Prosecution Insights
Last updated: May 29, 2026
Application No. 18/235,126

Vertical Semiconductor Power Device and Method for Manufacturing the Same

Final Rejection §112
Filed
Aug 17, 2023
Priority
Dec 08, 2022 — CN 202211574074.7
Examiner
KHALIFA, MOATAZ
Art Unit
2815
Tech Center
2800 — Semiconductors & Electrical Systems
Assignee
Diodes Incorporated
OA Round
2 (Final)
93%
Grant Probability
Favorable
3-4
OA Rounds
7m
Est. Remaining
90%
With Interview

Examiner Intelligence

Grants 93% — above average
93%
Career Allowance Rate
53 granted / 57 resolved
+25.0% vs TC avg
Minimal -3% lift
Without
With
+-3.4%
Interview Lift
resolved cases with interview
Typical timeline
3y 4m
Avg Prosecution
19 currently pending
Career history
103
Total Applications
across all art units

Statute-Specific Performance

§103
92.2%
+52.2% vs TC avg
§102
2.5%
-37.5% vs TC avg
§112
3.3%
-36.7% vs TC avg
Black line = Tech Center average estimate • Based on career data from 57 resolved cases

Office Action

§112
DETAILED ACTION Notice of Pre-AIA or AIA Status The present application, filed on or after March 16, 2013, is being examined under the first inventor to file provisions of the AIA . Remarks The 02/03/2026 amendments of claims 1-5, 9-10, 23-24, 27-30 and 32-33 have been noted and entered. Response to Arguments Applicant's arguments filed 02/03/2026 regarding the rejection of claims 1-11 and 23-33 under 35 U.S.C. 102 and 35 U.S.C. 103 have been fully considered but they are not persuasive in light of the newly added amendments. The amendments introduced to claims 1 and 23 contain unsupported limitations. Details of the new rejections are shared below. Specification The specification is objected to as failing to provide proper antecedent basis for the claimed subject matter. See 37 CFR 1.75(d)(1) and MPEP § 608.01(o). Correction of the following is required: The specification of the incident application is missing the support for the claimed limitation which are cited in claims 1 and 23: “… and the horizontal connector coupled between the vertical connector and the first gate electrode without overlapping with the gate metal layer.” (emphasis added). Claim Rejections - 35 USC § 112 The following is a quotation of the first paragraph of 35 U.S.C. 112(a): (a) IN GENERAL.—The specification shall contain a written description of the invention, and of the manner and process of making and using it, in such full, clear, concise, and exact terms as to enable any person skilled in the art to which it pertains, or with which it is most nearly connected, to make and use the same, and shall set forth the best mode contemplated by the inventor or joint inventor of carrying out the invention. The following is a quotation of the first paragraph of pre-AIA 35 U.S.C. 112: The specification shall contain a written description of the invention, and of the manner and process of making and using it, in such full, clear, concise, and exact terms as to enable any person skilled in the art to which it pertains, or with which it is most nearly connected, to make and use the same, and shall set forth the best mode contemplated by the inventor of carrying out his invention. Claims 1 and 23 and all their dependent claims (2-11 and 24-31) are rejected under 35 U.S.C. 112(a) or 35 U.S.C. 112 (pre-AIA ), first paragraph, as failing to comply with the written description requirement. The claim(s) contains subject matter which was not described in the specification in such a way as to reasonably convey to one skilled in the relevant art that the inventor or a joint inventor, or for applications subject to pre-AIA 35 U.S.C. 112, the inventor(s), at the time the application was filed, had possession of the claimed invention. Regarding claim 1; claim 1, in the last two lines of the claim, contains the limitations: “…, and the horizontal connector coupled between the vertical connector and the first gate electrode without overlapping with the gate metal layer.” (emphasis added). By examining the specification it is found that such language or any other similar language that might describe such a limitation is absent. Additionally, by examining Fig (1B) as a representative figure for the layout of the device, it appears that there is an overlap between the horizontal connector (Instant application: Fig (1B): 13c1) and the gate metal layer (G) along the horizontal direction identified as (+Y) in annotated copies of Fig (1B) of the instant application which are shared below to help clarify the examiner’s position. PNG media_image1.png 857 1254 media_image1.png Greyscale PNG media_image2.png 741 1152 media_image2.png Greyscale Regarding claim 23; claim 23, in the last three lines of the claim, contains the limitations: “…, and the horizontal connector coupled between the vertical connector and the first gate electrode without overlapping with the gate metal layer.” (emphasis added). By examining the specification it is found that such language or any other similar language that might describe such a limitation is absent. Additionally, by examining Fig (1B) as a representative figure for the layout of the device, it appears that there is an overlap between the horizontal connector (Instant application: Fig (1B): 13c1) and the gate metal layer (G) along the horizontal direction identified as (+Y) in annotated copies of Fig (1B) of the instant application which are shared above to help clarify the examiner’s position.. Allowable Subject Matter Claims 1-11 and 23-31 are objected to for containing unsupported limitations, but would be allowable if rewritten in a form that overcomes the 35 U.S.C. 112(a) rejections detailed above. The following is a statement of reasons for the indication of allowable subject matter: Regarding claim 1; Kikuchi in combination with other available art teaches a vertical semiconductor power device, comprising: a substrate, the substrate comprising: a first surface and a second surface opposite to each other, a doped region close to the second surface, and a first trench extending from the second surface toward the first surface; a first in-trench dielectric layer disposed along an inner surface of the first trench; a first shield electrode, disposed in the first trench and surrounded by the first in-trench dielectric layer; [[and]] a first gate electrode, disposed in the first in-trench dielectric layer and surrounding the first shield electrode, the first gate electrode being surrounded by the first in-trench dielectric layer without adjoining the first shield electrode and the substrate; a gate metal layer, disposed on and in contact with an interlayer dielectric layer that is on the second surface; and a gate electrode connector coupled between the gate metal layer and the first gate electrode, the gate electrode connector comprising a vertical connector and a first horizontal connector, the vertical connector coupled between the gate metal layer and the first horizontal connector. However, Kikuchi alone or in combination