Prosecution Insights
Last updated: July 17, 2026
Application No. 18/239,373

COMPOSITION, METHOD FOR MANUFACTURING SEMICONDUCTOR SUBSTRATE, POLYMER, AND METHOD FOR MANUFACTURING POLYMER

Non-Final OA §102
Filed
Aug 29, 2023
Priority
Mar 11, 2021 — JP 2021-039630 +3 more
Examiner
EOFF, ANCA
Art Unit
1722
Tech Center
1700 — Chemical & Materials Engineering
Assignee
JSR Corporation
OA Round
1 (Non-Final)
80%
Grant Probability
Favorable
1-2
OA Rounds
0m
Est. Remaining
91%
With Interview

Examiner Intelligence

Grants 80% — above average
80%
Career Allowance Rate
999 granted / 1249 resolved
+15.0% vs TC avg
Moderate +11% lift
Without
With
+11.1%
Interview Lift
resolved cases with interview
Typical timeline
2y 8m
Avg Prosecution
48 currently pending
Career history
1285
Total Applications
across all art units

Statute-Specific Performance

§101
0.2%
-39.8% vs TC avg
§103
84.4%
+44.4% vs TC avg
§102
7.9%
-32.1% vs TC avg
§112
5.0%
-35.0% vs TC avg
Black line = Tech Center average estimate • Based on career data from 1249 resolved cases

