Prosecution Insights
Last updated: April 19, 2026
Application No. 18/200,238

PHOTOMASK AND METHOD OF MANUFACTURING DISPLAY PANEL USING THE SAME

Non-Final OA §102§103§112
Filed
May 22, 2023
Examiner
ANGEBRANNDT, MARTIN J
Art Unit
1737
Tech Center
1700 — Chemical & Materials Engineering
Assignee
Samsung Display Co., Ltd.
OA Round
1 (Non-Final)
55%
Grant Probability
Moderate
1-2
OA Rounds
3y 3m
To Grant
90%
With Interview

Examiner Intelligence

Grants 55% of resolved cases
55%
Career Allow Rate
745 granted / 1351 resolved
-9.9% vs TC avg
Strong +34% interview lift
Without
With
+34.5%
Interview Lift
resolved cases with interview
Typical timeline
3y 3m
Avg Prosecution
86 currently pending
Career history
1437
Total Applications
across all art units

Statute-Specific Performance

§101
0.1%
-39.9% vs TC avg
§103
59.6%
+19.6% vs TC avg
§102
4.2%
-35.8% vs TC avg
§112
2.1%
-37.9% vs TC avg
Black line = Tech Center average estimate • Based on career data from 1351 resolved cases

Office Action

§102 §103 §112
Notice of Pre-AIA or AIA Status The present application, filed on or after March 16, 2013, is being examined under the first inventor to file provisions of the AIA . The following is a quotation of 35 U.S.C. 112(b): (b) CONCLUSION.—The specification shall conclude with one or more claims particularly pointing out and distinctly claiming the subject matter which the inventor or a joint inventor regards as the invention. The following is a quotation of 35 U.S.C. 112 (pre-AIA ), second paragraph: The specification shall conclude with one or more claims particularly pointing out and distinctly claiming the subject matter which the applicant regards as his invention. Claims 1-26 are rejected under 35 U.S.C. 112(b) or 35 U.S.C. 112 (pre-AIA ), second paragraph, as being indefinite for failing to particularly point out and distinctly claim the subject matter which the inventor or a joint inventor (or for applications subject to pre-AIA 35 U.S.C. 112, the applicant), regards as the invention. The claims should recite the auxiliary patterns as having a specific phase shift relative to the main patterns and that the auxiliary patterns do not printout during the exposure. In the event the determination of the status of the application as subject to AIA 35 U.S.C. 102 and 103 (or as subject to pre-AIA 35 U.S.C. 102 and 103) is incorrect, any correction of the statutory basis (i.e., changing from AIA to pre-AIA ) for the rejection will not be considered a new ground of rejection if the prior art relied upon, and the rationale supporting the rejection, would be the same under either status. The following is a quotation of the appropriate paragraphs of 35 U.S.C. 102 that form the basis for the rejections under this section made in this Office action: A person shall be entitled to a patent unless – (a)(1) the claimed invention was patented, described in a printed publication, or in public use, on sale, or otherwise available to the public before the effective filing date of the claimed invention. (a)(2) the claimed invention was described in a patent issued under section 151, or in an application for patent published or deemed published under section 122(b), in which the patent or application, as the case may be, names another inventor and was effectively filed before the effective filing date of the claimed invention. The following is a quotation of 35 U.S.C. 103 which forms the basis for all obviousness rejections set forth in this Office action: A patent for a claimed invention may not be obtained, notwithstanding that the claimed invention is not identically disclosed as set forth in section 102, if the differences between the claimed invention and the prior art are such that the claimed invention as a whole would have been obvious before the effective filing date of the claimed invention to a person having ordinary skill in the art to which the claimed invention pertains. Patentability shall not be negated by the manner in which the invention was made. Claims 1,5,17,20,22 and 23 are rejected under 35 U.S.C. 102(a)(1) as anticipated by or, in the alternative, under 35 U.S.C. 103 as obvious over Hasegawa et al. JP-H0876355. Hasegawa et al. JP-H0876355 (machine translation attached) teaches in figure 1a, a photomask formed of a glass substrate (3) and a patterned chromium semitransparent film (2) (transmittance is 9%, but can be 1-20%) and a phase shifter (3). The diameter of the main pattern is 0.6 microns. The width of the auxiliary pattern is 0.1 micron and the distance between the centers of the main and auxiliary patterns is 1.1 microns. The separation is (1.1 – 0.35 = 0.75 microns. The phase of the light from the main pattern and the auxiliary pattern is the same. (1b) [0023-0026]. In embodiment 3, illustrated in figure 6, the main pattern is a 0.5 micron square and the width of the auxiliary pattern is 0.1 micron. The length (10) of the auxiliary pattern is 1.5 microns. The distance between the center of the main pattern and the auxiliary pattern is 1.1 microns as in embodiment 2, so the spacing is 1.1 – 0.3= 0.8 microns. The sum of the length of the main feature and the spacing is 1.3 microns [002,0034-0035]. An Embodiment where the auxiliary pattern is an octagon is illustrated in figure 10. In the mask of figure 12(b), the mask includes adjacent main patterns 11-1 and 11-2 each surrounded by auxiliary