Prosecution Insights
Last updated: April 19, 2026
Application No. 18/155,491

IMAGE SENSOR PACKAGING AND METHODS FOR FORMING THE SAME

Non-Final OA §103
Filed
Jan 17, 2023
Examiner
MUNOZ, ANDRES F
Art Unit
2818
Tech Center
2800 — Semiconductors & Electrical Systems
Assignee
Taiwan Semiconductor Manufacturing Company Ltd.
OA Round
3 (Non-Final)
76%
Grant Probability
Favorable
3-4
OA Rounds
2y 4m
To Grant
94%
With Interview

Examiner Intelligence

Grants 76% — above average
76%
Career Allow Rate
541 granted / 707 resolved
+8.5% vs TC avg
Strong +18% interview lift
Without
With
+17.8%
Interview Lift
resolved cases with interview
Typical timeline
2y 4m
Avg Prosecution
36 currently pending
Career history
743
Total Applications
across all art units

Statute-Specific Performance

§101
0.5%
-39.5% vs TC avg
§103
43.7%
+3.7% vs TC avg
§102
28.6%
-11.4% vs TC avg
§112
21.5%
-18.5% vs TC avg
Black line = Tech Center average estimate • Based on career data from 707 resolved cases

Office Action

§103
DETAILED ACTION Notice of Pre-AIA or AIA Status The present application, filed on or after March 16, 2013, is being examined under the first inventor to file provisions of the AIA . Continued Examination Under 37 CFR 1.114 A request for continued examination under 37 CFR 1.114, including the fee set forth in 37 CFR 1.17(e), was filed in this application after final rejection. Since this application is eligible for continued examination under 37 CFR 1.114, and the fee set forth in 37 CFR 1.17(e) has been timely paid, the finality of the previous Office action has been withdrawn pursuant to 37 CFR 1.114. Applicant's submission filed on 1.13.2026 has been entered. Claim Rejections - 35 USC § 103 The following is a quotation of 35 U.S.C. 103 which forms the basis for all obviousness rejections set forth in this Office action: A patent for a claimed invention may not be obtained, notwithstanding that the claimed invention is not identically disclosed as set forth in section 102, if the differences between the claimed invention and the prior art are such that the claimed invention as a whole would have been obvious before the effective filing date of the claimed invention to a person having ordinary skill in the art to which the claimed invention pertains. Patentability shall not be negated by the manner in which the invention was made. Claims 1-8, 21-23, 25 and 27-32 are rejected under 35 U.S.C. 103 as being unpatentable over Wan et al. (of record, US 20140042298 A1) in view of Kwon (US 20190123088 A1). Regarding claim 1, Wan discloses a device structure (Figs. 9-10), comprising: a first die (200/202) comprising a first substrate (220) and a first interconnect structure (unlabeled; above 220) disposed over the first substrate; a second die (100/102) comprising a second substrate (120) and a second interconnect (unlabeled; above 120) structure disposed over the second substrate; and a third die (20/22) comprising a third interconnect structure (at least 34) and a third substrate (26) disposed over the third interconnect structure, wherein the first interconnect structure is bonded (Fig. 6) to the second substrate by way of a first plurality of bonding layers (annotated), wherein the second interconnect structure is bonded (Fig. 4) to the third interconnect structure by way of a second plurality of bonding layers (annotated), wherein the third substrate (20/22) comprises a plurality of photodiodes (24), a plurality of floating diffusion regions (32, “floating diffusion capacitor 32”, Fig. 9), and a first transistor (28) disposed over the third substrate (Figs. 2 and 10), wherein the second die (100/102) comprises (Fig. 10): a second transistor (130) having a source electrically (indirectly at least) connected to a drain of the first transistor (28), a third transistor (128) having a gate electrically (indirectly at least) connected to the drain of the first transistor (28) and the source of the second transistor (130), and a fourth transistor (126) having a drain electrically (indirectly at least) connected to a source of the third transistor (128). PNG media_image1.png 490 924 media_image1.png Greyscale Wan fails to disclose wherein each of the plurality of floating diffusion regions is surrounded and shared by four of the plurality of photodiodes, wherein the four of the plurality of photodiodes are arranged in a square formation in a top view. Kwon discloses (Fig. 2B) wherein each of the plurality of floating diffusion regions (FD) is surrounded and shared by four of the plurality of photodiodes (PD1-PD4), wherein the four of the plurality of photodiodes are arranged in a rectangular formation (MPEP 2125) in a top view (Fig. 2B, [0048] – “For example, the shared pixel SP may have a structure in which four photodiodes PD1 to PD4 surround and share one floating diffusion area FD.”). PNG