Prosecution Insights
Last updated: July 17, 2026
Application No. 18/169,304

STANDARD CELL AND IC STRUCTURE WITH TRENCH ISOLATION THROUGH ACTIVE REGIONS AND GATE ELECTRODES

Non-Final OA §103
Filed
Feb 15, 2023
Examiner
BERRY, PAUL ANTHONY
Art Unit
2898
Tech Center
2800 — Semiconductors & Electrical Systems
Assignee
Globalfoundries U.s. Inc.
OA Round
2 (Non-Final)
88%
Grant Probability
Favorable
2-3
OA Rounds
0m
Est. Remaining
84%
With Interview

Examiner Intelligence

Grants 88% — above average
88%
Career Allowance Rate
35 granted / 40 resolved
+19.5% vs TC avg
Minimal -4% lift
Without
With
+-3.8%
Interview Lift
resolved cases with interview
Typical timeline
3y 4m
Avg Prosecution
29 currently pending
Career history
90
Total Applications
across all art units

Statute-Specific Performance

§103
92.3%
+52.3% vs TC avg
§102
3.2%
-36.8% vs TC avg
§112
4.5%
-35.5% vs TC avg
Black line = Tech Center average estimate • Based on career data from 40 resolved cases

Office Action

§103
DETAILED ACTION Notice of Pre-AIA or AIA Status The present application, filed on or after March 16, 2013, is being examined under the first inventor to file provisions of the AIA . Response to Arguments Applicant’s arguments with respect to claims 1-4, 6, 8-11 and 13 have been considered but are moot because the new ground of rejection does not rely on any reference applied in the prior rejection of record for any teaching or matter specifically challenged in the argument. Claim Rejections - 35 USC § 103 The following is a quotation of 35 U.S.C. 103 which forms the basis for all obviousness rejections set forth in this Office action: A patent for a claimed invention may not be obtained, notwithstanding that the claimed invention is not identically disclosed as set forth in section 102, if the differences between the claimed invention and the prior art are such that the claimed invention as a whole would have been obvious before the effective filing date of the claimed invention to a person having ordinary skill in the art to which the claimed invention pertains. Patentability shall not be negated by the manner in which the invention was made. Claims 1-4, 6, 8-11 and 13 are rejected under 35 U.S.C. 103 as being unpatentable over Jung et al. (US 2022/0344463 A1, hereinafter Jung ‘463.) in view of Cho et al. (US 2022/0020859 A1, hereinafter Cho ‘859), in view of the following arguments. PNG media_image1.png 566 656 media_image1.png Greyscale PNG media_image2.png 700 847 media_image2.png Greyscale With respect to Claim 1 Jung ‘463 discloses an integrated circuit (IC) structure (Fig. 1, 3A-3F and 17), comprising: a substrate (substrate upon which structure of Fig 1, 3A-3F is fabricated, Fig 17, Para [0129] discloses a substrate) including a first active region (RX01, Fig 3D, Para [0057]) and a second active region (RX02, Fig 3D, Para [0057]); a first gate electrode (GE1, as shown in annotated Fig 3D of Jung ‘463, Para [0053]) over the first active region (RX01)(arrangement disclosed in annotated Fig 3D of Jung ‘463); a second gate electrode (GE2, as shown in annotated Fig 3D of Jung ‘463, Para [0053]) over the second active region (RX02); a first trench isolation (IS01, Fig 3D, Para [0053]) electrically isolating the first active region (RX01) and the first gate electrode (GE1) from the second active region (RX02) and the second gate electrode (GE2), wherein first ends (as shown in annotated Fig 3D of Jung ‘463, hereinafter FEFAR) of the first active region (RX01) and the first gate electrode (GE1) abut a first sidewall (as shown in annotated Fig 3D of Jung ‘463, hereinafter FSFTI) of the first trench isolation (IS01) and first ends (as shown in annotated Fig 3D of Jung ‘463, hereinafter FESAR) of the second active region (RX02) and the second gate electrode (GE2) abut a second, opposing sidewall (as shown in annotated Fig 3D of Jung ‘463, hereinafter SSFTI) of the first trench isolation (IS01); and a conductive strap (conductive area over IS01, Fig 3D, Para [0148-0149]) extending over an upper end (top of IS01) of the first trench isolation (IS01)(disclosed in Fig 3D) and electrically coupling the first gate electrode (GE1) and the second gate electrode (GE2)(Para [0053] discloses G01 (of which GE1 is part) as electrically connected to RX01 and RX02). But Jung ‘463 fails to explicitly disclose a first trench isolation extending below and electrically isolating the first active region and the first gate electrode from the second active region and the second gate electrode. Nevertheless, in a related endeavor (Fig 1-10 of Cho ‘859), Cho ‘859 teaches a first trench isolation (TC1 and ST in TR2 as shown in annotated Fig 11 of Cho ‘859, Para [0026 and 0070]) extending below (disclosed in annotated Fig 11 of Cho ‘859 and Para [0026]) and electrically isolating (disclosed in Para [0026 and 0070] of Cho ‘859) the first active region (FN1, Fig 11 of Cho ‘859, Para [0025]) and the first gate electrode (GE1, Fig 11 of Cho ‘859) from the second active region (FN2, Fig 11 of Cho ‘859, Para [0026]) and the second gate electrode (GE2, Fig 11 of Cho ‘859, Para [0026]). Therefore, it would have been obvious to one with ordinary skill in the art, before the effective filing date of the claimed invention, to incorporate Cho ‘859’s teaching of a first trench isolation extending below and electrically isolating the first active region and the first gate electrode from the second active region and the second gate electrode into Jung ‘463’s IC structure. Jung ‘463 teaches a standard cell IC structure with a first trench isolation that electrically isolates the first active region and the first gate electrode from the second active region and the second gate electrode but Jung ‘463 is silent on the depth of the first trench isolation. Cho ‘859 teaches a standard cell IC structure with a first trench isolation extending below and electrically isolates the first active region and the first gate electrode from the second active region and the second gate electrode. Therefore, the ordinary artisan would have been motivated to modify Jung ‘463 in the manner set forth above, at least, because extending the isolation region below the active region would provide an additional level of protection to achieve the well-known advantage of using a dielectric material to isolate electrically active areas. As incorporated, the teaching of the first trench isolation (TC1 and ST in TR2 of Cho ‘859) extending below the active region would be used as the length of first trench isolation (ISO1 of Jung ‘463) so that it extending below and electrically isolates (described above) the first active region (RX01 of Jung ‘463) and first gate electrode (GE1 of Jung ‘463) and the second active region (RX02 of Jung ‘463) and the second gate electrode (GE2 of Jung ‘463). PNG media_image3.png 566 656 media_image3.png Greyscale With respect to Claim 2 Jung ‘463 as modified by Cho ‘859 discloses all limitations of the IC structure of claim 1, and Jung ‘463 further discloses wherein the first end (FEFAR) of the first active region (RX01) is vertically aligned (annotated Fig 3D_2 of Jung ‘463 discloses first end of the first active region vertically aligned with first end of the first gate electrode at the area they contact) with the first end (first end of GE1 as shown in annotated Fig 3D_2 of Jung ‘463) of the first gate electrode (GE1) against the first sidewall (FSFTI) of the first trench isolation (IS01)(annotated Fig 3D_2 of Jung ‘463 discloses alignment), and the first end (FESAR as shown in annotated Fig 3D_2 of Jung ‘463) of the second active region (RX02) is vertically aligned (annotated Fig 3D_2 of Jung ‘463 discloses first end of the second active region vertically aligned with first end of the second gate electrode at the area they contact) with the first end (first end of GE2 as shown in annotated Fig 3D_2 of Jung ‘463) of the second gate electrode (GE2) against the second (SSFTI), opposite side of the first trench isolation (IS01)(arrangement disclosed in annotated Fig 3D_2 of Jung ‘463). With respect to Claim 3 Jung ‘463 as modified by Cho ‘859 discloses all limitations of the IC structure of claim 1, And in a related endeavor (Fig 13A of Jung ‘463), Jung ‘463 teaches further comprising a second trench isolation (CT1, as shown in annotated Fig 13A of Jung ‘463, Para [0094]) at a second end (right side of F21 as shown in annotated Fig 13A of Jung ‘463) of the first active region (F22/F21, First active region shown in annotated Fig 13A of Jung ‘463, Para [0093]) and the first gate electrode (CA1, first gate electrode as shown in annotated Fig 13A of Jung ‘463, Para [0093]) opposite the first ends thereof (left side of F22 as they abut first trench isolation CT2 as shown in annotated Fig 13A of Jung ‘463)(Para [0093] discloses active areas F21/F22 and F12/F11, each separated by isolation regions). Therefore, it would have been obvious to one with ordinary skill in the art, before the effective filing date of the claimed invention, to incorporate the further teaching of Jung 463’s further comprising a second trench isolation at a second end of the first active region and the first gate electrode opposite the first ends thereof into Jung 463 as modified by Cho ‘859’s device. The ordinary artisan would have been motivated to modify Jung ‘463 as modified by Cho ‘859 in the manner set forth above, at least, because the additional trench isolation at the second end of the first active device and first gate electrode provides additional dielectric protection to the active area, reducing the possibility of parasitic capacitance between