Prosecution Insights
Last updated: July 17, 2026
Application No. 18/076,519

DISPLAY DEVICE

Non-Final OA §102§103
Filed
Dec 07, 2022
Priority
Feb 09, 2022 — RE 10-2022-0017054
Examiner
BELL, LAUREN R
Art Unit
2896
Tech Center
2800 — Semiconductors & Electrical Systems
Assignee
Samsung Display Co., Ltd.
OA Round
3 (Non-Final)
40%
Grant Probability
Moderate
3-4
OA Rounds
0m
Est. Remaining
72%
With Interview

Examiner Intelligence

Grants 40% of resolved cases
40%
Career Allowance Rate
153 granted / 382 resolved
-27.9% vs TC avg
Strong +32% interview lift
Without
With
+31.5%
Interview Lift
resolved cases with interview
Typical timeline
3y 5m
Avg Prosecution
48 currently pending
Career history
449
Total Applications
across all art units

Statute-Specific Performance

§103
79.0%
+39.0% vs TC avg
§102
6.5%
-33.5% vs TC avg
§112
5.6%
-34.4% vs TC avg
Black line = Tech Center average estimate • Based on career data from 382 resolved cases

Office Action

§102 §103
DETAILED ACTION Continued Examination Under 37 CFR 1.114 A request for continued examination under 37 CFR 1.114, including the fee set forth in 37 CFR 1.17(e), was filed in this application after final rejection. Since this application is eligible for continued examination under 37 CFR 1.114, and the fee set forth in 37 CFR 1.17(e) has been timely paid, the finality of the previous Office action has been withdrawn pursuant to 37 CFR 1.114. Applicant's submission filed on 1/21/2026 has been entered. Claim Rejections - 35 USC § 102 The following is a quotation of the appropriate paragraphs of 35 U.S.C. 102 that form the basis for the rejections under this section made in this Office action: A person shall be entitled to a patent unless – (a)(1) the claimed invention was patented, described in a printed publication, or in public use, on sale, or otherwise available to the public before the effective filing date of the claimed invention. (a)(2) the claimed invention was described in a patent issued under section 151, or in an application for patent published or deemed published under section 122(b), in which the patent or application, as the case may be, names another inventor and was effectively filed before the effective filing date of the claimed invention. Claim(s) 1 and 6 is/are rejected under 35 U.S.C. 102(a)(1) and 102(a)(2) as being anticipated by Yang et al. (US 2021/0320150; herein “Yang”). Regarding claim 1, Yang discloses in Fig. 17 and related text a display device comprising: a display substrate comprising: a display area (e.g. DA, see [0061]); a non-display area (e.g. NDA, see [0061])adjacent to the display area; and light emitting elements (EL, see [0087]) disposed in the display area; and a light control substrate (300, see [0065]) facing the display substrate and comprising: a color filter layer (layer comprising CF1/CF2/CF3, see [0099]); a light conversion layer (layer comprising WLC1/WLC2/LTU, see [0099]); and an intermediate layer (e.g. CAP1, IBK1, and OBK1) disposed between the color filter layer and the light conversion layer, a capping layer (CAP2, see [0099]); wherein the intermediate layer has a side surface facing a direction perpendicular to a thickness direction of the display device (e.g. the slanted surface in direct contact with CAP2, which faces left in Fig. 17), in a cross-sectional view, the capping layer extends over and covers an entirety of the side surface of the intermediate layer (see Fig. 17), the color filter layer extends from the display area to the non-display area and comprises a first surface facing the display substrate, the first surface comprises a step difference overlapping the non-display area (see Fig. 12); in the cross-sectional view, the capping layer (CAP2) is in continuous and direct contact with the intermediate layer from a portion overlapping the step difference to the display area (see Fig. 17). Regarding claim 6, Yang further discloses wherein the intermediate layer (CPA1/OBK1/IBK1) covers the step difference. Claim Rejections - 35 USC § 103 The following is a quotation of 35 U.S.C. 103 which forms the basis for all obviousness rejections set forth in this Office action: A patent for a claimed invention may not be obtained, notwithstanding that the claimed invention is not identically disclosed as set forth in section 102, if the differences between the claimed invention and the prior art are such that the claimed invention as a whole would have been obvious before the effective filing date of the claimed invention to a person having ordinary skill in the art to which the claimed invention pertains. Patentability shall not be negated by the manner in which the invention was made. The factual inquiries for establishing a background for determining obviousness under 35 U.S.C. 103 are summarized as follows: 1. Determining the scope and contents of the prior art. 2. Ascertaining the differences between the prior art and the claims at issue. 