media_image2.png 484 462 media_image2.png Greyscale It would have been obvious to one of ordinary skill in the art, before the effective filing date of the claimed invention, to include the photodiode and floating diffusion arrangement of Kwon in Wan so as to maximize the number of photodiodes while reducing the number of floating diffusion areas and the number of transistors associated with said photodiodes (Kwon, [0046-0050]). Wan/Kwon discloses wherein the four of the plurality of photodiodes (PD1-PD4) are arranged in a rectangular formation (MPEP 2125) in a top view (Fig. 2B) but fails to disclose “a square formation”. It would have been obvious to one of ordinary skill in the art, before the effective filing date of the claimed invention, to arrive at a square formation in Wan/Kwon so as to maximize the number of photodiodes while reducing the number of floating diffusion areas and the number of transistors associated with said photodiodes (Kwon, [0046-0050]) and/or because it has been held that such modification would have involved a mere change in size/shape of a component which is prima-facie obvious. See MPEP 2144.04 IV. Regarding claim 2, Wan/Kwon discloses (Fig. 9 above) wherein the first plurality of bonding layers comprise a first plurality of bonding pad structures (annotated) disposed at a first pitch (Pitch A), and wherein the second plurality of bonding layers comprises a second plurality of bonding pad structures (annotated) disposed at a second pitch (Pitch B) different from the first pitch (Fig. 9 above, Pitch B < Pitch A). Regarding claim 3, Wan/Kwon discloses (Fig. 9 above) wherein the second pitch (Pitch B) is smaller than the first pitch (Pitch A, Fig. 9 above, Pitch B < Pitch A). Regarding claims 4-5, Wan/Kwon fails to disclose (claim 4) Wherein the first pitch is between about 1.5 µm and about 2.5 µm, wherein the second pitch is between about 0.3 µm and about 1.5 µm and (claim 5) wherein a ratio of the second pitch to the first pitch is between about 0.2 and about 0.75. However, it would have been obvious to one of ordinary skill in the art, before the effective filing date of the claimed invention, to arrive at a value within the claimed ranges in the device of Wan/Kwon so as to allow for maximizing the number of photodiodes in the third die which affects the second pitch (B) while maintaining circuitry capable of addressing said photodiodes in separate dies which affects the first pitch (A), and/or, as a matter of routine experimentation (MPEP 2144.05). Regarding claim 6, Wan/Kwon discloses (Fig. 9 above) wherein each of the plurality of floating diffusion regions (32) is vertically aligned (https://www.thefreedictionary.com/align; To adjust (parts of a mechanism, for example) to produce a proper relationship or orientation) with one of the second plurality of bonding pad structures (annotated). Regarding claim 7, Wan/Kwon discloses wherein a gate structure (30) of the first transistor (28) is in (indirect) physical contact (via other layers) with one of the plurality of photodiodes (24, Fig. 9). Regarding claim 8, Wan/Kwon discloses wherein the second die comprises a plurality of through-substrate-vias (TSVs) (146) extending through the second substrate (120, Fig. 9). Regarding claim 21, Wan discloses (Figs. 9 and 10) a device structure, comprising: a first die (200/202) comprising a first substrate (220) and a first interconnect structure (unlabeled) disposed over the first substrate; a second die (100/102) comprising a second substrate (120) and a second interconnect structure (unlabeled) disposed over the second substrate; and a third die (20/22) comprising a third interconnect structure (at least 34) and a third substrate (26) disposed over the third interconnect structure, wherein the first interconnect structure is bonded to the second substrate by way of a first plurality of bonding layers (annotated above) wherein the second interconnect structure is bonded to the third interconnect structure by way of a second plurality of bonding layers (annotated above), wherein the third substrate comprises a plurality of photodiodes (24), a first transistor (28) disposed over the third substrate, and a plurality of floating diffusion regions (32) adjacent the plurality of photodiodes, wherein the second die (Fig. 10) comprises: a second transistor (130) having a source electrically (indirectly at least) connected to a drain of the first transistor (28), a third transistor (128) having a gate electrically connected (indirectly at least) to the drain of the first transistor (28) and the source of the second transistor (130), and a fourth transistor (126) having a drain electrically connected (indirectly at least) to a source of the third transistor (128), wherein the first plurality of bonding layers comprise a first bonding layer (annotated