Prosecution Insights
Last updated: April 19, 2026
Application No. 18/236,042

METHODS OF ETCHING SILICON-AND-OXYGEN-CONTAINING FEATURES AT LOW TEMPERATURES

Non-Final OA §102§103
Filed
Aug 21, 2023
Examiner
CULBERT, ROBERTS P
Art Unit
1716
Tech Center
1700 — Chemical & Materials Engineering
Assignee
Applied Materials, Inc.
OA Round
1 (Non-Final)
82%
Grant Probability
Favorable
1-2
OA Rounds
2y 5m
To Grant
78%
With Interview

Examiner Intelligence

Grants 82% — above average
82%
Career Allow Rate
659 granted / 809 resolved
+16.5% vs TC avg
Minimal -4% lift
Without
With
+-3.6%
Interview Lift
resolved cases with interview
Typical timeline
2y 5m
Avg Prosecution
20 currently pending
Career history
829
Total Applications
across all art units

Statute-Specific Performance

§101
0.5%
-39.5% vs TC avg
§103
42.6%
+2.6% vs TC avg
§102
35.1%
-4.9% vs TC avg
§112
9.4%
-30.6% vs TC avg
Black line = Tech Center average estimate • Based on career data from 809 resolved cases

Office Action

§102 §103
DETAILED ACTION Notice of Pre-AIA or AIA Status The present application, filed on or after March 16, 2013, is being examined under the first inventor to file provisions of the AIA . Claim Rejections - 35 USC § 102 The following is a quotation of the appropriate paragraphs of 35 U.S.C. 102 that form the basis for the rejections under this section made in this Office action: A person shall be entitled to a patent unless – (a)(1) the claimed invention was patented, described in a printed publication, or in public use, on sale, or otherwise available to the public before the effective filing date of the claimed invention. Claims 1-8, 10, 11 and 18-20 are rejected under 35 U.S.C. 102(a)(1) as being anticipated by US Publication 2020/0263309 to Tanaka et al. Regarding Claim 1, Tanaka et al. teaches a semiconductor processing method comprising: providing a fluorine-containing precursor and a hydrogen-containing precursor (Paragraphs 26, 29 and 65) to a processing region (Fig 5) of a semiconductor processing chamber (1), wherein a substrate (W) is housed in the processing region, and wherein a layer of a silicon-containing material (Paragraph 25) is disposed on the substrate; forming plasma effluents (Paragraphs 4, 12, 23, 28-32, 65-70 and 75) of the fluorine-containing precursor and the hydrogen-containing precursor; and contacting the substrate with the plasma effluents of the fluorine-containing precursor and the hydrogen-containing precursor, wherein the contacting etches a feature in the layer of silicon-containing material, and wherein a substrate support pedestal temperature is maintained (Paragraphs 28 and 31-56) at less than or about -20 °C during the semiconductor processing method. Regarding Claim 2, Tanaka et al. teaches (Paragraphs 26, 29 and 65) the fluorine-containing precursor comprises nitrogen trifluoride (NF₃), carbon tetrafluoride (CF4), hexafluorobutadiene (C4F6), or fluoromethane (CH₃F). Regarding Claim 3, Tanaka et al. teaches (Paragraphs 26, 29 and 65) the hydrogen-containing precursor comprises diatomic hydrogen (H₂). Regarding Claim 4, Tanaka et al. teaches (Paragraphs 4, 12, 25, 42) the silicon-containing material comprises silicon oxide. Regarding Claim 5, Tanaka et al. teaches (Paragraphs 62, 65) the plasma effluents of the fluorine-containing precursor and the hydrogen-containing precursor forms a hydrogen fluoride (HF)-containing plasma. Regarding Claim 6, Tanaka et al. teaches (Paragraph 46) the plasma effluents of the fluorine-containing precursor and the hydrogen-containing precursor are formed at a plasma power of greater than or about 750 W. Regarding Claim 7, Tanaka et al. teaches (Paragraphs 30, 41, 56 and 57) applying a bias power while contacting the substrate with the plasma effluents of the fluorine-containing precursor and the hydrogen-containing precursor. Regarding Claim 8, Tanaka et al. teaches (Paragraphs 30, 41, 56 and 57) the bias power is greater than or about 1,500 W. Regarding Claim 10, Tanaka et al. teaches (Paragraphs 18, 25 and 27) the feature in the layer of oxygen-containing material is characterized by an aspect ratio of greater than or about 5:1. Regarding Claim 11, Tanaka et al. teaches (Paragraphs 28, 31 and 61) the substrate support pedestal temperature is less than or about -60 °C. Regarding Claim 18, Tanaka et al. teaches semiconductor processing method comprising: providing etchant precursors to a processing region (Fig 5) of a semiconductor processing chamber (1), wherein a substrate (W) is housed in the processing region, and wherein a layer of a silicon-containing material is disposed on the substrate (Paragraph 25); forming plasma effluents of the etchant precursors (Paragraphs 4, 12, 23, 28-32, 65-70 and 75), wherein the plasma effluents comprise a hydrogen fluoride (HF)-containing plasma (Paragraphs 62, 65); and contacting the substrate with the hydrogen fluoride (HF)-containing plasma, wherein the contacting etches a feature in the layer of silicon-containing material, and wherein a substrate support pedestal temperature is maintained (Paragraphs 28 and 31-56) at less than or about -40 °C during the semiconductor processing method. Regarding Claim 19, Tanaka et al. teaches (Paragraphs 26, 29 and 65) the etchant precursors comprise one or more of nitrogen trifluoride (NF₃), carbon tetrafluoride (CF4), hexafluorobutadiene (C4F6), and fluoromethane (CH₃F). Regarding Claim 20, Tanaka et al. teaches (Paragraphs 30, 41, 56 and 57) applying a bias power while contacting the substrate with the plasma effluents of the etchant precursors, wherein the bias power is greater than or about 1,250 W. Claim Rejections - 35 USC § 103 The following is a quotation of 35 U.S.C. 103 which forms the basis for all obviousness rejections set forth in this Office action: A patent for a claimed invention may not be obtained, notwithstanding that the claimed invention is not identically disclosed as set forth in section 102, if the differences between the claimed