patterns 14 PNG media_image1.png 167 290 media_image1.png Greyscale PNG media_image2.png 286 225 media_image2.png Greyscale PNG media_image3.png 224 193 media_image3.png Greyscale PNG media_image4.png 219 169 media_image4.png Greyscale PNG media_image5.png 385 579 media_image5.png Greyscale The examiner holds that the dimension of patterns 11-1 and 11-2 and the auxiliary patterns 14 meet the limitations of the claims. These are likely similar to those of embodiment 3 as is evident from a comparison of figure 6 and 12(b). In embodiment 3, the length of the auxiliary pattern is 1.5 microns and the sum of the width of the main pattern and the separation distance is 1.3 microns. The transmittance of the auxiliary features is less than that of the main pattern based upon differences in size. If this position is not upheld, the examiner holds that it would have been obvious to one skilled in the art to modify the size and spacing of features 11-1, 1-22 and the associated auxiliary patterns 14 to match that of the third embodiment (illustrated in figure 6) with a reasonable expectation of forming a useful photomask. Claims 1,5,17 and 20-23 are rejected under 35 U.S.C. 102(a)(1) as being fully anticipated by Miska 20040265708 Miska 20040265708 illustrates a mask in figure 9A including a transparent main features (203,204, 205 and 206) and phase shifting areas (208,209,210, 211) surrounded by the semi-shielding portions (201). PNG media_image6.png 609 389 media_image6.png Greyscale In figure 10, the width of each phase shifter is ~44 nm, the distance between the phase shifter and the main feature is ~120 nm, the length of the phase shifter is 160 nm, the transmittance of the semi-shielding layer is 6% [0158-0159,0207-0208] PNG media_image7.png 273 410 media_image7.png Greyscale The structure of the phase mask can be 6A-6D PNG media_image8.png 285 356 media_image8.png Greyscale PNG media_image9.png 265 362 media_image9.png Greyscale The phase shift can be 150-210 degrees [0118]. Useful semi-shielding materials include Cr and the like [0121]. Other useful phase shifter arrangements are shown in figure 13A-13C PNG media_image10.png 215 362 media_image10.png Greyscale PNG media_image11.png 200 357 media_image11.png Greyscale PNG media_image12.png 202 366 media_image12.png Greyscale The examiner holds that the auxiliary features and main features of the photomasks illustrated in figures 9 and 10A meet the limitations of the claims , specifically that the length of the sist features are at least equal to the sum of the length of the main pattern and the distance between the main pattern and the respective auxiliary feature. Claims 1,5,17 and 20-23 are rejected under 35 U.S.C. 102(a)(1) as being fully anticipated by Suda 20070190434. Suda 20070190434 teaches with respect to figures 3A, 9A and 12A phase shift masks including a light shielding background (102) with openings (103), and auxiliary openings (104) which are phase shifted 180 degrees from the main openings. PNG media_image13.png 267 434 media_image13.png Greyscale PNG media_image14.png 219 442 media_image14.png Greyscale PNG media_image15.png 195 341 media_image15.png Greyscale PNG media_image16.png 197 380 media_image16.png Greyscale The examiner holds that the auxiliary features and main features of the photomasks illustrated in figures 3A, 5A, 9A, and 12A meet the limitations of the claims , specifically that the length of the sist features are at least equal to the sum of the length of the main pattern and the distance between the main pattern and the respective auxiliary feature. Claims 1-25 are rejected under 35 U.S.C. 103 as being unpatentable over Suda 20070190434, in view of Imashita et al. KR 20160010322 and Imashiki JP 2018151618 Imashiki JP 2018151618 (machine translation attached) teaches with respect to figures 1a and 1b, photomask useful in forming displays comprising a substrate (10), a patterned phase shift film (11) and a light blocking film (12), where the main pattern is an opening down to the substrate and the phase shift auxiliary pattern (5) is where there are openings in the light shielding layer,, but the phase shift layer (11) is intact. PNG media_image17.png 222 297 media_image17.png Greyscale PNG media_image18.png 83 254 media_image18.png Greyscale Figures 10 and 11 show changes in the auxiliary features with different separation between the main patterns. PNG media_image19.png 461 689 media_image19.png Greyscale The octagonal assist feature can be considered to be 8 segments as in figure 8 [0062]. The phase shift can be 120-240 degrees [0056]. Figure 15 is the prior art. PNG media_image20.png 207 296 media_image20.png Greyscale PNG media_image21.png 223 365 media_image21.png Greyscale The use of the masks in an exposure process to form a display using i-line, h-line or g-line exposure sources is disclosed [0121-0124]. The use of the exposure to form contact holes on the display panel substrate is disclosed [0023]. PNG media_image22.png 210 232 media_image22.png Greyscale PNG media_image23.png 60 242 media_image23.png Greyscale illustrate the patterned phase shift layer overcoated with the patterned light shielding layer. Imashita et al. KR 20160010322 (machine translation attached) illustrates in figure 2, different masks for forming display devices with different auxiliary features including circles, octagons, and