below) adjacent the first interconnect structure and a second bonding layer (annotated below) adjacent the second substrate, wherein the first bonding layer comprises a first plurality of bonding pad structures (annotated below) disposed at a first pitch (Pitch A), wherein the second bonding layer comprises a second plurality of bonding pad structures (annotated below) disposed at the first pitch (Pitch A), wherein the plurality of floating diffusion regions (32) are disposed at a second pitch (Pitch B) different from the first pitch, wherein the second plurality of bonding layers comprises a third plurality of bonding pad structures (annotated) disposed at the second pitch (Pitch B) (Note: per MPEP 2125, the pitch of 32 appears to be the same of the third plurality of bonding pad structures; both having Pitch B. Alternatively, in the event the pitch of 32 is not the same of the third plurality of bonding pad structures, which the examiner does not concede, it would have been obvious to one of ordinary skill in the art, before the effective filing date, to ensure a common pitch as claimed is included in Wan so as to ensure the floating diffusion regions are interconnected to elements in the second die with short and vertical routing features). PNG media_image3.png 707 780 media_image3.png Greyscale Wan fails to disclose wherein four of the plurality of photodiodes are arranged in a square formation to center around one of the plurality of floating diffusion regions. Kwon discloses (Fig. 2B) wherein four of the plurality of photodiodes (PD1-PD4) are arranged in a rectangle formation (MPEP 2125) to center around one of the plurality of floating diffusion regions (FD, Fig. 2B, [0048] – “For example, the shared pixel SP may have a structure in which four photodiodes PD1 to PD4 surround and share one floating diffusion area FD.”). PNG media_image2.png 484 462 media_image2.png Greyscale It would have been obvious to one of ordinary skill in the art, before the effective filing date of the claimed invention, to include the photodiode and floating diffusion arrangement of Kwon in Wan so as to maximize the number of photodiodes while reducing the number of floating diffusion areas and the number of transistors associated with said photodiodes (Kwon, [0046-0050]). Wan/Kwon discloses wherein four of the plurality of photodiodes (PD1-PD4) are arranged in a rectangular formation (MPEP 2125, Fig. 2B) but fails to disclose “a square formation”. It would have been obvious to one of ordinary skill in the art, before the effective filing date of the claimed invention, to arrive at a square formation in Wan/Kwon so as to maximize the number of photodiodes while reducing the number of floating diffusion areas and the number of transistors associated with said photodiodes (Kwon, [0046-0050]) and/or because it has been held that such modification would have involved a mere change in size/shape of a component which is prima-facie obvious. See MPEP 2144.04 IV. Regarding claim 22, Wan/Kwon discloses wherein each of the third plurality of bonding pad structures (Fig. 9 annotated above) is vertically aligned (definition below) with one of the plurality of floating diffusion region (32, Fig. 9. See https://www.thefreedictionary.com/align; To adjust (parts of a mechanism, for example) to produce a proper relationship or orientation). Regarding claim 23, Wan/Kwon discloses wherein the second pitch (Pitch B) is smaller than the first pitch (Pitch A, Fig. 9 above). Regarding claim 25, Wan/Kwon fails to wherein a ratio of the second pitch to the first pitch is between about 0.2 and about 0.75. However, it would have been obvious to one of ordinary skill in the art, before the effective filing date of the claimed invention, to arrive at a value within the claimed ranges in the device of Wan/Kwon so as to allow for maximizing the number of photodiodes in the third die which affects the second pitch (B) while maintaining circuitry capable of addressing said photodiodes in separate dies which affects the first pitch (A), and/or, as a matter of routine experimentation (MPEP 2144.05). Regarding claim 27, Wan/Kwon discloses wherein the second die comprises a plurality of through-substrate-vias (TSVs) (146) extending through the second substrate (120, Fig. 9) to interface the second plurality of bonding pad structures (which are at the respective ends of each 146). Regarding claim 28, Wan discloses (Figs. 9-10) a device structure, comprising: a logic die (200/202) comprising a first substrate (220) and a first interconnect structure (unlabeled) disposed over the first substrate; a pixel device die (100/102) comprising a second substrate (120) and a second interconnect structure (unlabeled) disposed over the second substrate; and a pixel die (20/22) comprising a third interconnect structure (at least 34) and a