Prosecution Insights
Last updated: July 17, 2026
Application No. 18/230,565

DISPLAY APPARATUS

Non-Final OA §102§112
Filed
Aug 04, 2023
Priority
Mar 10, 2016 — RE 10-2016-0029110 +2 more
Examiner
BAUMAN, SCOTT E
Art Unit
2815
Tech Center
2800 — Semiconductors & Electrical Systems
Assignee
Samsung Display Co., Ltd.
OA Round
1 (Non-Final)
46%
Grant Probability
Moderate
1-2
OA Rounds
7m
Est. Remaining
74%
With Interview

Examiner Intelligence

Grants 46% of resolved cases
46%
Career Allowance Rate
84 granted / 182 resolved
-21.8% vs TC avg
Strong +28% interview lift
Without
With
+27.6%
Interview Lift
resolved cases with interview
Typical timeline
3y 6m
Avg Prosecution
28 currently pending
Career history
229
Total Applications
across all art units

Statute-Specific Performance

§103
80.1%
+40.1% vs TC avg
§102
14.3%
-25.7% vs TC avg
§112
4.8%
-35.2% vs TC avg
Black line = Tech Center average estimate • Based on career data from 182 resolved cases

Office Action

§102 §112
DETAILED ACTION Notice of Pre-AIA or AIA Status The present application, filed on or after March 16, 2013, is being examined under the first inventor to file provisions of the AIA . Election/Restrictions Applicant’s election without traverse of Species 1 – FIG. 3 in the reply filed on January 6, 2026 is acknowledged. Applicant states claims 1-6 and 8 reads upon the elected species. Claim 7 withdrawn from further consideration pursuant to 37 CFR 1.142(b) as being drawn to a nonelected species, there being no allowable generic or linking claim. Election was made without traverse in the reply filed on January 6, 2026. Information Disclosure Statement The information disclosure statement (IDS) submitted on December 8, 2024 is in compliance with the provisions of 37 CFR 1.97. Accordingly, the information disclosure statement is being considered by the examiner. The information disclosure statement filed February 23, 2024 fails to comply with 37 CFR 1.98(a)(3)(i) because it does not include a concise explanation of the relevance, as it is presently understood by the individual designated in 37 CFR 1.56(c) most knowledgeable about the content of the information, of each reference listed that is not in the English language. It has been placed in the application file, but the information referred to therein has not been considered. No English translation of KR 1020160010537 LUXVUE TECHNOLOGY CORPORATION provided The information disclosure statement filed August 4, 2023 fails to comply with 37 CFR 1.98(a)(2), which requires a legible copy of each cited foreign patent document; each non-patent literature publication or that portion which caused it to be listed; and all other information or that portion which caused it to be listed. It has been placed in the application file, but the information referred to therein has not been considered. No copy of CN103682036, CN105097870, CN105324858 provided. Specification The title of the invention is not descriptive. A new title is required that is clearly indicative of the invention to which the claims are directed. Claim Rejections - 35 USC § 112 The following is a quotation of 35 U.S.C. 112(b): (b) CONCLUSION.—The specification shall conclude with one or more claims particularly pointing out and distinctly claiming the subject matter which the inventor or a joint inventor regards as the invention. The following is a quotation of 35 U.S.C. 112 (pre-AIA ), second paragraph: The specification shall conclude with one or more claims particularly pointing out and distinctly claiming the subject matter which the applicant regards as his invention. Claims 2-4 are rejected under 35 U.S.C. 112(b) or 35 U.S.C. 112 (pre-AIA ), second paragraph, as being indefinite for failing to particularly point out and distinctly claim the subject matter which the inventor or a joint inventor (or for applications subject to pre-AIA 35 U.S.C. 112, the applicant), regards as the invention. Regarding claim 2. Claim 2 recites the limitation "the first concave portion.. the second concave portion… the third concave portion", in the claim language. There is insufficient antecedent basis for this limitation in the claim. Claims 3-4 are rejected for dependence upon a 112(b) rejected instance claim. Claim Rejections - 35 USC § 102 In the event the determination of the status of the application as subject to AIA 35 U.S.C. 102 and 103 (or as subject to pre-AIA 35 U.S.C. 102 and 103) is incorrect, any correction of the statutory basis (i.e., changing from AIA to pre-AIA ) for the rejection will not be considered a new ground of rejection if the prior art relied upon, and the rationale supporting the rejection, would be the same under either status. The following is a quotation of the appropriate paragraphs of 35 U.S.C. 102 that form the basis for the rejections under this section made in this Office action: A person shall be entitled to a patent unless – (a)(1) the claimed invention was patented, described in a printed publication, or in public use, on sale, or otherwise available to the public before the effective filing date of the claimed invention. (a)(2) the claimed invention was described in a patent issued under section 151, or in an application for patent published or deemed published under section 122(b), in which the patent or application, as the case may be, names another inventor and was effectively filed before the effective filing date of the claimed invention. Claims 1-6, 8 are rejected under 35 U.S.C. 102(a)(1)/102(a)(2) as being anticipated by Bibl et al (U.S. 2014/0367705). Regarding claim 1. Bibl et al disclose a display apparatus (FIG. 13B) comprising: a substrate (FIG. 9, item 102); at least a first pixel (FIG. 13A, item 128 with item 400R), a second pixel (FIG. 13A, item 128 with item 400G) and a third pixel (FIG. 13A, item 128 with item 400B) emitting light having different color to each other ([0049]); a pixel-defining layer (FIG. 9, item 126; [0047])) disposed above the substrate (FIG. 9, item 102) and comprising concave portions (see FIG. 13A with respect