Prosecution Insights
Last updated: April 19, 2026
Application No. 18/094,477

DUAL-SIDE COOLED EMBEDDED DIE PACKAGING FOR POWER SEMICONDUCTOR DEVICES

Non-Final OA §102§103
Filed
Jan 09, 2023
Examiner
CHAN, CANDICE
Art Unit
2813
Tech Center
2800 — Semiconductors & Electrical Systems
Assignee
Gan Systems Inc.
OA Round
1 (Non-Final)
73%
Grant Probability
Favorable
1-2
OA Rounds
3y 3m
To Grant
92%
With Interview

Examiner Intelligence

Grants 73% — above average
73%
Career Allow Rate
399 granted / 547 resolved
+4.9% vs TC avg
Strong +19% interview lift
Without
With
+18.8%
Interview Lift
resolved cases with interview
Typical timeline
3y 3m
Avg Prosecution
49 currently pending
Career history
596
Total Applications
across all art units

Statute-Specific Performance

§101
0.3%
-39.7% vs TC avg
§103
49.6%
+9.6% vs TC avg
§102
28.8%
-11.2% vs TC avg
§112
18.0%
-22.0% vs TC avg
Black line = Tech Center average estimate • Based on career data from 547 resolved cases

Office Action

§102 §103
DETAILED ACTION This Office action is in response to the election and claim amendments filed 5 January 2026. By this amendment, claims 6-14 and 19-29 are withdrawn; claim 15 is amended. Claims 1-29 are currently pending; claims 6-14 and 19-29 stand withdrawn. Notice of Pre-AIA or AIA Status The present application, filed on or after March 16, 2013, is being examined under the first inventor to file provisions of the AIA . Election/Restrictions Applicant's election with traverse of Species III (Fig. 29), Sub-species A (Figs. 5-6), claims 1-5 and 15-18, in the reply filed on 5 January 2026 is acknowledged. The traversal is on the ground(s) that (1) each of claims 1-29 are directed to a dual-side-cooled embedded die package and thus, are considered part of Species III, and (2) limiting this application to Sub-species A is unnecessarily restrictive. (Remarks, pp. 11-12.) As to (1), this argument is found persuasive and the restriction between Species I-III is withdrawn. Since all claims as originally presented were directed to Species III, it is noted that Species III is therefore constructively elected by original presentation. As to (2), this is not found persuasive because Sub-species A and B are mutually exclusive for the reasons as set forth in the Restriction Requirement mailed 7 November 2025, and thus present an undue search and examination burden necessitating the employment of different search strategies for each species. Therefore, the restriction between Sub-species A and B is maintained. Applicant is respectfully reminded rejoinder may be possible if future prosecution renders allowable subject matter and claims non-elected require all limitations of an allowable claim. The requirement is still deemed proper and is therefore made FINAL. Claims 6-14 and 19-29 have been withdrawn by Applicant; claims 17 and 18 depend directly or indirectly from withdrawn claim 14 and are thus withdrawn from further consideration pursuant to 37 CFR 1.142(b), as being drawn to a nonelected species, there being no allowable generic or linking claim. Applicant timely traversed the restriction (election) requirement in the reply filed on 5 January 2026. Claim Rejections - 35 USC § 102 In the event the determination of the status of the application as subject to AIA 35 U.S.C. 102 and 103 (or as subject to pre-AIA 35 U.S.C. 102 and 103) is incorrect, any correction of the statutory basis (i.e., changing from AIA to pre-AIA ) for the rejection will not be considered a new ground of rejection if the prior art relied upon, and the rationale supporting the rejection, would be the same under either status. The following is a quotation of the appropriate paragraphs of 35 U.S.C. 102 that form the basis for the rejections under this section made in this Office action: A person shall be entitled to a patent unless – (a)(1) the claimed invention was patented, described in a printed publication, or in public use, on sale, or otherwise available to the public before the effective filing date of the claimed invention. Claims 1-5 are rejected under 35 U.S.C. 102(a)(1) as being anticipated by US 2022/0020669 A1 to McKnight-MacNeil et al. (hereinafter “McKnight-MacNeil”). Regarding independent claim 1, McKnight-MacNeil (Fig. 29) discloses an embedded die package comprising a laminated body and a die (Die; ¶ 0097) comprising a power semiconductor device (¶ 0097), the die being embedded within the laminated body, the laminated body comprising a stack of a plurality of dielectric build-up layers 120-1/120-2/120-3/110 (¶ 0094) and a plurality of electrically conductive layers 130-1/130-2/130-3 (¶ 0094), wherein a primary thermal pad 118 (¶ 0096) is provided on a first side (bottom) of the package and a secondary thermal pad 130-2 (¶ 0094) is provided on an opposite side (top) of the package (Examiner notes that the primary thermal pad/secondary thermal pad and first side/second side may be reversed in an alternative interpretation), the primary and secondary thermal pads providing for dual-side-cooling (¶ 0096; ¶ 0084 - 130-2 comprises copper, suitable for heat dissipation and cooling). Regarding claim 2, McKnight-MacNeil (Fig. 29) discloses the embedded die package of claim 1, wherein the laminated body is based on a bottom-side-cooled layup that provides the primary thermal pad 118 and electrical connections 130-3 (¶ 0094) for the power semiconductor device on the first side (bottom-side) (bottom) of the package and wherein the secondary thermal pad 130-2 is provided on the opposite side (top-side) (top) of the package. Regarding claim 3, McKnight-MacNeil (Fig. 29) discloses the embedded die package of claim 1, wherein the laminated body is based on a top-side cooled layup that provides the primary thermal pad 118 on the first side (top-side) (top of 180° rotation of Fig. 29) of the package and wherein the secondary thermal pad 130-2 and electrical connections 130-2 (¶ 0094) for the power semiconductor device are provided on the opposite side (bottom-side) (bottom of 180° rotation of Fig. 29) of the package. Regarding claim 4, McKnight-MacNeil (Fig. 29) discloses the embedded die package of claim 2, wherein one of said plurality of electrically conductive layers comprises a leadframe 114/116 (¶ 0095), the leadframe supporting the die within the laminated body and providing said primary thermal pad 118 (Fig. 29). Regarding claim 5, McKnight-MacNeil (Fig. 29) discloses the embedded die package of claim 3, wherein one of said plurality of electrically conductive layers comprises a leadframe 114/116, the leadframe supporting the die within the laminated body and providing said primary thermal pad 118 (Fig. 29). Claim Rejections - 35 USC § 103 In the event the determination of the status of the application as