third substrate (26) disposed over the third interconnect structure, wherein the first interconnect structure is bonded to the second substrate by way of a first plurality of bonding layers (annotated above), wherein the first plurality of bonding layers comprise a first plurality of bonding pad structures (annotated above), wherein the second interconnect structure is bonded to the third interconnect structure by way of a second plurality of bonding layers (annotated above), wherein the third substrate comprises a plurality of photodiodes (24), a first transistor (28) disposed over the third substrate, and a plurality of floating diffusion regions (32) adjacent the plurality of photodiodes, wherein the pixel device die (Fig. 10) comprises: a second transistor (130) having a source electrically (indirectly at least) connected to a drain of the first transistor (28), a third transistor (128) having a gate electrically connected (indirectly at least) to the drain of the first transistor and the source of the second transistor, and a fourth transistor (126) having a drain electrically connected (indirectly at least) to a source of the third transistor, wherein the plurality of floating diffusion regions (32) are disposed at a first pitch (B), wherein the first plurality of bonding layers comprises a second first plurality of bonding pad structures (annotated above) disposed at a second pitch (A) different from the first pitch (Fig. 9 above). Wan does not disclose wherein each of the plurality of floating diffusion regions is surrounded and shared by four of the plurality of photodiodes. Kwon discloses (Fig. 2B) wherein each of the plurality of floating diffusion regions (FD) is surrounded and shared by four of the plurality of photodiodes (PD1-PD4, Fig. 2B, [0048] – “For example, the shared pixel SP may have a structure in which four photodiodes PD1 to PD4 surround and share one floating diffusion area FD.”). PNG media_image2.png 484 462 media_image2.png Greyscale It would have been obvious to one of ordinary skill in the art, before the effective filing date of the claimed invention, to include the photodiode and floating diffusion arrangement of Kwon in Wan so as to maximize the number of photodiodes while reducing the number of floating diffusion areas and the number of transistors associated with said photodiodes (Kwon, [0046-0050]). Regarding claim 29, Wan/Kwon discloses wherein the second plurality of bonding layers comprise a second plurality of bonding pad structures (annotated) disposed at the first pitch (B, per MPEP 2125, pitch B appears to be in both 32 and the second plurality of bonding pad structures. Alternatively, in the event the pitch of 32 is not the same of the second plurality of bonding pad structures, which the examiner does not concede, it would have been obvious to one of ordinary skill in the art, before the effective filing date, to ensure a common pitch as claimed is included in Wan/Kwon so as to ensure the floating diffusion regions are interconnected to elements in the second die with short and vertical routing features). Regarding claim 30, Wan/Kwon discloses wherein each of the second plurality of bonding pad structures (annotated) is vertically aligned (definition below) with one of the plurality of floating diffusion regions (32, Fig. 9. See https://www.thefreedictionary.com/align; To adjust (parts of a mechanism, for example) to produce a proper relationship or orientation). Regarding claim 31, Wan/Kwon discloses wherein the plurality of photodiodes (24) are disposed at a third pitch smaller than the second pitch (A; Fig. 9, the pitch between 24 is less than A). Regarding claim 32, Wan/Kwon discloses wherein the plurality of photodiodes (PD1-PD4) are grouped into a plurality of clusters (SP, Figs. 2A-2B), and wherein each of the plurality of clusters comprises four of the plurality of photodiodes (four PDs in Fig. 2B) surrounding one of the plurality of floating diffusion regions (FD, Fig. 2B). Claim 24 is rejected under 35 U.S.C. 103 as being unpatentable over Wan et al. (of record, US 20140042298 A1) in view of Kwon (US 20190123088 A1) as applied to claim 21 above, and further in view of Hwang (of record, US 20090065828 A1). Regarding claim 24, Wan /Kwon fails to disclose wherein the third substrate and the plurality of floating diffusion regions are doped with an n-type dopant, and wherein a concentration of the n-type dopant in the plurality of floating diffusion regions is greater than a concentration of the n-type dopant in the third substrate. Hwang discloses wherein a substrate (100, [0029] – “can be a substrate doped with p-type impurities or n-type impurities” and/or including 143, [0033] – “N- (143 “) and a floating diffusion region (FD/131, [0037] - “floating diffusion FD 131, which is an N+ junction”) are doped with an n-type