3. Resolving the level of ordinary skill in the pertinent art. 4. Considering objective evidence present in the application indicating obviousness or nonobviousness. This application currently names joint inventors. In considering patentability of the claims the examiner presumes that the subject matter of the various claims was commonly owned as of the effective filing date of the claimed invention(s) absent any evidence to the contrary. Applicant is advised of the obligation under 37 CFR 1.56 to point out the inventor and effective filing dates of each claim that was not commonly owned as of the effective filing date of the later invention in order for the examiner to consider the applicability of 35 U.S.C. 102(b)(2)(C) for any potential 35 U.S.C. 102(a)(2) prior art against the later invention. Claim(s) 2-5 and 9-13 is/are rejected under 35 U.S.C. 103 as being unpatentable over Yang, as applied to claim 1 above, and in view of Oh et al. (US 2021/0249478; herein “Oh”). Regarding claim 2, Yang further discloses a first color filter (CF1), a second color filter (CF2), and a third color filter (CF3) that each comprise a rear surface facing the intermediate layer (note that the first color filter CF1 and third color filter CF3 form a light shielding region extending from the display area to the non-display area, see [0182]). Yang does not disclose the first color filter, the second color filter, and the third color filter that each comprise the rear surface extending from the display area to the non-display area and facing the intermediate layer, and the first color filter, the second color filter, and the third color filter overlap each other in the non-display area. In the same field of endeavor, Oh teaches in Fig. 2A and related text the first color filter (123), the second color filter (122), and the third color filter (121, see [0067) each comprise the rear surface extending to areas of light shielding regions; the first color filter, the second color filter, and the third color filter overlap each other in the light shielding regions. It would have been obvious to one of ordinary skill in the art before the effective filing date of the claimed invention to modify the device of Yang by having the first color filter, the second color filter, and the third color filter each comprise a rear surface extending to areas of light shielding regions and the first color filter, the second color filter, and the third color filter overlap each other in the light shielding regions, as shown by Oh, in order to provide a high quality image and provide improved methods of manufacture (see Oh [0006] and [0152] at least). The limitations “the rear surface extending from the display area to the non-display area and facing the intermediate layer,” and “the first color filter, the second color filter, and the third color filter overlap each other in the non-display area” is therefore taught by the combination of the first color filter, the second color filter, and the third color filter having rear surfaces extending to light shielding regions and overlapping in the light shielding regions, as shown by Oh, and the light shielding region extending from the display area to the non-display area and the light shielding region being in the non-display area, as shown by Yang. Regarding claims 3 and 4, the combined device shows wherein an edge of the first color filter is disposed on the rear surface of the second (third) color filter to form the step difference (Oh: edges of the second color filter 122 protrude more than corresponding edges of the first color filter 123 and edges of the third color filter 121 protrude more than corresponding edges of the second color filter 122, see Fig. 1; thus there is a step difference at each edge). Regarding claim 5, the combined device shows the step difference comprises a first step difference portion and a second step difference portion, an edge of the first color filter is disposed on the rear surface of the second color filter to form the first step different portion, and an edge of the second color filter is disposed on the rear surface of the third color filter to form the second step different portion (Oh: edges of the second color filter 122 protrude more than corresponding edges of the first color filter 123 and edges of the third color filter 121 protrude more than corresponding edges of the second color filter 122, see Fig. 1; thus there is a step difference at each edge). Regarding claim 9, the combined device shows wherein the first color filter, the second color filter, and the third color filter have different colors relative to each other (Yang: see [0187]-[0189; Oh: see [0069]). Regarding claim 10, Yang further discloses a bank portion (IBK2, see [0099]) including openings defined therethrough to correspond to the light emitting elements; and a light conversion portion (WLC1/WLC2, see [0099]) and a light transmission portion (LTU, see [0099]) that are disposed in the openings, and the light conversion portion comprises a quantum dot converting a wavelength of a source light of the light emitting element (see [0132]). Regarding claim 11, the combined device shows wherein the first color filter, the second color filter, and the third color filter overlap each other in an area in which the bank portion is disposed (Oh: 123/122/121 overlap in regions of banks 130/140). Regarding claim 12, the combined device shows wherein the intermediate layer has a refractive index less than a refractive index of the light conversion portion (Yang: CAP1 of intermediate layer may include, e.g. aluminum oxide, titanium oxide, tin oxide, see [0109]; SCT1 may contain a titanium oxide, aluminum oxide, tin oxide, see [0130]; thus in at least some disclosed combinations CAP1 is lower than SCT1). Regarding claim 13, Yang further discloses wherein the light conversion portion comprises: a first light conversion portion (WLC1) converting the source light to a first color light; and a second light conversion portion (WLC2) converting the source light to a second color light, the first color filter (CF1) overlaps the first light conversion portion, the second color filter (CF2) overlaps the second light conversion portion, and the third color filter (CF3) overlaps the light transmission portion (CF3) (see Fig. 6). Claim(s) 15 is/are rejected under 35 U.S.C. 103 as being unpatentable over