four bars. PNG media_image24.png 483 281 media_image24.png Greyscale As described above, the main pattern of the photomask shown in Fig. 1 is square, but the present invention is not limited to this. For example, as illustrated in Fig. 2, the main pattern of the photomask may be a rotationally symmetrical shape, including an octagon or a circle. Then, the center of the rotational symmetry can be set as the center of the reference point P. The shape of the auxiliary pattern of the photomask shown in Fig. 1 is an octagonal band, but the present invention is not limited to this. It is preferable that the shape of the auxiliary pattern is a shape in which a constant width is imparted to the shape of the object to be rotated three or more times symmetrically with respect to the center of the hole pattern. 2 (a) to 2 (f), and the design of the main pattern and the design of the auxiliary pattern are different from each other in FIGS. 2 (a) to 2 (f) . For example, it is exemplified that the outer periphery of the auxiliary pattern is a regular polygon (preferably a regular 2n square, where n is an integer of 2 or more) or a circle such as a square, a hexagonal shape, a square octagonal shape or a regular octagonal shape. As the shape of the auxiliary pattern, it is preferable that the outer and inner peripheries of the auxiliary pattern are substantially parallel, that is, a shape such as a regular polygonal or circular band having a substantially constant width. This band-like shape is also referred to as a polygonal band or a circular band. As the shape of the auxiliary pattern, it is preferable that the regular polygonal band or the circular band surrounds the periphery of the main pattern. At this time, since the balance between the amount of light transmitted through the main pattern and the amount of light transmitted through the auxiliary pattern can be made substantially equal, it is easy to obtain a light interaction for obtaining the operation and effect of the present invention. Particularly, when the photomask of the present invention is used as a photomask for manufacturing a display device, that is, when the photomask of the present invention is used in combination with a photoresist for producing a display device, It is possible to reduce the resist loss in the portion where the resist is formed. Alternatively, the shape of the auxiliary pattern may be such that the polygonal band or a part of the ring-shaped band is partially missing without completely surrounding the periphery of the main pattern. The shape of the auxiliary pattern may be a shape in which the corner portion of the rectangular band is missing, for example, as shown in Fig. 2 (f). In addition to the main pattern and the auxiliary pattern of the present invention, other patterns may be used as long as the effect of the present invention is not impaired [0106-0111]. Example 2 exposes hole patterns on a display substrate [0174-0184]. Suda 20070190434 does not form the mask patterns with a patterned phase shift layer on the substrate and a patterned light shielding layer on the phase shift layer, describe the use of multi-segment auxiliary features with a 45 degree angle between the segments. With respect to claims 1,5 and 17-25, it would have been obvious to modify the masks illustrated in figures 5A, 9Aor 12A of Suda 20070190434 (reproduced below) by forming the mask with a phase shift layer patterned with an opening in the main pattern region and the light shielding layer formed on the phase shift layer patterned with openings in the light shielding layer corresponding to the main patterns and the auxiliary features as is known in the art as evidenced in Imashita et al. KR 20160010322 and Imashiki JP 2018151618 with a reasonable expectation of forming a useful photomask. With respect to claims 1-17 and 20-23, it would have been obvious to modify the mask of figure 12A of Suda 20070190434 (reproduced below) PNG media_image25.png 246 458 media_image25.png Greyscale by replacing each of the 3 outer rectangular auxiliary features with a single partial octagon auxiliary feature as in figure 11i PNG media_image26.png 144 133 media_image26.png Greyscale of Imashiki JP 2018151618, noting the direction away from the linear auxiliary features of figure 15 of Imashiki JP 2018151618 and the recognized equivalence of the four linear auxiliary features in figure 2f and the single octagonal auxiliary feature of figure 2b of Imashita et al. KR 20160010322 with a reasonable expectation of forming a useful photomask. With respect to claims 1-17 and 20-23, it would have been obvious to modify the mask of figure 12A of Suda 20070190434 (reproduced below) PNG media_image27.png 197 366 media_image27.png Greyscale by replacing each of the 3 outer rectangular auxiliary features with a single partial octagon auxiliary feature as in figure 11i PNG media_image26.png 144 133 media_image26.png Greyscale of Imashiki JP 2018151618, noting the direction away from the linear auxiliary features of figure 15 of Imashiki JP 2018151618 and the recognized equivalence of the four linear auxiliary features in figure 2f and the single octagonal auxiliary feature of figure 2b of Imashita et al. KR 20160010322. With respect to claims 1-25, it would have been obvious to modify the mask of figure 12A of Suda 20070190434 (reproduced below) PNG media_image27.png 