Prosecution Insights
Last updated: May 29, 2026
Application No. 18/324,036

HEAT DISSIPATION IN SEMICONDUCTOR DEVICES

Non-Final OA §102§103
Filed
May 25, 2023
Priority
Feb 13, 2023 — provisional 63/484,551
Examiner
GREEN, TELLY D
Art Unit
2898
Tech Center
2800 — Semiconductors & Electrical Systems
Assignee
Taiwan Semiconductor Manufacturing Co., Ltd.
OA Round
1 (Non-Final)
82%
Grant Probability
Favorable
1-2
OA Rounds
0m
Est. Remaining
86%
With Interview

Examiner Intelligence

Grants 82% — above average
82%
Career Allowance Rate
1053 granted / 1289 resolved
+13.7% vs TC avg
Minimal +4% lift
Without
With
+3.8%
Interview Lift
resolved cases with interview
Typical timeline
2y 3m
Avg Prosecution
42 currently pending
Career history
1348
Total Applications
across all art units

Statute-Specific Performance

§101
0.2%
-39.8% vs TC avg
§103
83.5%
+43.5% vs TC avg
§102
8.7%
-31.3% vs TC avg
§112
3.1%
-36.9% vs TC avg
Black line = Tech Center average estimate • Based on career data from 1289 resolved cases

