Prosecution Insights
Last updated: August 17, 2026
Application No. 18/316,146

P-DIPOLE MATERIAL FOR STACKED TRANSISTORS

Final Rejection §112
Filed
May 11, 2023
Priority
Jan 24, 2023 — provisional 63/481,280
Examiner
HOANG, TUAN A
Art Unit
2898
Tech Center
2800 — Semiconductors & Electrical Systems
Assignee
Taiwan Semiconductor Manufacturing Company, Ltd.
OA Round
2 (Final)
74%
Grant Probability
Favorable
3-4
OA Rounds
0m
Est. Remaining
86%
With Interview

Examiner Intelligence

Grants 74% — above average
74%
Career Allowance Rate
381 granted / 514 resolved
+6.1% vs TC avg
Moderate +11% lift
Without
With
+11.4%
Interview Lift
resolved cases with interview
Typical timeline
2y 8m
Avg Prosecution
27 currently pending
Career history
538
Total Applications
across all art units

Statute-Specific Performance

§101
0.2%
-39.8% vs TC avg
§103
53.1%
+13.1% vs TC avg
§102
21.4%
-18.6% vs TC avg
§112
20.7%
-19.3% vs TC avg
Black line = Tech Center average estimate • Based on career data from 514 resolved cases

Office Action

§112
DETAILED ACTION Notice of Pre-AIA or AIA Status The present application, filed on or after March 16, 2013, is being examined under the first inventor to file provisions of the AIA . Response to Amendment Applicant’s amendment filed on 5/26/2026 is acknowledged. Claims 1-16 have been amended. Claim Rejections - 35 USC § 112 The following is a quotation of 35 U.S.C. 112(b): (b) CONCLUSION.—The specification shall conclude with one or more claims particularly pointing out and distinctly claiming the subject matter which the inventor or a joint inventor regards as the invention. The following is a quotation of 35 U.S.C. 112 (pre-AIA ), second paragraph: The specification shall conclude with one or more claims particularly pointing out and distinctly claiming the subject matter which the applicant regards as his invention. Claims 1-8 are rejected under 35 U.S.C. 112(b) or 35 U.S.C. 112 (pre-AIA ), second paragraph, as being indefinite for failing to particularly point out and distinctly claim the subject matter which the inventor or a joint inventor (or for applications subject to pre-AIA 35 U.S.C. 112, the applicant), regards as the invention. Claim 1 recites “a transistor stack” in line 3. It is unclear whether this is the same or different transistor stack defined in the preamble (line 2) of the claim. For the purpose of examination, it is interpreted to be the same. Claim 1 recites “a first p-dipole from the first p-dipole dopant source layer” in lines 5-6. There is no antecedent bases for the first p-dipole dopant source layer in the claim. For the purpose of examination, it is interpreted that the limitation “forming a first n-dipole dopant source layer…” in line 4 is “forming a first p-dipole dopant source layer…” to be consistent with other claims. Allowable Subject Matter Claims 1-8 would be allowable if rewritten or amended to overcome the rejection(s) under 35 U.S.C. 112(b) or 35 U.S.C. 112 (pre-AIA ), 2nd paragraph, set forth in this Office action. Claims 9-16, 25-28 are allowed. The following is a statement of reasons for the indication of allowable subject matter: Regarding claim 1, the prior art of record does not disclose or fairly suggest a method of forming a gate stack of a transistor that comprises: “performing a first thermal drive-in process that drives a first p-dipole dopant from the first p-dipole dopant source layer into the first high-k dielectric layer;” and “forming a second high-k dielectric layer of a second gate stack of the transistor stack, wherein the second high-k dielectric layer is formed over the first gate stack;” and “forming a second p-dipole dopant source layer over the second high-k dielectric layer; performing a second thermal drive-in process that drives a second p-dipole dopant from the second p-dipole dopant source layer into the second high-k dielectric layer, wherein a drive- in temperature of the second thermal drive-in process is less than 600⁰C” along with other limitations of the claim. Regarding claim 9, the prior art of record does not disclose or fairly suggest a method of forming a gate stack of a transistor that comprises: “wherein the dipole engineering process includes: forming a p-dipole dopant source layer over the gate dielectric, performing a thermal drive-in process that drives a p-dipole dopant from the p-dipole dopant source layer into the gate dielectric, wherein a drive-in temperature of the thermal drive-in process is less than 600°C, and removing the p-dipole dopant source layer, wherein the dipole engineering process is a first dipole engineering process, the thermal drive-in process is a first thermal drive-in process, the drive-in temperature is a first drive-in temperature, the gate dielectric is a first gate dielectric, the gate electrode is a first gate electrode, the gate stack is a first gate stack, the p-dipole dopant source layer is a first p-dipole dopant source layer, and the p-dipole dopant is a first p-dipole dopant; and wherein the forming the first transistor includes forming a second gate stack, wherein the second gate stack includes a second gate dielectric and a second gate electrode, and performing a second dipole engineering process, wherein the second dipole engineering process includes: forming a second p-dipole dopant source layer over the second gate dielectric of the second gate stack of the first transistor, performing a second thermal drive-in process that drives a second p-dipole dopant from the second p-dipole dopant source layer into the second gate dielectric, wherein a second drive-in temperature of the second thermal drive-in process is less than 600°C, and removing the second p-dipole dopant source layer” along with other limitations of the claim. Regarding claim 12, the prior art of record does not disclose or fairly suggest a method of forming a gate stack of a transistor that comprises: “performing a dipole engineering process, wherein the dipole engineering process includes: