Prosecution Insights
Last updated: October 02, 2026
Application No. 18/274,698

CRISPR-ASSOCIATED TRANSPOSON SYSTEMS AND METHODS OF USING SAME

Non-Final OA §102§103
Filed
Jul 27, 2023
Priority
Jan 28, 2021 — provisional 63/142,979 +1 more
Examiner
LIPPOLIS, ALEXANDRA ROSE
Art Unit
1637
Tech Center
1600 — Biotechnology & Organic Chemistry
Assignee
Arbor Biotechnologies Inc.
OA Round
1 (Non-Final)
47%
Grant Probability
Moderate
1-2
OA Rounds
8m
Est. Remaining
99%
With Interview

Examiner Intelligence

Grants 47% of resolved cases
47%
Career Allowance Rate
15 granted / 32 resolved
-13.1% vs TC avg
Strong +59% interview lift
Without
With
+59.0%
Interview Lift
resolved cases with interview
Typical timeline
3y 11m
Avg Prosecution
56 currently pending
Career history
95
Total Applications
across all art units

Statute-Specific Performance

§101
5.7%
-34.3% vs TC avg
§103
42.9%
+2.9% vs TC avg
§102
18.4%
-21.6% vs TC avg
§112
26.4%
-13.6% vs TC avg
Black line = Tech Center average estimate • Based on career data from 32 resolved cases

