Prosecution Insights
Last updated: April 19, 2026
Application No. 18/229,581

DISPLAY DEVICE AND MANUFACTURING METHOD THEREOF

Non-Final OA §102
Filed
Aug 02, 2023
Examiner
HENRY, CALEB E
Art Unit
2818
Tech Center
2800 — Semiconductors & Electrical Systems
Assignee
Samsung Display Co., Ltd.
OA Round
1 (Non-Final)
86%
Grant Probability
Favorable
1-2
OA Rounds
2y 5m
To Grant
93%
With Interview

Examiner Intelligence

Grants 86% — above average
86%
Career Allow Rate
1052 granted / 1217 resolved
+18.4% vs TC avg
Moderate +6% lift
Without
With
+6.2%
Interview Lift
resolved cases with interview
Typical timeline
2y 5m
Avg Prosecution
48 currently pending
Career history
1265
Total Applications
across all art units

Statute-Specific Performance

§101
1.1%
-38.9% vs TC avg
§103
49.8%
+9.8% vs TC avg
§102
36.3%
-3.7% vs TC avg
§112
11.2%
-28.8% vs TC avg
Black line = Tech Center average estimate • Based on career data from 1217 resolved cases

Office Action

§102
Notice of Pre-AIA or AIA Status The present application, filed on or after March 16, 2013, is being examined under the first inventor to file provisions of the AIA . Election/Restrictions Applicant’s election without traverse of Claims 4-20 in the reply filed on 11/18/2025 is acknowledged. Specification The title of the invention is not descriptive. A new title is required that is clearly indicative of the invention to which the claims are directed. Claim Rejections - 35 USC § 102 In the event the determination of the status of the application as subject to AIA 35 U.S.C. 102 and 103 (or as subject to pre-AIA 35 U.S.C. 102 and 103) is incorrect, any correction of the statutory basis (i.e., changing from AIA to pre-AIA ) for the rejection will not be considered a new ground of rejection if the prior art relied upon, and the rationale supporting the rejection, would be the same under either status. The following is a quotation of the appropriate paragraphs of 35 U.S.C. 102 that form the basis for the rejections under this section made in this Office action: A person shall be entitled to a patent unless – (a)(1) the claimed invention was patented, described in a printed publication, or in public use, on sale, or otherwise available to the public before the effective filing date of the claimed invention. Claim(s) 4-7 and 18-20 are rejected under 35 U.S.C. 102(a)(1) as being anticipated by Kim (20190378455) Regarding claim 4, Kim teaches a manufacturing method of a display device, comprising: preparing a display panel (par. 69-72 teaches a display module being processed, this display module having a display panel) including a plurality of pixels (fig. 4: PX) on an upper surface (fig. 9A: SUB-US) of a substrate (par. 90 teaches a plurality of pixels, as seen in fig. 4, on the SUB-US of a SUB); seating the display panel on a stage (par. 23, 24, 120 teaches an apparatus/chamber which houses/holds the display panel ready to be subsequently processed) so that a rear surface (fig. 9A: SUB-BS) of the substrate facing the upper surface of the substrate faces upward (please see fig. 9A which shows SUB-BS facing upward toward ND1); applying a coating solution (fig. 8: S110) on the rear surface of the substrate while avoiding a specific area on the rear surface of the substrate (par. 132-134 and fig. 9A teach Adm being applied, in a patterned manner atop SUB-BS) while a first supplier (fig. 9A: ND1) including a plurality of first nozzles (please see ND1 having a plurality of nozzles) is positioned above the rear surface of the substrate and moved along a first direction (please see fig. 9A which shows ND1 above and depositing solution on SUB); applying the coating solution (fig. 8: S130) on an uncoated area to which the coating solution is not applied by the first supplier while avoiding a specific area of the substrate while a second supplier including a plurality of second nozzles (please see fig. 9C) moves along a second crossing the first direction (par. 136-140 and fig. 9C teach selectively applying Ada, avoiding certain areas wherein Adm resides); and curing the coating solution (fig. 8: S140) to form a cover panel including an opening corresponding to the specific area on the rear surface of the substrate (fig. 9D teaches UV curing and leaving an open area, between SU and SUB, on SUB-BS). Regarding claim 5, Kim teaches a manufacturing method of the display device of claim 4, wherein the rear surface of the substrate includes a first edge and a second edge facing each other in the first direction, and includes a third edge and a fourth edge facing each other in a second direction (please see fig. 9A-9D). Regarding claim 6, Kim teaches a manufacturing method of the display device of claim 5, wherein the coating solution includes a curable resin (par. 119 and 125). Regarding claim 7, Kim teaches a manufacturing method of the display device of claim 6, wherein the curable resin includes a thermosetting resin or a photocurable resin (par. 119 and 125). Regarding claim 18, Kim teaches a manufacturing method of the display device of claim 4, wherein the first direction is one of a vertical direction and a horizontal direction, and the second direction is the other of the vertical direction and the horizontal direction (please see fig. 9A-9D). Regarding claim 19, Kim teaches a manufacturing method of the display device of claim 4, further comprising: attaching a circuit board to one side of an upper surface thereof facing the rear surface of the substrate; and inserting a sensor (SU) into the opening (fig. 9B). Regarding claim 20, Kim teaches a manufacturing method of the display device of claim 19, wherein the sensor includes at least one of a camera, a proximity sensor, an illuminance sensor, a gesture sensor, an infrared sensor, a fingerprint recognition sensor, or a biometric sensor(par. 16, 109-110). Allowable Subject Matter Claim 8 objected to as being dependent upon a rejected base claim, but would be allowable if rewritten in independent form including all of the limitations of the base claim and any intervening claims. Claim 9 is objected to based on its dependency on claim 8. Claim 10 is objected to based on its dependency on claim 9. Claim 11 is objected to based on its dependency on claim 10. Claim 12 is objected to based on its dependency on claim 10. Claim 13 is objected to based on its dependency on claim 10. Claim 14 is objected to based on its dependency on claim 13. Claim 15 is objected to based on its dependency on claim 14. Claim 16 is objected to based on its dependency on claim 14. Claim 17 is objected to based on its dependency on claim 16. Conclusion Any inquiry concerning this communication or earlier communications from the examiner should be directed to CALEB E HENRY whose telephone number is (571)270-5370. The examiner can normally be reached Mon-Fri. Examiner interviews are available via telephone, in-person, and video conferencing using a USPTO supplied web-based collaboration tool. To schedule an interview, applicant is encouraged to use the USPTO Automated Interview Request (AIR) at http://www.uspto.gov/interviewpractice. If attempts to reach the examiner by telephone are unsuccessful, the examiner’s supervisor, Eva Montalvo can be reached at (571) 270-3829. The fax phone number for the organization where this application or proceeding is assigned is 571-273-8300. Information regarding the status of published or unpublished applications may be obtained from Patent Center. Unpublished application information in Patent Center is available to registered users. To file and manage patent submissions in Patent Center, visit: https://patentcenter.uspto.gov. Visit https://www.uspto.gov/patents/apply/patent-center for more information about Patent Center and https://www.uspto.gov/patents/docx for information about filing in DOCX format. For additional questions, contact the Electronic Business Center (EBC) at 866-217-9197 (toll-free). If you would like assistance from a USPTO Customer Service Representative, call 800-786-9199 (IN USA OR CANADA) or 571-272-1000. /CALEB E HENRY/Primary Examiner, Art Unit 2818
Read full office action

