolved cases
44%
Career Allow Rate
299 granted / 675 resolved
-23.7% vs TC avg
Strong +49% interview lift
Without
With
+49.2%
Interview Lift
resolved cases with interview
Typical timeline
3y 9m
Avg Prosecution
63 currently pending
Career history
738
Total Applications
across all art units

Statute-Specific Performance

§101
0.2%
-39.8% vs TC avg
§103
47.4%
+7.4% vs TC avg
§102
26.4%
-13.6% vs TC avg
§112
24.4%
-15.6% vs TC avg
Black line = Tech Center average estimate • Based on career data from 675 resolved cases

Office Action

§102 §103
DETAILED ACTION The present application, filed on or after March 16, 2013, is being examined under the first inventor to file provisions of the AIA . In the event the determination of the status of the application as subject to AIA 35 U.S.C. 102 and 103 (or as subject to pre-AIA 35 U.S.C. 102 and 103) is incorrect, any correction of the statutory basis for the rejection will not be considered a new ground of rejection if the prior art relied upon, and the rationale supporting the rejection, would be the same under either status. Continued Examination Under 37 CFR 1.114 A request for continued examination under 37 CFR 1.114, including the fee set forth in 37 CFR 1.17(e), was filed in this application after final rejection. Since this application is eligible for continued examination under 37 CFR 1.114, and the fee set forth in 37 CFR 1.17(e) has been timely paid, the finality of the previous Office action has been withdrawn pursuant to 37 CFR 1.114. Applicant's submission filed on January 07, 2026 has been entered. Claim Rejections - 35 USC § 102 The following is a quotation of the appropriate paragraphs of 35 U.S.C. 102 that form the basis for the rejections under this section made in this Office action: A person shall be entitled to a patent unless – (a)(1) the claimed invention was patented, described in a printed publication, or in public use, on sale, or otherwise available to the public before the effective filing date of the claimed invention. (a)(2) the claimed invention was described in a patent issued under section 151, or in an application for patent published or deemed published under section 122(b), in which the patent or application, as the case may be, names another inventor and was effectively filed before the effective filing date of the claimed invention. Claim(s) 1, 4, and 6-15 are rejected under 35 U.S.C. 102(a)(1)(2) as being anticipated by U.S. Patent Application Publication No. 2016/0343781 A1 to Kawata et al. (“Kawata”). As to claim 1, Kawata discloses a display device comprising: a display layer (125) including a light emitting element (115, 117, 118); a heat dissipation part (991, 993) disposed on a rear surface of the display layer (125), the heat dissipation part (991, 993) including a heat dissipation layer (991, 993); a cover layer (992) sealing at least two surfaces of the heat dissipation layer (991, 993) from the display layer (125); and a resin part (114, 120, 138) contacting a side surface of the heat dissipation layer (991, 993), the side surface being exposed by the cover layer (992), such that the heat dissipation layer (991, 993) is sealed by the cover layer (992) and the resin part (114, 120, 138), wherein, in a plan view, the heat dissipation layer (991, 993) extends by a same length as the display layer (125) or extends farther than the display layer (125) (See Fig. 3, Fig. 16, Fig. 17, ¶ 0071, ¶ 0195, ¶ 0204, ¶ 0211, ¶ 0237-¶ 0245) (Notes: the heat dissipation part is met by providing a highly conductive material). As to claim 4, Kawata further discloses wherein the cover layer (992) includes: a first cover layer (left 992) covering a surface of the heat dissipation layer (991, 993); and a second cover layer (right 992) covering another surface of the heat dissipation layer (991, 993) (See Fig. 17). As to claim 6, Kawata discloses further comprising: a first area (131) overlapping the heat dissipation layer (991, 993) in the plan view, and a second area (right 133) not overlapping the heat dissipation layer (991, 993) in the plan view, wherein, in the plan view, the display layer (125), the heat dissipation layer (991, 993), and the cover layer (992) overlap the first area (131), and wherein, in the plan view, the resin part (114, 120, 138) and the cover layer (992) overlap the second area (right 133) (See Fig. 17). As to claim 7, Kawata further discloses wherein, in the plan view, the resin part (114, 120, 138) overlaps the heat dissipation layer (991, 993) and the cover layer (992) in a partial area of the first area (131) (See Fig. 17). As to claim 8, Kawata further discloses wherein a surface of the display layer (125) is covered by the heat dissipation layer (991, 993), and wherein a side surface of the display layer (125) is covered by the resin part (114, 120, 138) (See Fig. 17). As to claim 9, Kawata discloses further comprising: a first area (131) overlapping the heat dissipation layer (991, 993) in the plan view; and a second area (right 133) not overlapping the heat dissipation layer (991, 993) in the plan view, wherein, in the plan view, the resin part (114, 120, 138) overlaps the cover layer (992) in each of the first area (131) and the second area (right 133) (See Fig. 17). As to claim 10, Kawata further discloses wherein the cover layer (992) extends by a same length as the heat dissipation layer (991, 993), or extends farther than the heat dissipation layer (991, 993), in an extending direction of the heat dissipation layer (991, 993) (See Fig. 17). As to claim 11, Kawata further discloses wherein the heat dissipation layer (991, 993) extends farther by a heat dissipation extension length than the display layer (125), and wherein, in the plan view, the resin part (114, 120, 138) overlaps the heat dissipation layer (991, 993) and an area in which the heat dissipation extension length is defined (See Fig. 17). As to claim 12, Kawata discloses further comprising an outer film layer (142) disposed on the display layer (125), wherein the resin part (114, 120, 138) includes a film adjacent surface (114 top) adjacent to the outer film layer (142) and an outer lower surface (141 bottom) disposed at another side of the film adjacent surface (114 top), and wherein a thickness (wider, longer, thicker) of the outer lower surface (114 bottom) is greater than a thickness (thinner, narrower in contact with 117) of the film adjacent surface (114 top) in an extending direction of the outer film layer (142) (See Fig. 14). As to claim 13, Kawata discloses further comprising an outer film