active regions. In addition the additional trench isolation serves the same purpose as the first isolation trench and is merely a duplication of the first trench isolation. MPEP 2144.04(VI)(B). As incorporated, the second trench isolation at a second end of the first active region and the first gate electrode opposite the first ends thereof as taught by Jung ‘463 in the further embodiment would be used in the device of Jung ‘463 as modified by Cho ‘859. With respect to Claim 4 Jung ‘463 as modified by Cho ‘859 discloses all limitations of the IC structure of claim 3, and Jung ‘463 discloses further comprising a third trench isolation (CT3, as shown in annotated Fig 13A of Jung ‘463, Para [0094]) at a second end (left side of F24 as shown in annotated Fig 13A of Jung ‘463) of the second active region (F23/F24, Second active region shown in annotated Fig 13A of Jung ‘463, Para [0093]) and the second gate electrode (CA2, second gate electrode as shown in annotated Fig 13A of Jung ‘463, Para [0093]) opposite the first ends thereof (right side of F23 as they abut first trench isolation CT2 as shown in annotated Fig 13A of Jung ‘463)(Para [0093] discloses active areas F24/F23 and F32/F31, each separated by isolation regions). With respect to Claim 6 Jung ‘463 as modified by Cho ‘859 discloses all limitations of the IC structure of claim 1, and Jung ‘463 discloses further wherein the first active region (RX01) includes an n-type dopant (disclosed in Para [0033]) to create an n-type field effect transistor (NFET in RX01 is disclosed in Para [0033]) with the first gate electrode (GE1), and the second active region (RX02) include a p-type dopant (disclosed in Para [0033]) to create a p-type field effect transistor (PFET in RX01 is disclosed in Para [0033]) with the second gate electrode (GE2). PNG media_image1.png 566 656 media_image1.png Greyscale PNG media_image2.png 700 847 media_image2.png Greyscale With respect to Claim 8 Jung ‘463 discloses a standard cell for an integrated circuit (IC) structure (Fig. 1, 3A-3F and 17)(Para [0032] discloses structure C01 as standard cell) having logic (cell design used in logic synthesis disclosed in Para [0125]) arranged in a plurality of cell rows (Para [0032] discloses a plurality of cells of Fig 1) extending in a first direction (X as shown in Fig 1, Para [0032]), the standard cell comprising: within a cell boundary (boundary of C01, Fig 1, Para [0033], denoted by dashed box: an area (areas disclosed in Fig 1) defining a first active region (RX01, Fig 1, Para [0033]) and a second active region (RX02, Fig 1, Para [0033]); a first gate electrode (GE1, as shown in annotated Fig 3D of Jung ‘463, Para [0053]) over the first active region (RX01)(arrangement disclosed in annotated Fig 3D of Jung ‘463); a first gate electrode over the first active region (addressed above, see Examiner interpretation above); a second gate electrode (GE2, as shown in annotated Fig 3D of Jung ‘463, Para [0053]) over the second active region (RX02); a first trench isolation (IS01, Fig 3D, Para [0053]) electrically isolating the first active region (RX01) and the first gate electrode (GE1) from the second active region (RX02) and the second gate electrode (GE2)(arrangement disclosed in annotated Fig 3D of Jung ‘463), wherein first ends (as shown in annotated Fig 3D of Jung ‘463, hereinafter FEFAR) of the first active region (RX01) and the first gate electrode (GE1) abut a first sidewall (as shown in annotated Fig 3D of Jung ‘463, hereinafter FSFTI) of the first trench isolation (IS01) and first ends (as shown in annotated Fig 3D of Jung ‘463, hereinafter FESAR) of the second active region (RX02) and the second gate electrode (GE2) abut a second, opposing sidewall (as shown in annotated Fig 3D of Jung ‘463, hereinafter SSFTI) of the first trench isolation (IS01); and a conductive strap (conductive area over IS01, Fig 3D, Para [0148-0149]) extending over an upper end (top of IS01) of the first trench isolation (IS01)(disclosed in Fig 2D) and electrically coupling the first gate electrode (GE1) and the second gate electrode (GE2)(Para [0053] discloses G01 (of which GE1 is part) as electrically connected to RX01 and RX02). But Jung ‘463 fails to explicitly disclose a first trench isolation extending below and electrically isolating the first active region and the first gate electrode from the second active region and the second gate electrode. Nevertheless, in a related endeavor (Fig 1-10 of Cho ‘859), Cho ‘859 teaches a first trench isolation (TC1 and ST in TR2 as shown in annotated Fig 11 of Cho ‘859, Para [0026 and 0070]) extending below (disclosed in annotated Fig 11 of Cho ‘859 and Para [0026]) and electrically isolating (disclosed in Para [0026 and 0070] of Cho ‘859) the first active region (FN1 of PR1 as shown in annotated