to FIG. 9, item 128) which define emission regions ([0047]) of the first pixel (FIG. 13A, item 128 with item 400R), the second pixel (FIG. 13A, item 128 with item 400G) and the third pixel (FIG. 13B, item 128 with item 400B); and a light blocker (FIG. 9, item 318; FIG. 13A, item 318) disposed above the pixel-defining layer (FIG. 9, item 126; [0047])); wherein each of the first pixel (FIG. 13A, item 128 with item 400R), the second pixel (FIG. 13A, item 128 with item 400G) and the third pixel (FIG. 13A, item 128 with item 400B) comprises a light-emitting diode (FIG. 9, item 400; FIG. 13A, item 400) disposed in a corresponding concave portion (see FIG. 13A with respect to FIG. 9, item 128) among the concave portions (see FIG. 13A with respect to FIG. 9, item 128), and wherein the light blocker (FIG. 13A, item 318) simultaneously covers light-emitting diodes of the first pixel (FIG. 13A, item 128 with item 400R), the second pixel (FIG. 13A, item 128 with item 400G) and the third pixel (FIG. 13A, item 128 with item 400B). Regarding claim 2. Bibl et al discloses all the limitation of the display apparatus of claim 1 above. Bibl et al further wherein the light-emitting diode (FIG. 9, item 400; FIG. 13A, item 400) of the first pixel (FIG. 13A, item 128 with item 400R) is disposed adjacent ([0087]) to a first inner side surface (FIG. 13A, inner surface of item 128 with item 400R) of the first concave portion (FIG. 13A, item 128 with item 400R), the light-emitting diode (FIG. 9, item 400; FIG. 13A, item 400) of the second pixel (FIG. 13A, item 128 with item 400G) is disposed adjacent ([0087]) to a first inner side surface (FIG. 13A, inner surface of item 128 with item 400G) of the second concave portion (see FIG. 13A with respect to FIG. 9, item 128) and the light-emitting diode (FIG. 9, item 400; FIG. 13A, item 400) of the third pixel (FIG. 13A, item 128 with item 400R) is disposed adjacent ([0087]) to a first inner side surface (FIG. 13A, inner surface of item 128 with item 400B) of the third concave portion (see FIG. 13A with respect to FIG. 9, item 128). Regarding claim 3. Bibl et al discloses all the limitation of the display apparatus of claim 2 above. Bibl et al further wherein the first inner side surface (FIG. 13A, inner surface of item 128 with item 400R) of the first concave portion (FIG. 13A, item 128 with item 400R) and the first inner side surface (FIG. 13A, inner surface of item 128 with item 400G) of the second concave portion (FIG. 13A, item 128 with item 400G) face to each other (FIG. 13A, item 106; [0087]). Regarding claim 4. Bibl et al discloses all the limitation of the display apparatus of claim 2 above. Bibl et al further disclose wherein the first inner side surfaces of the first (see FIG. 13A with respect to FIG. 9, item 128), second (see FIG. 13A with respect to FIG. 9, item 128) and third concave portions (see FIG. 13A with respect to FIG. 9, item 128) are disposed adjacent ([0087]) to each other (FIG. 13A, item 106). Regarding claim 5. Bibl et al discloses all the limitation of the display apparatus of claim 1 above. Bibl et al further disclose wherein the light blocker (FIG. 9, item 318; FIG. 13A, item 318) is electrically connected to upper surfaces ([0087], i.e. the top electrode layer 318 is formed over all of the micro LED devices 400 in the pixel area) of the light-emitting diodes (FIG. 9, item 400; FIG. 13A, item 400) of the first pixel (FIG. 13A, item 128 with item 400R), the second pixel (FIG. 13A, item 128 with item 400G) and the third pixel (FIG. 13A, item 128 with item 400B), and a voltage ([0045]) for driving ([0045]) the light-emitting diodes (FIG. 9, item 400; FIG. 13A, item 400) is applied via the light blocker (FIG. 9, item 318; FIG. 13A, item 318; [0087]). Regarding claim 6. Bibl et al discloses all the limitation of the display apparatus of claim 1 above. Bibl et al further disclose further comprising a light guide (FIG. 9, item 210; [0070]) filled in the concave portions (see FIG. 13A with respect to FIG. 9, item 128). Regarding claim 8. Bibl et al discloses all the limitation of the display apparatus of claim 2 above. Bibl et al further disclose wherein the first pixel (FIG. 9, item 400; FIG. 13A, item 128 with item 400R), the second pixel (FIG. 13A, item 128 with item 400G) and the third pixel (FIG. 13A, item 128 with item 400B) form a unit body (FIG. 13B, item 106) and the unit body (FIG. 13B, item 106) is repeatedly arranged above the substrate (FIG. 13B, item 102). Conclusion Any inquiry concerning this communication or earlier communications from the examiner should be directed to SCOTT E BAUMAN whose telephone number is (469)295-9045. The examiner can normally be reached M-F, 9-5 CST. Examiner interviews are available via telephone, in-person, and video conferencing using a USPTO supplied web-based collaboration tool. To schedule an interview, applicant is encouraged to use the USPTO Automated Interview Request (AIR) at http://www.uspto.gov/interviewpractice. If attempts to reach the examiner by telephone are unsuccessful, the examiner’s supervisor, Joshua Benitez can be reached at 571-270-1435. The fax phone number for the organization where this application or proceeding is assigned is 571-273-8300. Information regarding the status of published or unpublished applications may be obtained from Patent Center. Unpublished application information in Patent Center is available to registered users. To file and manage patent submissions in Patent Center, visit: https://patentcenter.uspto.gov. Visit https://www.uspto.gov/patents/apply/patent-center for more information about Patent Center and https://www.uspto.gov/patents/docx for information about filing in DOCX format. For additional questions, contact the Electronic Business Center (EBC) at 866-217-9197 (toll-free). If you would like assistance from a USPTO Customer Service Representative, call 800-786-9199 (IN USA OR CANADA) or 571-272-1000. /S.E.B./ Examiner, Art Unit 2815 /MONICA D HARRISON/ Primary Examiner, Art Unit 2815
Read full office action

