Prosecution Insights
Last updated: July 17, 2026
Application No. 18/114,313

FIELD-EFFECT TRANSISTORS WITH DEPOSITED GATE DIELECTRIC LAYERS

Non-Final OA §112
Filed
Feb 27, 2023
Examiner
NICELY, JOSEPH C
Art Unit
2813
Tech Center
2800 — Semiconductors & Electrical Systems
Assignee
Globalfoundries U.s. Inc.
OA Round
3 (Non-Final)
78%
Grant Probability
Favorable
3-4
OA Rounds
0m
Est. Remaining
97%
With Interview

Examiner Intelligence

Grants 78% — above average
78%
Career Allowance Rate
615 granted / 793 resolved
+9.6% vs TC avg
Strong +20% interview lift
Without
With
+19.8%
Interview Lift
resolved cases with interview
Typical timeline
2y 4m
Avg Prosecution
25 currently pending
Career history
831
Total Applications
across all art units

Statute-Specific Performance

§101
0.9%
-39.1% vs TC avg
§103
78.7%
+38.7% vs TC avg
§102
8.2%
-31.8% vs TC avg
§112
7.0%
-33.0% vs TC avg
Black line = Tech Center average estimate • Based on career data from 793 resolved cases

Office Action

§112
DETAILED ACTION Notice of Pre-AIA or AIA Status The present application, filed on or after March 16, 2013, is being examined under the first inventor to file provisions of the AIA . This Office action is in response to the RCE filed 6/22/2026 in which claim 26 was added. Claims 1, 2, 6, 7, 10-20, and 23-26 are pending and presented for examination. Claim Rejections - 35 USC § 112 The following is a quotation of the first paragraph of 35 U.S.C. 112(a): (a) IN GENERAL.—The specification shall contain a written description of the invention, and of the manner and process of making and using it, in such full, clear, concise, and exact terms as to enable any person skilled in the art to which it pertains, or with which it is most nearly connected, to make and use the same, and shall set forth the best mode contemplated by the inventor or joint inventor of carrying out the invention. The following is a quotation of the first paragraph of pre-AIA 35 U.S.C. 112: The specification shall contain a written description of the invention, and of the manner and process of making and using it, in such full, clear, concise, and exact terms as to enable any person skilled in the art to which it pertains, or with which it is most nearly connected, to make and use the same, and shall set forth the best mode contemplated by the inventor of carrying out his invention. Claims 1, 2, 6, and 7 are rejected under 35 U.S.C. 112(a) or 35 U.S.C. 112 (pre-AIA ), first paragraph, as failing to comply with the written description requirement. The claim(s) contains subject matter which was not described in the specification in such a way as to reasonably convey to one skilled in the relevant art that the inventor or a joint inventor, or for applications subject to pre-AIA 35 U.S.C. 112, the inventor(s), at the time the application was filed, had possession of the claimed invention. Claim 1 recites in lines 8-9 that "the silicon dioxide of the first gate dielectric layer [has] a higher density than the silicon dioxide of the second gate dielectric layer" and in lines 15-16 that "the first gate dielectric layer is disposed between the second gate dielectric layer and the gate conductor layer". The amendment filed 3/19/2026 introduced by new claim 21 (which was later incorporated into independent claim 1) that the first gate dielectric has a higher density than the second gate dielectric when the first gate dielectric is between the second gate dielectric and the gate conductor. However, the disclosure as originally filed only provides that the first gate dielectric 32 has a higher density than the second gate dielectric 34 when the first gate dielectric 32 is between the semiconductor substrate and the second gate dielectric 34, see Figs. 4-7 and [0033]. Therefore, the combination of limitations of the first gate dielectric having a higher density than the second gate dielectric when the first gate dielectric is between the second gate dielectric and the gate conductor is new matter as it was not described in the specification as filed. Claims 2, 6, and 7 inherit the deficiencies of claim 1. Appropriate correction is required. Claims 23-25 are rejected under 35 U.S.C. 112(a) or 35 U.S.C. 112 (pre-AIA ), first paragraph, as failing to comply with the written description requirement. The claim(s) contains subject matter which was not described in the specification in such a way as to reasonably convey to one skilled in the relevant art that the inventor or a joint inventor, or for applications subject to pre-AIA 35 U.S.C. 112, the inventor(s), at the time the application was filed, had possession of the claimed invention. Claim 23 recites in lines 21-22 that "the silicon dioxide of the first gate dielectric layer has a higher density than the silicon dioxide of the second gate dielectric layer" and in lines 16-17 that "the first gate dielectric layer is disposed between the gate conductor layer and the second gate dielectric layer". The amendment filed 3/19/2026 introduced by new claim 21 (which was later incorporated into independent claim 23) that the first gate dielectric has a higher density than the second gate dielectric when the first gate dielectric is between the second gate dielectric and the gate conductor. However, the disclosure as originally filed only provides that the first gate dielectric 32 has a higher density than the second gate dielectric 34 when the first gate dielectric 32 is between the semiconductor substrate and the second gate dielectric 34, see Figs. 4-7 and [0033]. Therefore, the combination of