Prosecution Insights
Last updated: April 19, 2026
Application No. 18/074,551

ACTIVE MATRIX SUBSTRATE AND METHOD FOR MANUFACTURING SAME

Non-Final OA §103
Filed
Dec 05, 2022
Examiner
TRAN, TONY
Art Unit
2893
Tech Center
2800 — Semiconductors & Electrical Systems
Assignee
Sharp Display Technology Corporation
OA Round
3 (Non-Final)
70%
Grant Probability
Favorable
3-4
OA Rounds
2y 11m
To Grant
99%
With Interview

Examiner Intelligence

Grants 70% — above average
70%
Career Allow Rate
597 granted / 850 resolved
+2.2% vs TC avg
Strong +34% interview lift
Without
With
+34.0%
Interview Lift
resolved cases with interview
Typical timeline
2y 11m
Avg Prosecution
61 currently pending
Career history
911
Total Applications
across all art units

Statute-Specific Performance

§101
0.2%
-39.8% vs TC avg
§103
59.0%
+19.0% vs TC avg
§102
35.2%
-4.8% vs TC avg
§112
3.9%
-36.1% vs TC avg
Black line = Tech Center average estimate • Based on career data from 850 resolved cases

Office Action

§103
Notice of Pre-AIA or AIA Status The present application, filed on or after March 16, 2013, is being examined under the first inventor to file provisions of the AIA . Continued Examination Under 37 CFR 1.114 A request for continued examination under 37 CFR 1.114, including the fee set forth in 37 CFR 1.17(e), was filed in this application after final rejection. Since this application is eligible for continued examination under 37 CFR 1.114, and the fee set forth in 37 CFR 1.17(e) has been timely paid, the finality of the previous Office action has been withdrawn pursuant to 37 CFR 1.114. Applicant's submission filed on 01/20/2026 has been entered. Claim Rejections - 35 USC § 103 The following is a quotation of 35 U.S.C. 103 which forms the basis for all obviousness rejections set forth in this Office action: A patent for a claimed invention may not be obtained, notwithstanding that the claimed invention is not identically disclosed as set forth in section 102, if the differences between the claimed invention and the prior art are such that the claimed invention as a whole would have been obvious before the effective filing date of the claimed invention to a person having ordinary skill in the art to which the claimed invention pertains. Patentability shall not be negated by the manner in which the invention was made. Claim(s) 1-13 and 19 is/are rejected under 35 U.S.C. 103 as being unpatentable over KIMOTO (Pub. No.: US 2020/0006392) in view of YOSHIDA et al. (Pub. No.: US 2019/0172843) (hereinafter YOSHIDA) and further in view of Suzuki (Pub. No.: US 2013/0207114). Re claim 1, KIMOTO, FIG. 12E teaches an active-matrix substrate having a display region including a plurality of pixel regions, the active-matrix substrate comprising: a substrate (1); a plurality of thin-film transistors (GE/7c/5/SE/DE), supported on the substrate and associated with the plurality of pixel regions; a plurality of pixel electrodes (PE(T2)) disposed in the plurality of pixel regions; and a first insulating layer (12/13) located above the plurality of thin-film transistors and the plurality of pixel electrodes, wherein each of the pixel electrodes (PE(T2), ¶ [0155]) is formed from a transparent conducting material, each of the thin-film transistors includes a gate electrode (GE), a gate insulating layer (5) covering the gate electrode, source (SE) and drain electrodes (DE) placed at a distance from each other on top of the gate insulating layer, and an oxide semiconductor layer (7c, [0139]), the oxide semiconductor layer includes a channel region (7c) that is in contact with the gate insulating layer (5) between the source electrode and the drain electrode, a source contact region that is in contact with at least part of an upper surface of the source electrode (9 of SE), and a drain contact region (that is in contact with at least part of an upper surface of the drain electrode (8 of DE), the source electrode has a stack structure (8/9 of SE) including a source transparent conducting layer formed at a layer that is identical to that at which each of the pixel electrodes (PE, [0141]) is formed and a source metal layer disposed on top of part of an upper surface of the source transparent conducting layer and formed from a metal material, the drain electrode includes a drain transparent (9 of DE) conducting layer formed at a layer that is identical to that at which each of the pixel electrodes (PE(T2)) is formed, and the drain transparent conducting layer (8 of DE) is formed integrally with a corresponding one of the plurality of pixel electrodes (PE(T2)). KIMOTO fails to teach the source electrode and the drain electrode are disposed between the gate insulating layer and the oxide semiconductor layer. YOSHIDA teaches the source electrode (7A, [0120]) and the drain electrode (8A) are disposed between the gate insulating layer (11, FIG. 15(b), note that “the second insulating layer 11 disposed between the back-gate electrode BG and the oxide semiconductor layer 5 is also hereinafter referred to as a “sub-gate insulating layer.””, ¶ [0068]) and the oxide semiconductor layer (5). It would have been obvious for a person of ordinary skill in the art before the effective filing date of the claim invention to include the above said teaching for the purpose of reducing the manufacturing cost by implement the back gate electrode as taught by YOSHIDA, [0014]. Moreover, KIMOTO/YOSHIDA fails to teach in each of the thin-film transistors, the gate electrode, the gate insulating layer, the source and drain electrodes and the oxide semiconductor layer are arranged in this order ascending from the substrate. Suzuki teaches in each of the thin-film transistors, the gate electrode (11a), the gate insulating layer (12a), the source and drain electrodes (15aa/15b) and the oxide semiconductor layer C/16a, Abstract) are arranged in this order ascending from the substrate. It would have been obvious for a person of ordinary skill in the art before the effective filing date of the claim invention to include the above said teaching for the purpose of preventing or reducing the diffusion of the copper into the upper layers as taught by Suzuki, [0012]. Re claim 2, KIMOTO, FIG. 12E teaches the active-matrix substrate according to Claim 1, wherein the drain electrode includes the drain transparent conducting layer and a drain metal layer (9 of DE) disposed on top of part of an upper surface of the drain transparent conducting layer (8 of DE) and formed at a layer that is identical to that at which the source metal layer is formed (9 of SE). Re claim 3, KIMOTO, FIG. 1 [flip it 90º] teaches the active-matrix substrate according to Claim 1, further comprising: a plurality of source bus lines (SL) extending in a row-wise direction; and a plurality of gate bus lines (GL) extending in a column-wise direction, wherein each of the source bus lines has the stack structure including the source