Prosecution Insights
Last updated: July 17, 2026
Application No. 18/295,465

ORGANIC LIGHT-EMITTING DISPLAY APPARATUS AND METHOD OF MANUFACTURING THE SAME

Final Rejection §103
Filed
Apr 04, 2023
Priority
Apr 05, 2022 — RE 10-2022-0042522
Examiner
LEBENTRITT, MICHAEL
Art Unit
2893
Tech Center
2800 — Semiconductors & Electrical Systems
Assignee
Samsung Display Co., Ltd.
OA Round
2 (Final)
92%
Grant Probability
Favorable
3-4
OA Rounds
0m
Est. Remaining
98%
With Interview

Examiner Intelligence

Grants 92% — above average
92%
Career Allowance Rate
924 granted / 1002 resolved
+24.2% vs TC avg
Moderate +6% lift
Without
With
+6.2%
Interview Lift
resolved cases with interview
Typical timeline
2y 3m
Avg Prosecution
19 currently pending
Career history
1026
Total Applications
across all art units

Statute-Specific Performance

§101
4.1%
-35.9% vs TC avg
§103
60.4%
+20.4% vs TC avg
§102
13.3%
-26.7% vs TC avg
§112
1.4%
-38.6% vs TC avg
Black line = Tech Center average estimate • Based on career data from 1002 resolved cases

