Prosecution Insights
Last updated: October 02, 2026
Application No. 18/021,897

LACTIC ACID BACTERIA STARTER, METHOD FOR PRODUCING FERMENTED MILK, AND FERMENTED MILK

Non-Final OA §102§103
Filed
Feb 17, 2023
Priority
Aug 21, 2020 — JP 2020-139992 +1 more
Examiner
TURNER, FELICIA C
Art Unit
1793
Tech Center
1700 — Chemical & Materials Engineering
Assignee
Meiji Co., Ltd.
OA Round
3 (Non-Final)
26%
Grant Probability
At Risk
3-4
OA Rounds
6m
Est. Remaining
56%
With Interview

Examiner Intelligence

Grants only 26% of cases
26%
Career Allowance Rate
167 granted / 636 resolved
-38.7% vs TC avg
Strong +30% interview lift
Without
With
+30.1%
Interview Lift
resolved cases with interview
Typical timeline
4y 2m
Avg Prosecution
52 currently pending
Career history
700
Total Applications
across all art units

Statute-Specific Performance

§101
1.0%
-39.0% vs TC avg
§103
61.9%
+21.9% vs TC avg
§102
8.8%
-31.2% vs TC avg
§112
24.2%
-15.8% vs TC avg
Black line = Tech Center average estimate • Based on career data from 636 resolved cases

