Prosecution Insights
Last updated: May 29, 2026
Application No. 18/074,533

SEMICONDUCTOR DEVICE AND METHOD FOR FABRICATING THE SAME

Final Rejection §102
Filed
Dec 05, 2022
Priority
Apr 16, 2020 — CN 202010298676.9 +1 more
Examiner
CHOU, SHIH TSUN A
Art Unit
2811
Tech Center
2800 — Semiconductors & Electrical Systems
Assignee
UNITED MICROELECTRONICS CORPORATION
OA Round
4 (Final)
76%
Grant Probability
Favorable
5-6
OA Rounds
0m
Est. Remaining
94%
With Interview

Examiner Intelligence

Grants 76% — above average
76%
Career Allowance Rate
341 granted / 450 resolved
+7.8% vs TC avg
Strong +18% interview lift
Without
With
+17.8%
Interview Lift
resolved cases with interview
Typical timeline
2y 5m
Avg Prosecution
15 currently pending
Career history
481
Total Applications
across all art units

Statute-Specific Performance

§103
84.0%
+44.0% vs TC avg
§102
6.9%
-33.1% vs TC avg
§112
8.9%
-31.1% vs TC avg
Black line = Tech Center average estimate • Based on career data from 450 resolved cases

Office Action

§102
DETAILED ACTION Notice of Pre-AIA or AIA Status The present application, filed on or after March 16, 2013, is being examined under the first inventor to file provisions of the AIA . Claim Rejections - 35 USC § 102 The text of those sections of Title 35, U.S. Code not included in this action can be found in a prior Office action. Claims 1-6 are rejected under 35 U.S.C. 102(a)(1) as being anticipated by Chuang (US 2017 /0194557). Regarding claim 1, Chuang discloses, in FIG. 3 and in related text, a method for fabricating a semiconductor device, comprising: forming a first metal interconnection (121’) on a substrate (see Chuang, FIG. 3, [0029], [0033]); forming a stop layer (141) on the first metal interconnection (121’), wherein the stop layer is a single layer directly contacting the first metal interconnection (see Chuang, FIG. 4, [0034]); removing part of the stop layer to form a first opening (137’) exposing the first metal interconnection (121’) (see Chuang, FIG. 5, [0034]); forming an electromigration enhancing layer (barrier layer 161) in the first opening, wherein the electromigration enhancing layer is a single layer filling the first opening completely while a width of a bottom surface of the electromigration enhancing layer is less than a width of a top surface of the first metal interconnection (121’) (see Chuang, FIG. 6, [0035]); and forming a second metal interconnection (132) on (above) the electromigration enhancing layer (161) (see Chuang, FIG. 15, [0035], [0044]). Regarding claim 2, Chuang discloses the method of claim 1. Chuang discloses forming a first inter-metal dielectric (IMD) layer (128) on the substrate; forming the first metal interconnection (121’) in the first IMD layer; forming the stop layer (141) on the first IMD layer (see Chuang, FIG. 4, [0034]); forming the electromigration enhancing layer (161) in the first opening (137’) (see Chuang, FIGS. 5-6, [0034]-[0035]); forming a second IMD layer (127) on (above) the stop layer (140) and the electromigration enhancing layer (161); forming the second metal interconnection (132) on (above) the electromigration enhancing layer (161) and in the second IMD layer (127); and forming a first magnetic tunneling junction (MTJ) (135) on the second metal interconnection (132) (see Chuang, FIG. 15, [0027], [0044]). Regarding claim 3, Chuang discloses the method of claim 2. Chuang discloses planarizing (CMP) the electromigration enhancing layer (161) before forming the second IMD layer (see Chuang, FIG. 7, [0035]). Regarding claim 4, Chuang discloses the method of claim 2. Chuang discloses forming the second metal interconnection (132 on the left-hand side) and a third metal interconnection (132 on the right-hand side) on (above) the electromigration enhancing layer (161) and in the second IMD layer (127); and forming the first MTJ (135 on the left-hand side) on the second metal interconnection and a second MTJ (135 on the right-hand side) on the third metal interconnection (see Chuang, FIG. 15, [0044]). Regarding claim 5, Chuang discloses the method of claim 4. Chuang discloses removing the stop layer (141) to form the first opening (137’ on the left-hand side) and a second opening (137’ on the right-hand side) (see Chuang, FIG. 5, [0034]); forming the electromigration enhancing layer (161) in the first opening and the second opening (see Chuang, FIG. 6, [0035]); planarizing (CMP) the electromigration enhancing layer to form a first electromigration enhancing layer (161 on the left-hand side) and a second electromigration enhancing layer (161 on the right-hand side) (see Chuang, FIG. 7, [0035]); and forming the second metal interconnection (132 on the left-hand side) on the first electromigration enhancing layer and the third metal interconnection (132 on the right-hand side) on the second electromigration enhancing layer (see Chuang, FIG. 15, [0044]). Regarding claim 6, Chuang discloses the method of claim 1. Chuang discloses wherein the first metal interconnection (121’, copper) and the second metal interconnection (132, Ta) comprise different materials (see Chuang, [0024], [0035]). Claims 1 and 6-8 are rejected under 35 U.S.C. 102(a)(2) as being anticipated by Yang (US 2020/0388757). Regarding claim 1, Yang discloses, in FIG. 1 and in related text, a method for fabricating a semiconductor device, comprising: forming a first metal interconnection (18D) on a substrate; forming a stop layer (20) on the first metal interconnection, wherein the stop layer is a single layer directly contacting the first metal interconnection (see Yang, FIG. 1, [0031], [0037]-[0038]); removing part of the stop layer (20) to form a first opening (22) exposing the first metal interconnection (18D) (see Yang, FIG. 2, [0039]); forming an electromigration enhancing layer (24) in the first opening, wherein the electromigration enhancing layer is a single layer filling the first opening completely while a width of a bottom surface of the electromigration enhancing layer is less than a width of a top surface of the first metal interconnection (18D) (see Yang, FIG. 3, [0040]; note that layer 24 includes TaN or TiN); forming a second metal interconnection (28S) on the electromigration enhancing layer (24) (see Yang, FIG. 7, [0046], [0048]). Regarding claim 6, Yang discloses the method of claim 1. Yang discloses wherein the first metal interconnection (18D, copper) and the second metal interconnection (28S, tungsten) comprise different materials (see Yang, [0031], [0037], [0046], [0048]). Regarding claim 7, Yang discloses the method of claim 1. Yang discloses wherein the first metal interconnection (18D, copper) and the electromigration enhancing layer (24, TaN) comprise different materials (see Yang, [0031], [0037], [0040]). Regarding claim 8, Yang discloses the method of claim 1. Yang discloses wherein the second metal interconnection (28S, tungsten) and the electromigration enhancing layer (24, TaN) comprise different materials (see Yang, [0040], [0046], [0048]). Response to Arguments Applicant's arguments filed on 03/04/2026 have been fully considered but they are not persuasive. Applicant argues, in pages 5-6 of the Remarks, that Chuang fails to disclose the limitation “wherein the stop layer is a single layer directly contacting the first metal interconnection” of amended claim 1. In response, the Office notes that Chuang discloses the above limitation. Furthermore, Yang discloses the above limitation. See discussion on rejections of claim 1 above. Conclusion Applicant's amendment necessitated the new ground(s) of rejection presented in this Office action. Accordingly, THIS ACTION IS MADE FINAL. See MPEP § 706.07(a). Applicant is reminded of the extension of time policy as set forth in 37 CFR 1.136(a). A shortened statutory period for reply to this final action is set to expire THREE MONTHS from the mailing date of this action. In the event a first reply is filed within TWO MONTHS of the mailing date of this final action and the advisory action is not mailed until after the end of the THREE-MONTH shortened statutory period, then the shortened statutory period will expire on the date the advisory action is mailed, and any nonprovisional extension fee (37 CFR 1.17(a)) pursuant to 37 CFR 1.136(a) will be calculated from the mailing date of the advisory action. In no event, however, will the statutory period for reply expire later than SIX MONTHS from the mailing date of this final action. Any inquiry concerning this communication or earlier communications from the examiner should be directed to SHIH TSUN A CHOU whose telephone number is (408)918-7583. The examiner can normally be reached M-F 8:00-16:00 Arizona Time. Examiner interviews are available via telephone, in-person, and video conferencing using a USPTO supplied web-based collaboration tool. To schedule an interview, applicant is encouraged to use the USPTO Automated Interview Request (AIR) at http://www.uspto.gov/interviewpractice. If attempts to reach the examiner by telephone are unsuccessful, the examiner’s supervisor, Lynne Gurley can be reached at (571) 272-1670. The fax phone number for the organization where this application or proceeding is assigned is 571-273-8300. Information regarding the status of published or unpublished applications may be obtained from Patent Center. Unpublished application information in Patent Center is available to registered users. To file and manage patent submissions in Patent Center, visit: https://patentcenter.uspto.gov. Visit https://www.uspto.gov/patents/apply/patent-center for more information about Patent Center and https://www.uspto.gov/patents/docx for information about filing in DOCX format. For additional questions, contact the Electronic Business Center (EBC) at 866-217-9197 (toll-free). If you would like assistance from a USPTO Customer Service Representative, call 800-786-9199 (IN USA OR CANADA) or 571-272-1000. /SHIH TSUN A CHOU/Primary Examiner, Art Unit 2811
Read full office action

