Prosecution Insights
Last updated: October 23, 2026
Application No. 18/027,722

METHOD FOR MANUFACTURING SEMICONDUCTOR DEVICE, AND DEVICE FOR MANUFACTURING SEMICONDUCTOR DEVICE

Non-Final OA §102§103
Filed
Mar 22, 2023
Priority
Sep 29, 2020 — JP 2020-163822 +1 more
Examiner
TRAN, TONY
Art Unit
2893
Tech Center
2800 — Semiconductors & Electrical Systems
Assignee
Tokyo Electron Limited
OA Round
3 (Non-Final)
70%
Grant Probability
Favorable
3-4
OA Rounds
0m
Est. Remaining
99%
With Interview

Examiner Intelligence

Grants 70% — above average
70%
Career Allowance Rate
621 granted / 884 resolved
+2.2% vs TC avg
Strong +33% interview lift
Without
With
+33.3%
Interview Lift
resolved cases with interview
Typical timeline
2y 9m
Avg Prosecution
50 currently pending
Career history
937
Total Applications
across all art units

Statute-Specific Performance

§101
0.8%
-39.2% vs TC avg
§103
60.5%
+20.5% vs TC avg
§102
33.3%
-6.7% vs TC avg
§112
3.7%
-36.3% vs TC avg
Black line = Tech Center average estimate • Based on career data from 884 resolved cases