with any other available art, does not teach the first horizontal connector coupled between the vertical connector and the first gate electrode without overlapping with the gate metal layer. Claims 2-11 are objected to for their dependence on an objected to but otherwise allowable base claim 1. Regarding claim 23; Kikuchi in combination with other available art teaches a vertical semiconductor power device, comprising: a substrate, comprising a first surface and a second surface opposite to the first surface; a first trench, extending from the second surface of the substrate into the substrate; a first in-trench dielectric layer, disposed along an inner surface of the first trench; a first shield electrode, disposed in the first trench and surrounded by the first in-trench dielectric layer; a first gate electrode, disposed in the first in-trench dielectric layer, surrounding the first shield electrode, and separated from the first shield electrode by the first in-trench dielectric layer; a doped region in the substrate and adjacent to the first trench and the second surface of the substrate; an interlayer dielectric layer disposed on the second surface; a gate metal layer, disposed on and in contact with the interlayer dielectric layer; and a gate electrode connector coupling the gate metal layer and the first gate electrode, the gate electrode connector comprising a vertical connector and a first horizontal connector, the vertical connector coupled between the gate metal layer and the first horizontal connector. However, Kikuchi alone or in combination with any other available art does not teach the first horizontal connector coupled between the vertical connector and the first gate electrode without overlapping with the gate metal layer. Claims 24-31 are objected to for their dependence on an objected to but otherwise allowable base claim 23. Claims 32-33 are allowable over prior art. The following is a statement of reasons for the indication of allowable subject matter: Regarding claim 32; Kikuchi in combination with other available art teaches a vertical semiconductor power device, comprising: a substrate, comprising a first surface and a second surface opposite to the first surface; a first trench, extending from the second surface of the substrate into the substrate; a first in-trench dielectric layer, disposed along an inner surface of the first trench; a first shield electrode, disposed in the first trench and surrounded by the first in-trench dielectric layer; a first gate electrode, disposed in the first in-trench dielectric layer, surrounding the first shield electrode, and separated from the first shield electrode by the first in-trench dielectric layer; a second trench, extending from the second surface of the substrate into the substrate and spaced apart from the first trench; a second in-trench dielectric layer, disposed along an inner surface of the second trench; a second shield electrode, disposed in the second trench and surrounded by the second in- trench dielectric layer; a second gate electrode, disposed in the second in-trench dielectric layer, surrounding the second shield electrode, and separated from the second shield electrode by the second in-trench dielectric layer; a doped region disposed in the substrate between the first trench and the second trench; a source region, disposed in the doped region between the first trench and the second trench; and an interlayer dielectric layer disposed on and covering the second surface of the substrate, the first trench and the second trench; a source metal layer on and in contact with the interlayer dielectric layer and covering the first trench and the second trench; a gate metal layer on and in contact with the interlayer dielectric layer without overlapping with the first trench and the second trench; and a gate electrode connector comprising a vertical connector, a first horizontal connector and a second horizontal connector, the vertical connector coupled between the gate metal layer and the first horizontal connector, the first horizontal connector coupled between the first gate electrode and the vertical connection. However, Kikuchi alone or in combination with any other available art does not teach the second horizontal connector coupled between the first gate electrode and the second gate electrode without overlapping with the gate metal layer. Claim 33 is allowable for its dependence on an allowable claim. Conclusion Applicant's amendment necessitated the new ground(s) of rejection presented in this Office action. Accordingly, THIS ACTION IS MADE FINAL. See MPEP § 706.07(a). Applicant is reminded of the extension of time policy as set forth in 37 CFR 1.136(a). A shortened statutory period for reply to this final action is set to expire THREE MONTHS from the mailing date of this action. In the event a first reply is filed within TWO MONTHS of the mailing date of this final action and the advisory action is not mailed until after the end of the THREE-MONTH shortened statutory period, then the shortened statutory period will expire on the date the advisory action is mailed, and any nonprovisional extension fee (37 CFR 1.17(a)) pursuant to 37 CFR 1.136(a) will be calculated from the mailing date of the advisory action. In no event, however, will the statutory period for reply expire later than SIX MONTHS from the mailing date of this final action. Any inquiry concerning this communication or earlier communications from the examiner should be directed to Moataz Khalifa whose telephone number is (703)756-1770. The examiner can normally be reached Monday - Friday (8:30 am - 5:00). Examiner interviews are available via telephone, in-person, and video conferencing using a USPTO supplied web-based collaboration tool. To schedule an interview, applicant is encouraged to use the USPTO Automated Interview Request (AIR) at http://www.uspto.gov/interviewpractice. If attempts to reach the examiner by telephone are unsuccessful, the examiner’s supervisor, Kretelia Graham can be reached at (571) 272-5055. The fax phone number for the organization where this application or proceeding is assigned is 571-273-8300. Information regarding the status of published or unpublished applications may be obtained from Patent Center. Unpublished application information in Patent Center is available to registered users. To file and manage patent submissions in Patent Center, visit: https://patentcenter.uspto.gov. Visit https://www.uspto.gov/patents/apply/patent-center for more information about Patent Center and https://www.uspto.gov/patents/docx for information about filing in DOCX format. For additional questions, contact the Electronic Business Center (EBC) at 866-217-9197 (toll-free). If you would like assistance from a USPTO Customer Service Representative, call 800-786-9199 (IN USA OR CANADA) or 571-272-1000. /M.K./Examiner, Art Unit 2817 /Kretelia Graham/Supervisory Patent Examiner, Art Unit 2817 April 21, 2026
Read full office action