Office Action

§102 §103
DETAILED ACTION Notice of Pre-AIA or AIA Status The present application, filed on or after March 16, 2013, is being examined under the first inventor to file provisions of the AIA . Receipt is acknowledged of the Request for Continued Examination (RCE) under 1.114, the Amendment and Response, all filed 6/16/26. Claims 1-2,4-7, 9-11, 13, and 24-28 are pending. Claims 1, 2, 4-7, 9-11, 13, and 24-28 have been examined on the merits. Claims 3, 8, and 12 were previously cancelled. Claims 14-23 have been cancelled. Claims 24-28 are new. Continued Examination Under 37 CFR 1.114 A request for continued examination under 37 CFR 1.114, including the fee set forth in 37 CFR 1.17(e), was filed in this application after final rejection. Since this application is eligible for continued examination under 37 CFR 1.114, and the fee set forth in 37 CFR 1.17(e) has been timely paid, the finality of the previous Office action has been withdrawn pursuant to 37 CFR 1.114. Applicant's submission filed on 6/16/26 has been entered. Withdrawn Rejections The 102(a)(1) rejections of claims 1, 4, 10, and 13 as being anticipated by Eyer et al. US 5962046 have been withdrawn due to the amendments to the claims. The 103(a) rejections of claims 2 and 11 over Eyer et al. (US 5962046) and Curic-Bawden et al. (US 2019/0082707) have been withdrawn due to the amendments to claims 1 and 10. The 103(a) rejection of claim 7 over Koh et al. (US 2019/0281848) and Curic-Bawden et al. (US 2019/0082707) has been withdrawn due to the amendment to claim 6 above. Claim Rejections - 35 USC § 102 The text of those sections of Title 35, U.S. Code not included in this action can be found in a prior Office action. Claims 1, 4, 5, 6, 9, 10, 13, 24, 25 and 27 are rejected under 35 U.S.C. 102(a)(1) as being anticipated by Folkenberg et al. (US 2012/0107450). Regarding Claims 1, 4, 24: Folkenberg discloses a method of fermenting milk [abstract; 0015]. Folkenberg discloses milk as including raw milk and pasteurized milk [0029]. Folkenberg discloses inoculating the milk with at least 107 CFU/g belonging to a species of Lactobacillus and 108CFU/g belonging to S. thermophilus [0023]. Folkenberg does not require the presence of L. delbruekii. Folkenberg discloses the Lactobacillus as L. johnsonii [0017; 0018]. Regarding Claim 5: Folkenberg discloses a method of fermenting milk [abstract; 0015]. Folkenberg discloses milk as including raw milk and pasteurized milk [0029]. Folkenberg discloses inoculating the milk with at least 107 CFU/g belonging to a species of Lactobacillus and 108CFU/g belonging to S. thermophilus [0023]. The recitation of a method for shortening fermentation, however, is a recitation of the intended use of the claimed invention and in order to patentably distinguish the claimed invention from the prior art, the recitation must result in a structural difference between the claimed invention and the prior art. MPEP 2103 states that intended use language "does not limit a claim to a particular structure does not limit the scope of a claim". The above-mentioned phrase does not limit the claim to any particular structure, so it is not interpreted to limit the scope of the claims. If the prior art structure is capable of performing the intended use, then it meets the claim. Regarding Claims 6, 9, and 25: Folkenberg discloses a method of fermenting milk [abstract; 0015]. Folkenberg discloses milk as including raw milk and pasteurized milk [0029]. Folkenberg discloses inoculating the milk with at least 107 CFU/g belonging to a species of Lactobacillus and 108CFU/g belonging to S. thermophilus [0023]. Folkenberg does not disclose adding saccharides [0057]. Regarding Claims 10, 11, 13, and 27: Folkenberg discloses a method of fermenting milk [abstract; 0015]. Folkenberg discloses milk as including raw milk and pasteurized milk [0029]. Folkenberg discloses inoculating the milk with at least 107 CFU/g belonging to a species of Lactobacillus and 108CFU/g belonging to S. thermophilus [0023]. Folkenberg does not require the presence of L. delbruekii. Folkenberg discloses the Lactobacillus as L. johnsonii [0017; 0018]. “Even though product-by-process claims are limited by and defined by the process, determination of patentability is based on the product itself. The patentability of a product does not depend on its method of production. If the product in the product-by-process claim is the same as or obvious from a product of the prior art, the claim is unpatentable even though the prior art was made by a different process.” In re Thorpe, 777 F.2d 695, 698. Claim Rejections - 35 USC § 103 The text of those sections of Title 35, U.S. Code not included in this action can be found in a prior Office action. Claim 26 is rejected under 35 U.S.C. 103 as being unpatentable over Folkenberg et al. (US 2012/0107450). Regarding Claim 26: Folkenberg discloses as discussed above in claim 6. Folkenberg discloses that the starter can be in liquid form [0024]. Folkenberg discloses inoculating the milk with at least 107 CFU/g belonging to a species of Lactobacillus and 108CFU/g belonging to S. thermophilus [0023]. Folkenberg does not disclose bacteria present at between 1x107 CFU/ml and 5 x109 CFU/ml. However, there is no particular patentable difference between a composition which is in dry form and one which is the same composition with the addition of water. The mere matter of liquid form, if respective compositions are substantially the same, cannot lend patentability to applicant’s claims. In re Nelson 1938 CD 708. Claim 28 is rejected under 35 U.S.C. 103 as being unpatentable over Folkenberg et al. (US 2012/0107450) in view of Sotoyama et al. (US 2004/0202749). Regarding Claim 28: Folkenberg discloses a method of fermenting milk [abstract; 0015]. Folkenberg discloses milk as including raw milk and pasteurized milk [0029]. Folkenberg discloses inoculating the milk with at least 107 CFU/g belonging to a species of Lactobacillus and 108CFU/g belonging to S. thermophilus [0023]. Folkenberg does not require the presence of L. delbruekii. Folkenberg discloses the Lactobacillus as L. johnsonii [0017; 0018]. Sotoyama discloses a method of fermenting milk and discloses the fermentation method as occurring for a short period of time or 5 hours [abstract; 0020; 0064; 0065]. At the effective filing date of the invention it would have been obvious to one of ordinary skill in the art to modify the method of Folkenberg to include fermenting for five hours as in Sotoyama since Sotoyama discloses bacteria as able to sufficiently ferment milk in the given time frame. Response to Arguments The 102(a)(1) rejections of claims 1, 4, 10, and 13 as being anticipated by Eyer et al. US 5962046 have been withdrawn due to the amendments to the claims. The 103(a) rejections of claims 2 and 11 over Eyer et al. (US 5962046) and Curic-Bawden et al. (US 2019/0082707) have been withdrawn due to the amendments to claims 1 and 10. The 103(a) rejection of claim 7 over Koh et al. (US 2019/0281848) and Curic-Bawden et al. (US 2019/0082707) has been withdrawn due to the amendment to claim 6 above. Pertinent Prior Art The prior art made of record and not relied upon is considered pertinent to applicant's disclosure. Chen et al. (US 20190388484) Chen discloses adding microorganisms to raw milk [0012]. Chen discloses Lactobacillus spp.; Streptococcus spp., and Bifidobacterium spp. [0012]. Conclusion Any inquiry concerning this communication or earlier communications from the examiner should be directed to FELICIA C TURNER whose telephone number is (571)270-3733. The examiner can normally be reached Mon-Thu 8:00-4:00 pm. Examiner interviews are available via telephone, in-person, and video conferencing using a USPTO supplied web-based collaboration tool. To schedule an interview, applicant is encouraged to use the USPTO Automated Interview Request (AIR) at http://www.uspto.gov/interviewpractice. If attempts to reach the examiner by telephone are unsuccessful, the examiner’s supervisor, Emily Le can be reached at 571-272-0903. The fax phone number for the organization where this application or proceeding is assigned is 571-273-8300. Information regarding the status of published or unpublished applications may be obtained from Patent Center. Unpublished application information in Patent Center is available to registered users. To file and manage patent submissions in Patent Center, visit: https://patentcenter.uspto.gov. Visit https://www.uspto.gov/patents/apply/patent-center for more information about Patent Center and https://www.uspto.gov/patents/docx for information about filing in DOCX format. For additional questions, contact the Electronic Business Center (EBC) at 866-217-9197 (toll-free). If you would like assistance from a USPTO Customer Service Representative, call 800-786-9199 (IN USA OR CANADA) or 571-272-1000. /Felicia C Turner/ Primary Examiner, Art Unit 1793
Read full office action