Office Action

§102 §103
DETAILED ACTION Notice of Pre-AIA or AIA Status The present application, filed on or after March 16, 2013, is being examined under the first inventor to file provisions of the AIA . Election/Restrictions Applicant’s election without traverse of Group I, Species 7 (Figs. 39A-39C), claims 1-8, 10-13 and 21-27 in the reply filed on February 27, 2026 is acknowledged. However, upon further inspection, the Examiner noticed that claims 12, 13 and 21-27 do not belong to the elected Species 7 (Figs. 39A-39C). Examiner notes that Species 7 does not include a first and second bonding layers/first and second insulating bonding layers (items 152A and 152B). Species 7 only has one bonding layer (item 152). Therefore, claims 1-8, 10, and 11 will be examined. Claims 9, 12, 13 and 21-27 have been withdrawn. Claims 14-20 have been cancelled by the Applicant. Action on the merits is as follows: Claim Rejections - 35 USC § 102 In the event the determination of the status of the application as subject to AIA 35 U.S.C. 102 and 103 (or as subject to pre-AIA 35 U.S.C. 102 and 103) is incorrect, any correction of the statutory basis (i.e., changing from AIA to pre-AIA ) for the rejection will not be considered a new ground of rejection if the prior art relied upon, and the rationale supporting the rejection, would be the same under either status. The following is a quotation of the appropriate paragraphs of 35 U.S.C. 102 that form the basis for the rejections under this section made in this Office action: A person shall be entitled to a patent unless – (a)(1) the claimed invention was patented, described in a printed publication, or in public use, on sale, or otherwise available to the public before the effective filing date of the claimed invention. Claim(s) 1 and 6 is/are rejected under 35 U.S.C. 102(a)(1) as being anticipated by Tsai et al. (Tsai) (US 2022/0359369 A1). In regards to claim 1, Tsai (Figs. 31A-31C and associated text) discloses a device (Figs. 31A-31C) comprising: a device layer (items 106 plus 109 plus 125) comprising a first transistor (item 109); a first interconnect structure (item 120) on a front-side of the device layer (items 106 plus 109 plus 125); and a second interconnect structure (item 140) on a backside of the device layer (items 106 plus 109 plus 125), the second interconnect structure item 140) comprising a power rail (item 132, paragraph 92); a semiconductor substrate (item 170) indirectly bonded to the first interconnect structure (item 120); and a first heat dissipation layer (item 160) indirectly contacting the semiconductor substrate (item 170). Examiner notes that the Applicant has not given a special definition to the terms “contact”, “contacting” or “bonded” therefore certain features may be in “direct” or “indirect” contact and/or “directly” or “indirectly” contacting/bonded to certain features. In regards to claim 6, Tsai (Figs. 31A-31C and associated text) discloses wherein the first heat dissipation layer (item 160) is disposed on an opposing side of the carrier substrate (item 170) as the first interconnect structure (item 120). Claim Rejections - 35 USC § 103 In the event the determination of the status of the application as subject to AIA 35 U.S.C. 102 and 103 (or as subject to pre-AIA 35 U.S.C. 102 and 103) is incorrect, any correction of the statutory basis (i.e., changing from AIA to pre-AIA ) for the rejection will not be considered a new ground of rejection if the prior art relied upon, and the rationale supporting the rejection, would be the same under either status. The following is a quotation of 35 U.S.C. 103 which forms the basis for all obviousness rejections set forth in this Office action: A patent for a claimed invention may not be obtained, notwithstanding that the claimed invention is not identically disclosed as set forth in section 102, if the differences between the claimed invention and the prior art are such that the claimed invention as a whole would have been obvious before the effective filing date of the claimed invention to a person having ordinary skill in the art to which the claimed invention pertains. Patentability shall not be negated by the manner in which the invention was made. Claim(s) 2 and 3 is/are rejected under 35 U.S.C. 103 as being unpatentable over Tsai et al. (Tsai) (US 2022/0359369 A1). In regards to claim 2, Tsai does not specifically disclose wherein the first heat dissipation layer has a thermal conductivity in a range of 10 W/m.Math.K to 1500 W/m.Math.K. It would have been obvious to one having ordinary skill in the art at the time of the invention to modify the invention to include a first heat dissipation layer having a thermal conductivity in a range of 10 W/m.Math.K to 1500 W/m.Math.K for the purpose heat dissipation, since it has been held that discovering an optimum value of a result effective variable involves only routine skill in the art (In re Boesch, 617 F.2d 272, 205 USPQ 215 (CCPA 1980)). In regards to claim 3, Tsai does not specifically disclose wherein the first heat dissipation layer comprises AlN, BN, Y.sub.2O.sub.2, Y.sub.3A.sub.15O.sub.12 (YAG), AL.sub.2O.sub.2, BeO, SiC, graphene, diamond-like-carbon (DLC), or diamond. It would have been obvious to modify the invention to include a first heat dissipation layer comprising AlN, BN, Y.sub.2O.sub.2, Y.sub.3A.sub.15O.sub.12 (YAG), AL.sub.2O.sub.2, BeO, SiC, graphene, diamond-like-carbon (DLC), or diamond for the purpose of heat dissipation, since it has been held to be within the general skill of a worker in the art to select a known material on the basis of its suitability for the intended use (In re Leshin, 125 USPQ 416). Claim(s) , 7, 8, 10 and 11 is/are rejected under 35 U.S.C. 103 as being unpatentable over Tsai et al. (Tsai) (US 2022/0359369 A1) in view of Chung et al. (Chung) (US 9,984,983 B2). In regards to claim 7, Tsai (Figs. 29A-31C and associated text) does not specifically disclose wherein the first heat dissipation layer is disposed on a sidewall of the semiconductor substrate. Chung (Fig. 1A and associated text) discloses wherein the first heat dissipation layer (items 18 plus 20 or item 24 of 20,) is disposed on a sidewall of a substrate (item 10, Chung). Therefore it would have been obvious to one of ordinary skill in the art before the effective filing date to incorporate the teachings