invention and the prior art are such that the claimed invention as a whole would have been obvious before the effective filing date of the claimed invention to a person having ordinary skill in the art to which the claimed invention pertains. Patentability shall not be negated by the manner in which the invention was made. Claims 9 and 12-16 are rejected under 35 U.S.C. 103 as being unpatentable over US Publication 2020/0263309 to Tanaka et al. Regarding Claims 9 and 13, as applied above to Claim 1, Tanaka et al. teaches the method of the invention substantially as claimed, but does not expressly teach the feature in the layer of oxygen-containing material is characterized by a critical dimension of less than or about 30 nm. However, Tanaka et al. teaches (Paragraph 25) high aspect ratio etching for memory devices such as 3D-NAND or DRAM. It would have been obvious to one of ordinary skill in the art before the effective filing date of the claimed invention to perform etching such that the feature in the layer of oxygen-containing material is characterized by a critical dimension of less than or about 30 nm in order to form a reduced dimension memory device with predictable results. Regarding Claim 12, Tanaka et al. teaches the method of the invention substantially as claimed, but does not expressly teach the contacting etches the feature in the layer of oxygen-containing material at an etch rate of greater than or about 100 nm/min. However, Tanaka et al. teaches the etching rate may be optimized with control of result effective variables such as temperature (Figure 2). It would have been obvious to one of ordinary skill in the art before the effective filing date of the claimed invention to an etch rate of greater than or about 100 nm/min with predictable results. Further since the material, etching chemistry and process conditions are the same in Tanaka et al. and the Claimed invention, the same etching rate would reasonably be expected to be achieved or else is the result of essential limitations which have not been claimed. Regarding Claim 14, Tanaka et al. teaches (Paragraphs 62, 65) the plasma effluents of the fluorine-containing precursor and the hydrogen-containing precursor forms a hydrogen fluoride (HF)-containing plasma. Regarding Claim 15, Tanaka et al. teaches (Paragraph 25) the layer of the silicon-and-oxygen-containing material is a layer in a DRAM structure. Regarding Claim 16, Tanaka et al. teaches (Paragraphs 28 and 31-56) a substrate support pedestal temperature is between about -100 °C about -20 °C. Claim 17 is rejected under 35 U.S.C. 103 as being unpatentable over US Publication 2020/0263309 to Tanaka et al. in view of US Publication 2018/0182777 to Cui et al. Regarding Claim 17, Tanaka et al. teaches the method of the invention substantially as claimed, but does not expressly teach a semiconductor processing chamber operating pressure is less than or about 2 Torr. However, pressures about 2 Torr are known in the art to be suitable for plasma etching high aspect ratio features. For example, Cui et al. teaches (Paragraphs 16 and 39) a semiconductor processing chamber operating pressure is less than or about 2 Torr for etching NAND flash memory features in semiconductor dielectric using a fluorine containing chemistry. It would have been obvious to one of ordinary skill in the art before the effective filing date of the claimed invention to provide a semiconductor processing chamber operating pressure is less than or about 2 Torr with predictable results. Conclusion The prior art made of record and not relied upon is considered pertinent to applicant's disclosure. US Publication 2017/0358460 to Tomura et al. teaches an etching process method is provided that includes outputting a first high frequency power of a first frequency from a first high frequency power supply, and outputting a second high frequency power of a second frequency, which is lower than the first high frequency, from a second high frequency power supply in an cryogenic temperature environment where a substrate temperature is controlled to be less than or equal to −35° C.; generating a plasma by adding a hydrocarbon gas containing at least 3 carbon atoms to an etching gas containing carbon, hydrogen, and fluorine; and etching a silicon oxide film or a laminated film made up of laminated layers of silicon-containing films having different compositions using the generated plasma. Any inquiry concerning this communication or earlier communications from the examiner should be directed to Roberts P Culbert whose telephone number is (571)272-1433. The examiner can normally be reached Monday thru Thursday 7:30 AM-6 PM EST. Examiner interviews are available via telephone, in-person, and video conferencing using a USPTO supplied web-based collaboration tool. To schedule an interview, applicant is encouraged to use the USPTO Automated Interview Request (AIR) at http://www.uspto.gov/interviewpractice. If attempts to reach the examiner by telephone are unsuccessful, the examiner’s supervisor, Parviz Hassanzadeh can be reached at 571-272-1435. The fax phone number for the organization where this application or proceeding is assigned is 571-273-8300. Information regarding the status of published or unpublished applications may be obtained from Patent Center. Unpublished application information in Patent Center is available to registered users. To file and manage patent submissions in Patent Center, visit: https://patentcenter.uspto.gov. Visit https://www.uspto.gov/patents/apply/patent-center for more information about Patent Center and https://www.uspto.gov/patents/docx for information about filing in DOCX format. For additional questions, contact the Electronic Business Center (EBC) at 866-217-9197 (toll-free). If you would like assistance from a USPTO Customer Service Representative, call 800-786-9199 (IN USA OR CANADA) or 571-272-1000. /ROBERTS P CULBERT/Primary Examiner, Art Unit 1716
Read full office action