Fig 11 of Cho ‘859, Para [0025]) and the first gate electrode (GE1, Fig 11 of Cho ‘859) from the second active region (FN2 of NR1 as shown in annotated Fig 11 of Cho ‘859, Para [0026]) and the second gate electrode (GE2, Fig 11 of Cho ‘859, Para [0026]). Therefore, it would have been obvious to one with ordinary skill in the art, before the effective filing date of the claimed invention, to incorporate Cho ‘859’s teaching of a first trench isolation extending below and electrically isolating the first active region and the first gate electrode from the second active region and the second gate electrode into Jung ‘463’s IC structure. Jung ‘463 teaches a standard cell IC structure with a first trench isolation that electrically isolates the first active region and the first gate electrode from the second active region and the second gate electrode but Jung ‘463 is silent on the depth of the first trench isolation. Cho ‘859 teaches a standard cell IC structure with a first trench isolation extending below and electrically isolates the first active region and the first gate electrode from the second active region and the second gate electrode. Therefore, the ordinary artisan would have been motivated to modify Jung ‘463 in the manner set forth above, at least, because extending the isolation region below the active region would provide an additional level of protection to achieve the well-known advantage of using a dielectric material to isolate electrically active areas. As incorporated, the teaching of the first trench isolation (TC1 and ST in TR2 of Cho ‘859) extending below the active region would be used as the length of first trench isolation (ISO1 of Jung ‘463) so that it extending below and electrically isolates (described above) the first active region (RX01 of Jung ‘463) and first gate electrode (GE1 of Jung ‘463) and the second active region (RX02 of Jung ‘463) and the second gate electrode (GE2 of Jung ‘463). PNG media_image3.png 566 656 media_image3.png Greyscale With respect to Claim 9 Jung ‘463 as modified by Cho ‘859 discloses all limitations of the standard cell of claim 8, and Jung ‘463 further discloses wherein the first end (FEFAR) of the first active region (RX01) is vertically aligned (annotated Fig 3D_2 of Jung ‘463 discloses first end of the first active region vertically aligned with first end of the first gate electrode at the area they contact) with the first end (first end of GE1 as shown in annotated Fig 3D_2 of Jung ‘463) of the first gate electrode (GE1) against the first sidewall (FSFTI) of the first trench isolation (IS01)(annotated Fig 3D_2 of Jung ‘463 discloses alignment), and the first end (FESAR as shown in annotated Fig 3D_2 of Jung ‘463) of the second active region (RX02) is vertically aligned (annotated Fig 3D_2 of Jung ‘463 discloses first end of the second active region vertically aligned with first end of the second gate electrode at the area they contact) with the first end (first end of GE2 as shown in annotated Fig 3D_2 of Jung ‘463) of the second gate electrode (GE2) against the second (SSFTI), opposite side of the first trench isolation (IS01)(arrangement disclosed in annotated Fig 3D_2 of Jung ‘463). With respect to Claim 10 Jung ‘463 as modified by Cho ‘859 discloses all limitations of the standard cell of claim 8, And in a related endeavor (Fig 13A of Jung ‘463), Jung ‘463 teaches further comprising a second trench isolation (CT1, as shown in annotated Fig 13A of Jung ‘463, Para [0094]) at a second end (right side of F21 as shown in annotated Fig 13A of Jung ‘463) of the first active region (F22/F21, First active region shown in annotated Fig 13A of Jung ‘463, Para [0093]) and the first gate electrode (CA1, first gate electrode as shown in annotated Fig 13A of Jung ‘463, Para [0093]) opposite the first ends thereof (left side of F22 as they abut first trench isolation CT2 as shown in annotated Fig 13A of Jung ‘463)(Para [0093] discloses active areas F21/F22 and F12/F11, each separated by isolation regions), wherein a portion of the second trench isolation (CT1) extends beyond the cell boundary (boundary between R1 and R2 as shown in Fig 13A)(Fig 13A discloses CT1 extends between R1 and R2, and Para [0094] discloses CT1 on boundary). Therefore, it would have been obvious to one with ordinary skill in the art, before the effective filing date of the claimed invention, to incorporate the further teaching of Jung 463’s further comprising a second trench isolation at a second end of the first active region and the first gate electrode opposite the first ends thereof, wherein a portion of the second trench isolation extends beyond the cell boundary into Jung 463 as modified by Cho ‘859’s device. The ordinary artisan would have been motivated to modify Jung ‘463 as modified by Cho ‘859 