Office Action

§102 §103
Notice of Pre-AIA or AIA Status The present application, filed on or after March 16, 2013, is being examined under the first inventor to file provisions of the AIA . Continued Examination Under 37 CFR 1.114 A request for continued examination under 37 CFR 1.114, including the fee set forth in 37 CFR 1.17(e), was filed in this application after final rejection. Since this application is eligible for continued examination under 37 CFR 1.114, and the fee set forth in 37 CFR 1.17(e) has been timely paid, the finality of the previous Office action has been withdrawn pursuant to 37 CFR 1.114. Applicants’ submission filed on 08/27/2026 has been entered. Claim Rejections - 35 USC § 102 The following is a quotation of the appropriate paragraphs of 35 U.S.C. 102 that form the basis for the rejections under this section made in this Office action: A person shall be entitled to a patent unless – (a)(1) the claimed invention was patented, described in a printed publication, or in public use, on sale, or otherwise available to the public before the effective filing date of the claimed invention. (a)(2) the claimed invention was described in a patent issued under section 151, or in an application for patent published or deemed published under section 122(b), in which the patent or application, as the case may be, names another inventor and was effectively filed before the effective filing date of the claimed invention. Claim(s) 10 is/are rejected under 35 U.S.C. 102(a)(1)/(2) as being anticipated by MA (Pub. No.: US 2007/0054487). Re claim 10, MA, FIGS. 1A-1C teaches a method for manufacturing a semiconductor device that includes forming a ruthenium film including boron on a conductive film formed on a substrate for manufacture of the semiconductor device, wherein the conductive film includes a metal that increases an electrical resistance between the conductive film (106) and the ruthenium film (108) by interfacial diffusion between the conductive film and the ruthenium film, and wherein the method comprises forming the ruthenium film including boron on the conductive film by alternately repeating a plurality of times (to reach a desired thickness, [0057]): forming a ruthenium thin film by supplying a ruthenium raw material gas (“an ampoule containing methylcyclopentadienyl pyrrolyl ruthenium ((MeCp)(Py)Ru)”, ¶ [0027]) to the substrate on which the conductive film (106, FIG. 1A, [0056], note that the ruthenium form is 108, [0057]) is formed; and then forming the ruthenium film including boron by supplying a boron compound gas to the ruthenium thin film while preventing contact between the conductive film and the boron compound gas (“Thereafter, the flow of the reagent gas….. a variety of reactants may be used to form ruthenium materials having a wide range of compositions. In another example, a boron-containing reactant compound (e.g., diborane) is used to form a ruthenium material containing boride”, [0029], note that because the ruthenium precursor formed first therefore it is preventing contact between the conductive film and the boron compound gas). Claim Rejections - 35 USC § 103 The following is a quotation of 35 U.S.C. 103 which forms the basis for all obviousness rejections set forth in this Office action: A patent for a claimed invention may not be obtained, notwithstanding that the claimed invention is not identically disclosed as set forth in section 102, if the differences between the claimed invention and the prior art are such that the claimed invention as a whole would have been obvious before the effective filing date of the claimed invention to a person having ordinary skill in the art to which the claimed invention pertains. Patentability shall not be negated by the manner in which the invention was made. Claim(s) 10-17 is/are rejected under 35 U.S.C. 103 as being unpatentable over Shinriki (Patent No.: US 2008/0318417) and further in view of MA (Pub. No.: US 2007/0054487). Re claim 10, Shinriki, Figs. 7(a)-(f) teaches method for manufacturing a semiconductor device that includes forming a ruthenium film on a conductive film formed on a substrate for manufacture of the semiconductor device, wherein the conductive film (209, Fig. 7(c)) includes a metal that increases an electrical resistance between the conductive film and the ruthenium film by interfacial diffusion between the conductive film and the ruthenium film, and wherein the method comprises forming the ruthenium film (210, Fig. 7(d), ¶ [0170]) on the conductive film (209, [0167]) by alternately repeating a plurality of times (to reach certain thickness, for example, “repeated for a specified number of cycles (such as 10 cycles, 20 cycles, 30 cycles, 40 cycles, 50 cycles”, [0142]); forming a ruthenium thin film by supplying a ruthenium raw material gas ((Ru(EtCp)2), [0141]) to the substrate (201) on which the conductive film (209) is formed; and supplying a boron compound gas (B2H6, [0167]) to the ruthenium thin film. Shinriki fails to teach forming a ruthenium thin film by supplying a ruthenium raw material gas to the substrate on which the conductive film is formed; and then forming the ruthenium film including boron by supplying a boron compound gas to the ruthenium thin film while preventing contact between the conductive film and the boron compound gas. MA teaches forming a ruthenium thin film by supplying a ruthenium raw material gas (“an ampoule containing methylcyclopentadienyl pyrrolyl ruthenium ((MeCp)(Py)Ru)”, ¶ [0027]) to the substrate on which the conductive film (106, FIG. 1A, [0056], note that the ruthenium form is 108, [0057]) is formed; and then forming the ruthenium film including boron by supplying a boron compound gas to the ruthenium thin film while preventing contact between the conductive film and the boron compound gas (“Thereafter, the flow of the reagent gas….. a variety of reactants may be used to form ruthenium materials having a wide range of compositions. In another example, a boron-containing reactant compound (e.g., diborane) is used to form a ruthenium material containing boride”, [0029], note that because the ruthenium precursor formed first therefore it is preventing contact between the conductive film and the boron compound gas). It would have been obvious for a person of ordinary skill in the art before the effective filing date of the claim invention to include the above said teaching for the purpose of providing a variety of reactants of forming ruthenium materials as taught by MA, [0029]. Re claim 11, Shinriki, Figs. 7(a)-(f) teaches the method of Claim 10, wherein the conductive film is a cobalt film including cobalt [0212]. Re claim 12, Shinriki, Figs. 7(a)-(f) teaches the method of Claim 11, wherein the boron compound gas is a diborane gas (B2H6, [0167]). Re claim 13 and 15, Shinriki teaches the method of Claim 12, wherein the ruthenium raw material gas is a derivative ruthenium precursor gas (Figs. 2(a)-2(c), [015])). Shinriki differs from the invention by not showing a dodecacarbonium triruthenium gas. However, it would have been obvious to one having ordinary skill in the art at the time of the invention was made to include the above said teaching since it has been held to be within the general skill of a worker in the art to select a known material on the basis of its suitability for the intended use as a matter of obvious design choice. In re Leshin, 277 F.2d 197, 125 USPQ 416. Re claim 14, Shinriki teaches the method of Claim 13, wherein the ruthenium thin film has a film thickness of 0.268 nm or more and 2 nm or less (“approx. 1 nm, [0150]). Re claim 15, Shinriki teaches the method of Claim 10, wherein the boron compound gas is a diborane gas (B2H6, [0167]). Re claim 17, Shinriki teaches the method of Claim 10, wherein the ruthenium thin film has a film thickness of 0.268 nm or more and 2 nm or less (“approx. 1 nm, [0150]). Response to Arguments Applicants’ arguments with respect to claims 10-17 on the remarks filed on 08/27/2026 have been considered but are not persuasive because MA teaches forming a ruthenium thin film by supplying a ruthenium raw material gas (“an ampoule containing methylcyclopentadienyl pyrrolyl ruthenium ((MeCp)(Py)Ru)”, ¶ [0027]) to the substrate on which the conductive film (106, FIG. 1A, [0056], note that the ruthenium form is 108, [0057]) is formed; and then forming the ruthenium film including boron by supplying a boron compound gas to the ruthenium thin film while preventing contact between the conductive film and the boron compound gas (“Thereafter, the flow of the reagent gas….. a variety of reactants may be used to form ruthenium materials having a wide range of compositions. In another example, a boron-containing reactant compound (e.g., diborane) is used to form a ruthenium material containing boride”, [0029], note that because the ruthenium precursor formed first therefore it is preventing contact between the conductive film and the boron compound gas). Conclusion Any inquiry concerning this communication or earlier communications from the examiner should be directed to TONY TRAN whose telephone number is (571)270-1749. The examiner can normally be reached Monday-Friday, 8AM-5PM, EST. Examiner interviews are available via telephone, in-person, and video conferencing using a USPTO supplied web-based collaboration tool. To schedule an interview, applicant is encouraged to use the USPTO Automated Interview Request (AIR) at http://www.uspto.gov/interviewpractice. If attempts to reach the examiner by telephone are unsuccessful, the examiner’s supervisor, Britt Hanley can be reached at 571-270-3042. The fax phone number for the organization where this application or proceeding is assigned is 571-273-8300. Information regarding the status of published or unpublished applications may be obtained from Patent Center. Unpublished application information in Patent Center is available to registered users. To file and manage patent submissions in Patent Center, visit: https://patentcenter.uspto.gov. Visit https://www.uspto.gov/patents/apply/patent-center for more information about Patent Center and https://www.uspto.gov/patents/docx for information about filing in DOCX format. For additional questions, contact the Electronic Business Center (EBC) at 866-217-9197 (toll-free). If you would like assistance from a USPTO Customer Service Representative, call 800-786-9199 (IN USA OR CANADA) or 571-272-1000. /TONY TRAN/Primary Examiner, Art Unit 2893
Read full office action