Yang, as applied to claim 1 above, and in view of Jung et al. (US 2021/0384283; herein “Jung”). Regarding claim 15, Yang does not disclose a sealing member disposed between the display substrate and the light control substrate to overlap the non-display area, wherein the step difference is disposed closer to an outer side of the light control substrate than the sealing member is in a plan view. In the same field of endeavor, Jung teaches in Fig. 12 and related text a sealing member (50, see [0048]) disposed between the display substrate (10) and the light control substrate (30) to overlap the non-display area, wherein the step difference (i.e. the outer end of the color filter layer(s) 310/260) is disposed closer to an outer side of the light control substrate than the sealing member is in a plan view (see Fig. 12). It would have been obvious to one of ordinary skill in the art before the effective filing date of the claimed invention to modify the device of Yang by having a sealing member disposed between the display substrate and the light control substrate to overlap the non-display area and the step difference is disposed closer to an outer side of the light control substrate than the sealing member is in a plan view, as shown by Jung, in order to allow for connection pads and the connection of flexible circuit boards to device for driving the device (see Jung [0081]). Claim(s) 16, 20 and 21 is/are rejected under 35 U.S.C. 103 as being unpatentable over Yang in view of Oh. Regarding claim 16, Yang discloses in Fig. 17 and related text a display device comprising: a display substrate comprising: a display area (e.g. DA, see [0061]); a non-display area (e.g. NDA, see [0061])adjacent to the display area; and light emitting elements (EL, see [0087]) disposed in the display area; and an upper substrate (SUB2) comprising a rear surface facing the display substrate; a color filter layer (layer comprising CF1/CF2/CF3, see [0099]) disposed on the rear surface of the upper substrate; a light conversion layer (layer comprising WLC1/WLC2/LTU, see [0099]) disposed between the display substrate and the color filter layer; and a intermediate layer (e.g. CAP1, IBK1, and OBK1) disposed between the color filter layer and the light conversion layer, a capping layer (CAP2, see [0099]); wherein the intermediate layer has a side surface facing a direction perpendicular to a thickness direction of the display device (e.g. the slanted surface in direct contact with CAP2, which faces left in Fig. 17), in a cross-sectional view, the capping layer extends over and covers an entirety of the side surface of the intermediate layer (see Fig. 17), the color filter layer comprises a first color filter (CF1), a second color filter (CF2), and a third color filter (CF3) (note that the first color filter CF1 and third color filter CF3 form a light shielding region extending from the display area to the non-display area, see [0182]), an edge of the third color filter (CF3) protrudes more than an edge of the first color filter (CF1) toward an outer side of the upper substrate, and the edge of the first color filter is covered by the intermediate layer (see Fig. 17); in the cross-sectional view, the capping layer (CAP2) is in continuous and direct contact with the intermediate layer from a portion overlapping the edge of the third color filter to the display area (see Fig. 17). Yang does not disclose the first color filter, the second color filter, and the third color filter, that extend from the display area to the non-display area and are sequentially disposed in a direction from the intermediate layer to the upper substrate. In the same field of endeavor, Oh teaches in Fig. 2A and related text the first color filter (123), the second color filter (122), and the third color filter (121, see [0067) are sequentially disposed in a direction towards the upper substrate (note that the first color filter 123, the second color filter 122, and the third color filter 121 extend to areas of light shielding regions, see [0071]). It would have been obvious to one of ordinary skill in the art before the effective filing date of the claimed invention to modify the device of Yang by having the first color filter, the second color filter, and the third color filter, extending to light shielding regions and being sequentially disposed in a direction toward the upper substrate, as shown by Oh, in order to provide a high quality image and provide improved methods of manufacture (see Oh [0006] and [0152] at least). The limitation “the first color filter, the second color filter, and the third color filter, that extend from the display area to the non-display area and are sequentially disposed in a direction from the intermediate layer to the upper substrate” is therefore taught by the combination of the first color filter, the second color filter, and the third color filter extending to light shielding regions and being sequentially disposed in a direction toward the upper substrate, as shown by Oh, and the light shielding region extending from the display area to the non-display area and a direction from the intermediate layer to the upper substrate being toward the upper substrate, as shown by Yang. Regarding claim 20, the combined device shows an edge of the second color filter protrudes more than the edge of the first color filter toward the outer side of the upper substrate, and the edge of the third color filter protrudes more than the edge of the second color filter toward the outer side of the upper substrate (Oh: edges of the second color filter 122 protrude more than corresponding edges of the first color filter 123 