layer (142) disposed on the display layer (125), wherein the resin part (114, 120, 138) includes: a film adjacent surface (114 top) adjacent to the outer film layer (142); and an outer lower surface (114 bottom) disposed at another side of the film adjacent surface (114 top), wherein the film adjacent surface (114 top) has a first thickness (thinner, narrower, shorter) from a division point of the first area (131) and the second area (right 133) in an extending direction of the outer film layer (142), wherein the outer lower surface (114 bottom) has a second thickness (wider, longer, thicker) from the division point of the first area (131) and the second area (right 133) in the extending direction of the outer film layer (142), wherein the resin part (114, 120, 138) has an average thickness defined from the division point of the first area (131) and the second area (right 133) in the extending direction of the outer film layer (142), and wherein the second thickness (wider, longer, thicker) is greater than the average thickness (See Fig. 17). As to claim 14, Kawata further discloses wherein the first thickness (thinner, narrower, shorter) is less than the average thickness (See Fig. 17). As to claim 15, Kawata discloses a display device comprising: a display layer (125) including a light emitting element (115, 117, 118); a heat dissipation part (991, 993) disposed on a rear surface of the display layer (125), the heat dissipation part (991, 993) including a heat dissipation layer (991, 993); an outer film layer (142) disposed on the display layer (125); a cover layer (992) sealing at least two surfaces of the heat dissipation layer (991, 993) from the display layer (125); and a resin part (114, 120, 138) contacting a side surface of the heat dissipation layer (991, 993), the side surface being exposed by the cover layer (992), such that the heat dissipation layer (991, 993) is sealed by the cover layer (992) and the resin part (114, 120, 138), and including a film adjacent surface (114 top) adjacent to the outer film layer (142) and an outer lower surface (114 bottom) disposed at another side of the film adjacent surface (114 top), wherein a thickness (wider, longer, thicker) of the outer lower surface (114 bottom) is greater than an average thickness of the resin part (114, 120, 138) in an extending direction of the outer film layer (142) (See Fig. 3, Fig. 16, Fig. 17, ¶ 0071, ¶ 0195, ¶ 0204, ¶ 0211, ¶ 0237-¶ 0245) (Notes: the heat dissipation part is met by providing a highly conductive material). Claim Rejections - 35 USC § 103 The following is a quotation of 35 U.S.C. 103 which forms the basis for all obviousness rejections set forth in this Office action: A patent for a claimed invention may not be obtained, notwithstanding that the claimed invention is not identically disclosed as set forth in section 102, if the differences between the claimed invention and the prior art are such that the claimed invention as a whole would have been obvious before the effective filing date of the claimed invention to a person having ordinary skill in the art to which the claimed invention pertains. Patentability shall not be negated by the manner in which the invention was made. The factual inquiries for establishing a background for determining obviousness under 35 U.S.C. 103 are summarized as follows: 1. Determining the scope and contents of the prior art. 2. Ascertaining the differences between the prior art and the claims at issue. 3. Resolving the level of ordinary skill in the pertinent art. 4. Considering objective evidence present in the application indicating obviousness or nonobviousness. This application currently names joint inventors. In considering patentability of the claims the examiner presumes that the subject matter of the various claims was commonly owned as of the effective filing date of the claimed invention(s) absent any evidence to the contrary. Applicant is advised of the obligation under 37 CFR 1.56 to point out the inventor and effective filing dates of each claim that was not commonly owned as of the effective filing date of the later invention in order for the examiner to consider the applicability of 35 U.S.C. 102(b)(2)(C) for any potential 35 U.S.C. 102(a)(2) prior art against the later invention. Claim(s) 2 is rejected under 35 U.S.C. 103 as being unpatentable over U.S. Patent Application Publication No. 2016/0343781 A1 to Kawata et al. (“Kawata”) as applied to claim 1 above, and further in view of CN 104375679 A to Zeng (“Zeng”). The teaching of Kawata has been discussed above. As to claim 2, Kawata in view of Zeng further discloses wherein the heat dissipation layer (991, 993) includes graphite (See Kawata Fig. 17, ¶ 0237, ¶ 0238 and Zeng ¶ 0022, ¶ 0023) such that the heat dissipation layer having stable performance, excellent conductivity, better light transmittance, and low cost is obtained. Response to Arguments Applicant's arguments with respect to claims 1 and 15 have been considered but are moot in view of the new ground(s) of rejection. Conclusion Any inquiry concerning this communication or earlier communications from the examiner should be directed to DAVID CHEN whose telephone number is (571)270-7438. The examiner can normally be reached M-F 12-6. Examiner interviews are available via telephone, in-person, and video conferencing using a USPTO supplied web-based collaboration tool. To schedule an interview, applicant is encouraged to use the USPTO Automated Interview Request (AIR) at http://www.uspto.gov/interviewpractice. If attempts to reach the examiner by telephone are unsuccessful, the examiner’s supervisor, JOSHUA BENITEZ can be reached at (571) 270-1435. The fax phone number for the organization where this application or proceeding is assigned is 571-273-8300. Information regarding the status of published or unpublished applications may be obtained from Patent Center. Unpublished application information in Patent Center is available to registered users. To file and manage patent submissions in Patent Center, visit: https://patentcenter.uspto.gov. Visit https://www.uspto.gov/patents/apply/patent-center for more information about Patent Center and https://www.uspto.gov/patents/docx for information about filing in DOCX format. For additional questions, contact the Electronic Business Center (EBC) at 866-217-9197 (toll-free). If you would like assistance from a USPTO Customer Service Representative, call 800-786-9199 (IN USA OR CANADA) or 571-272-1000. /DAVID CHEN/Primary Examiner, Art Unit 2815
Read full office action

