Prosecution Insights
Last updated: April 19, 2026
Application No. 18/232,133

ADHESION IMPROVEMENTS IN METAL-CONTAINING HARDMASKS

Non-Final OA §103
Filed
Aug 09, 2023
Examiner
CHOUDHRY, MOHAMMAD M
Art Unit
2899
Tech Center
2800 — Semiconductors & Electrical Systems
Assignee
Applied Materials, Inc.
OA Round
1 (Non-Final)
82%
Grant Probability
Favorable
1-2
OA Rounds
2y 10m
To Grant
95%
With Interview

Examiner Intelligence

Grants 82% — above average
82%
Career Allow Rate
561 granted / 686 resolved
+13.8% vs TC avg
Moderate +13% lift
Without
With
+13.3%
Interview Lift
resolved cases with interview
Typical timeline
2y 10m
Avg Prosecution
35 currently pending
Career history
721
Total Applications
across all art units

Statute-Specific Performance

§101
0.4%
-39.6% vs TC avg
§103
73.7%
+33.7% vs TC avg
§102
10.7%
-29.3% vs TC avg
§112
4.8%
-35.2% vs TC avg
Black line = Tech Center average estimate • Based on career data from 686 resolved cases

Office Action

§103
Notice of Pre-AIA or AIA Status The present application, filed on or after March 16, 2013, is being examined under the first inventor to file provisions of the AIA . Claim Rejections - 35 USC § 103 In the event the determination of the status of the application as subject to AIA 35 U.S.C. 102 and 103 (or as subject to pre-AIA 35 U.S.C. 102 and 103) is incorrect, any correction of the statutory basis for the rejection will not be considered a new ground of rejection if the prior art relied upon, and the rationale supporting the rejection, would be the same under either status. The following is a quotation of 35 U.S.C. 103 which forms the basis for all obviousness rejections set forth in this Office action: A patent for a claimed invention may not be obtained, notwithstanding that the 20claimed invention is not identically disclosed as set forth in section 102, if the differences between the claimed invention and the prior art are such that the claimed invention as a whole would have been obvious before the effective filing date of the claimed invention to a person having ordinary skill in the art to which the claimed invention pertains. Patentability shall not be negated by the manner in which the invention was made. Claims 1, 3-5, 8-9 and 13-14 are rejected under 35 U.S.C. 103 as being unpatentable over Lee et al. (US 6656831, hereinafter Lee) in view of Papalia et al. (US 2020/0321220, hereinafter Papalia). With respect to claim 1, Lee discloses a semiconductor processing method comprising: providing a treatment precursor (Col. 4; lines 34-38; pretreating the substrate with argon) to a processing region (250) of a semiconductor processing chamber (200 of Fig. 2), wherein a substrate (290) is disposed within the processing region (Fig. 2); contacting a surface of the substrate with the treatment precursor (Col. 4; lines 34-38; pretreating the substrate with argon); providing deposition precursors to the processing region (Col. 3; lines 50-60), wherein the deposition precursors comprise a metal-containing precursor (Col. 2; lines 25-30; Col. 3; lines 50-60; metal precursor gas); forming plasma effluents of the deposition precursors (Col. 2; lines 25-30; PECVD of the metal nitride layer comprises contacting a plasma of a metal precursor gas, a nitrogen-containing gas, and a hydrogen-containing gas with the substrate to form a metal nitride layer. The deposited metal nitride layer is preferably treated with nitrogen plasma to densify the metal nitride film); and contacting the substrate with the plasma effluents of the deposition precursors (Col. 2; lines 25-30; and Col. 4; lines 21-35), wherein the contacting deposits a metal-containing layer on the substrate (Col. 4; lines 25-35; depositing TiN film). Lee does not explicitly disclose that the metal containing layer is a hardmask layer. In an analogous art, Papaplia discloses that the metal containing layer is a hardmask layer (Para 0033; TiN may be used as a hard mask). It would have been obvious to a person of ordinary skill in the art before the effective filing date of the claimed invention to modify Lee’s method/system by having Papalia’s disclosure in order to protect the semiconductor device. With respect to claim 3, Lee discloses forming plasma effluents of the treatment precursor (Col. 4; lines 34-39). With respect to claim 4, Lee discloses wherein the plasma effluents of the treatment precursor are formed at a plasma power of less than or about 1,000 W (Col. 5; lines 32-35; power level 350-1000Watts). With respect to claim 5, Lee discloses prior to providing the deposition precursors, providing a seed layer precursor to the processing region (Col. 6; lines 59-61; seed layer); and contacting the substrate with the seed layer precursor (col. 6; lines 59-60), wherein the contacting deposits a seed layer on the substrate, and wherein the metal-containing hardmask is deposited on the seed layer (Col. 6; lines 59-67). With respect to claim 8, Lee discloses wherein the metal- containing hardmask comprises one or more of chromium, cobalt, hafnium, molybdenum, osmium, ruthenium, rhenium, tantalum, titanium, tungsten, and zirconium (Col. 4; lines 25-35; titanium). With respect to claim 9, Lee discloses semiconductor processing method (Col. 6; lines 7-8) comprising: providing a seed layer precursor (Col. 6; lines 55-61) to a processing region (250 of Fig. 2) of a semiconductor processing chamber (200), wherein a substrate (290) is disposed within the processing region; contacting the substrate with the seed layer precursor (Col. 6; lines 55-61), wherein the contacting deposits a seed layer on the substrate (Col. 6; lines 59-61); providing deposition precursors to the processing region (Col. 3; lines 50-60), wherein the deposition precursors comprise a metal-containing precursor (Col. 2; lines 25-30; Col. 3; lines 