of Chung for the purpose of improving heat dissipation and EMI shielding (col. 7, lines 31-34). In regards to claim 8, (Fig. 1A and associated text) discloses heat dissipation (items 18 plus 20 or item 24 of 20) covers the top and side surfaces of the entire package (item 1a), therefore Tsai (Figs. 29A-31C and associated text) as modified by Chung (Fig. 1A and associated text) discloses wherein the first heat dissipation layer (items 18 plus 20 or item 24 of 20, Chung) is disposed on a sidewall of first interconnect structure (item 120, Tsai), the device layer (items 106 plus 109 plus 125, Tsai), and the second interconnect structure (item 140, Tsai). In regards to claim 10, Tsai (Figs. 29A-31C and associated text) discloses a device comprising: a first transistor structure (item 109) and a second transistor structure (item 109) in device layer (items 106 plus 109 plus 125); a front-side interconnect structure (items 120 or 140) on a front-side of the device layer (items 106 plus 109 plus 125), the first transistor structure (item 109) being electrically coupled to the second transistor structure (item 109) through the front-side interconnect structure (item 120 or 140); a backside interconnect structure (item 140, or 120) on a backside of the device layer (items 106 plus 109 plus 125), the backside interconnect structure (item 140, or 120) comprising a power supply line (item 132 or 122); a semiconductor substrate (item 170) bonded to the front-side interconnect structure (item 140, or 120). It would have been obvious to one of ordinary skill in the art before the effective filing date to incorporate different teachings and/or configurations other embodiments taught by Tsai for the purpose of have different nano-FET structures, since it has been held that rearranging parts of an invention involves only routine skill in the art (In re Japiske, 86 USPQ 70). Tsai does not specifically disclose a heat dissipation layer in physical contact with a lateral surface of the semiconductor substrate. Chung (Fig. 1A and associated text) discloses a heat dissipation layer (items 20 or 18 plus 20 or item 24 of item 20) in physical contact with a lateral surface of a substrate (item 10). Therefore it would have been obvious to one of ordinary skill in the art before the effective filing date to incorporate the teachings of Chung for the purpose of improving heat dissipation and EMI shielding (col. 7, lines 31-34). In regards to claim 11, Tsai as modified by Chung discloses does not specifically disclose wherein the heat dissipation layer comprises diamond-like-carbon (DLC). It would have been obvious to modify the invention to include a heat dissipation layer comprising diamond-like-carbon (DLC) for the purpose of heat dissipation, since it has been held to be within the general skill of a worker in the art to select a known material on the basis of its suitability for the intended use (In re Leshin, 125 USPQ 416). Claim(s) 1-4, 6-8, 10 and 11 is/are rejected under 35 U.S.C. 103 as being unpatentable over Yu et al. (Yu) (US 2021/0408247 A1) in view of Chung et al. (Chung) (US 9,984,983 B2). PNG media_image1.png 628 538 media_image1.png Greyscale PNG media_image1.png 628 538 media_image1.png Greyscale In regards to claim 1, Yu (Figs. 29A-29C, 36A-36E and associated text) discloses a device (items 200, 250) comprising: a device layer (items 106 plus 96 plus 115 plus 50 plus 160 plus 162) comprising a first transistor (item 115); a first interconnect structure (item 120) on a front-side of the device layer (items 106 plus 96 plus 115 plus 50 plus 160 plus 162); and a second interconnect structure (item 136 plus 132 plus 134) on a backside of the device layer (items 106 plus 96 plus 115 plus 50 plus 160 plus 162), the second interconnect (item 136 plus 132 plus 134) comprising a power rail (item 134, paragraph 91); a semiconductor substrate (item 150) bonded to the first interconnect structure (item 120). Examiner notes that the Applicant has not given a special definition to the terms “contact”, “contacting” or “bonded” therefore certain features may be in “direct” or “indirect” contact and/or “directly” or “indirectly” contacting/bonded to certain features. Yu does not specifically disclose a first heat dissipation layer contacting the semiconductor substrate. Chung (Fig. 1A and associated text) discloses a heat dissipation layer (items 20 or 18 plus 20) contacting a substrate (item 10). Therefore it would have been obvious to one of ordinary skill in the art before the effective filing date to incorporate the teachings of Chung for the purpose of improving heat dissipation and EMI shielding (col. 7, lines 31-34). In regards to claim 2, Yu as modified by Chung does not specifically disclose wherein the first heat dissipation layer has a thermal conductivity in a range of 10 W/m.Math.K to 1500 W/m.Math.K. It would have been obvious to one having ordinary skill in the art at the time of the invention to modify the invention to include a first heat dissipation layer having a thermal conductivity in a range of 10 W/m.Math.K to 1500 W/m.Math.K for the purpose heat dissipation, since it has been held that discovering an optimum value of a result effective variable involves only routine skill in the art (In re Boesch, 617 F.2d 272, 205 USPQ 215 (CCPA 1980)). In regards to claim 3, Yu as modified by Chung does not specifically disclose wherein the first heat dissipation layer comprises AlN, BN, Y.sub.2O.sub.2, Y.sub.3A.sub.15O.sub.12 (YAG), AL.sub.2O.sub.2, BeO, SiC, graphene, diamond-like-carbon (DLC), or diamond. It would have been obvious to modify the invention to include a first heat dissipation layer comprising AlN, BN, Y.sub.2O.sub.2, Y.sub.3A.sub.15O.sub.12 (YAG), AL.sub.2O.sub.2, BeO, SiC, graphene, diamond-like-carbon (DLC), or diamond for the purpose of heat dissipation, since it has been held to be within the general skill of a worker in the art to select a known material on the basis of its suitability for the intended use (In re Leshin, 125 USPQ 416). In regards to claim 4, Yu as modified by Chung does not specifically disclose wherein the first heat dissipation layer is disposed between the semiconductor substrate and the first interconnect structure. It would have been obvious to one having ordinary skill in the art at the time of the invention to modify the