Prosecution Insights
Last updated: August 14, 2026
Application No. 18/231,547

MANUFACTURING METHOD OF DIAMOND COMPOSITE WAFER

Non-Final OA §103
Filed
Aug 08, 2023
Priority
Aug 08, 2022 — provisional 63/395,887
Examiner
ERDEM, FAZLI
Art Unit
2812
Tech Center
2800 — Semiconductors & Electrical Systems
Assignee
Etron Technology Inc.
OA Round
3 (Non-Final)
85%
Grant Probability
Favorable
3-4
OA Rounds
0m
Est. Remaining
99%
With Interview

Examiner Intelligence

Grants 85% — above average
85%
Career Allowance Rate
919 granted / 1077 resolved
+17.3% vs TC avg
Strong +16% interview lift
Without
With
+16.0%
Interview Lift
resolved cases with interview
Typical timeline
2y 5m
Avg Prosecution
32 currently pending
Career history
1100
Total Applications
across all art units

Statute-Specific Performance

§101
0.5%
-39.5% vs TC avg
§103
50.2%
+10.2% vs TC avg
§102
37.9%
-2.1% vs TC avg
§112
7.5%
-32.5% vs TC avg
Black line = Tech Center average estimate • Based on career data from 1077 resolved cases

Office Action

§103
DETAILED ACTION Notice of Pre-AIA or AIA Status The present application, filed on or after March 16, 2013, is being examined under the first inventor to file provisions of the AIA . Continued Examination Under 37 CFR 1.114 A request for continued examination under 37 CFR 1.114, including the fee set forth in 37 CFR 1.17(e), was filed in this application after final rejection. Since this application is eligible for continued examination under 37 CFR 1.114, and the fee set forth in 37 CFR 1.17(e) has been timely paid, the finality of the previous Office action has been withdrawn pursuant to 37 CFR 1.114. Applicant's submission filed on 6/4/2026 has been entered. Claim Rejections - 35 USC § 103 In the event the determination of the status of the application as subject to AIA 35 U.S.C. 102 and 103 (or as subject to pre-AIA 35 U.S.C. 102 and 103) is incorrect, any correction of the statutory basis (i.e., changing from AIA to pre-AIA ) for the rejection will not be considered a new ground of rejection if the prior art relied upon, and the rationale supporting the rejection, would be the same under either status. The following is a quotation of 35 U.S.C. 103 which forms the basis for all obviousness rejections set forth in this Office action: A patent for a claimed invention may not be obtained, notwithstanding that the claimed invention is not identically disclosed as set forth in section 102, if the differences between the claimed invention and the prior art are such that the claimed invention as a whole would have been obvious before the effective filing date of the claimed invention to a person having ordinary skill in the art to which the claimed invention pertains. Patentability shall not be negated by the manner in which the invention was made. Claims 1-14 are rejected under 35 U.S.C. 103 as being unpatentable over Xu et al. (20160233142) in view of Yu (20110278732) Regarding Claim 1, in Figs. 1A-5 and paragraphs 0043, 0076 and 0077, Xu et al. discloses a method to process a diamond composite wafer 2/4/6/16, comprising:(a) forming a plurality of through vias 6 in the diamond composite wafer and a first re-distribution layer 20-1 on a first side of the diamond composite wafer;(b) attaching a temporary carrier to the first re-distribution layer, and forming a second re-distribution layer on a second side of the diamond composite wafer (Figs. 1C and 1D); (c) releasing the temporary carrier to form a circuit containing diamond composite wafer (Figs. 4, 5 6). Xu et al. fails to disclose the newly added limitation of: “then removing a portion of the diamond composite wafer to expose a terminal surface of each of the through vias and then forming a second re-distribution layer on a second side of the diamond composite wafer” However, such limitation is disclosed in Fig. 1, paragraphs 0018, 0029 and 0120 as elements 100/110/122. It would have been obvious to one of having ordinary skill in the art before the effective filing date of the claimed invention to have the required added above limitation in Xu et al. as taught by Yu in order to have RLD/interconnect/UBM structure on both sides of a composite substrate and electrically connect them with the usage of through via. Regarding Claim 2, in Xu et al, the diamond composite wafer comprises a semiconductor substrate with a predetermined diameter and a plurality of diamond blocks 4 on the semiconductor substrate. Regarding Claim 3, in Xu et al, the semiconductor substrate comprises a plurality of semiconductor blocks 10 consolidated into the predetermined diameter. Regarding Claim 4, in Xu et al., forming a plurality of IC circuits in the semiconductor substrate (see paragraph 0077) Regarding Claim 5, in Xu et al, the first re-distribution layer is formed on the semiconductor substrate, and the second re-distribution layer is formed on the plurality of diamond blocks (see paragraphs 0076, 0077, and 0079) Regarding Claim 6, in Xu et al, dicing the circuit containing diamond composite wafer into a plurality of circuit containing composite block, each circuit containing composite block comprising one of the diamond blocks and a semiconductor block diced from the semiconductor substrate (see paragraph 0077(. Regarding Claim 7, in Xu et al, each of the plurality of through vias comprises an electrical via (i.e. metal), an optical via, a thermal via and/or a fluidic via. Regarding Claim 8, in Xu et al, the first re-distribution layer and/or the second re-distribution layer comprises an electrical interconnection or an optical waveguide (see paragraph 0076, 0077 and 0079). Regarding Claim 9, in Figs. 1A-5 of Xu et al, the diamond composite wafer comprises a first semiconductor substrate with a predetermined diameter, a plurality of diamond blocks on the first semiconductor substrate, and a second semiconductor substrate with the predetermined diameter on the first semiconductor substrate. Regarding Claim 10, in paragraphs 0076, 0077 and 0079 of Xu et al, the first re-distribution layer is formed on the first semiconductor substrate, and the second re-distribution layer is formed on the second semiconductor substrate. Regarding Claim 11, in paragraph 0077 of Xu et al, dicing the circuit containing diamond composite wafer into a plurality of circuit containing composite block, each circuit containing composite block comprising one of the diamond blocks, a first semiconductor block diced from the first semiconductor substrate, and a second semiconductor block diced from the second semiconductor substrate. Regarding Claim 12, in Figs. 1A-5 of Xu et al, the diamond composite wafer comprises a plurality of diamond blocks consolidated into a predetermined diameter. Regarding Claim 13, in paragraph 0076, 0077 and 0079 of Xu et al, first re-distribution layer and the second re-distribution layer are formed on different sides of the plurality of diamond blocks consolidated with the predetermined diameter Regarding Claim 14, in paragraph 0077 of Xu et al, dicing the circuit containing diamond composite wafer into a plurality of circuit containing composite block, each circuit containing composite block comprising one of the diamond blocks. Please note that commonly owned Tong 20230154825 discloses thermal enhanced diamond structure semiconductor device and there is not joint ownership statement against Tong at this time. Conclusion Any inquiry concerning this communication or earlier communications from the examiner should be directed to FAZLI ERDEM whose telephone number is (571)272-1914. The examiner can normally be reached M-F, 8am-5pm. Examiner interviews are available via telephone, in-person, and video conferencing using a USPTO supplied web-based collaboration tool. To schedule an interview, applicant is encouraged to use the USPTO Automated Interview Request (AIR) at http://www.uspto.gov/interviewpractice. If attempts to reach the examiner by telephone are unsuccessful, the examiner’s supervisor, Davienne Monbleau can be reached at 571-272-1945. The fax phone number for the organization where this application or proceeding is assigned is 571-273-8300. Information regarding the status of published or unpublished applications may be obtained from Patent Center. Unpublished application information in Patent Center is available to registered users. To file and manage patent submissions in Patent Center, visit: https://patentcenter.uspto.gov. Visit https://www.uspto.gov/patents/apply/patent-center for more information about Patent Center and https://www.uspto.gov/patents/docx for information about filing in DOCX format. For additional questions, contact the Electronic Business Center (EBC) at 866-217-9197 (toll-free). If you would like assistance from a USPTO Customer Service Representative, call 800-786-9199 (IN USA OR CANADA) or 571-272-1000. /FAZLI ERDEM/Primary Examiner, Art Unit 2812 6/6/2026
Read full office action