transparent conducting layer (8 of SE) and the source metal layer (9 of SE), and the source electrode (SE) of each of the thin-film transistors is formed integrally with a corresponding one of the plurality of source bus lines (SL). Re claim 4, KIMOTO, FIG. 12E teaches the active-matrix substrate according to Claim 3, further comprising a plurality of wire covering layers (7b, [0157]) formed at a layer that is identical to that at which the oxide semiconductor layer of each of the thin-film transistors is formed, wherein each of the wire covering layer covers one of the plurality of source bus lines and extends in the column-wise direction. Re claim 5, KIMOTO, FIG. 12E teaches the active-matrix substrate according to Claim 1, wherein upper and side surfaces of the source metal layer (SE) are covered with the oxide semiconductor layer (7c) or a covering layer formed at a layer identical to that at which the oxide semiconductor layer is formed. Re claim 6, KIMOTO, FIG. 12E teaches the active-matrix substrate according to Claim 1, wherein part of an end face of the oxide semiconductor layer of each of the thin-film transistors is located on an upper surface of the source metal layer, and part of the upper surface of the source metal layer (SE) is in direct contact with the first insulating layer (12). Re claim 7, KIMOTO, FIG. 12E teaches the active-matrix substrate according to Claim 1, further comprising a common electrode (TC(T2), [0155]) disposed on top of the first insulating layer (12), wherein when seen from a direction normal to the substrate, the common electrode partially overlaps the plurality of pixel electrodes via the first insulating layer. Re claim 8, KIMOTO, FIG. 12E teaches the active-matrix substrate according to Claim 1, wherein in each of the pixel regions, the first insulating layer (12/13) has an opening through which part of each of the pixel electrodes (PE(T2)) is exposed. Re claim 9, KIMOTO, FIG. 12E teaches the active-matrix substrate according to Claim 1, further comprising a plurality of terminals disposed in a non-display region other than the display region, wherein each of the terminals includes a source connection including a connection transparent conducting layer (CE(T2) formed at a layer that is identical to that at which each of the pixel electrodes (PE(T2)) is formed and a connection metal layer disposed on top of part of an upper surface of the connection transparent conducting layer and formed at a layer that is identical to that at which the source metal layer is formed, a connection covering layer (7b), formed at a layer that is identical to that at which the oxide semiconductor layer (7c) of each of the thin-film transistors is formed, that covers part of an upper surface and side surfaces of the source connection, an extension of the first insulating layer provided on top of the connection covering layer, a contact hole, formed in the first insulating layer (12/13) and the connection covering layer, through which part of the source connection is exposed, and an upper connection that is in contact with the part of the source connection in the contact hole. Re claim 10, KIMOTO, FIG. 12E teaches the active-matrix substrate according to Claim 6, further comprising a plurality of terminals disposed in a non-display region other than the display region, wherein each of the terminals includes a source connection including a connection transparent conducting layer (TC(T2)/SE), note that “the source connecting portion SC are electrically connected to each other via the upper connecting portion TC”, [0155]) formed at a layer that is identical to that at which each of the pixel electrodes (PE(T2)) is formed and a connection metal layer disposed on top of part of an upper surface of the connection transparent conducting layer and formed at a layer that is identical to that at which the source metal layer is formed, an extension of the first insulating layer (12/13) provided on top of the source connection (SE), a contact hole (HC), formed in the first insulating layer, through which part of the source connection is exposed, and an upper connection (TC(T2)) that is in contact with the part of the source connection in the contact hole. Re claim 11, KIMOTO, FIG. 12E teaches the active-matrix substrate according to Claim 1, wherein the first insulating layer does not include an organic insulating film (ITO material, [0203]). Re claim 12, KIMOTO, FIG. 12E teaches the active-matrix substrate according to Claim 1, wherein the oxide semiconductor layer contains an In-Ga-Zn-O semiconductor [0178]. Re claim 13, KIMOTO, FIG. 12E teaches the active-matrix substrate according to Claim 12, wherein the In-Ga-Zn-O semiconductor includes a crystalline portion ([0178] & [0271]). PNG media_image1.png 200 400 media_image1.png Greyscale Re claim 19, KIMOTO, FIG. 12E [as shown above] teaches the active matrix substrate according to Claim 1, wherein the source contact region [SCR] is directly in contact with the at least part of the upper surface of the source electrode (9 of SE), and the drain contact region [DCR] is directly in contact with the at least part of the upper surface of the drain electrode (9 of DE). Response to Arguments Applicant's arguments with respect to claims 1-13 and 19 on the remarks filed on 01/20/2026 have been considered but are moot in view of the new ground(s) of rejection. Conclusion Any inquiry concerning this communication or earlier communications from the examiner should be directed to TONY TRAN whose telephone number is (571)270-1749. The examiner can normally be reached Monday-Friday, 8AM-5PM, EST. Examiner interviews are available via telephone, in-person, and video conferencing using a USPTO supplied web-based collaboration tool. To schedule an interview, applicant is encouraged to use the USPTO Automated Interview Request (AIR) at http://www.uspto.gov/interviewpractice. If attempts to reach the examiner by telephone are unsuccessful, the examiner’s supervisor, Britt Hanley can be reached at 571-270-3042. The fax phone number for the organization where this application or proceeding is assigned is 571-273-8300. Information regarding the status of published or unpublished applications may be obtained from Patent Center. Unpublished application information in Patent Center is available to registered users. To file and manage patent submissions in Patent Center, visit: https://patentcenter.uspto.gov. Visit https://www.uspto.gov/patents/apply/patent-center for more information about Patent Center and https://www.uspto.gov/patents/docx for information about filing in DOCX format. For additional questions, contact the Electronic Business Center (EBC) at 866-217-9197 (toll-free). If you would like assistance from a USPTO Customer Service Representative, call 800-786-9199 (IN USA OR CANADA) or 571-272-1000. /TONY TRAN/Primary Examiner, Art Unit 2893
Read full office action