Prosecution Timeline

Aug 02, 2023
Application Filed
Dec 18, 2025
Non-Final Rejection — §102 (current)

Precedent Cases

Applications granted by this same examiner with similar technology

Patent 12604596
METHOD FOR MANUFACTURING A PEROVSKITE SOLAR CELL WITH AN IMPROVED HOLE TRANSPORT LAYER AND A PEROVSKITE SOLAR CELL WITH AN IMPROVED HOLE TRANSPORT LAYER MANUFACTURED BY THE SAME METHOD
2y 5m to grant Granted Apr 14, 2026
Patent 12604650
METHOD FOR MANUFACTURING THE LIGHT-EMITTING ELEMENT AND LIGHT-EMITTING DEVICE USING PHOTOLITHOGRAPHY TECHNIQUE
2y 5m to grant Granted Apr 14, 2026
Patent 12598801
SEMICONDUCTOR DEVICE OF PHYSICAL UNCLONABLE FUNCTION AND MANUFACTURING METHOD THEREOF
2y 5m to grant Granted Apr 07, 2026
Patent 12588440
SUBSTRATE PROCESSING METHOD AND SUBSTRATE PROCESSING APPARATUS FOR ETCHING USING OXDIZATION
2y 5m to grant Granted Mar 24, 2026
Patent 12584068
COMPOUND FOR ORGANIC ELECTRIC ELEMENT, ORGANIC ELECTRIC ELEMENT USING THE SAME, AND AN ELECTRONIC DEVICE THEREOF
2y 5m to grant Granted Mar 24, 2026
Study what changed to get past this examiner. Based on 5 most recent grants.

AI Strategy Recommendation

Get an AI-powered prosecution strategy using examiner precedents, rejection analysis, and claim mapping.
Powered by AI — typically takes 5-10 seconds

Prosecution Projections

1-2
Expected OA Rounds
86%
Grant Probability
93%
With Interview (+6.2%)
2y 5m
Median Time to Grant
Low
PTA Risk
Based on 1217 resolved cases by this examiner. Grant probability derived from career allow rate.

Sign in with your work email

Enter your email to receive a magic link. No password needed.

Personal email addresses (Gmail, Yahoo, etc.) are not accepted.

Free tier: 3 strategy analyses per month