and edges of the third color filter 121 protrude more than corresponding edges of the second color filter 122, see Fig. 1). Regarding claim 21, Yang discloses in Fig. 17 and related text a display device comprising: a display substrate comprising: a display area (e.g. DA, see [0061]); a non-display area (e.g. NDA, see [0061])adjacent to the display area; and light emitting elements (EL, see [0087]) disposed in the display area; and an upper substrate (SUB2) comprising a rear surface facing the display substrate; a color filter layer (layer comprising CF1/CF2/CF3, see [0099]) disposed on the rear surface of the upper substrate; a light conversion layer (layer comprising WLC1/WLC2/LTU, see [0099]) disposed between the display substrate and the color filter layer; and a intermediate layer (CAP2) disposed between the color filter layer and the light conversion layer (e.g. between in at least one direction), a capping layer (CAP1, OBK1, and IBK1); wherein the intermediate layer has a side surface facing a direction perpendicular to a thickness direction of the display device (e.g. a slanted surface in direct contact with OBK1 or IBK1, which faces left or right in Fig. 17), in a cross-sectional view, the capping layer extends over and covers an entirety of the side surface of the intermediate layer (see Fig. 17), the color filter layer comprises a first color filter (CF1), a second color filter (CF2), and a third color filter (CF3) (note that the first color filter CF1 and third color filter CF3 form a light shielding region extending from the display area to the non-display area, see [0182]), an edge of the third color filter (CF3) protrudes more than an edge of the first color filter (CF1) toward an outer side of the upper substrate, and the edge of the first color filter is covered by the intermediate layer (see Fig. 17); wherein the capping layer (CAP1, OBK1, and IBK1) directly contacts the upper substrate (CAP1 portion directly contacts SUB2), and the capping layer includes a plurality of step portions (see Fig. 17). Yang does not disclose the first color filter, the second color filter, and the third color filter, that extend from the display area to the non-display area and are sequentially disposed in a direction from the intermediate layer to the upper substrate. In the same field of endeavor, Oh teaches in Fig. 2A and related text the first color filter (123), the second color filter (122), and the third color filter (121, see [0067) are sequentially disposed in a direction towards the upper substrate (note that the first color filter 123, the second color filter 122, and the third color filter 121 extend to areas of light shielding regions, see [0071]). It would have been obvious to one of ordinary skill in the art before the effective filing date of the claimed invention to modify the device of Yang by having the first color filter, the second color filter, and the third color filter, extending to light shielding regions and being sequentially disposed in a direction toward the upper substrate, as shown by Oh, in order to provide a high quality image and provide improved methods of manufacture (see Oh [0006] and [0152] at least). The limitation “the first color filter, the second color filter, and the third color filter, that extend from the display area to the non-display area and are sequentially disposed in a direction from the intermediate layer to the upper substrate” is therefore taught by the combination of the first color filter, the second color filter, and the third color filter extending to light shielding regions and being sequentially disposed in a direction toward the upper substrate, as shown by Oh, and the light shielding region extending from the display area to the non-display area and a direction from the intermediate layer to the upper substrate being toward the upper substrate, as shown by Yang. Response to Arguments Applicant's arguments filed 1/21/2026 have been fully considered but are moot in view of the new grounds of rejection above. It is noted that the Yang reference has been newly interpreted in regards to the intermediate layer. Conclusion Any inquiry concerning this communication or earlier communications from the examiner should be directed to Lauren R Bell whose telephone number is (571)272-7199. The examiner can normally be reached M-F 8am-5pm. Examiner interviews are available via telephone, in-person, and video conferencing using a USPTO supplied web-based collaboration tool. To schedule an interview, applicant is encouraged to use the USPTO Automated Interview Request (AIR) at http://www.uspto.gov/interviewpractice. If attempts to reach the examiner by telephone are unsuccessful, the examiner’s supervisor, William Kraig can be reached at (571) 272-8660. The fax phone number for the organization where this application or proceeding is assigned is 571-273-8300. Information regarding the status of published or unpublished applications may be obtained from Patent Center. Unpublished application information in Patent Center is available to registered users. To file and manage patent submissions in Patent Center, visit: https://patentcenter.uspto.gov. Visit https://www.uspto.gov/patents/apply/patent-center for more information about Patent Center and https://www.uspto.gov/patents/docx for information about filing in DOCX format. For additional questions, contact the Electronic Business Center (EBC) at 866-217-9197 (toll-free). If you would like assistance from a USPTO Customer Service Representative, call 800-786-9199 (IN USA OR CANADA) or 571-272-1000. /LAUREN R BELL/Primary Examiner, Art Unit 2896 3/30/2026
Read full office action