limitations of the first gate dielectric having a higher density than the second gate dielectric when the first gate dielectric is between the second gate dielectric and the gate conductor is new matter as it was not described in the specification as filed. Claims 24 and 25 inherit the deficiencies of claim 23. Appropriate correction is required. Important to Note Examiner notes that the reference Sugahara (JP 2018200919) provided in the IDS filed by applicant on 6/22/2026 teaches in Fig. 1 and [0028] of the attached machine translation where the first gate dielectric 61 comprises silicon dioxide (silica glass comprises silicon dioxide) and can have a density higher than that of second gate dielectric 62, which comprises silicon dioxide, when the first gate dielectric is between the substrate and the second gate dielectric 62. Allowable Subject Matter Claims 10-20 and 26 are allowed over the prior art of record. The following is a statement of reasons for the indication of allowable subject matter: the closest prior art, Cai (US 2020/0343370 and Cai hereinafter), discloses a method of forming a structure for a field-effect transistor (Figs. 1-2J; 100; [0011]), the method comprising: forming a doped region (Fig. 1; 109; [0013]) in a semiconductor substrate (comprising 120, 101, 110, 109, and 108; [0011]-[0013]); forming a trench (Fig. 1; 103; [0012]) including a plurality of sidewalls (left and right sidewall of 103) extending from a top surface (top of 109) of the semiconductor substrate (comprising 120, 101, 110, 109, and 108) into the semiconductor substrate (comprising 120, 101, 110, 109, and 108), wherein the semiconductor substrate (comprising 120, 101, 110, 109, and 108) comprises a wide bandgap semiconductor material (substrate can comprise a material such as SiC; [0008]); forming a first gate dielectric layer (Fig. 1; inner half of 115; [0012]) disposed on the sidewalls of the trench (103); forming a second gate dielectric layer (Fig. 1; claim doesn’t establish a material difference between the first and second gate dielectric layers so Examiner interprets them to be the same material, such as the material of 115, and the second gate dielectric layer is the outer half of 115; [0012]) disposed on the sidewalls of the trench (103); forming a gate conductor layer (Fig. 1; 105; [0012]) inside the trench (103); forming a dielectric layer (Fig. 1; 111; [0013]) including a first portion (111 that is directly over 105) on the gate conductor layer (105) and a second portion (111 that is directly over the top surface of 109) on the top surface (top of 109) of the semiconductor substrate (comprising 120, 101, 110, 109, and 108); and forming an electrode (Fig. 1; 122 is the source electrode; [0014]) coupled (through 112; [0014]) to the doped region (109), wherein the first gate dielectric layer (inner half of 115) is disposed between the gate conductor layer (105) and the second gate dielectric layer (outer half of 115), the first portion (111 that is directly over 105) of the dielectric layer (111) is thicker (111 that is directly over 105 extends from the bottom surface of 122 to the top of 105 that is recessed relative to the top of 109 which is thicker than 111 that is directly over the top of 109 that extends from the bottom surface of 122 to the top of 109) than the second portion (111 that is directly over the top surface of 109) of the dielectric layer (111), and the first portion (111 that is directly over 105) of the dielectric layer (111) is disposed between the gate conductor layer (105) and the electrode (122). Cai fails to expressly disclose wherein the gate conductor layer comprises silicon, and forming the dielectric layer including the first portion on the gate conductor layer and the second portion on the top surface of the semiconductor substrate comprises: oxidizing the silicon of the gate conductor layer and the wide bandgap semiconductor material of the semiconductor substrate. Conclusion Any inquiry concerning this communication or earlier communications from the examiner should be directed to JOSEPH C NICELY whose telephone number is (571)270-3834. The examiner can normally be reached Monday-Friday 7:30 am - 4 pm, EST. Examiner interviews are available via telephone, in-person, and video conferencing using a USPTO supplied web-based collaboration tool. To schedule an interview, applicant is encouraged to use the USPTO Automated Interview Request (AIR) at http://www.uspto.gov/interviewpractice. If attempts to reach the examiner by telephone are unsuccessful, the examiner’s supervisor, Steven Gauthier can be reached at (571) 270-0373. The fax phone number for the organization where this application or proceeding is assigned is 571-273-8300. Information regarding the status of published or unpublished applications may be obtained from Patent Center. Unpublished application information in Patent Center is available to registered users. To file and manage patent submissions in Patent Center, visit: https://patentcenter.uspto.gov. Visit https://www.uspto.gov/patents/apply/patent-center for more information about Patent Center and https://www.uspto.gov/patents/docx for information about filing in DOCX format. For additional questions, contact the Electronic Business Center (EBC) at 866-217-9197 (toll-free). If you would like assistance from a USPTO Customer Service Representative, call 800-786-9199 (IN USA OR CANADA) or 571-272-1000. JOSEPH C. NICELY Primary Examiner Art Unit 2813 /JOSEPH C. NICELY/Primary Examiner, Art Unit 2813
Read full office action