50-60; metal precursor gas); forming plasma effluents of the deposition precursors (Col. 2; lines 25-30; PECVD of the metal nitride layer comprises contacting a plasma of a metal precursor gas, a nitrogen-containing gas, and a hydrogen-containing gas with the substrate to form a metal nitride layer. The deposited metal nitride layer is preferably treated with nitrogen plasma to densify the metal nitride film); and contacting the substrate with the plasma effluents of the deposition precursors (Col. 2; lines 25-30; and Col. 4; lines 21-35), wherein the contacting deposits a metal-containing layer on the substrate (Col. 4; lines 25-35; depositing TiN film). Lee does not explicitly disclose that the metal containing layer is a hardmask layer. In an analogous art, Papaplia discloses that the metal containing layer is a hardmask layer (Para 0033; TiN may be used as a hard mask). It would have been obvious to a person of ordinary skill in the art before the effective filing date of the claimed invention to modify Lee’s method/system by having Papalia’s disclosure in order to protect the semiconductor device. With respect to claim 13, Lee does not explicitly disclose wherein the substrate comprises a layer of silicon-containing material or a layer of carbon-containing material. In an analogous art, Papalia discloses wherein the substrate comprises a layer of silicon-containing material or a layer of carbon-containing material (Para 0029; substrate comprises of silicon). It would have been obvious to a person of ordinary skill in the art before the effective filing date of the claimed invention to modify Lee’s method/system by having Papalia’s disclosure in order to provide controllable electrical properties while keeping the cost of the device very low. With respect to claim 14, Lee discloses increasing a flow rate of the metal-containing precursor while contacting the substrate with the plasma effluents of the deposition precursors; increasing a plasma power while contacting the substrate with the plasma effluents of the deposition precursors (Col. 5; lines 5-20; 30-32; 60-67); or both. Claims 2 is rejected under 35 U.S.C. 103 as being unpatentable over Lee/Papalia in view of Jung et al. (US 2021/0104396, hereinafter Jung). With respect to claim 2, Lee/Papalia discloses the semiconductor processing method of claim 1. Lee/Papalia does not explicitly disclose wherein the treatment precursor comprises a hydrogen-containing precursor, a nitrogen-containing precursor, or a hydrogen-and-nitrogen-containing precursor. In an analogous art, Jung discloses wherein the treatment precursor comprises a hydrogen-containing precursor, a nitrogen-containing precursor, or a hydrogen-and-nitrogen-containing precursor (Para 0035; 0042; nitrogen precursor). It would have been obvious to a person of ordinary skill in the art before the effective filing date of the claimed invention to modify Lee/Papalia’s method/system by having Jung’s disclosure in order to remove contaminants form semiconductor devices. Claims 6-7, 10-12 are rejected under 35 U.S.C. 103 as being unpatentable over Lee/Papalia in view of Venkatasubramanian (US 2018/0218902, hereinafter Venkat). With respect to claim 6, Lee/Papalia does not explicitly disclose wherein the seed layer precursor comprises one or more of a boron-containing precursor, a nitrogen-containing precursor, and a silicon-containing precursor. In an analogous art, Venkat discloses wherein the seed layer precursor comprises one or more of a boron-containing precursor, a nitrogen-containing precursor, and a silicon-containing precursor (Para 0011; boron-based precursor gas for seed layer). It would have been obvious to a person of ordinary skill in the art before the effective filing date of the claimed invention to modify Lee/Papalia’s method/system by having Venkat’s disclosure in order to enhance adhesion and improve uniformity of the layers. With respect to claim 10, Lee/Papalia does not explicitly disclose wherein the seed layer consists of boron, nitrogen, oxygen, silicon, or a combination thereof. In an analogous art, Venkat discloses wherein the seed layer consists of boron, nitrogen, oxygen, silicon, or a combination thereof (Para 0011; boron-based gas for seed layer). It would have been obvious to a person of ordinary skill in the art before the effective filing date of the claimed invention to modify Lee/Papalia’s method/system by having Venkat’s disclosure in order to enhance adhesion and improve uniformity of the layers. With respect to claims 7 and 11, Lee/Papalia does not explicitly forming plasma effluents of the seed layer precursor. In an analogous art, Venkat discloses forming plasma effluents of the seed layer precursor (Para 0049-0050 and 0055). It would have been obvious to a person of ordinary skill in the art before the effective filing date of the claimed invention to modify Lee/Papalia’s method/system by having Venkat’s disclosure in order to enhance adhesion and improve uniformity of the layers. With respect to claim 12, Lee/Papalia does not explicitly disclose wherein the plasma effluents of the seed layer precursor are formed at a plasma power of less than or about 2,250 W. In an analogous art, Venkat discloses wherein the plasma effluents of the seed layer precursor are formed at a plasma power of less than or about 2,250 W (para 0064; 1500 Watts). It would have been obvious to a person of ordinary skill in the art before the effective filing date of the claimed invention to modify Lee/Papalia’s method/system by having Venkat’s disclosure in order to enhance adhesion and improve uniformity of the layers. Claims 15-18 and 20 are rejected under 35 U.S.C. 103 as being unpatentable over Lee in view of Roy et al. (US 2017/0207087, hereinafter Roy). With respect to claim 15, Lee discloses a