Prosecution Timeline

Mar 22, 2023
Application Filed
Jan 27, 2026
Non-Final Rejection mailed — §102, §103
Apr 27, 2026
Response Filed
May 27, 2026
Final Rejection mailed — §102, §103
Aug 27, 2026
Request for Continued Examination
Aug 28, 2026
Response after Non-Final Action
Oct 05, 2026
Non-Final Rejection mailed — §102, §103 (current)

Precedent Cases

Applications granted by this same examiner with similar technology

Patent 12757489
ENLARGED OVERLAP BETWEEN BACKSIDE POWER RAIL AND BACKSIDE CONTACT
3y 9m to grant Granted Oct 06, 2026
Patent 12757698
Method for Gapfill
3y 9m to grant Granted Oct 06, 2026
Patent 12751270
Diffusion Barrier for Semiconductor Device and Method
4y 2m to grant Granted Sep 29, 2026
Patent 12751265
VERTICAL SEMICONDUCTOR DEVICES
3y 10m to grant Granted Sep 29, 2026
Patent 12745406
Integrated transformer
2y 9m to grant Granted Sep 22, 2026
Study what changed to get past this examiner. Based on 5 most recent grants.

Strategy Recommendation AI-generated — please review before filing

Get a prosecution strategy drawn from examiner precedents, rejection analysis, and claim mapping.
Typically takes 5-10 seconds — AI-generated, attorney review required before filing

Prosecution Projections

3-4
Expected OA Rounds
70%
Grant Probability
99%
With Interview (+33.3%)
2y 9m (~0m remaining)
Median Time to Grant
High
PTA Risk
Based on 884 resolved cases by this examiner. Grant probability derived from career allowance rate.

Sign in with your work email

Enter your email to receive a magic link. No password needed.

Personal email addresses (Gmail, Yahoo, etc.) are not accepted.

Free tier: 3 strategy analyses per month