Office Action

§103
Notice of Pre-AIA or AIA Status The present application, filed on or after March 16, 2013, is being examined under the first inventor to file provisions of the AIA . Information Disclosure Statement The information disclosure statement (IDS) submitted on 12/17/2025 was filed after the mailing date of the first action on the merits. The submission is in compliance with the provisions of 37 CFR 1.97. Accordingly, the information disclosure statement is being considered by the examiner. Claim Rejections - 35 USC § 103 The following is a quotation of 35 U.S.C. 103 which forms the basis for all obviousness rejections set forth in this Office action: A patent for a claimed invention may not be obtained, notwithstanding that the claimed invention is not identically disclosed as set forth in section 102, if the differences between the claimed invention and the prior art are such that the claimed invention as a whole would have been obvious before the effective filing date of the claimed invention to a person having ordinary skill in the art to which the claimed invention pertains. Patentability shall not be negated by the manner in which the invention was made. Claim(s) 1-6, and 9-20 is/are rejected under 35 U.S.C. 103 as being unpatentable over Noh et al, US 20170125719 A1 and further in view of MASUI; Kensuke, US 20100301315 A1. Noh teaches: a pixel electrode (p) above a substrate (105); an insulating layer (120) covering an edge of the pixel electrode and including an opening exposing a central portion of the pixel electrode; (figure 2) a first functional layer (130) disposed on the pixel electrode exposed by the opening and including a convex upper surface; (para 56) a second functional layer (140) disposed on the first functional layer and including a planarized upper surface; (para 59 and 60) an organic emission layer (160) disposed on the second functional layer; and an opposite electrode (190) disposed on the organic emission layer. Noh fails to teach: wherein a molecular weight of the first functional layer is greater than a molecular weight of the second functional layer. Masui teaches: [0059] The hole-injection layer and the hole-transport layer each have a function of receiving holes from the anode or the anode side and transporting to the cathode side. The hole-injection layer and the hole-transport layer may be of a monolayer structure, or a laminate structure containing a plurality of layers each formed of identical or different compositions. [0060] The hole-injection material or hole-transport material used for these layers may be a low-molecular-weight compound or a high-molecular-weight compound. [0061] The hole-injection material or the hole-transport material may be suitably selected depending on the intended purpose without any restriction. Examples thereof include pyrrole derivatives, carbazole derivatives, triazole derivatives, oxazole derivatives, oxadiazole derivatives, imidazole derivatives, polyarylalkane derivatives, pyrazoline derivatives, pyrazolone derivatives, phenylenediamine derivatives, arylamine derivatives, amino-substituted chalcone derivatives, styrylanthracene derivatives, fluorenone derivatives, hydrazone derivatives, stilbene derivatives, silazane derivatives, aromatic tertiary amine compounds, styrylamine compounds, aromatic dimethylidine compounds, phthalocyanine compounds, porphyrin compounds, thiophene derivatives, organosilane derivatives and carbon. These may be used independently or in combination. Therefore, it would have been obvious to one of ordinary skill in the art before the effective filing date of the claimed invention, to combine the teachings of Masui, with the primary reference of Noh, because [t]he hole-injection layer and the hole-transport layer may be of a monolayer structure, or a laminate structure containing a plurality of layers each formed of identical or different compositions. Masui para 59 Noh further teaches: 2. The organic light-emitting display apparatus of claim 1, wherein the first functional layer includes a hole injection function. (para 56) 3. The organic light-emitting display apparatus of claim 1, wherein the second functional layer includes a hole injection function. (para 59 and 60) 4. The organic light-emitting display apparatus of claim 1, wherein the first functional layer and the second functional layer comprise a curable material. (para 57) 5. The organic light-emitting display apparatus of claim 1, wherein a bottom surface of the second functional layer is concave. (figure 6) 6. The organic light-emitting display apparatus of claim 5, wherein a thickness of the second functional layer is least at a center thereof and gradually increases toward the insulating layer. (figure 6) (para 92) 9. The organic light-emitting display apparatus of claim 1, wherein the first functional layer and the second functional layer comprise a same material as each other or different materials from each other. (para 57) 10. A method of manufacturing an organic light-emitting display apparatus, the method comprising: forming a pixel electrode (p) above a substrate (105); forming an insulating layer (120) covering an edge of the pixel electrode and including an opening exposing a central portion of the pixel electrode; forming a first functional layer (130) on the pixel electrode exposed by the opening, the first functional layer including a convex upper surface; (para 56) Figure 2 forming a second functional layer (140) on the first functional layer, the second functional layer including a planarized upper surface; Para 59,60 Figure 2 forming an organic emission layer (160) on the second functional layer; and forming an opposite electrode (190) on the organic emission layer. Noh fails to teach: wherein a molecular weight of the first functional layer is greater than a molecular weight of the second functional layer. Masui teaches: [0059] The hole-injection layer and the hole-transport layer each have a function of receiving holes from the anode or the anode side and transporting to the cathode side. The hole-injection layer and the hole-transport layer may be of a monolayer structure, or a laminate structure containing a plurality of layers each formed of identical or different compositions. [0060] The hole-injection material or hole-transport material used for these layers may be a low-molecular-weight compound or a high-molecular-weight compound. [0061] The hole-injection material or the hole-transport material may be suitably selected depending on the intended purpose without any restriction. Examples thereof include pyrrole derivatives, carbazole derivatives, triazole derivatives, oxazole derivatives, oxadiazole derivatives, imidazole derivatives, polyarylalkane derivatives, pyrazoline derivatives, pyrazolone derivatives, phenylenediamine derivatives, arylamine derivatives, amino-substituted chalcone derivatives, styrylanthracene derivatives, fluorenone derivatives, hydrazone derivatives, stilbene derivatives, silazane derivatives, aromatic tertiary amine compounds, styrylamine compounds, aromatic dimethylidine compounds, phthalocyanine compounds, porphyrin compounds, thiophene derivatives, organosilane derivatives and carbon. These may be used independently or in combination. Therefore, it would have been obvious to one of ordinary skill in the art before the effective filing date of the claimed invention, to combine the teachings of Masui, with the primary reference of Noh, because [t]he hole-injection layer and the hole-transport layer may be of a monolayer structure, or a laminate structure containing a plurality of layers each formed of identical or different compositions. Masui para 59 Noh further teaches: 11. The method of claim 10, wherein the forming of the first functional layer comprises: setting a temperature in a chamber to a first temperature; (para 52) reducing pressure in the chamber to a first pressure (para 60); and drying the first functional layer under conditions of the first temperature and the first pressure. (para 55) 12. The method of claim 11, wherein the forming of the second functional layer comprises: setting the temperature in the chamber to a second temperature that is lower than the first temperature; (para 59) controlling the pressure in the chamber to a second pressure that is higher than the first pressure; and (para 60) drying the second functional layer under conditions of the second temperature and the second pressure. (para 60 and 98) 13. The method of claim 12, wherein the first temperature is about 50 °C or greater (para 52), and the second temperature is less than about 50 °C. (para 60) Noh and Masui fail to teach: 14. The method of claim 12, wherein the second pressure is maintained at about 0.01 Torr or greater. 15. The method of claim 11, wherein the first pressure is about 1x10° Torr or less. In regards to these values, the values would have been optimized through routine experimentation and would not lend themselves to patentability in the instant application, without displaying unexpected results. (in re Aller) 16. The method of claim 11, wherein the second functional layer is formed after the first functional layer is cured. (para 55-60) 17. The method of claim 10, wherein the first functional layer and the second functional layer include a hole injection function. (para 55,56) 18. The method of claim 10, wherein the first functional layer and the second functional layer comprise a curable material. (para 55) 19. The method of claim 10, wherein a bottom surface of the second functional layer is concave. Figure 6 para 92 20. The method of claim 19, wherein a thickness of the second functional layer is least at a center thereof and gradually increases toward the insulating layer. Figure 6 and para 92. Conclusion Applicant's amendment necessitated the new ground(s) of rejection presented in this Office action. Accordingly, THIS ACTION IS MADE FINAL. See MPEP § 706.07(a). Applicant is reminded of the extension of time policy as set forth in 37 CFR 1.136(a). A shortened statutory period for reply to this final action is set to expire THREE MONTHS from the mailing date of this action. In the event a first reply is filed within TWO MONTHS of the mailing date of this final action and the advisory action is not mailed until after the end of the THREE-MONTH shortened statutory period, then the shortened statutory period will expire on the date the advisory action is mailed, and any nonprovisional extension fee (37 CFR 1.17(a)) pursuant to 37 CFR 1.136(a) will be calculated from the mailing date of the advisory action. In no event, however, will the statutory period for reply expire later than SIX MONTHS from the mailing date of this final action. Any inquiry concerning this communication or earlier communications from the examiner should be directed to MICHAEL LEBENTRITT whose telephone number is (571)272-1873. The examiner can normally be reached IFP Mon- Fri 8:30 am- 6 pm. Examiner interviews are available via telephone, in-person, and video conferencing using a USPTO supplied web-based collaboration tool. To schedule an interview, applicant is encouraged to use the USPTO Automated Interview Request (AIR) at http://www.uspto.gov/interviewpractice. If attempts to reach the examiner by telephone are unsuccessful, the examiner’s supervisor, Sue Purvis can be reached at (571)272-1236. The fax phone number for the organization where this application or proceeding is assigned is 571-273-8300. Information regarding the status of published or unpublished applications may be obtained from Patent Center. Unpublished application information in Patent Center is available to registered users. To file and manage patent submissions in Patent Center, visit: https://patentcenter.uspto.gov. Visit https://www.uspto.gov/patents/apply/patent-center for more information about Patent Center and https://www.uspto.gov/patents/docx for information about filing in DOCX format. For additional questions, contact the Electronic Business Center (EBC) at 866-217-9197 (toll-free). If you would like assistance from a USPTO Customer Service Representative, call 800-786-9199 (IN USA OR CANADA) or 571-272-1000. MICHAEL . LEBENTRITT Primary Examiner Art Unit 2893 /MICHAEL LEBENTRITT/Primary Examiner, Art Unit 2893
Read full office action

