Prosecution Insights
Last updated: April 19, 2026
Application No. 18/188,306

Gate Isolation Wall for Semiconductor Device

Non-Final OA §102
Filed
Mar 22, 2023
Examiner
RAHMAN, MOIN M
Art Unit
2898
Tech Center
2800 — Semiconductors & Electrical Systems
Assignee
Taiwan Semiconductor Manufacturing Company Ltd.
OA Round
3 (Non-Final)
87%
Grant Probability
Favorable
3-4
OA Rounds
2y 6m
To Grant
99%
With Interview

Examiner Intelligence

Grants 87% — above average
87%
Career Allow Rate
635 granted / 732 resolved
+18.7% vs TC avg
Moderate +15% lift
Without
With
+14.6%
Interview Lift
resolved cases with interview
Typical timeline
2y 6m
Avg Prosecution
46 currently pending
Career history
778
Total Applications
across all art units

Statute-Specific Performance

§101
0.1%
-39.9% vs TC avg
§103
53.7%
+13.7% vs TC avg
§102
26.9%
-13.1% vs TC avg
§112
17.8%
-22.2% vs TC avg
Black line = Tech Center average estimate • Based on career data from 732 resolved cases

Office Action

§102
DETAILED ACTION Notice of Pre-AIA or AIA Status The present application, filed on or after March 16, 2013, is being examined under the first inventor to file provisions of the AIA . In the event the determination of the status of the application as subject to AIA 35 U.S.C. 102 and 103 (or as subject to pre-AIA 35 U.S.C. 102 and 103) is incorrect, any correction of the statutory basis for the rejection will not be considered a new ground of rejection if the prior art relied upon, and the rationale supporting the rejection, would be the same under either status. Status of the application This office Action is in response to Applicant's Application filled on 12/01/2025. Claims 1-20 are pending for this examination. Continued Examination under 37 CFR 1.114 A request for continued examination under 37 CFR 1.114, including the fee set forth in 37 CFR 1.17(e), was filed in this application after final rejection. Since this application is eligible for continued examination under 37 CFR 1.114, and the fee set forth in 37 CFR 1.17(e) has been timely paid, the finality of the previous Office action has been withdrawn pursuant to 37 CFR 1.114. Applicant's submission filed on 12/01/2025 has been entered. An action on the RCE follows. Response to Arguments Applicant’s reply filed on 12/01/2025 has been entered and considered. Applicant’s amendments necessitated the shift in grounds of rejection detailed below. The shift in grounds of rejection renders Applicant’s arguments moot. Claim Rejections - 35 USC § 102 The following is a quotation of the appropriate paragraphs of 35 U.S.C. 102 that form the basis for the rejections under this section made in this Office action: A person shall be entitled to a patent unless – (a)(1) the claimed invention was patented, described in a printed publication, or in public use, on sale or otherwise available to the public before the effective filing date of the claimed invention. Claims 1-2 and 6-7 are rejected under 35 U.S.C. 102(a)(1) as being anticipated by YU et al (US 2021/0098455 A1; hereafter YU). Regarding claim 1. YU discloses a semiconductor structure, comprising: a set of nanostructures (Fig. [16], nano-sheets 132, Para [ 0024]) on a substrate (substrate 102, Para [ 0024]); a gate dielectric layer (Fig. [16], layers [140, 142], construed as gate dielectric layer, Para [ 0028]) wrapped around the set of nanostructures (Fig. [16], nano-sheets 132, Para [ 0024]), wherein the gate dielectric layer (Fig. [16], layers [140, 142], construed as gate dielectric layer, Para [ 0028]) comprises an interfacial layer (interfacial layer (IL) 140, Para [ 0028]) and a high-k dielectric layer (high-k gate dielectric layer 142, Para [ 0028]); a work function metal layer (work function metal layer 153, Para [ 0050]) on the gate dielectric layer (Fig. [16], layers [140, 142], construed as gate dielectric layer, Para [ 0028]) and around the set of nanostructures (Fig. [16], nano-sheets 132, Para [ 0024]); and an isolation structure (passivation layer 162, Para [ 0055]) on sidewalls of the set of nanostructures (Fig. [16], nano-sheets 132, Para [ 0024]), the high-k gate dielectric layer (high-k gate dielectric layer 142), and the work function metal layer (Fig. [16], work function metal layer 153, Para [ 0050]), wherein a portion of the work function metal layer (Fig. [16], work function metal layer 153, Para [ 0050]) is on a top surface of the isolation structure (passivation layer 162, Para [ 0055]). Regarding claim 2. YU. Ando discloses the semiconductor structure of claim 1, YU further discloses wherein the isolation structure (Fig. [16], passivation layer 162, Para [ 0055]) has a sidewall adjacent to the work function metal layer (work function metal layer 153, Para [ 0050]), and wherein the sidewall includes concave and convex surfaces adjacent to each other (Fig. [16], passivation layer 162, Para [ 0055]). Regarding claim 6. YU discloses the semiconductor structure of claim 1, YU further discloses wherein a height of the isolation structure (Fig. [16], passivation layer 162, Para [ 0055]) is less than a height of the set of nanostructures (Fig. [16], nano-sheets 132, Para [ 0024]). Regarding claim 7. YU discloses the semiconductor structure of claim 1, Ando further discloses wherein the gate dielectric layer (Fig. [16], layers [140, 142], construed as gate dielectric layer, Para [ 0028]) comprises a high-k dielectric layer (high-k gate dielectric layer 142) between the isolation structure (passivation layer 162, Para [ 0055]) and the set of nanostructures (Fig. [16], nano-sheets 132, Para [ 0024]). Allowable Subject Matter Claims 3-5 and 8 are objected to as being dependent upon a rejected base claim, but would be allowable if rewritten in independent form including all of the limitations of the base claim and any intervening claims. The following is the Examiner's Reasons for Allowance: The prior art fails to disclose and would not have rendered obvious: Regarding claim 3. The semiconductor structure of claim 1, an air gap between the gate dielectric layer and the isolation structure. Regarding claim 4. The semiconductor structure of claim 1, further comprising a dielectric liner between the gate dielectric layer and the isolation structure. Regarding claim 5. The semiconductor structure of claim 1, wherein an additional portion of the work function metal layer is between the gate dielectric layer and the isolation structure. Regarding claim 8. The semiconductor structure of claim 1, wherein the work function metal layer comprises a first work function metal sublayer surrounding four sides of the set of nanostructures and a second work function metal sublayer surrounding three sides of the set of nanostructures. Claims 9-20 are allowed. The following is the Examiner's Reasons for Allowance: The prior art fails to disclose and would not have rendered obvious: a first isolation structure between sidewalls of the first and second sets of nanostructures and in contact with the first and second work function metal layers, wherein the gate dielectric layer is on sidewall surfaces of the first isolation structure; and a second isolation structure on the first isolation structure and in contact with the first isolation structure, wherein a width of the first isolation structure is greater than a width of the second isolation structure, as recited in claim 9. Claims 10-13 are allowed based on the dependency of claim 9. The following is the Examiner's Reasons for Allowance: The prior art fails to disclose and would not have rendered obvious: forming a dielectric liner on the first and second sets of nanostructures; forming a first isolation structure between sidewalls of the first set of nanostructures and the second set of nanostructures, wherein the first isolation structure is in contact with the dielectric liner; removing the dielectric plugs between each of the first set of nanostructures and between each of the second set of nanostructures; forming a first work function metal layer on the gate dielectric layer wrapped around the first set of nanostructures and on a top surface of the first isolation structure; and forming a second work function metal layer on the gate dielectric layer wrapped around the second set of nanostructures and on the top surface of the first isolation structure, as recited in claim 14. Claims 15-20 are allowed based on the dependency of claim 14. Conclusion Any inquiry concerning this communication or earlier communications from the examiner should be directed to MOIN M RAHMAN whose telephone number is (571)272-5002. The examiner can normally be reached 8:30-5:00pm. Examiner interviews are available via telephone, in-person, and video conferencing using a USPTO supplied web-based collaboration tool. To schedule an interview, applicant is encouraged to use the USPTO Automated Interview Request (AIR) at http://www.uspto.gov/interviewpractice. If attempts to reach the examiner by telephone are unsuccessful, the examiner’s supervisor, Julio Maldonado can be reached at 571-272-1864. The fax phone number for the organization where this application or proceeding is assigned is 571-273-8300. Information regarding the status of published or unpublished applications may be obtained from Patent Center. Unpublished application information in Patent Center is available to registered users. To file and manage patent submissions in Patent Center, visit: https://patentcenter.uspto.gov. Visit https://www.uspto.gov/patents/apply/patent-center for more information about Patent Center and https://www.uspto.gov/patents/docx for information about filing in DOCX format. For additional questions, contact the Electronic Business Center (EBC) at 866-217-9197 (toll-free). If you would like assistance from a USPTO Customer Service Representative, call 800-786-9199 (IN USA OR CANADA) or 571-272-1000. /MOIN M RAHMAN/Primary Examiner, Art Unit 2898
Read full office action