197 366 media_image27.png Greyscale by replacing each of the 3 outer rectangular auxiliary features with a single partial octagon auxiliary feature as in figure 11i of Imashiki JP 2018151618, noting the direction away from the linear auxiliary features of figure 15 of Imashiki JP 2018151618 and the recognized equivalence of the four linear auxiliary features in figure 2f and the single octagonal auxiliary feature of figure 2b of Imashita et al. KR 20160010322, forming the mask with a phase shift layer patterned with an opening in the main pattern region and the light shielding layer formed on the phase shift layer patterned with openings in the light shielding layer corresponding to the main patterns and the auxiliary features as is known in the art as evidenced in Imashita et al. KR 20160010322 and Imashiki JP 2018151618. Claims 1-5,17 and 20-23 are rejected under 35 U.S.C. 103 as being unpatentable over Miska 20040265708, in view of Imashita et al. KR 20160010322 and Imashiki JP 2018151618 Miska 20040265708 does not form the mask patterns with a patterned phase shift layer on the substrate and a patterned light shielding layer on the phase shift layer, describe the use of multi-segment auxiliary features with a 45 degree angle between the segments or describe the use of masks to expose contact holes on display device substrates. With respect to claims 1,5 ,17 and 20-23, it would have been obvious to modify the masks illustrated in figures 9A, 10A or 13A-C of Miska 20040265708 by forming the mask with a phase shift layer patterned with an opening in the main pattern region and the light shielding layer formed on the phase shift layer patterned with openings in the light shielding layer corresponding to the main patterns and the auxiliary features as is known in the art as evidenced in Imashita et al. KR 20160010322 and Imashiki JP 2018151618 with a reasonable expectation of forming a useful photomask. With respect to claims 1,5,17,20-23 and 26, it would have been obvious to modify the masks illustrated in figures 9A, 10A or 13A-C of Miska 20040265708 by forming the mask with a phase shift layer patterned with an opening in the main pattern region and the light shielding layer formed on the phase shift layer patterned with openings in the light shielding layer corresponding to the main patterns and the auxiliary features as is known in the art as evidenced in Imashita et al. KR 20160010322 and Imashiki JP 2018151618 and using the resulting photomask to form contact holes in the production of display devices as taught in Imashita et al. KR 20160010322 and Imashiki JP 2018151618 with a reasonable expectation of forming a useful display device. With respect to claims 1-5, 17, 20-23, it would have been obvious to modify the mask of figure 13B of Miska 20040265708 (reproduced below) PNG media_image28.png 180 303 media_image28.png Greyscale by replacing each of the 3 outer rectangular auxiliary features with a single partial octagon auxiliary feature as in figure 11i PNG media_image26.png 144 133 media_image26.png Greyscale of Imashiki JP 2018151618, noting the direction away from the linear auxiliary features of figure 15 of Imashiki JP 2018151618 and the recognized equivalence of the four linear auxiliary features in figure 2f and the single octagonal auxiliary feature of figure 2b of Imashita et al. KR 20160010322 with a reasonable expectation of forming a useful photomask. With respect to claims 1-5,17, 20-23 and 26, it would have been obvious to modify the mask of figure 13B of Miska 20040265708 (reproduced below) PNG media_image28.png 180 303 media_image28.png Greyscale by replacing each of the 3 outer rectangular auxiliary features with a single partial octagon auxiliary feature as in figure 11i PNG media_image26.png 144 133 media_image26.png Greyscale of Imashiki JP 2018151618, noting the direction away from the linear auxiliary features of figure 15 of Imashiki JP 2018151618 and the recognized equivalence of the four linear auxiliary features in figure 2f and the single octagonal auxiliary feature of figure 2b of Imashita et al. KR 20160010322 and using the resulting photomask to form contact holes in the production of display devices as taught in Imashita et al. KR 20160010322 and Imashiki JP 2018151618 with a reasonable expectation of forming a useful display device. Claims 1-26 are rejected under 35 U.S.C. 103 as being unpatentable over Suda 20070190434, in view of Imashita et al. KR 20160010322 and Imashiki JP 2018151618, further in view of Ahn et al. 20060139504. Ahn et al. 20060139504 illustrates in figure 7B, a patterned photoresist (168) over a substrate (150), a patterned metal/conductive gate lines (101/101)gate insulating film (152), an amorphous silicon layer (105), a doped amorphous silicon layer (107), source/drain metal layer (109) coated with a patterned resist (168), which was patterned by exposure through a photomask with a fully transmissive part, a light shielding part and a phase shifted part to form a pattern in the resist corresponding to contact holes. These contact holes are then etched down to the gate lines. As in figure 7C [0055- PNG media_image29.png 649 442 media_image29.png Greyscale PNG media_image30.png 637 455 media_image30.png Greyscale The combination of Suda 20070190434, Imashita et al. KR 20160010322 and Imashiki JP 2018151618 describes the use of