Prosecution Insights
Last updated: May 29, 2026
Application No. 18/148,687

METAL-ON-METAL DEPOSITION METHODS FOR FILLING A GAP FEATURE ON A SUBSTRATE SURFACE

Non-Final OA §102
Filed
Dec 30, 2022
Priority
Nov 23, 2021 — provisional 63/282,217 +1 more
Examiner
KEBEDE, BROOK
Art Unit
2818
Tech Center
2800 — Semiconductors & Electrical Systems
Assignee
Asm Ip Holding B V
OA Round
3 (Non-Final)
89%
Grant Probability
Favorable
3-4
OA Rounds
0m
Est. Remaining
93%
With Interview

Examiner Intelligence

Grants 89% — above average
89%
Career Allowance Rate
899 granted / 1012 resolved
+20.8% vs TC avg
Minimal +4% lift
Without
With
+4.3%
Interview Lift
resolved cases with interview
Fast prosecutor
2y 1m
Avg Prosecution
19 currently pending
Career history
1031
Total Applications
across all art units

Statute-Specific Performance

§101
0.8%
-39.2% vs TC avg
§103
48.0%
+8.0% vs TC avg
§102
21.3%
-18.7% vs TC avg
§112
8.2%
-31.8% vs TC avg
Black line = Tech Center average estimate • Based on career data from 1012 resolved cases

Office Action

§102
DETAILED ACTION The present application, filed on or after March 16, 2013, is being examined under the first inventor to file provisions of the AIA . Continued Examination Under 37 CFR 1.114 A request for continued examination under 37 CFR 1.114, including the fee set forth in 37 CFR 1.17(e), was filed in this application after final rejection. Since this application is eligible for continued examination under 37 CFR 1.114, and the fee set forth in 37 CFR 1.17(e) has been timely paid, the finality of the previous Office action has been withdrawn pursuant to 37 CFR 1.114. Applicant's submission filed on March 12, 2026 has been entered. Claim Rejections - 35 USC § 102 The following is a quotation of the appropriate paragraphs of 35 U.S.C. 102 that form the basis for the rejections under this section made in this Office action: A person shall be entitled to a patent unless – (a)(1) the claimed invention was patented, described in a printed publication, or in public use, on sale, or otherwise available to the public before the effective filing date of the claimed invention. Claim(s) 12 is/are rejected under 35 U.S.C. 102(a)(1) as being anticipated by NA et al. (WO 2021046058 A1). Re Claim 12, NA et al. disclose a semiconductor structure comprising a substrate (see Paragraph [0005]) with a surface comprising a gap feature (Fig. 4) and filling a gap future with molybdenum film (see Figs. 3 and 4). Furthermore, the process claim that recited in claim 1 has no patentable weight for the device claim. Even though product-by-process claims are limited by and defined by the process, determination of patentability is based on the product itself. The patentability of a product does not depend on its method of production. If the product in the product-by-process claim is the same as or obvious from a product of the prior art, the claim is unpatentable even though the prior product was made by a different process.” See In re Thorpe, 777 F.2d 695, 698, 227 USPQ 964, 966 (Fed. Cir. 1985). Allowable Subject Matter Claims 1, 2, 4-11, 13-16, 18-19 and 21 are allowed over prior art of record. The following is a statement of reasons for the indication of allowable subject matter: Prior art of record neither anticipates nor renders obvious the claimed subject matter of the instant application as a whole either taken alone or in combination, in particular, prior art of record does not teach “wherein the surface clean comprises providing an etchant comprising a metal chloride to the reaction chamber and wherein the surface clean is performed before the cyclical deposition process,” as recited in claim 1, “wherein the surface cleaning comprises providing an etchant comprising a metal chloride to the reaction chamber and wherein the surface cleaning is performed before the contacting the substrate with the reducing agent,” as recited in claim 13, and “wherein the step of cleaning comprises providing an etchant comprising a metal chloride to the reaction chamber and wherein the cleaning the metal surface and the dielectric surface is performed before the cyclical deposition process,” as recited in claim 18 respectively. Claims 4-11, 14-16, 19 and 21 are also allowed as being directly or indirectly dependent of the allowed independent base claim. Conclusion THIS ACTION IS MADE NON-FINAL. Correspondence Any inquiry concerning this communication or earlier communications from the examiner should be directed to BROOK KEBEDE whose telephone number is 571-272-1862. The examiner can normally be reached Monday Friday 8:00 AM 5:00 PM. Examiner interviews are available via telephone, in-person, and video conferencing using a USPTO supplied web-based collaboration tool. To schedule an interview, applicant is encouraged to use the USPTO Automated Interview Request (AIR) at http://www.uspto.gov/interviewpractice. If attempts to reach the examiner by telephone are unsuccessful, the examiner’s supervisor, Jeff Natalini can be reached at 571-272-2266. The fax phone number for the organization where this application or proceeding is assigned is 571-273-8300. Information regarding the status of published or unpublished applications may be obtained from Patent Center. Unpublished application information in Patent Center is available to registered users. To file and manage patent submissions in Patent Center, visit: https://patentcenter.uspto.gov. Visit https://www.uspto.gov/patents/apply/patent-center for more information about Patent Center and https://www.uspto.gov/patents/docx for information about filing in DOCX format. For additional questions, contact the Electronic Business Center (EBC) at 866-217-9197 (toll-free). If you would like assistance from a USPTO Customer Service Representative, call 800-786-9199 (IN USA OR CANADA) or 571-272-1000. /BROOK KEBEDE/ Primary Examiner, Art Unit 2894 /BK/ March 21, 2026
Read full office action

Prosecution Timeline

Dec 30, 2022
Application Filed
Jun 18, 2025
Non-Final Rejection mailed — §102
Sep 18, 2025
Response Filed
Dec 30, 2025
Final Rejection mailed — §102
Feb 28, 2026
Response after Non-Final Action
Mar 12, 2026
Request for Continued Examination
Mar 19, 2026
Response after Non-Final Action
Mar 25, 2026
Non-Final Rejection mailed — §102 (current)

Precedent Cases

Applications granted by this same examiner with similar technology

Patent 12635249
DISPLAY DEVICE
2y 7m to grant Granted May 19, 2026
Patent 12635548
METHOD OF MANUFACTURING A BONDED SUBSTRATE STACK BY SURFACE ACTIVATION
2y 1m to grant Granted May 19, 2026
Patent 12628343
SEMICONDUCTOR DEVICES AND DATA STORAGE SYSTEMS INCLUDING THE SAME
3y 2m to grant Granted May 12, 2026
Patent 12625424
METHOD OF ANNEALING REFLECTIVE PHOTOMASK BY USING LASER
2y 2m to grant Granted May 12, 2026
Patent 12621987
MEMORY DEVICES AND METHODS FOR FORMING THE SAME
2y 11m to grant Granted May 05, 2026
Study what changed to get past this examiner. Based on 5 most recent grants.

Strategy Recommendation AI-generated — please review before filing

Get a prosecution strategy drawn from examiner precedents, rejection analysis, and claim mapping.
Typically takes 5-10 seconds — AI-generated, attorney review required before filing

Prosecution Projections

3-4
Expected OA Rounds
89%
Grant Probability
93%
With Interview (+4.3%)
2y 1m (~0m remaining)
Median Time to Grant
High
PTA Risk
Based on 1012 resolved cases by this examiner. Grant probability derived from career allowance rate.

Sign in with your work email

Enter your email to receive a magic link. No password needed.

Personal email addresses (Gmail, Yahoo, etc.) are not accepted.

Free tier: 3 strategy analyses per month