Prosecution Insights
Last updated: April 19, 2026
Application No. 18/313,607

MASK ASSEMBLY, METHOD OF MANUFACTURING MASK ASSEMBLY, AND METHOD OF MANUFACTURING DISPLAY APPARATUS

Non-Final OA §102
Filed
May 08, 2023
Examiner
ALANKO, ANITA KAREN
Art Unit
1713
Tech Center
1700 — Chemical & Materials Engineering
Assignee
Samsung Display Co., Ltd.
OA Round
1 (Non-Final)
69%
Grant Probability
Favorable
1-2
OA Rounds
3y 1m
To Grant
52%
With Interview

Examiner Intelligence

Grants 69% — above average
69%
Career Allow Rate
470 granted / 677 resolved
+4.4% vs TC avg
Minimal -17% lift
Without
With
+-17.2%
Interview Lift
resolved cases with interview
Typical timeline
3y 1m
Avg Prosecution
36 currently pending
Career history
713
Total Applications
across all art units

Statute-Specific Performance

§101
0.6%
-39.4% vs TC avg
§103
45.1%
+5.1% vs TC avg
§102
20.7%
-19.3% vs TC avg
§112
20.0%
-20.0% vs TC avg
Black line = Tech Center average estimate • Based on career data from 677 resolved cases