Prosecution Timeline

Show 2 earlier events
Nov 06, 2025
Non-Final Rejection (signed) — §112
Dec 23, 2025
Non-Final Rejection mailed — §112
Mar 19, 2026
Response Filed
Jun 02, 2026
Final Rejection mailed — §112
Jun 04, 2026
Response after Non-Final Action
Jun 22, 2026
Request for Continued Examination
Jun 24, 2026
Response after Non-Final Action
Jul 08, 2026
Non-Final Rejection mailed — §112 (current)

Precedent Cases

Applications granted by this same examiner with similar technology

Patent 12684809
SPLIT-GATE MOSFET AND MANUFACTURING METHOD THEREOF
3y 6m to grant Granted Jul 14, 2026
Patent 12672291
MEMORY DEVICE CONTAINING FERROELECTRIC-SPACER-FERROELECTRIC MEMORY ELEMENTS AND METHOD OF MAKING THE SAME
3y 5m to grant Granted Jun 30, 2026
Patent 12641784
MEMORY DEVICES AND METHODS FOR FORMING THE SAME
3y 4m to grant Granted May 26, 2026
Patent 12622037
GATE CUT SUBSEQUENT TO REPLACEMENT GATE
4y 5m to grant Granted May 05, 2026
Patent 12615830
SEMICONDUCTOR STRUCTURE AND METHOD FOR FORMING THE SAME
3y 5m to grant Granted Apr 28, 2026
Study what changed to get past this examiner. Based on 5 most recent grants.

Strategy Recommendation AI-generated — please review before filing

Get a prosecution strategy drawn from examiner precedents, rejection analysis, and claim mapping.
Typically takes 5-10 seconds — AI-generated, attorney review required before filing

Prosecution Projections

3-4
Expected OA Rounds
78%
Grant Probability
97%
With Interview (+19.8%)
2y 4m (~0m remaining)
Median Time to Grant
High
PTA Risk
Based on 793 resolved cases by this examiner. Grant probability derived from career allowance rate.

Sign in with your work email

Enter your email to receive a magic link. No password needed.

Personal email addresses (Gmail, Yahoo, etc.) are not accepted.

Free tier: 3 strategy analyses per month