invention to have first heat dissipation layer is disposed between the semiconductor substrate and the first interconnect structure, since it has been held that rearranging parts of an invention involves only routine skill in the art (In re Japiske, 86 USPQ 70). In regards to claim 6, Yu (Figs. 29A-29C, 36A-36E and associated text) as modified by Chung (Fig. 1A and associated text) discloses wherein the first heat dissipation layer (items 20 or 18 plus 20, Chung) is disposed on an opposing side of the carrier substrate (item 150, Yu) as the first interconnect structure (item 120). In regards to claim 7, Chung (Fig. 1A and associated text) discloses a heat dissipation layer (items 18 plus 20 or item 24 of 20) covers the top and side surfaces of the entire package (item 1a), therefor Yu (Figs. 29A-29C, 36A-36E and associated text) as modified by Chung (Fig. 1A and associated text) discloses wherein the first heat dissipation layer (items 18 plus 20 or item 24 of 20, Chung) is disposed on a sidewall of the semiconductor substrate (item 150, Yu, item 10, Chung). In regards to claim 8, Chung (Fig. 1A and associated text) discloses a heat dissipation (items 18 plus 20 or item 24 of 20) covers the top and side surfaces of the entire package (item 1a), therefor Yu (Figs. 29A-29C, 36A-36E and associated text) as modified by Chung (Fig. 1A and associated text) discloses wherein the first heat dissipation layer (items 18 plus 20 or item 24 of 20, Chung) is disposed on a sidewall of first interconnect structure (item 120, Yu), the device layer (items 106 plus 96 plus 115 plus 50 plus 160 plus 162, Yu), and the second interconnect structure (item 136 plus 132 plus 134, Yu). In regards to claim 10, Yu (Figs. 29A-29C, 36A-36E and associated text) discloses a device comprising: a first transistor structure (item 115) and a second transistor (item 115) in device layer (items 106 plus 96 plus 115 plus 50 plus 160 plus 162); a front-side interconnect structure (items 120) on a front-side of the device layer (items 106 plus 96 plus 115 plus 50 plus 160 plus 162), the first transistor structure (item 115) being electrically coupled to the second transistor structure (item 115) through the front-side interconnect structure (item 120); a backside interconnect structure (item 136 plus 132 plus 134) on a backside of the device layer (items 106 plus 96 plus 115 plus 50 plus 160 plus 162), the backside interconnect structure (item 136 plus 132 plus 134) comprising a power supply line (item 134); a semiconductor substrate (item 150) bonded to the front-side interconnect structure (item 120). It would have been obvious to one of ordinary skill in the art before the effective filing date to incorporate different teachings and/or configurations other embodiments taught by Yu for the purpose of have different nano-FET structures, since it has been held that rearranging parts of an invention involves only routine skill in the art (In re Japiske, 86 USPQ 70). Yu does not specifically disclose a heat dissipation layer in physical contact with a lateral surface of the semiconductor substrate. Chung (Fig. 1A and associated text) discloses a heat dissipation layer (items 20 or 18 plus 20 or item 24 of item 20) in physical contact with a lateral surface of a substrate (item 10). Therefore it would have been obvious to one of ordinary skill in the art before the effective filing date to incorporate the teachings of Chung for the purpose of improving heat dissipation and EMI shielding (col. 7, lines 31-34). In regards to claim 11, Yu as modified by Chung discloses does not specifically disclose wherein the heat dissipation layer comprises diamond-like-carbon (DLC). It would have been obvious to modify the invention to include a heat dissipation layer comprising diamond-like-carbon (DLC) for the purpose of heat dissipation, since it has been held to be within the general skill of a worker in the art to select a known material on the basis of its suitability for the intended use (In re Leshin, 125 USPQ 416). Allowable Subject Matter Claim 5 is objected to as being dependent upon a rejected base claim, but would be allowable if rewritten in independent form including all of the limitations of the base claim and any intervening claims. None of the current prior art disclose “a second heat dissipation layer on an opposite side of the semiconductor substrate as the first heat dissipation layer”. Conclusion The prior art made of record and not relied upon is considered pertinent to applicant's disclosure. All other prior art of record listed in the 892 could have been used as primary references. All disclose front-side and backside interconnects, power rails and device layers, however they lack teaching first and second heat dissipation layers as configured and/or claimed. Any inquiry concerning this communication or earlier communications from the examiner should be directed to TELLY D GREEN whose telephone number is (571)270-3204. The examiner can normally be reached M-F 8am-5pm. Examiner interviews are available via telephone, in-person, and video conferencing using a USPTO supplied web-based collaboration tool. To schedule an interview, applicant is encouraged to use the USPTO Automated Interview Request (AIR) at http://www.uspto.gov/interviewpractice. If attempts to reach the examiner by telephone are unsuccessful, the examiner’s supervisor, Jessica Manno can be reached at 571-272-2339. The fax phone number for the organization where this application or proceeding is assigned is 571-273-8300. Information regarding the status of published or unpublished applications may be obtained from Patent Center. Unpublished application information in Patent Center is available to registered users. To file and manage patent submissions in Patent Center, visit: https://patentcenter.uspto.gov. Visit https://www.uspto.gov/patents/apply/patent-center for more information about Patent Center and https://www.uspto.gov/patents/docx for information about filing in DOCX format. For additional questions, contact the Electronic Business Center (EBC) at 866-217-9197 (toll-free). If you would like assistance from a USPTO Customer Service Representative, call 800-786-9199 (IN USA OR CANADA) or 571-272-1000. TELLY D. GREEN Examiner Art Unit 2898 /TELLY D GREEN/Primary Examiner, Art Unit 2898 April 21, 2026
Read full office action

