Prosecution Insights
Last updated: April 19, 2026
Application No. 18/229,106

DISPLAY APPARATUS AND METHOD OF MANUFACTURING THE SAME

Non-Final OA §102
Filed
Aug 01, 2023
Examiner
HENRY, CALEB E
Art Unit
2818
Tech Center
2800 — Semiconductors & Electrical Systems
Assignee
Samsung Display Co., Ltd.
OA Round
1 (Non-Final)
86%
Grant Probability
Favorable
1-2
OA Rounds
2y 5m
To Grant
93%
With Interview

Examiner Intelligence

Grants 86% — above average
86%
Career Allow Rate
1052 granted / 1217 resolved
+18.4% vs TC avg
Moderate +6% lift
Without
With
+6.2%
Interview Lift
resolved cases with interview
Typical timeline
2y 5m
Avg Prosecution
48 currently pending
Career history
1265
Total Applications
across all art units

Statute-Specific Performance

§101
1.1%
-38.9% vs TC avg
§103
49.8%
+9.8% vs TC avg
§102
36.3%
-3.7% vs TC avg
§112
11.2%
-28.8% vs TC avg
Black line = Tech Center average estimate • Based on career data from 1217 resolved cases

Office Action

§102
Notice of Pre-AIA or AIA Status The present application, filed on or after March 16, 2013, is being examined under the first inventor to file provisions of the AIA . Specification The title of the invention is not descriptive. A new title is required that is clearly indicative of the invention to which the claims are directed. Election/Restrictions Applicant’s election without traverse of claims 1-14 in the reply filed on 11/18/2025 is acknowledged. Claim Rejections - 35 USC § 102 In the event the determination of the status of the application as subject to AIA 35 U.S.C. 102 and 103 (or as subject to pre-AIA 35 U.S.C. 102 and 103) is incorrect, any correction of the statutory basis (i.e., changing from AIA to pre-AIA ) for the rejection will not be considered a new ground of rejection if the prior art relied upon, and the rationale supporting the rejection, would be the same under either status. The following is a quotation of the appropriate paragraphs of 35 U.S.C. 102 that form the basis for the rejections under this section made in this Office action: A person shall be entitled to a patent unless – (a)(2) the claimed invention was described in a patent issued under section 151, or in an application for patent published or deemed published under section 122(b), in which the patent or application, as the case may be, names another inventor and was effectively filed before the effective filing date of the claimed invention. Claims 1 and 14 are rejected under 35 U.S.C. 102(a)(2) as being anticipated by Kim (20220206314). PNG media_image1.png 367 562 media_image1.png Greyscale PNG media_image2.png 739 506 media_image2.png Greyscale Regarding claim 1, Kim teaches a display apparatus (fig. 4: 10’) comprising: a cover window (fig. 4: 300) comprising a window central area (please middle area of 300 in fig. 4), a first window area (please side area of 300 in fig. 4 and 6) connected to the window central area in a first direction (please see fig. 4 and 6 which shows this limitation) and bent based on an axis extending in a second direction crossing the first direction (please see fig. 4 and 6 above which shows this limitation), a second window area (please see fig. 4 and 6 which shows the face of 300 coming out of the page) connected to the window central area in the second direction and bent based on an axis extending in the first direction (please see fig. 4 and 6 which shows this limitation), and a window corner area (please see fig. 4-6 which shows four corners of LL) contacting a corner of the window central area; and a display panel (fig. 4: 100) arranged below the cover window, wherein, when a radius of curvature of a portion of the display panel arranged to overlap the first window area and bent based on the axis extending in the second direction is R.sub.B (R, Equation 6 below; please see the equation comparison below; please see fig. 13 and 16), and a length of the portion of the display panel arranged to overlap the first window area in a direction perpendicular to a portion of the display panel arranged to overlap the window central area is Z.sub.0, (please note that this distance can be derived using equation below, specifically using theta_P) a first width (W.sub.P1) (L_P, Equation 6 below; please see the equation comparison below) of the portion of the display panel in the first direction arranged to overlap the first window area satisfies the following equation: PNG media_image3.png 74 399 media_image3.png Greyscale Please note the form of the arc length of a quarter circle equation seen above is the same as that seen in claim 1. Comparing equation 6 above to that seen in claim 1, we see that: Theta_P = π(1/2)×[cos-1([RB-Z0]/RB)]/90 R = R_B L_P = W_P1 Please note that the equations seen in Equation 6 and claim 1 are mathematically identical, just rewritten using a normalized sector fraction. Regarding claim 14, Kim teaches a display apparatus of claim 1, wherein a radius of curvature of a portion of the display panel arranged to overlap the second window area is the same as R.sub.B (please see fig. 13 showing this radius), a length of the portion of the display panel arranged to overlap the second window area in the direction perpendicular to the portion of the display panel arranged to overlap the window central area is the same as Z.sub.0 (please see fig. 13 showing this length), and a width of the portion of the display panel arranged to overlap the second window area in the second direction is the same as the first width (please see fig. 13 which shows width). Allowable Subject Matter Claim 2 objected to as being dependent upon a rejected base claim, but would be allowable if rewritten in independent form including all of the limitations of the base claim and any intervening claims. Claim 3, 4, 6, 8 is objected to based on its dependency on claim 2. Claim 5 is objected to based on its dependency on claim 4. Claim 7 is objected to based on its dependency on claim 6. Claim 9 is objected to based on its dependency on claim 8. . Claim 10 is objected to based on its dependency on claim 8. Claim 11 is objected to based on its dependency on claim 10. Claim 12 is objected to based on its dependency on claim 10. Claim 13 is objected to based on its dependency on claim 12. Conclusion Any inquiry concerning this communication or earlier communications from the examiner should be directed to CALEB E HENRY whose telephone number is (571)270-5370. The examiner can normally be reached Mon-Fri. Examiner interviews are available via telephone, in-person, and video conferencing using a USPTO supplied web-based collaboration tool. To schedule an interview, applicant is encouraged to use the USPTO Automated Interview Request (AIR) at http://www.uspto.gov/interviewpractice. If attempts to reach the examiner by telephone are unsuccessful, the examiner’s supervisor, Eva Montalvo can be reached at (571) 270-3829. The fax phone number for the organization where this application or proceeding is assigned is 571-273-8300. Information regarding the status of published or unpublished applications may be obtained from Patent Center. Unpublished application information in Patent Center is available to registered users. To file and manage patent submissions in Patent Center, visit: https://patentcenter.uspto.gov. Visit https://www.uspto.gov/patents/apply/patent-center for more information about Patent Center and https://www.uspto.gov/patents/docx for information about filing in DOCX format. For additional questions, contact the Electronic Business Center (EBC) at 866-217-9197 (toll-free). If you would like assistance from a USPTO Customer Service Representative, call 800-786-9199 (IN USA OR CANADA) or 571-272-1000. /CALEB E HENRY/Primary Examiner, Art Unit 2818
Read full office action