Prosecution Timeline

Aug 21, 2023
Application Filed
Feb 06, 2026
Non-Final Rejection — §102, §103 (current)

Precedent Cases

Applications granted by this same examiner with similar technology

Patent 12598928
APPARATUS AND METHODS FOR SELECTIVELY ETCHING SILICON OXIDE FILMS
2y 5m to grant Granted Apr 07, 2026
Patent 12584039
SLURRY COMPOSITION FOR A CHEMICAL MECHANICAL POLISHING
2y 5m to grant Granted Mar 24, 2026
Patent 12577466
PHOTORESIST DEVELOPMENT WITH ORGANIC VAPOR
2y 5m to grant Granted Mar 17, 2026
Patent 12575352
ETCHING METHOD AND ETCHING APPARATUS
2y 5m to grant Granted Mar 10, 2026
Patent 12575353
METHOD FOR LATERAL ETCH WITH BOTTOM PASSIVATION
2y 5m to grant Granted Mar 10, 2026
Study what changed to get past this examiner. Based on 5 most recent grants.

AI Strategy Recommendation

Get an AI-powered prosecution strategy using examiner precedents, rejection analysis, and claim mapping.
Powered by AI — typically takes 5-10 seconds

Prosecution Projections

1-2
Expected OA Rounds
82%
Grant Probability
78%
With Interview (-3.6%)
2y 5m
Median Time to Grant
Low
PTA Risk
Based on 809 resolved cases by this examiner. Grant probability derived from career allow rate.

Sign in with your work email

Enter your email to receive a magic link. No password needed.

Personal email addresses (Gmail, Yahoo, etc.) are not accepted.

Free tier: 3 strategy analyses per month