Prosecution Timeline

May 25, 2023
Application Filed
Jul 18, 2023
Response after Non-Final Action
Apr 28, 2026
Non-Final Rejection mailed — §102, §103 (current)

Precedent Cases

Applications granted by this same examiner with similar technology

Patent 12642086
MULTI-TIM PACKAGES AND METHOD FORMING SAME
2y 9m to grant Granted May 26, 2026
Patent 12635518
SEMICONDUCTOR DEVICE
2y 6m to grant Granted May 19, 2026
Patent 12628710
SEMICONDUCTOR PACKAGE AND MANUFACTURING METHOD THEREOF
3y 6m to grant Granted May 12, 2026
Patent 12628695
PACKAGING STRUCTURE AND PACKAGING METHOD
3y 4m to grant Granted May 12, 2026
Patent 12622303
NOTCHED WAFER AND BONDING SUPPORT STRUCTURE TO IMPROVE WAFER STACKING
3y 0m to grant Granted May 05, 2026
Study what changed to get past this examiner. Based on 5 most recent grants.

Strategy Recommendation AI-generated — please review before filing

Get a prosecution strategy drawn from examiner precedents, rejection analysis, and claim mapping.
Typically takes 5-10 seconds — AI-generated, attorney review required before filing

Prosecution Projections

1-2
Expected OA Rounds
82%
Grant Probability
86%
With Interview (+3.8%)
2y 3m (~0m remaining)
Median Time to Grant
Low
PTA Risk
Based on 1289 resolved cases by this examiner. Grant probability derived from career allowance rate.

Sign in with your work email

Enter your email to receive a magic link. No password needed.

Personal email addresses (Gmail, Yahoo, etc.) are not accepted.

Free tier: 3 strategy analyses per month