Office Action

§102 §103
DETAILED ACTION Notice of Pre-AIA or AIA Status The present application, filed on or after March 16, 2013, is being examined under the first inventor to file provisions of the AIA . Priority Acknowledgment is made of applicant’s claim for priority based on a provisional application filed as 63/142,979 on 01/28/2021. All claims are given the priority date of 01/28/2021. Application Status Receipt is acknowledged of amendment, filed 06/15/2026. Claims 1, 6, 12, 17, 20, 21, 24, 25, 27-29, 34, 36, 37, 41, 42, 44 and 47-49 are currently pending. Election/Restriction Applicant’s election without traverse of Group I, drawn to claims 1, 6, 12, 17, 20, 21, 24, 25, 27-29, 34 and 47-49 in the reply filed on 06/15/2026 is acknowledged. Claims 36, 37, 41, 42 and 44 are withdrawn from further consideration pursuant to 37 CFR 1.142(b) as being drawn to a nonelected invention, there being no allowable generic or linking claim. Election was made without traverse in the reply filed on 06/15/2026. Claims 1, 6, 12, 17, 20, 21, 24, 25, 27-29, 34 and 47-49 are currently under examination. Information Disclosure Statement Receipt of acknowledgment of the information disclosure statements filed on 10/27/2023 and 08/07/2024 have been received and all references have been considered. Claim Rejections - 35 USC § 102 In the event the determination of the status of the application as subject to AIA 35 U.S.C. 102 and 103 (or as subject to pre-AIA 35 U.S.C. 102 and 103) is incorrect, any correction of the statutory basis (i.e., changing from AIA to pre-AIA ) for the rejection will not be considered a new ground of rejection if the prior art relied upon, and the rationale supporting the rejection, would be the same under either status. The following is a quotation of the appropriate paragraphs of 35 U.S.C. 102 that form the basis for the rejections under this section made in this Office action: A person shall be entitled to a patent unless – (a)(1) the claimed invention was patented, described in a printed publication, or in public use, on sale, or otherwise available to the public before the effective filing date of the claimed invention. (a)(2) the claimed invention was described in a patent issued under section 151, or in an application for patent published or deemed published under section 122(b), in which the patent or application, as the case may be, names another inventor and was effectively filed before the effective filing date of the claimed invention. Claims 1, 6, 12, 17, 20, 21, 24, 25, 27-29 and 47-49 are rejected under 35 U.S.C. 102(a)(1)/(a)(2) as being anticipated by Doudna et al (WO 2021/155020 A2; with priority to 62/968,644 with a date of 01/31/2020) as evidenced by Zhang et al (WO 2020/236972 A2). Regarding claims 1, 6 and 12, the claim is interpreted that “an amino acid sequence” means two or more consecutive amino acids and not the entirety of the sequence. Doudna teaches a transposon system comprising: i) a nucleotide sequence encoding polypeptides that form a CRISPR-associated transposase complex; ii) a nucleotide sequence encoding a guide RNA: and iii) a transposon, or an insertion site for a transposon, flanked by CAST complex recognition sites (Page 1, Abstract; Page 65, Fig. 1 and Page 100, Fig. 10B). Doudna teaches the RNA-guided CRISPR-Cas transposase wherein the gRNA complexes with the Cas protein [0006-0007, 00219 and 00264]. Doudna teaches that the transposon encodes TnsB, TnsC and TniQ proteins within the vector (Page 100, Figure 10B). Doudna teaches the Cas protein is a Cas12k as identified in SEQ ID NO: 24 which is 100% identical to two or more consecutive amino acids of instant SEQ ID NO: 1 (Page 74, Figure 6F and See Appendix I). Doudna teaches the guide RNA is a dual-molecule guide RNA referred to as sgRNA comprising the crRNA and the tracrRNA within a single molecule RNA [0093-0095]. Zhang is only cited to show that TniA is also known as TnsB, TniB is also known as TnsC and TniQ is also known as TnsD; and therefore, in certain embodiments these Tn5053 transposase subunits may be referred to as TnsB, TnsC, and TnsD [0626]. Regarding claim 17, the claim is interpreted that “a nucleotide sequence” means two or more consecutive nucleotides and not the entirety of the sequence. Doudna teaches the guide RNA is a dual-molecule guide RNA referred to as sgRNA comprising the crRNA and the tracrRNA within a single molecule RNA wherein the sequence of SEQ ID NO: 6 is 100% identical to two or more consecutive nucleotides of instant SEQ ID NO: 5 (See Appendix II; [0093-0095]). Regarding claims 20 and 21, Doudna teaches an all-in-one conjugate vector additionally comprising a donor polynucleotide comprising a payload sequence for insertion, such as gentamicin resistance gene (GmR) cassette flanked by the transposon left end and transposon right end (Page 100, Fig. 10B). Doudna teaches the guide sequence has complementarity with (hybridizes to) a target sequence of the target DNA and wherein the ShCasTn gRNAs used 23 nt spacers and a 5'-GTT Cas 12k PAM [0090 and 00226]. Regarding claims 24 and 25, the claim is interpreted that “a nucleotide sequence” means two or more consecutive nucleotides and not the entirety of the sequence. Doudna teaches the transposon or the insertion site for a transposon is flanked by recognition sites (nucleotide sequences) that are bound by and cleaved by a CAST complex wherein the recognition sites are referred to as “left end” and “right end” [0084]. Doudna teaches the ShCasT left end recognition site as SEQ ID NO: 3 which is 100% identical to two or more consecutive nucleotides of instant SEQ ID NO: 6 (See Appendix III; [0086]). Doudna teaches the ShCasT right end recognition site as SEQ ID NO: 4 which is 100% identical to two or more consecutive nucleotides of instant SEQ ID NO: 7 (See Appendix IV; [0086]). Regarding clams 27-29, the claim is interpreted that “a nucleotide sequence” and/or “an amino acid sequence” means two or more consecutive amino acids/nucleotides and not the entirety of the sequence. Doudna teaches a transposon system comprising: i) a nucleotide sequence encoding polypeptides that form a CRISPR-associated transposase complex; ii) a nucleotide sequence encoding a guide RNA: and iii) a transposon, or an insertion site for a transposon, flanked by CAST complex recognition sites (Page 1, Abstract; Page 65, Fig. 1 and Page 100, Fig. 10B). Doudna teaches the RNA-guided CRISPR-Cas transposase wherein the gRNA complexes with the Cas protein [0006-0007, 00219 and 00264]. Doudna teaches the Cas protein is a Cas12k as identified in SEQ ID NO: 24 which is 100% identical to two or more consecutive amino acids of instant SEQ ID NO: 1 (Page 74, Figure 6F and See Appendix I). Doudna teaches the guide sequence has complementarity with (hybridizes to) a target sequence of the target DNA and wherein the ShCasTn gRNAs used 23 nt spacers and a 5' -GTT Cas 12k PAM [0090 and 00226]. Doudna teaches the guide RNA is a dual-molecule guide RNA referred to as sgRNA comprising the crRNA and the tracrRNA within a single molecule RNA wherein the sequence of SEQ ID NO: 6 is 100% identical to two or more consecutive nucleotides of instant SEQ ID NO: 5 (See Appendix II; [0093-0095]). Doudna teaches the transposon or the