semiconductor processing method comprising: providing deposition precursors (Col. 3; lines 50-60) to a processing region (250 of Fig. 2) of a semiconductor processing chamber (200), wherein a substrate (290) is disposed within the processing region (Fig. 2); wherein the deposition precursors comprise a metal-containing precursor (Col. 2; lines 25-30; Col. 3; lines 50-60; metal precursor gas); forming plasma effluents of the deposition precursors (Col. 2; lines 25-30; PECVD of the metal nitride layer comprises contacting a plasma of a metal precursor gas, a nitrogen-containing gas, and a hydrogen-containing gas with the substrate to form a metal nitride layer. The deposited metal nitride layer is preferably treated with nitrogen plasma to densify the metal nitride film); and contacting the substrate with the plasma effluents of the deposition precursors (Col. 2; lines 25-30; and Col. 4; lines 21-35), wherein the contacting deposits a metal-containing layer on the substrate (Col. 4; lines 25-35; depositing metal film). Lee does not explicitly disclose that the metal containing layer is a hardmask layer; wherein a flow rate of at least one of the deposition precursors, a plasma power, or both are increased during a first amount of deposition of the metal-containing hardmask. In an analogous art, Roy discloses that the metal containing layer is a hardmask layer (Para 0017 and 0019; hardmask), wherein a flow rate of at least one of the deposition precursors, a plasma power, or both are increased during a first amount of deposition of the metal-containing hardmask (Para 0041-0043; and 005; ramped up flow rate). It would have been obvious to a person of ordinary skill in the art before the effective filing date of the claimed invention to modify Lee’s method/system by having Roy’s disclosure in order to protect the semiconductor device. With respect to claim 16, Lee discloses prior to providing the deposition precursors: contacting a surface of the substrate with a treatment precursor (Col. 6; lines 59-67) contacting the surface of the substrate with a seed layer precursor, wherein the contacting deposits a seed layer on the substrate (Col. 6; lines 59-61; seed layer); or both. With respect to claim 17, Lee does not explicitly disclose wherein the first amount of deposition is less than or about 10% of a total deposition duration. In an analogous art, Roy discloses wherein the first amount of deposition is less than or about 10% of a total deposition duration (Para 0041-0043; and 005; ramped up flow rate – gradually increasing the deposition). It would have been obvious to a person of ordinary skill in the art before the effective filing date of the claimed invention to modify Lee’s method/system by having Roy’s disclosure in order to protect the semiconductor device. With respect to claim 18, Lee discloses wherein the metal containing precursor comprises a chromium-containing precursor, a cobalt-containing precursor, a hafnium-containing precursor, a molybdenum-containing precursor, an osmium-containing precursor, a ruthenium-containing precursor, a rhenium-containing precursor, a tantalum- containing precursor, a titanium-containing precursor, a tungsten-containing precursor, or a zirconium-containing precursor (Col. 3; lines 52-56; claim 11). With respect to claim 20, Lee discloses wherein a temperature in the processing region is maintained at less than or about 600 °C (Col. 7; lines 15-22). Claim 19 is rejected under 35 U.S.C. 103 as being unpatentable over Lee/Roy in view of Venkat. With respect to claim 19, Lee/Roy does not explicitly disclose wherein the deposition precursors further comprise one or more of a boron-containing precursor, a nitrogen-containing precursor, and a silicon-containing precursor. In an analogous art, Venkat discloses wherein the deposition precursors further comprise one or more of a boron-containing precursor, a nitrogen-containing precursor, and a silicon-containing precursor (Para 0011; boron-based precursor gas for seed layer). It would have been obvious to a person of ordinary skill in the art before the effective filing date of the claimed invention to modify Lee/Roy’s method/system by having Venkat’s disclosure in order to enhance adhesion and improve uniformity of the layers. Conclusion Any inquiry concerning this communication or earlier communications from the examiner should be directed to MOHAMMAD M CHOUDHRY whose telephone number is (571)270-5716. The examiner can normally be reached Monday - Friday. Examiner interviews are available via telephone, in-person, and video conferencing using a USPTO supplied web-based collaboration tool. To schedule an interview, applicant is encouraged to use the USPTO Automated Interview Request (AIR) at http://www.uspto.gov/interviewpractice. If attempts to reach the examiner by telephone are unsuccessful, the examiner’s supervisor, Fairbanks Brent can be reached at 408-918-7532. The fax phone number for the organization where this application or proceeding is assigned is 571-273-8300. Information regarding the status of published or unpublished applications may be obtained from Patent Center. Unpublished application information in Patent Center is available to registered users. To file and manage patent submissions in Patent Center, visit: https://patentcenter.uspto.gov. Visit https://www.uspto.gov/patents/apply/patent-center for more information about Patent Center and https://www.uspto.gov/patents/docx for information about filing in DOCX format. For additional questions, contact the Electronic Business Center (EBC) at 866-217-9197 (toll-free). If you would like assistance from a USPTO Customer Service Representative, call 800-786-9199 (IN USA OR CANADA) or 571-272-1000. /MOHAMMAD M CHOUDHRY/Primary Examiner, Art Unit 2899
Read full office action