forming a p-dipole dopant source layer over the gate dielectric, performing a thermal drive-in process that drives a p-dipole dopant from the p-dipole dopant source layer into the gate dielectric, wherein a drive-in temperature of the thermal drive-in process is less than 600°C, and removing the p-dipole dopant source layer, wherein the dipole engineering process is a first dipole engineering process, the thermal drive-in process is a first thermal drive-in process, the drive-in temperature is a first drive-in temperature, the gate dielectric is a first gate dielectric, the gate electrode is a first gate electrode, the gate stack is a first gate stack, the p-dipole dopant source layer is a first p-dipole dopant source layer, and the p-dipole dopant is a first p-dipole dopant; and wherein the forming the first transistor includes forming a second gate stack of the first transistor and performing a second dipole engineering process, wherein the second gate stack includes a second gate dielectric and a second gate electrode, and further wherein the second dipole engineering process includes: forming a second p-dipole dopant source layer over the second gate dielectric of the second gate stack of the first transistor, performing a second thermal drive-in process that drives a second p-dipole dopant from the second p-dipole dopant source layer into the second gate dielectric, wherein a second drive-in temperature of the second thermal drive-in process is at least 600°C, and removing the second p-dipole dopant source layer” along with other limitations of the claim. The closest prior art are Chung et al. (CN 113675197 A) (for the purpose of compact prosecution, the US Application US 2022/0037497 A1 is used hereinafter as an English translation of the Chinese application), and Pao et al. (US 2021/0391439 A1). Chung teaches a method (1100 in Figs. 85-98C of Chung) comprising: forming a first transistor (lower transistor 260a) of a transistor stack (260a-260b); bonding (step 1126 in Fig. 85) the first transistor of the transistor stack to a precursor (204b in Fig. 96A-C) for fabricating a second transistor (260b) of the transistor stack; and forming the second transistor (260b) over the first transistor, wherein the forming the second transistor includes processing the precursor (as shown in Figs. 96A-97C), forming a gate stack (254b in Fig. 97A) of the second transistor, wherein the gate stack includes a gate dielectric (256) and a gate electrode (258). But the transistor stack of Chung is a p-type transistor on a n-type transistor, not the same p-type. Pao teaches a method (100 in Fig. 1 of Pao) for forming a gate stack (metal gate 236 in Fig. 15) of a transistor (420), wherein the transistor forms a portion of a transistor stack (transistor stack is from substrate 202 to gate 236), the method comprising: forming a high-k dielectric layer (222 in Fig. 5); forming a dipole dopant source layer (224/230) over the high-k dielectric layer; performing a thermal drive-in process (anneal process 300 in Fig. 13) that drives a dipole dopant (lanthanum, yttrium or aluminum, as described in [0034]) from the dipole dopant source layer into the high-k dielectric layer (as described in [0034]); and after removing the dipole dopant source layer (step 120 of method 100 in Fig. 1), forming at least one electrically conductive gate layer (work function layer and metal fill layer of the metal gate stack 236, as described in [0038] of Pao) over the high-k dielectric layer. Conclusion Applicant's amendment necessitated the new ground(s) of rejection presented in this Office action. Accordingly, THIS ACTION IS MADE FINAL. See MPEP § 706.07(a). Applicant is reminded of the extension of time policy as set forth in 37 CFR 1.136(a). A shortened statutory period for reply to this final action is set to expire THREE MONTHS from the mailing date of this action. In the event a first reply is filed within TWO MONTHS of the mailing date of this final action and the advisory action is not mailed until after the end of the THREE-MONTH shortened statutory period, then the shortened statutory period will expire on the date the advisory action is mailed, and any nonprovisional extension fee (37 CFR 1.17(a)) pursuant to 37 CFR 1.136(a) will be calculated from the mailing date of the advisory action. In no event, however, will the statutory period for reply expire later than SIX MONTHS from the mailing date of this final action. Any inquiry concerning this communication or earlier communications from the examiner should be directed to TUAN A HOANG whose telephone number is (571)270-0406. The examiner can normally be reached Monday-Friday 8-9am, 10am-6pm EST. Examiner interviews are available via telephone, in-person, and video conferencing using a USPTO supplied web-based collaboration tool. To schedule an interview, applicant is encouraged to use the USPTO Automated Interview Request (AIR) at http://www.uspto.gov/interviewpractice. If attempts to reach the examiner by telephone are unsuccessful, the examiner’s supervisor, Jessica Manno can be reached at (571) 272-2339. The fax phone number for the organization where this application or proceeding is assigned is 571-273-8300. Information regarding the status of published or unpublished applications may be obtained from Patent Center. Unpublished application information in Patent Center is available to registered users. To file and manage patent submissions in Patent Center, visit: https://patentcenter.uspto.gov. Visit https://www.uspto.gov/patents/apply/patent-center for more information about Patent Center and https://www.uspto.gov/patents/docx for information about filing in DOCX format. For additional questions, contact the Electronic Business Center (EBC) at 866-217-9197 (toll-free). If you would like assistance from a USPTO Customer Service Representative, call 800-786-9199 (IN USA OR CANADA) or 571-272-1000. /Tuan A Hoang/ Primary Examiner, Art Unit 2898
Read full office action