dopant, and wherein a concentration of the n-type dopant in the floating diffusion region (as N+) is greater than a concentration of the n-type dopant in the substrate (as N or N-, Figs. 1-2). It would have been obvious to one of ordinary skill in the art, before the effective filing date of the claimed invention, to include the dopant arrangement of Hwang in Wan/Kwon and arrive at the claimed invention so as to minimize dark current (Hwang, [0079]) and/or provide arrangements suitable for incorporating photodiodes and circuitry within the same substrate. Claim 26 is rejected under 35 U.S.C. 103 as being unpatentable over Wan et al. (of record, US 20140042298 A1) in view of Kwon (US 20190123088 A1) as applied to claim 21 above, and further in view of Yamada et al. (US 20230254608 A1). Regarding claim 26, Wan/Kwon fails to disclose wherein a gate structure of the first transistor extends into one of the plurality of photodiodes along a direction perpendicular to a top surface of the third substrate. Yamada discloses (Fig. 2) wherein a first transistor (TG) extends into one of the plurality of photodiodes (PD) along a direction perpendicular to a top surface of the third substrate (11). It would have been obvious to one of ordinary skill in the art, before the effective filing date, to include the arrangement of Yamada in Wan/Kwon and ensure a gate structure extends into the photodiode as claimed so as to facilitate transferring of charge between the floating diffusion region and the photodiode (Yamada, [0042] – “When the transfer transistor TG is turned on, the charge stored in the photodiode PD is transferred to the floating diffusion FD”). Response to Arguments Applicant's arguments filed 12.29.2025 have been fully considered but they are not persuasive. The applicant alleges (regarding claim 1) the prior art of record fails to disclose or suggest wherein each of the plurality of floating diffusion regions is surrounded and shared by four of the plurality of photodiodes, wherein the four of the plurality of photodiodes are arranged in a square formation in a top view. This limitation is addressed by the introduction of Kwon; see rejection above for details. The applicant alleges (regarding claim 21) the prior art of record fails to disclose or suggest (a) wherein the first plurality of bonding layers comprise a first bonding layer adjacent the first interconnect structure and a second bonding layer adjacent the second substrate, wherein the first bonding layer comprises a first plurality of bonding pad structures disposed at a first pitch, wherein the second bonding layer comprises a second plurality of bonding pad structures disposed at the first pitch and (b) wherein four of the plurality of photodiodes are arranged in a square formation to center around one of the plurality of floating diffusion regions. Regarding (a), Wan discloses the claimed limitation and regarding (b), Kwon is introduced to address this limitation; see rejection above for details. The applicant alleges (regarding claim 28) the prior art of record fails to disclose or suggest wherein each of the plurality of floating diffusion regions is surrounded and shared by four of the plurality of photodiodes. This limitation is addressed by the introduction of Kwon; see rejection above for details. Conclusion Any inquiry concerning this communication or earlier communications from the examiner should be directed to ANDRES MUNOZ whose telephone number is (571)270-3346. The examiner can normally be reached 8AM-5PM Central Time. Examiner interviews are available via telephone, in-person, and video conferencing using a USPTO supplied web-based collaboration tool. To schedule an interview, applicant is encouraged to use the USPTO Automated Interview Request (AIR) at http://www.uspto.gov/interviewpractice. If attempts to reach the examiner by telephone are unsuccessful, the examiner’s supervisor, Eva Montalvo can be reached at (571)270-3829. The fax phone number for the organization where this application or proceeding is assigned is 571-273-8300. Information regarding the status of published or unpublished applications may be obtained from Patent Center. Unpublished application information in Patent Center is available to registered users. To file and manage patent submissions in Patent Center, visit: https://patentcenter.uspto.gov. Visit https://www.uspto.gov/patents/apply/patent-center for more information about Patent Center and https://www.uspto.gov/patents/docx for information about filing in DOCX format. For additional questions, contact the Electronic Business Center (EBC) at 866-217-9197 (toll-free). If you would like assistance from a USPTO Customer Service Representative, call 800-786-9199 (IN USA OR CANADA) or 571-272-1000. /Andres Munoz/Primary Examiner, Art Unit 2818
Read full office action

