Prosecution Insights
Last updated: April 19, 2026
Application No. 18/093,205

3D UFET DEVICE FOR ADVANCED 3D INTEGRATION

Non-Final OA §102
Filed
Jan 04, 2023
Examiner
HENRY, CALEB E
Art Unit
2818
Tech Center
2800 — Semiconductors & Electrical Systems
Assignee
Tokyo Electron Limited
OA Round
1 (Non-Final)
86%
Grant Probability
Favorable
1-2
OA Rounds
2y 5m
To Grant
93%
With Interview

Examiner Intelligence

Grants 86% — above average
86%
Career Allow Rate
1052 granted / 1217 resolved
+18.4% vs TC avg
Moderate +6% lift
Without
With
+6.2%
Interview Lift
resolved cases with interview
Typical timeline
2y 5m
Avg Prosecution
48 currently pending
Career history
1265
Total Applications
across all art units

Statute-Specific Performance

§101
1.1%
-38.9% vs TC avg
§103
49.8%
+9.8% vs TC avg
§102
36.3%
-3.7% vs TC avg
§112
11.2%
-28.8% vs TC avg
Black line = Tech Center average estimate • Based on career data from 1217 resolved cases

Office Action

§102
Notice of Pre-AIA or AIA Status The present application, filed on or after March 16, 2013, is being examined under the first inventor to file provisions of the AIA . Election/Restrictions Applicant’s election without traverse of Group I in the reply filed on 5/23/2025 is acknowledged. Please disregard Requirement for Restriction/Election sent 7/25/2025. Specification The title of the invention is not descriptive. A new title is required that is clearly indicative of the invention to which the claims are directed. Claim Rejections - 35 USC § 102 In the event the determination of the status of the application as subject to AIA 35 U.S.C. 102 and 103 (or as subject to pre-AIA 35 U.S.C. 102 and 103) is incorrect, any correction of the statutory basis (i.e., changing from AIA to pre-AIA ) for the rejection will not be considered a new ground of rejection if the prior art relied upon, and the rationale supporting the rejection, would be the same under either status. The following is a quotation of the appropriate paragraphs of 35 U.S.C. 102 that form the basis for the rejections under this section made in this Office action: A person shall be entitled to a patent unless – (a)(2) the claimed invention was described in a patent issued under section 151, or in an application for patent published or deemed published under section 122(b), in which the patent or application, as the case may be, names another inventor and was effectively filed before the effective filing date of the claimed invention. Claim(s) 1-8, 10 is/are rejected under 35 U.S.C. 102(a)(2) as being anticipated by Dennen (6555872) PNG media_image1.png 522 758 media_image1.png Greyscale Regarding claim 1, Dennen teaches an semiconductor device comprising: a substrate comprising a working surface (please see figure above); and a transistor formed in the substrate (please see figure above), the transistor comprising: a complex channel structure (please see figure above) which is vertically arranged with respect to the working surface, the complex channel structure comprising first and second source-drain (S-D) ends (please see figure above) provided in a plane extending along the working surface to define an opening to a bounded region of the complex channel structure, a gate dielectric layer (126) formed on the complex channel structure within the bounded region, and a gate metal layer (128; Dennen teaches gate material being tungsten) formed on the gate dielectric layer within the bounded region to form the transistor. Regarding claim 2, Dennen teaches an semiconductor device of claim 1, wherein the complex channel structure comprises: a first channel portion including the first S-D end and extending along a vertical direction perpendicular to the working surface to a first distal end; and a second channel portion including the second S-D end and extending along the vertical direction to a second distal end (please see figure above). Regarding claim 3, Dennen teaches an semiconductor device of claim 2, wherein the first and second distal ends are connected to complete the complex channel structure (please see figure above). Regarding claim 4, Dennen teaches an semiconductor device of claim 3, further comprising a third channel portion that extends in a horizontal direction along the working surface and connects the first and second distal ends to complete the complex channel structure (please see figure above). Regarding claim 5, Dennen teaches an semiconductor device of claim 4, wherein the gate dielectric layer comprises a conformal layer formed on the first, second and third channel portions to form a complex dielectric structure (please see figure above). Regarding claim 6, Dennen teaches an semiconductor device of claim 5, wherein the gate metal fills abounded region of the complex dielectric structure (please see figure above). Regarding claim 7, Dennen teaches an semiconductor device of claim 4, wherein the complex channel structure has a U-shape in a vertical plane that is perpendicular to the working surface (please see figure above). Regarding claim 8, Dennen teaches an semiconductor device of claim 1, further comprising a first wiring layer formed over the semiconductor device, the first wiring layer comprising electrical connections that connect to the gate metal and the first and second S-D ends (please see connections to gate, source and drain above). Regarding claim 10, Dennen teaches an semiconductor device of claim 1, further comprising a plurality of complex channel structure transistors formed in the substrate (please see fig. 13). Further, please note that mere duplication of parts has no patentable significance unless a new and unexpected result is produced Allowable Subject Matter Claim 9 objected to as being dependent upon a rejected base claim, but would be allowable if rewritten in independent form including all of the limitations of the base claim and any intervening claims. The following is a statement of reasons for the indication of allowable subject matter: a semiconductor device of claim 6, wherein: the complex channel structure comprises a conductive oxide layer; and the gate dielectric comprises a high-k dielectric material. Claim 11 objected to as being dependent upon a rejected base claim, but would be allowable if rewritten in independent form including all of the limitations of the base claim and any intervening claims. The following is a statement of reasons for the indication of allowable subject matter: a semiconductor device of claim 10, wherein: the substrate and the plurality complex channel transistors collectively define a first transistor sheet; and a second transistor sheet is located above the first transistor sheet, the second transistor sheet further comprising: a second substrate disposed on the first substrate and having a second working surface opposite the first working surface; and a second plurality of complex channel transistors located within the second substrate, each having first and second S-D ends. Claims 12 and 13 are objected to based on their dependency on claim 11. Conclusion Any inquiry concerning this communication or earlier communications from the examiner should be directed to CALEB E HENRY whose telephone number is (571)270-5370. The examiner can normally be reached Mon-Fri. Examiner interviews are available via telephone, in-person, and video conferencing using a USPTO supplied web-based collaboration tool. To schedule an interview, applicant is encouraged to use the USPTO Automated Interview Request (AIR) at http://www.uspto.gov/interviewpractice. Information regarding the status of published or unpublished applications may be obtained from Patent Center. Unpublished application information in Patent Center is available to registered users. To file and manage patent submissions in Patent Center, visit: https://patentcenter.uspto.gov. Visit https://www.uspto.gov/patents/apply/patent-center for more information about Patent Center and https://www.uspto.gov/patents/docx for information about filing in DOCX format. For additional questions, contact the Electronic Business Center (EBC) at 866-217-9197 (toll-free). If you would like assistance from a USPTO Customer Service Representative, call 800-786-9199 (IN USA OR CANADA) or 571-272-1000. /CALEB E HENRY/Primary Examiner, Art Unit 2818
Read full office action