Prosecution Timeline

Aug 17, 2023
Application Filed
Nov 12, 2025
Non-Final Rejection mailed — §112
Feb 03, 2026
Response Filed
Apr 23, 2026
Final Rejection mailed — §112 (current)

Precedent Cases

Applications granted by this same examiner with similar technology

Patent 12635301
DISPLAY APPARATUS AND METHOD OF MANUFACTURING THE SAME
3y 11m to grant Granted May 19, 2026
Patent 12622099
SEMICONDUCTOR LIGHT EMITTING DEVICE AND LIGHT EMITTING DEVICE PACKAGE INCLUDING THE SAME
4y 6m to grant Granted May 05, 2026
Patent 12615770
SEMICONDUCTOR DEVICE AND METHOD OF FORMING THE SAME
4y 8m to grant Granted Apr 28, 2026
Patent 12610604
CROSS COUPLE DESIGN FOR HIGH DENSITY STANDARD CELLS
3y 10m to grant Granted Apr 21, 2026
Patent 12604572
THIN-FILM LED ARRAY WITH LOW REFRACTIVE INDEX PATTERNED STRUCTURES AND REFLECTOR
3y 5m to grant Granted Apr 14, 2026
Study what changed to get past this examiner. Based on 5 most recent grants.

Strategy Recommendation AI-generated — please review before filing

Get a prosecution strategy drawn from examiner precedents, rejection analysis, and claim mapping.
Typically takes 5-10 seconds — AI-generated, attorney review required before filing

Prosecution Projections

3-4
Expected OA Rounds
93%
Grant Probability
90%
With Interview (-3.4%)
3y 4m (~7m remaining)
Median Time to Grant
Moderate
PTA Risk
Based on 57 resolved cases by this examiner. Grant probability derived from career allowance rate.

Sign in with your work email

Enter your email to receive a magic link. No password needed.

Personal email addresses (Gmail, Yahoo, etc.) are not accepted.

Free tier: 3 strategy analyses per month