Prosecution Timeline

Mar 22, 2023
Application Filed
Jun 11, 2025
Non-Final Rejection — §102
Aug 12, 2025
Interview Requested
Aug 20, 2025
Applicant Interview (Telephonic)
Aug 22, 2025
Examiner Interview Summary
Sep 15, 2025
Response Filed
Sep 27, 2025
Final Rejection — §102
Dec 01, 2025
Request for Continued Examination
Dec 08, 2025
Response after Non-Final Action
Feb 05, 2026
Non-Final Rejection — §102
Mar 26, 2026
Interview Requested
Apr 06, 2026
Applicant Interview (Telephonic)
Apr 06, 2026
Examiner Interview Summary

Precedent Cases

Applications granted by this same examiner with similar technology

Patent 12604603
LIGHT-EMITTING ELEMENT AND DISPLAY DEVICE
2y 5m to grant Granted Apr 14, 2026
Patent 12598775
Source/Drains In Semiconductor Devices and Methods of Forming Thereof
2y 5m to grant Granted Apr 07, 2026
Patent 12593504
TRANSISTORS WITH VARYING WIDTH NANOSHEET
2y 5m to grant Granted Mar 31, 2026
Patent 12588382
Color stable multicolor OLED device structures
2y 5m to grant Granted Mar 24, 2026
Patent 12581727
ELECTRONIC CIRCUIT AND SEMICONDUCTOR MODULE
2y 5m to grant Granted Mar 17, 2026
Study what changed to get past this examiner. Based on 5 most recent grants.

AI Strategy Recommendation

Get an AI-powered prosecution strategy using examiner precedents, rejection analysis, and claim mapping.
Powered by AI — typically takes 5-10 seconds

Prosecution Projections

3-4
Expected OA Rounds
87%
Grant Probability
99%
With Interview (+14.6%)
2y 6m
Median Time to Grant
High
PTA Risk
Based on 732 resolved cases by this examiner. Grant probability derived from career allow rate.

Sign in with your work email

Enter your email to receive a magic link. No password needed.

Personal email addresses (Gmail, Yahoo, etc.) are not accepted.

Free tier: 3 strategy analyses per month