Prosecution Insights
Last updated: October 04, 2026
Application No. 18/326,096

DISPLAY DEVICE

Non-Final OA §103
Filed
May 31, 2023
Priority
Jul 27, 2022 — RE 10-2022-0093496
Examiner
KIM, SU C
Art Unit
2899
Tech Center
2800 — Semiconductors & Electrical Systems
Assignee
Samsung Display Co., Ltd.
OA Round
3 (Non-Final)
78%
Grant Probability
Favorable
3-4
OA Rounds
0m
Est. Remaining
66%
With Interview

Examiner Intelligence

Grants 78% — above average
78%
Career Allowance Rate
718 granted / 923 resolved
+9.8% vs TC avg
Minimal -12% lift
Without
With
+-11.8%
Interview Lift
resolved cases with interview
Typical timeline
2y 9m
Avg Prosecution
35 currently pending
Career history
962
Total Applications
across all art units

Statute-Specific Performance

§101
0.2%
-39.8% vs TC avg
§103
59.5%
+19.5% vs TC avg
§102
23.8%
-16.2% vs TC avg
§112
6.4%
-33.6% vs TC avg
Black line = Tech Center average estimate • Based on career data from 923 resolved cases

Office Action

§103
DETAILED ACTION Notice of Pre-AIA or AIA Status The present application, filed on or after March 16, 2013, is being examined under the first inventor to file provisions of the AIA . Continued Examination Under 37 CFR 1.114 A request for continued examination under 37 CFR 1.114, including the fee set forth in 37 CFR 1.17(e), was filed in this application after final rejection. Since this application is eligible for continued examination under 37 CFR 1.114, and the fee set forth in 37 CFR 1.17(e) has been timely paid, the finality of the previous Office action has been withdrawn pursuant to 37 CFR 1.114. Applicant's submission filed on 7/23/2026 has been entered. Claim Rejections - 35 USC § 103 The following is a quotation of 35 U.S.C. 103 which forms the basis for all obviousness rejections set forth in this Office action: A patent for a claimed invention may not be obtained, notwithstanding that the claimed invention is not identically disclosed as set forth in section 102, if the differences between the claimed invention and the prior art are such that the claimed invention as a whole would have been obvious before the effective filing date of the claimed invention to a person having ordinary skill in the art to which the claimed invention pertains. Patentability shall not be negated by the manner in which the invention was made. The factual inquiries for establishing a background for determining obviousness under 35 U.S.C. 103 are summarized as follows: 1. Determining the scope and contents of the prior art. 2. Ascertaining the differences between the prior art and the claims at issue. 3. Resolving the level of ordinary skill in the pertinent art. 4. Considering objective evidence present in the application indicating obviousness or nonobviousness. Claim(s) 1-20 is/are rejected under 35 U.S.C. 103 as being unpatentable over Lim (US 20190245126) in view of CHOI et al. (US 20210020707) . Regarding claim 1, Lim discloses that a display device comprising: an alignment electrode including: a first electrode El1 & MM (Fig. 5B); and a second electrode EL2 surrounding the first electrode MM (Fig. 8K, partially surrounding and applicant argues that fully surrounding); a first organic layer INS1 (para. 0101, note: the organic insulating layer) disposed on the alignment electrode EL1, MM EL2 and defining an opening OPN (Fig. 8C-D) partially exposing the alignment electrode (Fig. 8D); and a light-emitting element LDb provided in the opening of the first organic layer (Fig. 8F). PNG media_image1.png 385 557 media_image1.png Greyscale Lin fails to specify that a second electrode helically surrounding the first electrode. However, CHOI suggests that a second electrode E2 helically surrounding the first electrode E1 (Fig. 12). PNG media_image2.png 429 677 media_image2.png Greyscale Therefore, it would have been obvious to one of ordinary skill in the art before effective filing date of applicant(s) claimed invention was made to provide Lim with a second electrode surrounding the first electrode as taught by Yang in order to enhance outgassing of the insulating layer (para. 0101), using different methods to form stacked electrodes and also, the claim would have been obvious because a particular know technique was recognized as part of the ordinary capabilities of one skilled in the art. Reclaim 2, Lim & CHOI disclose that an insulating layer INS2 between the first electrode and the second electrode EL2 (Lim, Fig. 8K). Reclaim 3, Lim & CHOI disclose that a first end portion of the light-emitting element DLb is exposed at an upper portion of the first organic layer INS1(Lim, Fig. 8H). Reclaim 4 , Lim & CHOI disclose that a connecting electrode CM on the first end portion of the light-emitting element (Lim, Fig. 8H). Reclaim 5, Lim & CHOI disclose that the first end portion of the light-emitting element LDb is electrically connected to the connecting electrode CM (Lim, Fig. 8H). Reclaim 6, Lim & CHOI disclose that a second end portion of the light-emitting element is electrically connected to the alignment electrode EL1, EL1, EL2 (Lim, Fig. 8K). Reclaim 7, Lim & CHOI disclose that the second end portion of the