Prosecution Timeline

Show 2 earlier events
Sep 18, 2025
Examiner Interview Summary
Sep 18, 2025
Applicant Interview (Telephonic)
Oct 06, 2025
Response Filed
Dec 11, 2025
Final Rejection mailed — §102, §103
Jan 21, 2026
Response after Non-Final Action
Feb 04, 2026
Request for Continued Examination
Feb 14, 2026
Response after Non-Final Action
May 04, 2026
Non-Final Rejection mailed — §102, §103 (current)

Precedent Cases

Applications granted by this same examiner with similar technology

Patent 12684905
LIGHT-EMITTING DEVICE, MANUFACTURING METHOD THEREOF AND DISPLAY APPARATUS
2y 6m to grant Granted Jul 14, 2026
Patent 12672278
SEMICONDUCTOR DEVICE AND METHOD OF FABRICATING THE SAME
2y 6m to grant Granted Jun 30, 2026
Patent 12666782
DISPLAY DEVICE AND TILED DISPLAY DEVICE INCLUDING THE SAME
5y 0m to grant Granted Jun 23, 2026
Patent 12660312
BACKLIGHT MODULE AND MANUFACTURING METHOD THEREOF
5y 6m to grant Granted Jun 16, 2026
Patent 12648455
CLIP INTERCONNECT WITH MICRO CONTACT HEADS
5y 6m to grant Granted Jun 02, 2026
Study what changed to get past this examiner. Based on 5 most recent grants.

Strategy Recommendation AI-generated — please review before filing

Get a prosecution strategy drawn from examiner precedents, rejection analysis, and claim mapping.
Typically takes 5-10 seconds — AI-generated, attorney review required before filing

Prosecution Projections

3-4
Expected OA Rounds
40%
Grant Probability
72%
With Interview (+31.5%)
3y 5m (~0m remaining)
Median Time to Grant
High
PTA Risk
Based on 382 resolved cases by this examiner. Grant probability derived from career allowance rate.

Sign in with your work email

Enter your email to receive a magic link. No password needed.

Personal email addresses (Gmail, Yahoo, etc.) are not accepted.

Free tier: 3 strategy analyses per month