photomasks masks to form contact holes in display devices, but does not describe the display substrate being patterned as having a patterned conductive layer on the substrate, overlaid with an insulating layer and a resist. In addition to the basis above, it would have been obvious top one skilled in the art to use the masks with transparent main features and phase shifted assist patterns rendered obvious by the combination of Suda 20070190434, Imashita et al. KR 20160010322 and Imashiki JP 2018151618 in the contact hole formation process described with respect to figures 7A-C of Ahn et al. 20060139504 with a reasonable expectation of forming a useful display devices based upon the disclosure of the use of the mask in forming contact holes in Imashita et al. KR 20160010322 and Imashiki JP 2018151618 and the resultant masks having the light shielding regions, fully transparent patterns and phase shifted patterns as discussed in Ahn et al. 20060139504 at [0056]. Claims 1-5,17,20-23 and 26 are rejected under 35 U.S.C. 103 as being unpatentable over Miska 20040265708, in view of Imashita et al. KR 20160010322 and Imashiki JP 2018151618, further in view of Ahn et al. 20060139504 The combination of Miska 20040265708, Imashita et al. KR 20160010322 and Imashiki JP 2018151618 describes the use of photomasks masks to form contact holes in display devices, but does not describe the display substrate being patterned as having a patterned conductive layer on the substrate, overlaid with an insulating layer and a resist. In addition to the basis above, it would have been obvious top one skilled in the art to use the masks with transparent main features and phase shifted assist patterns rendered obvious by the combination of Miska 20040265708, Imashita et al. KR 20160010322 and Imashiki JP 2018151618 in the contact hole formation process described with respect to figures 7A-C of Ahn et al. 20060139504 with a reasonable expectation of forming a useful display devices based upon the disclosure of the use of the mask in forming contact holes in Imashita et al. KR 20160010322 and Imashiki JP 2018151618 and the resultant masks having the light shielding regions, fully transparent patterns and phase shifted patterns as discussed in Ahn et al. 20060139504 at [0056]. The prior art made of record and not relied upon is considered pertinent to applicant's disclosure. Sukegawa et al. 5387485 teaches with respect to figures 6a and 6b, the difference between convention masks and phase shift masks. Where the intensity of the side lobes is at a low level (below the dashed line corresponding to a developable resist image) (col 4/lines 8-12). Figure 3 illustrates a main pattern (4a) and rectangular phase shift areas (4b) (col. 3/lines 1-13). Figure 4 is a conventional phase mask where the phase shift is a annular/square (4b) separated from the main area by a light shielding region (2) (3/4-7). In the inventive mask, the pattern is annular with the corners cut off. The phase shift of layer (3) is 180 degrees (see figure1, 1/44-2/22)) PNG media_image31.png 360 326 media_image31.png Greyscale PNG media_image32.png 308 325 media_image32.png Greyscale PNG media_image33.png 161 402 media_image33.png Greyscale PNG media_image34.png 188 355 media_image34.png Greyscale Imashiki CN 111665680 (machine translation attached) teaches the correction of photomasks useful for forming display or electronic devices. The formation of contact holes in thin film transistor devices is disclosed [0012]. Figure 8 illustrates different photomask patterns with various numbers of defects in the auxiliary features, which are oriented in different arrangements and have different angles (0 or 45 degrees) relative to one another. PNG media_image35.png 303 438 media_image35.png Greyscale Any inquiry concerning this communication or earlier communications from the examiner should be directed to Martin J Angebranndt whose telephone number is (571)272-1378. The examiner can normally be reached 7-3:30 pm EST. Examiner interviews are available via telephone, in-person, and video conferencing using a USPTO supplied web-based collaboration tool. To schedule an interview, applicant is encouraged to use the USPTO Automated Interview Request (AIR) at http://www.uspto.gov/interviewpractice. If attempts to reach the examiner by telephone are unsuccessful, the examiner’s supervisor, Mark F Huff can be reached at 571-272-1385. The fax phone number for the organization where this application or proceeding is assigned is 571-273-8300. Information regarding the status of published or unpublished applications may be obtained from Patent Center. Unpublished application information in Patent Center is available to registered users. To file and manage patent submissions in Patent Center, visit: https://patentcenter.uspto.gov. Visit https://www.uspto.gov/patents/apply/patent-center for more information about Patent Center and https://www.uspto.gov/patents/docx for information about filing in DOCX format. For additional questions, contact the Electronic Business Center (EBC) at 866-217-9197 (toll-free). If you would like assistance from a USPTO Customer Service Representative, call 800-786-9199 (IN USA OR CANADA) or 571-272-1000. MARTIN J. ANGEBRANNDT Primary Examiner Art Unit 1737 /MARTIN J ANGEBRANNDT/Primary Examiner, Art Unit 1737 January 13, 2026
Read full office action