Prosecution Timeline

Apr 04, 2023
Application Filed
Nov 28, 2025
Non-Final Rejection mailed — §103
Feb 19, 2026
Response Filed
Jun 03, 2026
Final Rejection mailed — §103 (current)

Precedent Cases

Applications granted by this same examiner with similar technology

Patent 12684779
SEMICONDUCTOR MEMORY DEVICE, METHOD FOR FABRICATING THE SAME AND ELECTRONIC SYSTEM INCLUDING THE SAME
2y 7m to grant Granted Jul 14, 2026
Patent 12677620
SURFACE TREATMENT METHOD FOR SEMICONDUCTOR SUBSTRATE AND SURFACE TREATMENT AGENT COMPOSITION
3y 7m to grant Granted Jul 07, 2026
Patent 12652915
DISPLAY DEVICE
2y 7m to grant Granted Jun 09, 2026
Patent 12630419
PRODUCTION METHOD FOR A MICROMECHANICAL SENSOR APPARATUS, AND CORRESPONDING MICROMECHANICAL SENSOR APPARATUS
2y 12m to grant Granted May 19, 2026
Patent 12635584
THREE-DIMENSIONAL INTEGRATED CIRCUIT WITH TOP CHIP INCLUDING SCHOTTKY DIODE BODY CONTACT
2y 11m to grant Granted May 19, 2026
Study what changed to get past this examiner. Based on 5 most recent grants.

Strategy Recommendation AI-generated — please review before filing

Get a prosecution strategy drawn from examiner precedents, rejection analysis, and claim mapping.
Typically takes 5-10 seconds — AI-generated, attorney review required before filing

Prosecution Projections

3-4
Expected OA Rounds
92%
Grant Probability
98%
With Interview (+6.2%)
2y 3m (~0m remaining)
Median Time to Grant
Moderate
PTA Risk
Based on 1002 resolved cases by this examiner. Grant probability derived from career allowance rate.

Sign in with your work email

Enter your email to receive a magic link. No password needed.

Personal email addresses (Gmail, Yahoo, etc.) are not accepted.

Free tier: 3 strategy analyses per month