Prosecution Timeline

Aug 04, 2023
Application Filed
May 01, 2026
Non-Final Rejection mailed — §102, §112 (current)

Precedent Cases

Applications granted by this same examiner with similar technology

Patent 12628461
PASSIVATION METHOD FOR A PASSAGE OPENING OF A WAFER
5y 8m to grant Granted May 12, 2026
Patent 12588185
METHOD OF FABRICATING SEMICONDUCTOR MEMORY DEVICE INCLUDING CAPPING LAYER
3y 11m to grant Granted Mar 24, 2026
Patent 12506002
METHOD OF MANUFACTURING SEMICONDUCTOR DEVICE USING PLASMA TO MODIFY SURFACE OF SILICON-CONTAINING FILMS EXPOSED IN TRENCH STRUCTURE, AND RECORDING MEDIUM
8y 9m to grant Granted Dec 23, 2025
Patent 12406946
INTEGRATED CIRCUIT FOR PREVENTION OF CIRCUIT DESIGN THEFT
4y 7m to grant Granted Sep 02, 2025
Patent 12360153
IN-LINE DEVICE ELECTRICAL PROPERTY ESTIMATING METHOD AND TEST STRUCTURE OF THE SAME
2y 8m to grant Granted Jul 15, 2025
Study what changed to get past this examiner. Based on 5 most recent grants.

Strategy Recommendation AI-generated — please review before filing

Get a prosecution strategy drawn from examiner precedents, rejection analysis, and claim mapping.
Typically takes 5-10 seconds — AI-generated, attorney review required before filing

Prosecution Projections

1-2
Expected OA Rounds
46%
Grant Probability
74%
With Interview (+27.6%)
3y 6m (~7m remaining)
Median Time to Grant
Low
PTA Risk
Based on 182 resolved cases by this examiner. Grant probability derived from career allowance rate.

Sign in with your work email

Enter your email to receive a magic link. No password needed.

Personal email addresses (Gmail, Yahoo, etc.) are not accepted.

Free tier: 3 strategy analyses per month