Office Action

§102
DETAILED ACTION The present application, filed on or after March 16, 2013, is being examined under the first inventor to file provisions of the AIA . Claims 1-17 are pending. The foreign priority applications No. 2021-039630 filed on March 11, 2021 in Japan and No. 2021-087365 filed on May 25, 2021 in Japan have been received and are acknowledged. Claim Rejections - 35 USC § 102 The following is a quotation of the appropriate paragraph of 35 U.S.C. 102 that forms the basis for the rejections under this section made in this Office action: A person shall be entitled to a patent unless – (a)(1) the claimed invention was patented, described in a printed publication, or in public use, on sale, or otherwise available to the public before the effective filing date of the claimed invention. Claims 1, 3, 5, 8, 10, 12, and 16 are rejected under 35 U.S.C. 102(a)(1) as being anticipated by Young et al. (CN111458982A, with machine translation made of record by the applicant on July 23, 2025). With regard to claims 1 and 10, Young et al. teach a composition comprising the polymer A-5 and the solvents B-1 and B-2 (Example 5 in Table 1, par.0201), wherein the polymer A-5 is represented by the formula: PNG media_image1.png 184 186 media_image1.png Greyscale (par.0167-0169). The polymer A-5 of Young et al. is a polymer comprising a repeating unit of formula (1) in claims 1 and 10, wherein Ar1 is a divalent group comprising an aromatic group having 16 carbon atoms, R0 is a group of formula (1-1), Ar2 and Ar3 are unsubstituted aromatic rings with 6 carbon atoms that form fused ring with the two adjacent carbon atoms, X1 is represented by the formula (iv), R6 is a monovalent organic group with 2 carbon atoms. The composition in Example 5 of Young et al. anticipates the composition in claim 1, and the polymer A-5 anticipates the polymer in claim 10 of the instant application. With regard to claims 3 and 12, the polymer A-5 meets the limitations for a polymer wherein Ar1 comprises a hydroxy group. With regard to claim 5, Young et al. teach that the composition in Example 5 is used to form a resist underlayer film (par.0148). With regard to claim 8, Young et al. teach that the composition is coated on a substrate to form a resist underlayer, and a photoresist layer is formed on the resist underlayer. The photoresist layer is exposed and developed to form a photoresist pattern, the resist underlayer is etched using the photoresist pattern as a mask (par.0005 and par.0148). With regard to claim 16, Young et al. teach the reaction of N-ethyl-3-carbazole aldehyde with PNG media_image2.png 158 108 media_image2.png Greyscale to obtain the polymer A-5 of formula: PNG media_image1.png 184 186 media_image1.png Greyscale (par.0167-0169). PNG media_image2.png 158 108 media_image2.png Greyscale is a “first compound comprising an aromatic ring having 16 carbon atoms” in claim 16, and N-ethyl-3-carbazole aldehyde is a “second compound of formula (4-1) wherein R0a is a group of formula (1-1), Ar2 and Ar3 are unsubstituted aromatic rings with 6 carbon atoms that form fused ring with the two adjacent carbon atoms, X1 is represented by the formula (iv), R6 is a monovalent organic group with 2 carbon atoms” in claim 16. Therefore, the reaction of Young et al. anticipates the method in claim 16 of the instant application. Claims 1-5, 8-13, 16, and 17 are rejected under 35 U.S.C. 102(a)(1) as being anticipated by Ogihara et al. (US 2012/0108071). With regard to claims 1 and 10, Ogihara et al. teach a polymer obtained from the condensation of a compound of formula: PNG media_image3.png 56 128 media_image3.png Greyscale with a compound of formula: PNG media_image4.png 54 104 media_image4.png Greyscale and paraformaldehyde (Polymer 3 in Table 1, par.0142). The Polymer 3 is represented by the formula: PNG media_image5.png 122 228 media_image5.png Greyscale (Table 2 in par.0142). The condensation of PNG media_image3.png 56 128 media_image3.png Greyscale with PNG media_image4.png 54 104 media_image4.png Greyscale leads to a repeating unit of formula (1) in claims 1 and 10, wherein Ar1 is a divalent group comprising an aromatic group and having 10 carbon atoms, R0 is represented by the formula (1-2), Ar4 is an unsubstituted aromatic ring having 6 carbon atoms that formed a fused ring structure together with two adjacent carbon atoms, X2 is represented by the formula (i), R1 and R2 are hydrogen atoms (see par.0056 of the specification of the instant application). Ogihara et al. further teach a composition comprising Polymer 3 and a solvent (par.0143 and SOL-3 in Table 3, par.0144). The composition anticipates the composition in claim 1, and the Polymer 3 anticipates the polymer in claim 10 of the instant application. With regard to claims 2 and 11, Polymer 3 meets the limitations for a polymer wherein Ar1 includes a naphthalene ring. With regard to claims 3 and 12, the Polymer 3 meets the limitations for a polymer wherein Ar1 comprises a hydroxy group. With regard to claims 4 and 13, the condensation of PNG media_image3.png 56 128 media_image3.png Greyscale with paraformaldehyde leads a repeating unit of formula (3), wherein Ar5 is a divalent group comprising an aromatic group and having 10 carbon atoms and R1 is a hydrogen atom (see par.0056 of the specification of the instant application). With regard to claim 5, Ogihara et al. teach that the composition SOL-3 is used to form a resist underlayer film UDL-3(par.0150). With regard to claims 8 and 9, Ogihara et al. teach a process comprising the steps of: -applying the resist underlayer film composition (UDL-3) onto a Si wafer substrate and baking for obtain a resist underlayer film; -applying a resist intermediate film composition containing a silicon atom (SOG-1) onto the resist underlayer film and baking to form a resist intermediate film; -applying a resist upper layer composition onto the resist intermediate film and baking to form a resist upper layer film (par.0150); -exposing and developing the resist upper layer film to form a pattern (par.0152); and -etching the resist underlayer film using the pattern as a mask (par.0153). With regard to claim 16, Ogihara et al. teach that PNG media_image6.png 68 120 media_image6.png Greyscale reacts with PNG media_image7.png 46 120 media_image7.png Greyscale to form a polymer of formula: PNG media_image8.png 116 176 media_image8.png Greyscale (Polymer 4 in Tables 1 and 2, par.0142). PNG media_image6.png 68 120 media_image6.png Greyscale is a “first compound comprising an aromatic ring having 10 carbon atoms”, and PNG media_image7.png 46 120 media_image7.png Greyscale is a “second compound of formula (4-1) wherein R0a is a group of formula (1-2), Ar4 is an unsubstituted aromatic ring with 6 carbon atoms that form fused ring with the two adjacent carbon atoms, X1 is represented by the formula (i), R1 and R2 are hydrogen atoms”. Therefore, the reaction of Ogihara et al. anticipates the method in claim 16. With regard to claim 17, PNG media_image6.png 68 120 media_image6.png Greyscale comprises a naphthalene ring. Allowable Subject Matter Claims 6, 7, 14, and 15 are objected to as being dependent upon a rejected base claim, but would be allowable if rewritten in independent form including all of the limitations of the base claim and any intervening claims. Young et al. (CN111458982A) and Ogihara et al. (US 2012/0108071) fail to teach the compositions in claims 6 and 7, and polymers in claims 14 and 15. There are no prior art teachings that would motivate one of ordinary skill to modify Young et al. or Ogihara et al. and obtain the compositions in claims 6 and 7, and polymers in claims 14 and 15 of the instant application. Conclusion Any inquiry concerning this communication or earlier communications from the examiner should be directed to ANCA EOFF whose telephone number is (571)272-9810. The examiner can normally be reached Mon-Fri 10am-6:30pm. Examiner interviews are available via telephone, in-person, and video conferencing using a USPTO supplied web-based collaboration tool. To schedule an interview, applicant is encouraged to use the USPTO Automated Interview Request (AIR) at http://www.uspto.gov/interviewpractice. If attempts to reach the examiner by telephone are unsuccessful, the examiner’s supervisor, Niki Bakhtiari can be reached at (571)272-3433. The fax phone number for the organization where this application or proceeding is assigned is 571-273-8300. Information regarding the status of published or unpublished applications may be obtained from Patent Center. Unpublished application information in Patent Center is available to registered users. To file and manage patent submissions in Patent Center, visit: https://patentcenter.uspto.gov. Visit https://www.uspto.gov/patents/apply/patent-center for more information about Patent Center and https://www.uspto.gov/patents/docx for information about filing in DOCX format. For additional questions, contact the Electronic Business Center (EBC) at 866-217-9197 (toll-free). If you would like assistance from a USPTO Customer Service Representative, call 800-786-9199 (IN USA OR CANADA) or 571-272-1000. /ANCA EOFF/Primary Examiner, Art Unit 1722
Read full office action