Prosecution Timeline

Jan 04, 2023
Application Filed
Sep 05, 2025
Non-Final Rejection — §102
Sep 16, 2025
Interview Requested
Sep 24, 2025
Applicant Interview (Telephonic)
Sep 24, 2025
Examiner Interview Summary

Precedent Cases

Applications granted by this same examiner with similar technology

Patent 12604596
METHOD FOR MANUFACTURING A PEROVSKITE SOLAR CELL WITH AN IMPROVED HOLE TRANSPORT LAYER AND A PEROVSKITE SOLAR CELL WITH AN IMPROVED HOLE TRANSPORT LAYER MANUFACTURED BY THE SAME METHOD
2y 5m to grant Granted Apr 14, 2026
Patent 12604650
METHOD FOR MANUFACTURING THE LIGHT-EMITTING ELEMENT AND LIGHT-EMITTING DEVICE USING PHOTOLITHOGRAPHY TECHNIQUE
2y 5m to grant Granted Apr 14, 2026
Patent 12598801
SEMICONDUCTOR DEVICE OF PHYSICAL UNCLONABLE FUNCTION AND MANUFACTURING METHOD THEREOF
2y 5m to grant Granted Apr 07, 2026
Patent 12588440
SUBSTRATE PROCESSING METHOD AND SUBSTRATE PROCESSING APPARATUS FOR ETCHING USING OXDIZATION
2y 5m to grant Granted Mar 24, 2026
Patent 12584068
COMPOUND FOR ORGANIC ELECTRIC ELEMENT, ORGANIC ELECTRIC ELEMENT USING THE SAME, AND AN ELECTRONIC DEVICE THEREOF
2y 5m to grant Granted Mar 24, 2026
Study what changed to get past this examiner. Based on 5 most recent grants.

AI Strategy Recommendation

Get an AI-powered prosecution strategy using examiner precedents, rejection analysis, and claim mapping.
Powered by AI — typically takes 5-10 seconds

Prosecution Projections

1-2
Expected OA Rounds
86%
Grant Probability
93%
With Interview (+6.2%)
2y 5m
Median Time to Grant
Low
PTA Risk
Based on 1217 resolved cases by this examiner. Grant probability derived from career allow rate.

Sign in with your work email

Enter your email to receive a magic link. No password needed.

Personal email addresses (Gmail, Yahoo, etc.) are not accepted.

Free tier: 3 strategy analyses per month