Office Action

§102
DETAILED ACTION Notice of Pre-AIA or AIA Status The present application, filed on or after March 16, 2013, is being examined under the first inventor to file provisions of the AIA . Election/Restrictions Claims 16-20 are withdrawn from further consideration pursuant to 37 CFR 1.142(b) as being drawn to a nonelected invention, there being no allowable generic or linking claim. Election was made without traverse in the reply filed on October 31, 2025. Election of sub-species I-1A, claims 3-7, laser etching, in the reply filed on February 17, 2026 is acknowledged. Election was made without traverse in the reply filed on February 17, 2026. Claims 1-2 and 8 are generic. Claims 9-15 are withdrawn from consideration as directed to a non-elected species. Claim Rejections - 35 USC § 102 In the event the determination of the status of the application as subject to AIA 35 U.S.C. 102 and 103 (or as subject to pre-AIA 35 U.S.C. 102 and 103) is incorrect, any correction of the statutory basis (i.e., changing from AIA to pre-AIA ) for the rejection will not be considered a new ground of rejection if the prior art relied upon, and the rationale supporting the rejection, would be the same under either status. The following is a quotation of the appropriate paragraphs of 35 U.S.C. 102 that form the basis for the rejections under this section made in this Office action: A person shall be entitled to a patent unless – (a)(1) the claimed invention was patented, described in a printed publication, or in public use, on sale, or otherwise available to the public before the effective filing date of the claimed invention. (a)(2) the claimed invention was described in a patent issued under section 151, or in an application for patent published or deemed published under section 122(b), in which the patent or application, as the case may be, names another inventor and was effectively filed before the effective filing date of the claimed invention. Claims 1-8 are rejected under 35 U.S.C. 102(a)(1) as being anticipated by Kim et al (US 2021/0285086 A1). Claims 1-8 are rejected under 35 U.S.C. 102(a)(2) as being anticipated by Kim et al (US 2021/0285086 A1). The applied reference has a common applicant with the instant application. Based upon the earlier effectively filed date of the reference, it constitutes prior art under 35 U.S.C. 102(a)(2). This rejection under 35 U.S.C. 102(a)(2) might be overcome by: (1) a showing under 37 CFR 1.130(a) that the subject matter disclosed in the reference was obtained directly or indirectly from the inventor or a joint inventor of this application and is thus not prior art in accordance with 35 U.S.C. 102(b)(2)(A); (2) a showing under 37 CFR 1.130(b) of a prior public disclosure under 35 U.S.C. 102(b)(2)(B) if the same invention is not being claimed; or (3) a statement pursuant to 35 U.S.C. 102(b)(2)(C) establishing that, not later than the effective filing date of the claimed invention, the subject matter disclosed in the reference and the claimed invention were either owned by the same person or subject to an obligation of assignment to the same person or subject to a joint research agreement. Kim ’086 discloses a method of manufacturing a mask assembly 1 (Fig. 3C), the method comprising: preparing a mask frame 20 (Fig. 2, [0058]) including an opening area (as depicted in Fig. 2); forming an opening OP of a first group OP-G2 in a first area of a center of a mask sheet (as depicted in Fig. 5B, [0061]); tensioning and fixing the mask sheet to the mask frame [0060]; and forming an opening OP of a second group OP-G1 in a second area (the periphery) of the mask sheet (Fig. 5B; “openings OP located at the central portion of the mask sheet 11 may be formed first, and openings OP located at the edges of the mask sheet 11 may be finally formed” [0078]), wherein the second area surrounds the first area (Fig. 5B). As to claim 2, Kim ’086 discloses that in a comparative example, opening OP is formed through wet etching [0062], which includes wet-etching the first area. As to claim 3, Kim ’086 discloses laser etching the second area [0061]. As to claim 4, Kim ’086 discloses that the opening of the second group OP-G1 surrounds the first area (that comprises first group OP-G2). As to claim 5, Kim ’086 discloses that forming the opening of the second group includes sequentially performing the laser etching in a clockwise or counterclockwise direction as cited [0077], [0079]. As to claim 6, Kim ’086 discloses performing the laser-etching to form a first opening OP1 (Fig. 6A); and performing the laser-etching to form a second opening OP2 symmetrical to the first opening with response to a reference point RP (Fig. 6A) located in a center of the mask sheet [0081]. As to claim 7, Kim ’086 discloses to compensate for changes in size due to tension, i.e. tensile stress [0069]-[0070], which encompasses making the opening smaller and then extending the size by using tensile force applied to the mask sheet (because the mask sheet is welded on the mask frame). As to claim 8, Kim ’086 discloses welding as cited ([0060], see Fig. 3A). Applicant cannot rely upon the certified copy of the foreign priority application to overcome this rejection because a translation of said application has not been made of record in accordance with 37 CFR 1.55. When an English language translation of a non-English language foreign application is required, the translation must be that of the certified copy (of the foreign application as filed) submitted together with a statement that the translation of the certified copy is accurate. See MPEP §§ 215 and 216. Claims 1-4 and 7-8 are rejected under 35 U.S.C. 102(a)(1) as being anticipated by Kim (KR 101869889 B1). Kim ’889 discloses a method of manufacturing a mask assembly 1 (Fig. 3C), the method comprising: preparing a mask frame 44 including an opening area (as depicted in Fig. 4); forming an opening of a first group in a first area of a center of a mask sheet (step 301, page 4, paragraph 8 of English machine translation); tensioning and fixing the mask sheet to the mask frame (stretching step 303 and joining step 305, page 4, paragraph 9); and forming an opening of a second group in a second area (the periphery) of the mask sheet (same as forming openings of the first group, but located in the periphery, e.g., the outermost openings as depicted in Fig. 4), wherein the second area surrounds the first area (see Fig. 4). As to claim 2, Kim ’889 discloses wet-etching (page 4, paragraph 8), which includes wet etching the first area. As to claim 3, Kim ’889 discloses laser etching (page 4, paragraph 8), which includes laser etching the second area. As to claim 4, Kim ’889 discloses that the opening of the second group surrounds the first area (as depicted in Fig. 4). As to claim 7, Kim ’889 discloses laser-etching the openings, which includes the second area, in a size less than a size of the opening of the second group (“the preliminary opening may be an opening slightly smaller than the final opening of the desired size” page 4, paragraph 8); and extending a laser-etched portion to the size of the opening of the second group by using tensile force applied to the mask sheet (as applied during the stretching step, page 4, paragraph 9). As to claim 8, Kim ’889 discloses welding a third area to the mask frame (page 8, paragraph 2), and the third area surrounds the second area of the mask sheet (as depicted in Fig. 4). Conclusion The prior art made of record and not relied upon is considered pertinent to applicant's disclosure. Lee (US 2026/0022447 A1), Jang et al (US 2024/0318298 A1) and Kim et al (US 2023/0265555 A1), not applicable as prior art for the instant invention, are cited to show methods of making a mask assembly. Yamabuchi (US 2019/0372002 A1) is cited to show etching openings for a mask sheet of a mask assembly (Fig. 5). Yamabuchi et al (US 2020/0385856 A1) is cited to show forming openings prior to welding [0073]. Shigemura et al (US 2004/0104197 A1) is cited to show apertures surrounded by dummy apertures in a mask sheet (Fig. 12, 14, [0112]). Any inquiry concerning this communication or earlier communications from the examiner should be directed to ANITA K ALANKO whose telephone number is (571)270-0297. The examiner can normally be reached Monday-Friday, 9 am-5pm. Examiner interviews are available via telephone, in-person, and video conferencing using a USPTO supplied web-based collaboration tool. To schedule an interview, applicant is encouraged to use the USPTO Automated Interview Request (AIR) at http://www.uspto.gov/interviewpractice. If attempts to reach the examiner by telephone are unsuccessful, the examiner’s supervisor, Joshua Allen can be reached at 571-270-3176. The fax phone number for the organization where this application or proceeding is assigned is 571-273-8300. Information regarding the status of published or unpublished applications may be obtained from Patent Center. Unpublished application information in Patent Center is available to registered users. To file and manage patent submissions in Patent Center, visit: https://patentcenter.uspto.gov. Visit https://www.uspto.gov/patents/apply/patent-center for more information about Patent Center and https://www.uspto.gov/patents/docx for information about filing in DOCX format. For additional questions, contact the Electronic Business Center (EBC) at 866-217-9197 (toll-free). If you would like assistance from a USPTO Customer Service Representative, call 800-786-9199 (IN USA OR CANADA) or 571-272-1000. /ANITA K ALANKO/Primary Examiner, Art Unit 1713
Read full office action