subject to AIA 35 U.S.C. 102 and 103 (or as subject to pre-AIA 35 U.S.C. 102 and 103) is incorrect, any correction of the statutory basis (i.e., changing from AIA to pre-AIA ) for the rejection will not be considered a new ground of rejection if the prior art relied upon, and the rationale supporting the rejection, would be the same under either status. This application currently names joint inventors. In considering patentability of the claims the examiner presumes that the subject matter of the various claims was commonly owned as of the effective filing date of the claimed invention(s) absent any evidence to the contrary. Applicant is advised of the obligation under 37 CFR 1.56 to point out the inventor and effective filing dates of each claim that was not commonly owned as of the effective filing date of the later invention in order for the examiner to consider the applicability of 35 U.S.C. 102(b)(2)(C) for any potential 35 U.S.C. 102(a)(2) prior art against the later invention. The following is a quotation of 35 U.S.C. 103 which forms the basis for all obviousness rejections set forth in this Office action: A patent for a claimed invention may not be obtained, notwithstanding that the claimed invention is not identically disclosed as set forth in section 102, if the differences between the claimed invention and the prior art are such that the claimed invention as a whole would have been obvious before the effective filing date of the claimed invention to a person having ordinary skill in the art to which the claimed invention pertains. Patentability shall not be negated by the manner in which the invention was made. Claims 15-16 are rejected under 35 U.S.C. 103 as being unpatentable over McKnight-MacNeil. Regarding independent claim 15, McKnight-MacNeil (Fig. 29) discloses an embedded die package 1000 (¶ 0096) comprising a laminated body 120-1/120-2/120-3/130-1/130-2/130-3 (¶¶ 0095-96) and a die (Die; ¶ 0097) comprising a power semiconductor device (¶ 0097), the die being embedded within the laminated body, wherein: the die (Die; see also Fig. 6B, ¶ 0080) comprises a patterned layer of conductive metallization on a front-side of the die providing electrical contact areas of the power semiconductor device (Fig. 29; ¶ 0080), and a thermal contact area (118 connected thereto; ¶0095) on a back-side of the die (Fig. 29); and a layer stack of the laminated body comprises: a first conductive layer comprising a leadframe 114/116 (¶ 0095) supporting the die and providing electrical contact areas and a primary thermal pad 118 (¶ 0096), the thermal contact area of the die being in thermal contact with the primary thermal pad of the leadframe (Fig. 29); a first dielectric build-up layer 110 (¶ 0095) embedding the die and the leadframe; a second conductive layer (Fig. 29 - conductive layer disposed on top surface of 120-1, ¶ 0094) on the first dielectric build-up layer 110; the second conductive layer being patterned to define interconnect areas (Fig. 29); the interconnect areas of the second conductive layer being connected by electrically conductive vias (Fig. 29 - vias in contact with top surface of Die) to respective electrical contact areas of the power semiconductor device (Die); and a second dielectric build-up layer 120-2 (¶ 0095) on the second conductive layer; a third conductive layer 130-2 (¶ 0096) on the second dielectric build-up layer 120-2; the third conductive layer 130-2 being patterned to define a secondary thermal pad (Fig. 29; ¶ 0084 - 130-2 comprises copper, suitable for heat dissipation and cooling); and a fourth conductive layer 130-3 (¶ 0096) underlying the first conductive layer 114/116 and separated therefrom by another dielectric build-up layer 120-3 (¶ 0096), the fourth conductive layer forming an external thermal pad 130-3 which is in thermal contact with the primary thermal pad 118 of the first conductive layer, and the fourth conductive layer providing external electrical contact areas which are interconnected to respective contact areas of the first conductive layer (Fig. 29), wherein the primary and secondary thermal pads providing for dual-side cooling (Fig. 29). The instant embodiment fails to expressly disclose: the second conductive layer being connected to electrical contact areas of the leadframe 114/116. In another figure, McKnight-MacNeil (Fig. 25) discloses a conductive layer 132/134 (¶ 0095) being connected by electrically conductive vias to respective electrical contact areas of the power semiconductor devices (Die) and electrical contact areas of the leadframe 114/116 (¶ 0095). It would have been obvious to one of ordinary skill in the art before the effective filing date of the claimed invention to provide electrically connections between the second conductive layer and the leadframe for the purpose of electrical contact versatility and accommodating different types of die in the embedded die package. Regarding claim 16, McKnight-MacNeil (Fig. 29) discloses the embedded die package of claim 15, wherein thermally conductive vias provide said thermal contact between the first thermal pad 118 and the external thermal pad 130-3 (¶ 0096). Conclusion Any inquiry concerning this communication or earlier communications from the examiner should be directed to Candice Y. Chan whose telephone number is (571)272-9013. The examiner can normally be reached 8:30 am - 5 pm ET. Examiner interviews are available via telephone, in-person, and video conferencing using a USPTO supplied web-based collaboration tool. To schedule an interview, applicant is encouraged to use the USPTO Automated Interview Request (AIR) at http://www.uspto.gov/interviewpractice. If attempts to reach the examiner by telephone are unsuccessful, the examiner’s supervisor, Steven B. Gauthier can be reached at 571-270-0373. The fax phone number for the organization where this application or proceeding is assigned is 571-273-8300. Information regarding the status of published or unpublished applications may be obtained from Patent Center. Unpublished application information in Patent Center is available to registered users. To file and manage patent submissions in Patent Center, visit: https://patentcenter.uspto.gov. Visit https://www.uspto.gov/patents/apply/patent-center for more information about Patent Center and https://www.uspto.gov/patents/docx for information about filing in DOCX format. For additional questions, contact the Electronic Business Center (EBC) at 866-217-9197 (toll-free). If you would like assistance from a USPTO Customer Service Representative, call 800-786-9199 (IN USA OR CANADA) or 571-272-1000. CANDICE Y. CHAN Examiner Art Unit 2813 19 February 2026 /STEVEN B GAUTHIER/Supervisory Patent Examiner, Art Unit 2813
Read full office action