in the manner set forth above, at least, because the additional trench isolation at the second end of the first active device and first gate electrode provides additional dielectric protection to the active area, reducing the possibility of parasitic capacitance between active regions. In addition the additional trench isolation serves the same purpose as the first isolation trench and is merely a duplication of the first trench isolation. MPEP 2144.04(VI)(B). As incorporated, the second trench isolation at a second end of the first active region and the first gate electrode opposite the first ends thereof as taught by Jung ‘463 in the further embodiment would be used in the device of Jung ‘463 as modified by Cho ‘859. With respect to Claim 11 Jung ‘463 as modified by Cho ‘859 discloses all limitations of the standard cell of claim 10, and Jung ‘463 discloses further comprising a third trench isolation (CT3, as shown in annotated Fig 13A of Jung ‘463, Para [0094]) at a second end (left side of F24 as shown in annotated Fig 13A of Jung ‘463) of the second active region (F23/F24, Second active region shown in annotated Fig 13A of Jung ‘463, Para [0093]) and the second gate electrode (CA2, second gate electrode as shown in annotated Fig 13A of Jung ‘463, Para [0093]) opposite the first ends thereof (right side of F23 as they abut first trench isolation CT2 as shown in annotated Fig 13A of Jung ‘463)(Para [0093] discloses active areas F24/F23 and F32/F31, each separated by isolation regions), wherein a portion of the third trench isolation (CT3) extends beyond the cell boundary(boundary between R2 and R3 as shown in Fig 13A)(Fig 13A discloses CT3 extends between R2 and R3, and Para [0094] discloses CT3 on boundary). With respect to Claim 13 Jung ‘463 disclose all limitations of the standard cell of claim 8, and Jung ‘463 further discloses wherein the first active region (RX01) includes an n-type dopant (disclosed in Para [0033]) to create an n-type field effect transistor (NFET in RX01 is disclosed in Para [0033]) with the first gate electrode (GE1), and the second active region (RX02) include a p-type dopant (disclosed in Para [0033]) to create a p-type field effect transistor (PFET in RX01 is disclosed in Para [0033]) with the second gate electrode (GE2). Conclusion Applicant's amendment necessitated the new ground(s) of rejection presented in this Office action. Accordingly, THIS ACTION IS MADE FINAL. See MPEP § 706.07(a). Applicant is reminded of the extension of time policy as set forth in 37 CFR 1.136(a). A shortened statutory period for reply to this final action is set to expire THREE MONTHS from the mailing date of this action. In the event a first reply is filed within TWO MONTHS of the mailing date of this final action and the advisory action is not mailed until after the end of the THREE-MONTH shortened statutory period, then the shortened statutory period will expire on the date the advisory action is mailed, and any nonprovisional extension fee (37 CFR 1.17(a)) pursuant to 37 CFR 1.136(a) will be calculated from the mailing date of the advisory action. In no event, however, will the statutory period for reply expire later than SIX MONTHS from the mailing date of this final action. Any inquiry concerning this communication or earlier communications from the examiner should be directed to PAUL A. BERRY whose telephone number is (703)756-5637. The examiner can normally be reached M-F 8-5 EST. Examiner interviews are available via telephone, in-person, and video conferencing using a USPTO supplied web-based collaboration tool. To schedule an interview, applicant is encouraged to use the USPTO Automated Interview Request (AIR) at http://www.uspto.gov/interviewpractice. If attempts to reach the examiner by telephone are unsuccessful, the examiner’s supervisor, Julio Maldonado can be reached at 571-272-1864. The fax phone number for the organization where this application or proceeding is assigned is 571-273-8300. Information regarding the status of published or unpublished applications may be obtained from Patent Center. Unpublished application information in Patent Center is available to registered users. To file and manage patent submissions in Patent Center, visit: https://patentcenter.uspto.gov. Visit https://www.uspto.gov/patents/apply/patent-center for more information about Patent Center and https://www.uspto.gov/patents/docx for information about filing in DOCX format. For additional questions, contact the Electronic Business Center (EBC) at 866-217-9197 (toll-free). If you would like assistance from a USPTO Customer Service Representative, call 800-786-9199 (IN USA OR CANADA) or 571-272-1000. /PAUL A BERRY/Examiner, Art Unit 2898 /JULIO J MALDONADO/Supervisory Patent Examiner, Art Unit 2898
Read full office action