Prosecution Timeline

Dec 05, 2022
Application Filed
May 20, 2025
Non-Final Rejection — §103
Aug 22, 2025
Response Filed
Oct 21, 2025
Final Rejection — §103
Jan 20, 2026
Request for Continued Examination
Jan 28, 2026
Response after Non-Final Action
Feb 11, 2026
Non-Final Rejection — §103 (current)

Precedent Cases

Applications granted by this same examiner with similar technology

Patent 12604527
DISPLAY PANEL AND DISPLAY DEVICE
2y 5m to grant Granted Apr 14, 2026
Patent 12598731
MEMORY DEVICE USING SEMICONDUCTOR ELEMENT
2y 5m to grant Granted Apr 07, 2026
Patent 12593677
SEMICONDUCTOR DEVICE STRUCTURE WITH ENERGY REMOVABLE STRUCTURE AND METHOD FOR PREPARING THE SAME
2y 5m to grant Granted Mar 31, 2026
Patent 12588395
Display Substrate and Preparation Method thereof, and Display Apparatus
2y 5m to grant Granted Mar 24, 2026
Patent 12588288
ACTIVE DEVICE SUBSTRATE
2y 5m to grant Granted Mar 24, 2026
Study what changed to get past this examiner. Based on 5 most recent grants.

AI Strategy Recommendation

Get an AI-powered prosecution strategy using examiner precedents, rejection analysis, and claim mapping.
Powered by AI — typically takes 5-10 seconds

Prosecution Projections

3-4
Expected OA Rounds
70%
Grant Probability
99%
With Interview (+34.0%)
2y 11m
Median Time to Grant
High
PTA Risk
Based on 850 resolved cases by this examiner. Grant probability derived from career allow rate.

Sign in with your work email

Enter your email to receive a magic link. No password needed.

Personal email addresses (Gmail, Yahoo, etc.) are not accepted.

Free tier: 3 strategy analyses per month