Prosecution Timeline

Show 1 earlier event
Jul 30, 2025
Non-Final Rejection mailed — §102
Sep 03, 2025
Response Filed
Oct 01, 2025
Final Rejection mailed — §102
Dec 02, 2025
Request for Continued Examination
Dec 10, 2025
Response after Non-Final Action
Jan 14, 2026
Non-Final Rejection mailed — §102
Feb 04, 2026
Response Filed
Apr 02, 2026
Final Rejection mailed — §102 (current)

Precedent Cases

Applications granted by this same examiner with similar technology

Patent 12641797
RRAM STRUCTURE AND METHOD OF FABRICATING THE SAME
2y 10m to grant Granted May 26, 2026
Patent 12635147
MEMORY SELECTOR
3y 9m to grant Granted May 19, 2026
Patent 12610748
SELECTIVE ENCAPSULATION FOR METAL ELECTRODES OF EMBEDDED MEMORY DEVICES
2y 8m to grant Granted Apr 21, 2026
Patent 12604459
SEMICONDUCTOR DEVICE AND METHOD FOR FABRICATING THE SAME
3y 10m to grant Granted Apr 14, 2026
Patent 12604672
MRAM REFILL DEVICE STRUCTURE
3y 3m to grant Granted Apr 14, 2026
Study what changed to get past this examiner. Based on 5 most recent grants.

Strategy Recommendation AI-generated — please review before filing

Get a prosecution strategy drawn from examiner precedents, rejection analysis, and claim mapping.
Typically takes 5-10 seconds — AI-generated, attorney review required before filing

Prosecution Projections

5-6
Expected OA Rounds
76%
Grant Probability
94%
With Interview (+17.8%)
2y 5m (~0m remaining)
Median Time to Grant
High
PTA Risk
Based on 450 resolved cases by this examiner. Grant probability derived from career allowance rate.

Sign in with your work email

Enter your email to receive a magic link. No password needed.

Personal email addresses (Gmail, Yahoo, etc.) are not accepted.

Free tier: 3 strategy analyses per month