Prosecution Timeline

May 08, 2023
Application Filed
Oct 31, 2025
Response after Non-Final Action
Mar 07, 2026
Non-Final Rejection — §102 (current)

Precedent Cases

Applications granted by this same examiner with similar technology

Patent 12577178
SLIDING MEMBER AND METHOD OF MANUFACTURING SLIDING MEMBER
2y 5m to grant Granted Mar 17, 2026
Patent 12577465
METHOD FOR PRODUCING SEMICONDUCTOR TREATMENT LIQUID AND METHOD FOR PRODUCING SEMICONDUCTOR ELEMENT
2y 5m to grant Granted Mar 17, 2026
Patent 12552962
CMP SLURRY COMPOSITION FOR POLISHING TUNGSTEN PATTERN WAFER AND METHOD OF POLISHING TUNGSTEN PATTERN WAFER USING THE SAME
2y 5m to grant Granted Feb 17, 2026
Patent 12545839
SUBSTRATE PROCESSING METHOD AND SUBSTRATE PROCESSING APPARATUS
2y 5m to grant Granted Feb 10, 2026
Patent 12534640
POLISHING LIQUID AND POLISHING METHOD
2y 5m to grant Granted Jan 27, 2026
Study what changed to get past this examiner. Based on 5 most recent grants.

AI Strategy Recommendation

Get an AI-powered prosecution strategy using examiner precedents, rejection analysis, and claim mapping.
Powered by AI — typically takes 5-10 seconds

Prosecution Projections

1-2
Expected OA Rounds
69%
Grant Probability
52%
With Interview (-17.2%)
3y 1m
Median Time to Grant
Low
PTA Risk
Based on 677 resolved cases by this examiner. Grant probability derived from career allow rate.

Sign in with your work email

Enter your email to receive a magic link. No password needed.

Personal email addresses (Gmail, Yahoo, etc.) are not accepted.

Free tier: 3 strategy analyses per month