insertion site for a transposon is flanked by recognition sites (nucleotide sequences) that are bound by and cleaved by a CAST complex wherein the recognition sites are referred to as “left end” and “right end” [0084]. Doudna teaches the ShCasT left end recognition site as SEQ ID NO: 3 which is 100% identical to two or more consecutive nucleotides of instant SEQ ID NO: 6 (See Appendix III; [0086]). Doudna teaches the ShCasT right end recognition site as SEQ ID NO: 4 which is 100% identical to two or more consecutive nucleotides of instant SEQ ID NO: 7 (See Appendix IV; [0086]). Doudna teaches that the transposon encodes TnsB, TnsC and TniQ proteins within the vector (Page 100, Figure 10B). Zhang is only cited to show that TniA is also known as TnsB, TniB is also known as TnsC and TniQ is also known as TnsD; and therefore, in certain embodiments these Tn5053 transposase subunits may be referred to as TnsB, TnsC, and TnsD [0626]. Doudna teaches the TnsB sequence as SEQ ID NO: 21 which is 100% identical to two or more consecutive amino acids of instant SEQ ID NO: 2; the TnsC sequence as SEQ ID NO: 29 which is 100% identical to two or more consecutive amino acids of instant SEQ ID NO: 3; and the TniQ sequence as SEQ ID NO: 11 which is 100% identical to two or more consecutive amino acids of instant SEQ ID NO: 4 (Page 69, Fig. 4D; Page 73, Fig. 6C and Page 77, Fig. 6K; and See Appendix V-VII, respectively). Regarding claims 47-49, Doudna teaches the all-in-one conjugate vector comprises a transposon system comprising: i) a nucleotide sequence encoding polypeptides that form a CRISPR-associated transposase complex; ii) a nucleotide sequence encoding a guide RNA: and iii) a transposon, or an insertion site for a transposon, flanked by CAST complex recognition sites additionally comprising a donor polynucleotide comprising a payload sequence for insertion, such as gentamicin resistance gene (GmR) cassette flanked by the transposon left end and transposon right end were further delivered to E. coli cells [00248]. Claim Rejections - 35 USC § 103 In the event the determination of the status of the application as subject to AIA 35 U.S.C. 102 and 103 (or as subject to pre-AIA 35 U.S.C. 102 and 103) is incorrect, any correction of the statutory basis (i.e., changing from AIA to pre-AIA ) for the rejection will not be considered a new ground of rejection if the prior art relied upon, and the rationale supporting the rejection, would be the same under either status. The following is a quotation of 35 U.S.C. 103 which forms the basis for all obviousness rejections set forth in this Office action: A patent for a claimed invention may not be obtained, notwithstanding that the claimed invention is not identically disclosed as set forth in section 102, if the differences between the claimed invention and the prior art are such that the claimed invention as a whole would have been obvious before the effective filing date of the claimed invention to a person having ordinary skill in the art to which the claimed invention pertains. Patentability shall not be negated by the manner in which the invention was made. The factual inquiries for establishing a background for determining obviousness under 35 U.S.C. 103 are summarized as follows: 1. Determining the scope and contents of the prior art. 2. Ascertaining the differences between the prior art and the claims at issue. 3. Resolving the level of ordinary skill in the pertinent art. 4. Considering objective evidence present in the application indicating obviousness or nonobviousness. Claim 34 is rejected under 35 U.S.C. 103 as being unpatentable over Doudna et al (WO 2021/155020 A2; with priority to 62/968,644 with a date of 01/31/2020) as evidenced by Zhang et al (WO 2020/236972 A2) in view of Sternberg et al (US 2020/0283769 Al). The teachings of Doudna are as described and applied as above. Regarding claim 34, Doudna does not teach that any of the protein used are purified proteins. Sternberg teaches a DNA segment encoding the present protein(s) is contained in a plasmid vector that allows expression of the protein(s) and subsequent isolation and purification of the protein produced by the recombinant vector and accordingly, the proteins disclosed herein can be purified following expression from the native transposon, obtained by chemical synthesis, or obtained by recombinant methods [0332]. Sternberg teaches all the transposon proteins (TniA, TniB and TniQ) are recombinantly expressed and purified individually, and RNA-guided DNA integration is later reconstituted by mixing the proteins in vitro together with gRNA [0719]. It would have been obvious to one of ordinary skill in the art before the effective filing date of the claimed invention to substitute the TniA protein, TniB protein and TniQ protein of Doudna to include the purified TniA, TniB and TniQ proteins as taught by Sternberg because Doudna teaches it is within the ordinary skill in the art to use the transposon encodes TnsB, TnsC and TniQ proteins within the transposon system comprising: i) a nucleotide sequence encoding polypeptides that form a CRISPR-associated transposase complex; ii) a nucleotide sequence encoding a guide RNA: and iii) a transposon, or an insertion site for a transposon, flanked by CAST complex recognition sites and Sternberg teaches the TniA, TniB and TniQ proteins were purified proteins used in a transposon system in conjugation with a Cas protein and sgRNA. One would have been motivated to make such a substitution in order to receive the expected benefit of the purified proteins from the native transposon system as taught by Sternberg. Conclusion No claims are allowed. Any inquiry concerning this communication or earlier communications from the examiner should be directed to ALEXANDRA ROSE LIPPOLIS whose telephone number is (703)756-5450. The examiner can normally be reached Monday-Friday, 8:00am to 5:00pm EST. Examiner interviews are available via telephone, in-person, and video conferencing using a USPTO supplied web-based collaboration tool. To schedule an interview, applicant is encouraged to use the USPTO Automated Interview Request (AIR) at http://www.uspto.gov/interviewpractice. If attempts to reach the examiner by telephone are unsuccessful, the examiner’s supervisor, JENNIFER A DUNSTON can be reached at (571) 272-2916. The fax phone number for the organization where this application or proceeding is assigned is 571-273-8300. Information regarding the status of published or unpublished applications may be obtained from Patent Center. Unpublished application information in Patent Center is available to registered users. To file and manage patent submissions in Patent Center, visit: https://patentcenter.uspto.gov. Visit https://www.uspto.gov/patents/apply/patent-center for more information about Patent Center and https://www.uspto.gov/patents/docx for information about filing in DOCX format. For additional questions, contact the Electronic Business Center (EBC) at 866-217-9197 (toll-free). If you would like assistance from a USPTO Customer Service Representative, call 800-786-9199 (IN USA OR CANADA) or 571-272-1000. /ALEXANDRA ROSE LIPPOLIS/Examiner, Art Unit 1637 /CELINE X QIAN/Primary Examiner, Art Unit 1637
Read full office action