Prosecution Timeline

Jan 17, 2023
Application Filed
Jun 04, 2025
Examiner Interview Summary
Jun 04, 2025
Examiner Interview (Telephonic)
Jun 17, 2025
Non-Final Rejection — §103
Sep 22, 2025
Response Filed
Oct 20, 2025
Final Rejection — §103
Dec 29, 2025
Response after Non-Final Action
Jan 13, 2026
Request for Continued Examination
Jan 24, 2026
Response after Non-Final Action
Feb 05, 2026
Non-Final Rejection — §103 (current)

Precedent Cases

Applications granted by this same examiner with similar technology

Patent 12604484
SEMICONDUCTOR DEVICE INCLUDING DATA STORAGE STRUCTURE AND METHOD OF MANUFACTURING DATA STORAGE STRUCTURE
2y 5m to grant Granted Apr 14, 2026
Patent 12598974
CHIP PACKAGE AND MANUFACTURING METHOD THEREOF
2y 5m to grant Granted Apr 07, 2026
Patent 12593534
METHOD OF PRODUCING SEMICONDUCTOR DEVICE
2y 5m to grant Granted Mar 31, 2026
Patent 12588268
LINER-FREE CONDUCTIVE STRUCTURES
2y 5m to grant Granted Mar 24, 2026
Patent 12582001
METHODS FOR FUSION BONDING SEMICONDUCTOR DEVICES TO TEMPORARY CARRIER WAFERS WITH CAVITY REGIONS FOR REDUCED BOND STRENGTH, AND SEMICONDUCTOR DEVICE ASSEMBLIES FORMED BY THE SAME
2y 5m to grant Granted Mar 17, 2026
Study what changed to get past this examiner. Based on 5 most recent grants.

AI Strategy Recommendation

Get an AI-powered prosecution strategy using examiner precedents, rejection analysis, and claim mapping.
Powered by AI — typically takes 5-10 seconds

Prosecution Projections

3-4
Expected OA Rounds
76%
Grant Probability
94%
With Interview (+17.8%)
2y 4m
Median Time to Grant
High
PTA Risk
Based on 707 resolved cases by this examiner. Grant probability derived from career allow rate.

Sign in with your work email

Enter your email to receive a magic link. No password needed.

Personal email addresses (Gmail, Yahoo, etc.) are not accepted.

Free tier: 3 strategy analyses per month