Prosecution Timeline

Aug 01, 2023
Application Filed
Feb 26, 2026
Non-Final Rejection — §102 (current)

Precedent Cases

Applications granted by this same examiner with similar technology

Patent 12604596
METHOD FOR MANUFACTURING A PEROVSKITE SOLAR CELL WITH AN IMPROVED HOLE TRANSPORT LAYER AND A PEROVSKITE SOLAR CELL WITH AN IMPROVED HOLE TRANSPORT LAYER MANUFACTURED BY THE SAME METHOD
2y 5m to grant Granted Apr 14, 2026
Patent 12604650
METHOD FOR MANUFACTURING THE LIGHT-EMITTING ELEMENT AND LIGHT-EMITTING DEVICE USING PHOTOLITHOGRAPHY TECHNIQUE
2y 5m to grant Granted Apr 14, 2026
Patent 12598801
SEMICONDUCTOR DEVICE OF PHYSICAL UNCLONABLE FUNCTION AND MANUFACTURING METHOD THEREOF
2y 5m to grant Granted Apr 07, 2026
Patent 12588440
SUBSTRATE PROCESSING METHOD AND SUBSTRATE PROCESSING APPARATUS FOR ETCHING USING OXDIZATION
2y 5m to grant Granted Mar 24, 2026
Patent 12584068
COMPOUND FOR ORGANIC ELECTRIC ELEMENT, ORGANIC ELECTRIC ELEMENT USING THE SAME, AND AN ELECTRONIC DEVICE THEREOF
2y 5m to grant Granted Mar 24, 2026
Study what changed to get past this examiner. Based on 5 most recent grants.

AI Strategy Recommendation

Get an AI-powered prosecution strategy using examiner precedents, rejection analysis, and claim mapping.
Powered by AI — typically takes 5-10 seconds

Prosecution Projections

1-2
Expected OA Rounds
86%
Grant Probability
93%
With Interview (+6.2%)
2y 5m
Median Time to Grant
Low
PTA Risk
Based on 1217 resolved cases by this examiner. Grant probability derived from career allow rate.

Sign in with your work email

Enter your email to receive a magic link. No password needed.

Personal email addresses (Gmail, Yahoo, etc.) are not accepted.

Free tier: 3 strategy analyses per month