Prosecution Timeline

Jul 27, 2023
Application Filed
Sep 04, 2026
Non-Final Rejection mailed — §102, §103 (current)

Precedent Cases

Applications granted by this same examiner with similar technology

Patent 12746294
AAV DELIVERY OF NUCLEOBASE EDITORS
4y 10m to grant Granted Sep 29, 2026
Patent 12736531
METHOD FOR DETECTING VIRUS USING SSDNA FUNCTIONALIZED SENSOR
4y 4m to grant Granted Sep 15, 2026
Patent 12692500
Aptamers and use thereof
4y 11m to grant Granted Jul 28, 2026
Patent 12599637
A GENETICALLY MODIFIED LACTOBACILLUS AND USES THEREOF
4y 8m to grant Granted Apr 14, 2026
Patent 12600958
METHODS AND COMPOSITIONS FOR MANUFACTURING POLYNUCLEOTIDES
4y 4m to grant Granted Apr 14, 2026
Study what changed to get past this examiner. Based on 5 most recent grants.

Strategy Recommendation AI-generated — please review before filing

Get a prosecution strategy drawn from examiner precedents, rejection analysis, and claim mapping.
Typically takes 5-10 seconds — AI-generated, attorney review required before filing

Prosecution Projections

1-2
Expected OA Rounds
47%
Grant Probability
99%
With Interview (+59.0%)
3y 11m (~8m remaining)
Median Time to Grant
Low
PTA Risk
Based on 32 resolved cases by this examiner. Grant probability derived from career allowance rate.

Sign in with your work email

Enter your email to receive a magic link. No password needed.

Personal email addresses (Gmail, Yahoo, etc.) are not accepted.

Free tier: 3 strategy analyses per month