Prosecution Timeline

Aug 08, 2023
Application Filed
Oct 31, 2025
Non-Final Rejection mailed — §103
Jan 28, 2026
Response Filed
Mar 04, 2026
Final Rejection mailed — §103
Jun 04, 2026
Request for Continued Examination
Jun 05, 2026
Response after Non-Final Action
Jun 10, 2026
Non-Final Rejection mailed — §103 (current)

Precedent Cases

Applications granted by this same examiner with similar technology

Patent 12707688
SEMICONDUCTOR STRUCTURE WITH ROUGHENED SIDEWALL AND METHOD OF MANUFACTURING THEREOF
3y 11m to grant Granted Aug 11, 2026
Patent 12707707
SEMICONDUCTOR DEVICE
2y 11m to grant Granted Aug 11, 2026
Patent 12707687
SEMICONDUCTOR DEVICE
2y 10m to grant Granted Aug 11, 2026
Patent 12699333
MASK PLATE, ALIGNMENT MARK AND PHOTOLITHOGRAPHY SYSTEM
2y 10m to grant Granted Aug 04, 2026
Patent 12701777
SEMICONDUCTOR DEVICE WITH SCHOTTKY CONTACT
2y 10m to grant Granted Aug 04, 2026
Study what changed to get past this examiner. Based on 5 most recent grants.

Strategy Recommendation AI-generated — please review before filing

Get a prosecution strategy drawn from examiner precedents, rejection analysis, and claim mapping.
Typically takes 5-10 seconds — AI-generated, attorney review required before filing

Prosecution Projections

3-4
Expected OA Rounds
85%
Grant Probability
99%
With Interview (+16.0%)
2y 5m (~0m remaining)
Median Time to Grant
High
PTA Risk
Based on 1077 resolved cases by this examiner. Grant probability derived from career allowance rate.

Sign in with your work email

Enter your email to receive a magic link. No password needed.

Personal email addresses (Gmail, Yahoo, etc.) are not accepted.

Free tier: 3 strategy analyses per month