Prosecution Timeline

Aug 09, 2023
Application Filed
Feb 07, 2026
Non-Final Rejection — §103 (current)

Precedent Cases

Applications granted by this same examiner with similar technology

Patent 12604515
SEMICONDUCTOR DEVICE STRUCTURE WITH INNER SPACER LAYER
2y 5m to grant Granted Apr 14, 2026
Patent 12581917
MATCHING PRE-PROCESSING AND POST-PROCESSING SUBSTRATE SAMPLES
2y 5m to grant Granted Mar 17, 2026
Patent 12557366
Semiconductor Device and Method For Manufacturing Semiconductor Device
2y 5m to grant Granted Feb 17, 2026
Patent 12550382
THIN-FILM STORAGE TRANSISTOR WITH FERROELECTRIC STORAGE LAYER
2y 5m to grant Granted Feb 10, 2026
Patent 12550655
METHOD FOR MANUFACTURING SEMICONDUCTOR DEVICE AND SEMICONDUCTOR DEVICE
2y 5m to grant Granted Feb 10, 2026
Study what changed to get past this examiner. Based on 5 most recent grants.

AI Strategy Recommendation

Get an AI-powered prosecution strategy using examiner precedents, rejection analysis, and claim mapping.
Powered by AI — typically takes 5-10 seconds

Prosecution Projections

1-2
Expected OA Rounds
82%
Grant Probability
95%
With Interview (+13.3%)
2y 10m
Median Time to Grant
Low
PTA Risk
Based on 686 resolved cases by this examiner. Grant probability derived from career allow rate.

Sign in with your work email

Enter your email to receive a magic link. No password needed.

Personal email addresses (Gmail, Yahoo, etc.) are not accepted.

Free tier: 3 strategy analyses per month