Prosecution Timeline

Show 1 earlier event
Nov 17, 2025
Non-Final Rejection mailed — §103
Feb 02, 2026
Interview Requested
Feb 09, 2026
Examiner Interview Summary
Feb 09, 2026
Applicant Interview (Telephonic)
Feb 13, 2026
Response Filed
Apr 30, 2026
Final Rejection mailed — §103
Jun 10, 2026
Response after Non-Final Action
Jul 06, 2026
Interview Requested

Precedent Cases

Applications granted by this same examiner with similar technology

Patent 12677685
PACKAGE STRUCTURE AND METHOD FOR FORMING THE SAME
4y 2m to grant Granted Jul 07, 2026
Patent 12666655
METHOD FOR MANUFACTURING TELLURIUM-BASED SEMICONDUCTOR DEVICE, TELLURIUM-BASED SEMICONDUCTOR DEVICE MANUFACTURED THEREBY, AND THIN FILM TRANSISTOR
3y 4m to grant Granted Jun 23, 2026
Patent 12641793
NONVOLATILE MEMORY DEVICE
3y 9m to grant Granted May 26, 2026
Patent 12604537
HIGH MOBILITY TRANSISTOR ELEMENT RESULTING FROM IGTO OXIDE SEMICONDUCTOR CRYSTALLIZATION, AND PRODUCTION METHOD FOR SAME
2y 9m to grant Granted Apr 14, 2026
Patent 12604724
VERTICAL SEMICONDUCTOR DEVICE
2y 11m to grant Granted Apr 14, 2026
Study what changed to get past this examiner. Based on 5 most recent grants.

Strategy Recommendation AI-generated — please review before filing

Get a prosecution strategy drawn from examiner precedents, rejection analysis, and claim mapping.
Typically takes 5-10 seconds — AI-generated, attorney review required before filing

Prosecution Projections

2-3
Expected OA Rounds
88%
Grant Probability
84%
With Interview (-3.8%)
3y 4m (~0m remaining)
Median Time to Grant
Moderate
PTA Risk
Based on 40 resolved cases by this examiner. Grant probability derived from career allowance rate.

Sign in with your work email

Enter your email to receive a magic link. No password needed.

Personal email addresses (Gmail, Yahoo, etc.) are not accepted.

Free tier: 3 strategy analyses per month