Prosecution Timeline

Aug 29, 2023
Application Filed
Jun 22, 2026
Non-Final Rejection mailed — §102 (current)

Precedent Cases

Applications granted by this same examiner with similar technology

Patent 12683144
ELECTRODE FOR SECONDARY BATTERY AND MANUFACTURING METHOD THEREOF
1y 6m to grant Granted Jul 14, 2026
Patent 12658462
Hydrogen fuel cell power source with metal bipolar plates
8y 7m to grant Granted Jun 16, 2026
Patent 12655111
Novel Phenazine-Based Compounds
3y 10m to grant Granted Jun 16, 2026
Patent 12651780
BATTERY USING LAYERED DOUBLE HYDROXIDE-LIKE COMPOUND
3y 3m to grant Granted Jun 09, 2026
Patent 12646733
HYDROGEN FUEL CELL POWER SOURCE WITH METAL BIPOLAR PLATES
3y 7m to grant Granted Jun 02, 2026
Study what changed to get past this examiner. Based on 5 most recent grants.

Strategy Recommendation AI-generated — please review before filing

Get a prosecution strategy drawn from examiner precedents, rejection analysis, and claim mapping.
Typically takes 5-10 seconds — AI-generated, attorney review required before filing

Prosecution Projections

1-2
Expected OA Rounds
80%
Grant Probability
91%
With Interview (+11.1%)
2y 8m (~0m remaining)
Median Time to Grant
Low
PTA Risk
Based on 1249 resolved cases by this examiner. Grant probability derived from career allowance rate.

Sign in with your work email

Enter your email to receive a magic link. No password needed.

Personal email addresses (Gmail, Yahoo, etc.) are not accepted.

Free tier: 3 strategy analyses per month