Prosecution Timeline

Nov 23, 2022
Application Filed
Jun 13, 2025
Non-Final Rejection — §102, §103
Aug 13, 2025
Applicant Interview (Telephonic)
Aug 13, 2025
Examiner Interview Summary
Sep 16, 2025
Response Filed
Oct 07, 2025
Final Rejection — §102, §103
Dec 04, 2025
Response after Non-Final Action
Jan 07, 2026
Request for Continued Examination
Jan 11, 2026
Response after Non-Final Action
Feb 21, 2026
Non-Final Rejection — §102, §103 (current)

Precedent Cases

Applications granted by this same examiner with similar technology

Patent 12601689
ELECTRONIC PACKAGE HAVING HUMIDITY INDICATOR
2y 5m to grant Granted Apr 14, 2026
Patent 12581634
SEMICONDUCTOR DEVICES INCORPORATING SEMICONDUCTOR LAYER CONFIGURATIONS AND METHODS OF MANUFACTURING THE SAME
2y 5m to grant Granted Mar 17, 2026
Patent 12581755
IMAGING DEVICE COMPRISING NET SHAPE WIRING
2y 5m to grant Granted Mar 17, 2026
Patent 12568849
DAM FOR THREE-DIMENSIONAL INTEGRATED CIRCUIT
2y 5m to grant Granted Mar 03, 2026
Patent 12557691
SEMICONDUCTOR DEVICE AND SEMICONDUCTOR MODULE COMPRISING A POLYIMIDE FILM DISPOSED IN AN ACTIVE REGION AND A TERMINATION REGION AND A PASSIVATION FILM DISPOSED AS A FILM UNDERLYING THE POLYIMIDE FILM
2y 5m to grant Granted Feb 17, 2026
Study what changed to get past this examiner. Based on 5 most recent grants.

AI Strategy Recommendation

Get an AI-powered prosecution strategy using examiner precedents, rejection analysis, and claim mapping.
Powered by AI — typically takes 5-10 seconds

Prosecution Projections

3-4
Expected OA Rounds
44%
Grant Probability
94%
With Interview (+49.2%)
3y 9m
Median Time to Grant
High
PTA Risk
Based on 675 resolved cases by this examiner. Grant probability derived from career allow rate.

Sign in with your work email

Enter your email to receive a magic link. No password needed.

Personal email addresses (Gmail, Yahoo, etc.) are not accepted.

Free tier: 3 strategy analyses per month