Prosecution Insights
Last updated: October 02, 2026
Application No. 18/043,867

USE OF A MIXTURE OF PREGELATINIZED, AMYLOSE-RICH STARCHES HAVING LARGE PARTICLE SIZE AND SOLUBLE FIBERS FOR COATING AND GLAZING BREAKFAST CEREALS

Non-Final OA §112
Filed
Mar 02, 2023
Priority
Sep 02, 2020 — FR 2008886 +1 more
Examiner
TRAN, LIEN THUY
Art Unit
1793
Tech Center
1700 — Chemical & Materials Engineering
Assignee
Roquette Freres
OA Round
3 (Non-Final)
29%
Grant Probability
At Risk
3-4
OA Rounds
4m
Est. Remaining
55%
With Interview

Examiner Intelligence

Grants only 29% of cases
29%
Career Allowance Rate
258 granted / 903 resolved
-36.4% vs TC avg
Strong +26% interview lift
Without
With
+26.5%
Interview Lift
resolved cases with interview
Typical timeline
3y 12m
Avg Prosecution
62 currently pending
Career history
981
Total Applications
across all art units

Statute-Specific Performance

§101
0.9%
-39.1% vs TC avg
§103
53.6%
+13.6% vs TC avg
§102
7.9%
-32.1% vs TC avg
§112
32.1%
-7.9% vs TC avg
Black line = Tech Center average estimate • Based on career data from 903 resolved cases

Office Action

§112
Notice of Pre-AIA or AIA Status The present application, filed on or after March 16, 2013, is being examined under the first inventor to file provisions of the AIA . Continued Examination Under 37 CFR 1.114 A request for continued examination under 37 CFR 1.114, including the fee set forth in 37 CFR 1.17(e), was filed in this application after final rejection. Since this application is eligible for continued examination under 37 CFR 1.114, and the fee set forth in 37 CFR 1.17(e) has been timely paid, the finality of the previous Office action has been withdrawn pursuant to 37 CFR 1.114. Applicant's submission filed on 6/3/26 has been entered. Claims 1-2 are amended and claim 15 is added. Claims 1-5 and 15 are pending. Claim 13 remains withdrawn. Claim 16 is added but it’s depended from claim 6 which is a withdrawn claim. Thus, claim 16 is also withdrawn. Claim Rejections - 35 USC § 112 Claim 1 is rejected under 35 U.S.C. 112(b) or 35 U.S.C. 112 (pre-AIA ), second paragraph, as being indefinite for failing to particularly point out and distinctly claim the subject matter which the inventor or a joint inventor (or for applications subject to pre-AIA 35 U.S.C. 112, the applicant), regards as the invention. Claim 1 is vague and indefinite. The claim recites providing an aqueous coating and glazing composition; however, it’s unclear what is intended or encompassed by “ aqueous”. The claim does not recite any liquid component; it’s unclear what is meant by aqueous. Allowable Subject Matter Claim1-5 and 15 allowable over the prior art because applicant’s argument is persuasive. Greene does not disclose an aqueous composition containing 31-51% sucrose, 4-12% pregelatinized starch and 28-41% soluble fiber. Response to Arguments Applicant's arguments filed 6/3/26 have been fully considered but they are not persuasive. In the response, applicant argues that the amendment to claims 1 and 13 overcomes the restriction requirement because claims 1 and 13 are both directed to the same inventive concept. This argument is not persuasive. As set forth in the final office action mailed on 3/4/26, new claim 13 and original claim 1 are different and do not share the same or corresponding technical feature. The amended claim 13 is directed to a method of formulating and aqueous coating and glazing composition. The new method is different from the original elected claim 1 which is directed to a method for coating and glazing ready to eat breakfast cereals by applying onto a surface a mixture. The method of claim 1 and method of amended claim 13 do not share the same or corresponding special technical feature. The amended claim 13 does not require the applying step of claim 1 and the amounts of sucrose, starch and soluble fiber as required by claim 1. The method of claim 1 does not require the forming of aqueous coating and glazing composition having reduced amount of sucrose wherein the sucrose is reduced by 20-60%. The two methods are distinct and do not share the same or corresponding technical features. Claim 13 remains withdrawn. Applicant’s argument directed at the 103 rejection is persuasive. The rejection is withdrawn. Conclusion Any inquiry concerning this communication or earlier communications from the examiner should be directed to LIEN THUY TRAN whose telephone number is (571)272-1408. The examiner can normally be reached Monday-Thursday. Examiner interviews are available via telephone, in-person, and video conferencing using a USPTO supplied web-based collaboration tool. To schedule an interview, applicant is encouraged to use the USPTO Automated Interview Request (AIR) at http://www.uspto.gov/interviewpractice. If attempts to reach the examiner by telephone are unsuccessful, the examiner’s supervisor, Emily Le can be reached at 571-272-0903. The fax phone number for the organization where this application or proceeding is assigned is 571-273-8300. Information regarding the status of published or unpublished applications may be obtained from Patent Center. Unpublished application information in Patent Center is available to registered users. To file and manage patent submissions in Patent Center, visit: https://patentcenter.uspto.gov. Visit https://www.uspto.gov/patents/apply/patent-center for more information about Patent Center and https://www.uspto.gov/patents/docx for information about filing in DOCX format. For additional questions, contact the Electronic Business Center (EBC) at 866-217-9197 (toll-free). If you would like assistance from a USPTO Customer Service Representative, call 800-786-9199 (IN USA OR CANADA) or 571-272-1000. September 18, 2026 /LIEN T TRAN/Primary Examiner, Art Unit 1793
Read full office action

Prosecution Timeline

Mar 02, 2023
Application Filed
Sep 19, 2025
Non-Final Rejection mailed — §112
Dec 17, 2025
Response Filed
Mar 04, 2026
Final Rejection mailed — §112
Jun 03, 2026
Request for Continued Examination
Jun 04, 2026
Response after Non-Final Action
Sep 22, 2026
Non-Final Rejection mailed — §112 (current)

Precedent Cases

Applications granted by this same examiner with similar technology

Patent 12745788
METHOD FOR PREPARING LEGUMES POWDER USING AQUAFABA
2y 6m to grant Granted Sep 29, 2026
Patent 12690601
PLANT-BASED DELI MEAT ANALOGUE PRODUCTS COMPRISING TITANIUM DIOXIDE
1y 8m to grant Granted Jul 28, 2026
Patent 12648576
METHOD FOR PREPARING LINSEED MERINGUE FROM LINSEED
2y 10m to grant Granted Jun 09, 2026
Patent 12622437
Dual Textured Food
4y 1m to grant Granted May 12, 2026
Patent 12622442
NATIVE-WHOLE-STARCH-BASED FAT REPLACER
2y 8m to grant Granted May 12, 2026
Study what changed to get past this examiner. Based on 5 most recent grants.

Strategy Recommendation AI-generated — please review before filing

Get a prosecution strategy drawn from examiner precedents, rejection analysis, and claim mapping.
Typically takes 5-10 seconds — AI-generated, attorney review required before filing

Prosecution Projections

3-4
Expected OA Rounds
29%
Grant Probability
55%
With Interview (+26.5%)
3y 12m (~4m remaining)
Median Time to Grant
High
PTA Risk
Based on 903 resolved cases by this examiner. Grant probability derived from career allowance rate.

Sign in with your work email

Enter your email to receive a magic link. No password needed.

Personal email addresses (Gmail, Yahoo, etc.) are not accepted.

Free tier: 3 strategy analyses per month