Prosecution Timeline

May 22, 2023
Application Filed
Jan 13, 2026
Non-Final Rejection — §102, §103, §112 (current)

Precedent Cases

Applications granted by this same examiner with similar technology

Patent 12578652
PHOTOMASK AND METHODS FOR MEASURING AND MANUFACTURING THE PHOTOMASK
2y 5m to grant Granted Mar 17, 2026
Patent 12566369
METHOD AND APPARATUS FOR MANUFACTURING A PHOTOMASK FROM A BLANK MASK
2y 5m to grant Granted Mar 03, 2026
Patent 12566377
MULTIPLE PATTERNING WITH ORGANOMETALLIC PHOTOPATTERNABLE LAYERS WITH INTERMEDIATE FREEZE STEPS
2y 5m to grant Granted Mar 03, 2026
Patent 12554191
PELLICLE MEMBRANE AND METHOD OF FORMING THE SAME
2y 5m to grant Granted Feb 17, 2026
Patent 12535740
INTERSTITIAL TYPE ABSORBER FOR EXTREME ULTRAVIOLET MASK
2y 5m to grant Granted Jan 27, 2026
Study what changed to get past this examiner. Based on 5 most recent grants.

AI Strategy Recommendation

Get an AI-powered prosecution strategy using examiner precedents, rejection analysis, and claim mapping.
Powered by AI — typically takes 5-10 seconds

Prosecution Projections

1-2
Expected OA Rounds
55%
Grant Probability
90%
With Interview (+34.5%)
3y 3m
Median Time to Grant
Low
PTA Risk
Based on 1351 resolved cases by this examiner. Grant probability derived from career allow rate.

Sign in with your work email

Enter your email to receive a magic link. No password needed.

Personal email addresses (Gmail, Yahoo, etc.) are not accepted.

Free tier: 3 strategy analyses per month