Prosecution Timeline

Feb 17, 2023
Application Filed
Jun 02, 2025
Non-Final Rejection mailed — §102, §103
Dec 01, 2025
Response Filed
Jan 16, 2026
Final Rejection mailed — §102, §103
Jun 16, 2026
Request for Continued Examination
Jun 18, 2026
Response after Non-Final Action
Sep 10, 2026
Non-Final Rejection mailed — §102, §103 (current)

Precedent Cases

Applications granted by this same examiner with similar technology

Patent 12727604
A PROCESS FOR PREPARING A BEVERAGE ENRICHED WITH NATURAL ANTIOXIDANTS AND BEVERAGE COMPOSITION THEREOF
2y 5m to grant Granted Sep 08, 2026
Patent 12714120
BIOPROTECTIVE LACTIC ACID BACTERIA WITH LOW POSTACIDIFICATION
3y 9m to grant Granted Aug 25, 2026
Patent 12690602
TRADITIONAL CHINESE MEDICINE POLYSACCHARIDE EXTRACT FREEZE-DRYING PROTECTIVE AGENT, DIRECT-TO-VAT STARTER AND PREPARATION METHODS THEREOF
3y 6m to grant Granted Jul 28, 2026
Patent 12642280
YEAST AND LACTIC ACID BACTERIA COMBINATION
3y 7m to grant Granted Jun 02, 2026
Patent 12628834
A BREAD WITH D-ALLULOSE INSTEAD OF SUCROSE AND A PREPARATION METHOD THEREFOR
2y 10m to grant Granted May 19, 2026
Study what changed to get past this examiner. Based on 5 most recent grants.

Strategy Recommendation AI-generated — please review before filing

Get a prosecution strategy drawn from examiner precedents, rejection analysis, and claim mapping.
Typically takes 5-10 seconds — AI-generated, attorney review required before filing

Prosecution Projections

3-4
Expected OA Rounds
26%
Grant Probability
56%
With Interview (+30.1%)
4y 2m (~6m remaining)
Median Time to Grant
High
PTA Risk
Based on 636 resolved cases by this examiner. Grant probability derived from career allowance rate.

Sign in with your work email

Enter your email to receive a magic link. No password needed.

Personal email addresses (Gmail, Yahoo, etc.) are not accepted.

Free tier: 3 strategy analyses per month