Prosecution Timeline

Jan 09, 2023
Application Filed
Feb 26, 2026
Non-Final Rejection — §102, §103 (current)

Precedent Cases

Applications granted by this same examiner with similar technology

Patent 12604726
ELECTRONIC FUSE
2y 5m to grant Granted Apr 14, 2026
Patent 12575337
OXIDE ELECTRODE-BASED 3-TERMINAL NEUROMORPHIC SYNAPTIC DEVICE CONTAINING MOBILE IONS, AND METHOD OF MANUFACTURING THE SAME
2y 5m to grant Granted Mar 10, 2026
Patent 12532739
METAL MATRIX COMPOSITE LAYERS HAVING GRADED FILLER CONTENT FOR HEAT DISSIPATION FROM INTEGRATED CIRCUIT DEVICES
2y 5m to grant Granted Jan 20, 2026
Patent 12532516
MANUFACTURING METHOD CONTAINING AN OXYGEN CONCENTRATION DISTRIBUTION
2y 5m to grant Granted Jan 20, 2026
Patent 12494404
SEMICONDUCTOR DEVICE INCLUDING STOP ISLANDS AND METHOD FOR MANUFACTURING SEMICONDUCTOR DEVICE
2y 5m to grant Granted Dec 09, 2025
Study what changed to get past this examiner. Based on 5 most recent grants.

AI Strategy Recommendation

Get an AI-powered prosecution strategy using examiner precedents, rejection analysis, and claim mapping.
Powered by AI — typically takes 5-10 seconds

Prosecution Projections

1-2
Expected OA Rounds
73%
Grant Probability
92%
With Interview (+18.8%)
3y 3m
Median Time to Grant
Low
PTA Risk
Based on 547 resolved cases by this examiner. Grant probability derived from career allow rate.

Sign in with your work email

Enter your email to receive a magic link. No password needed.

Personal email addresses (Gmail, Yahoo, etc.) are not accepted.

Free tier: 3 strategy analyses per month