Prosecution Timeline

May 11, 2023
Application Filed
Feb 26, 2026
Non-Final Rejection mailed — §112
May 26, 2026
Response Filed
Jul 01, 2026
Final Rejection mailed — §112 (current)

Precedent Cases

Applications granted by this same examiner with similar technology

Patent 12707757
METHOD FOR MAKING SOLAR CELL AND SOLAR CELL
2y 4m to grant Granted Aug 11, 2026
Patent 12701747
SEMICONDUCTOR DEVICE WITH BACKSIDE INTERCONNECTION AND METHOD FOR FORMING THE SAME
3y 4m to grant Granted Aug 04, 2026
Patent 12701786
Fin Field-Effect Transistor Device and Method
3y 3m to grant Granted Aug 04, 2026
Patent 12694928
EPITAXIAL LAYERS OF A TRANSISTOR ELECTRICALLY COUPLED WITH A BACKSIDE CONTACT METAL
4y 4m to grant Granted Jul 28, 2026
Patent 12696532
SEMICONDUCTOR DEVICE STRUCTURE WITH GATE DIELECTRIC LAYER AND METHOD FOR FORMING THE SAME
3y 5m to grant Granted Jul 28, 2026
Study what changed to get past this examiner. Based on 5 most recent grants.

Strategy Recommendation AI-generated — please review before filing

Get a prosecution strategy drawn from examiner precedents, rejection analysis, and claim mapping.
Typically takes 5-10 seconds — AI-generated, attorney review required before filing

Prosecution Projections

3-4
Expected OA Rounds
74%
Grant Probability
86%
With Interview (+11.4%)
2y 8m (~0m remaining)
Median Time to Grant
Moderate
PTA Risk
Based on 514 resolved cases by this examiner. Grant probability derived from career allowance rate.

Sign in with your work email

Enter your email to receive a magic link. No password needed.

Personal email addresses (Gmail, Yahoo, etc.) are not accepted.

Free tier: 3 strategy analyses per month