light-emitting element is in electrical contact with the alignment electrode exposed by the opening of the first organic layer (Lim, Fig. 8J). Reclaim 8, Lim & CHOI disclose that a second organic layer INS2 on the first organic layer INS1 (Lim, Fig. 8K). Reclaim 9, Lim & CHOI disclose that the second organic layer is provided in the opening of the first organic layer (Lim, Fig. 8K). Reclaim 10, Lim & CHOI disclose that the second organic layer exposes the first end portion of the light-emitting element (Lim, Fig. 8K). Regarding claim 11, Lim & CHOI disclose that a display device comprising: an alignment electrode including: a lower electrode EL1 & MM; a an upper electrode El2 electrically contacting the lower electrode (Lim in view of Yang’s Fig. 1F, a lower electrode 50 and an upper electrode can be 60) ; and a core electrode CM helically surrounding by the lower electrode and the upper electrode (CHOI, Fig. 12); a first organic layer INS1 disposed on the alignment electrode and defining an opening partially exposing the alignment electrode (Lim, Fig. 8C-D); and a light-emitting element LDb provided in the opening of the first organic layer. 12 INS1 (Lim, Fig. 8H). Reclaim 12, Lim & CHOI disclose that a first insulating layer INS2 between the lower electrode and the core electrode CM (Lim, Fig. 8I). Reclaim 13, Lim & CHOI disclose that a second insulating layer between the core electrode CM and the upper electrode EL2 (Lim, Fig. 8K, para. 0109). Reclaim 14, Lim & CHOI disclose that the lower electrode and the upper electrode are electrically connected to each other (Lim, Fig. 8K). Reclaim 15, Lim & CHOI disclose that the upper electrode EL2 is in electrical contact with the lower electrode EL1 or MM through a contact hole penetrating the second insulating layer and the first insulating layer (Lim, Fig. 8K). Reclaim 16, Lim & CHOI disclose that a first end portion of the light-emitting element is exposed at an upper portion of the first organic layer (Lim, Fig. 8K). Reclaim 17, Lim & CHOI disclose that a connecting electrode on the first end portion of the light-emitting element (Lim, Fig. 8K). Reclaim 18, Lim & CHOI disclose that a second end portion of the light-emitting element is electrically connected to the alignment electrode exposed by the opening of the first organic layer (Lim, Fig. 8K). Reclaim 19, Lim & CHOI disclose that a second organic layer on the first organic layer (Lim, Fig. 8K). Reclaim 20, Lim & CHOI disclose that the second organic layer exposes the first end portion of the light-emitting element (Lim, Fig. 8K). Response to Arguments Applicant’s arguments with respect to claim(s) have been considered but are moot because the new ground of rejection does not rely on any reference applied in the prior rejection of record for any teaching or matter specifically challenged in the argument. Conclusion Any inquiry concerning this communication or earlier communications from the examiner should be directed to SU C KIM whose telephone number is (571)272-5972. The examiner can normally be reached M-F 9:00 to 5:00. Examiner interviews are available via telephone, in-person, and video conferencing using a USPTO supplied web-based collaboration tool. To schedule an interview, applicant is encouraged to use the USPTO Automated Interview Request (AIR) at http://www.uspto.gov/interviewpractice. If attempts to reach the examiner by telephone are unsuccessful, the examiner’s supervisor, Dale Page can be reached at 571-270-7877. The fax phone number for the organization where this application or proceeding is assigned is 571-273-8300. Information regarding the status of published or unpublished applications may be obtained from Patent Center. Unpublished application information in Patent Center is available to registered users. To file and manage patent submissions in Patent Center, visit: https://patentcenter.uspto.gov. Visit https://www.uspto.gov/patents/apply/patent-center for more information about Patent Center and https://www.uspto.gov/patents/docx for information about filing in DOCX format. For additional questions, contact the Electronic Business Center (EBC) at 866-217-9197 (toll-free). If you would like assistance from a USPTO Customer Service Representative, call 800-786-9199 (IN USA OR CANADA) or 571-272-1000. /SU C KIM/Primary Examiner, Art Unit 2899
Read full office action

Prosecution Timeline

May 31, 2023
Application Filed
Nov 17, 2025
Non-Final Rejection mailed — §103
Feb 13, 2026
Response Filed
Apr 29, 2026
Final Rejection mailed — §103
Jun 24, 2026
Response after Non-Final Action
Jul 23, 2026
Request for Continued Examination
Jul 27, 2026
Response after Non-Final Action
Sep 03, 2026
Non-Final Rejection mailed — §103 (current)

Precedent Cases

Applications granted by this same examiner with similar technology

Patent 12740198
INK INCLUDING LIGHT-EMITTING ELEMENTS, DISPLAY DEVICE AND METHOD OF FABRICATING THE SAME
5y 0m to grant Granted Sep 15, 2026
Patent 12727511
SEMICONDUCTOR LIGHT EMITTING DEVICE PACKAGE FOR DISPLAY PIXEL AND DISPLAY DEVICE INCLUDING THE SAME
3y 0m to grant Granted Sep 01, 2026
Patent 12727497
MEMORY TILE WITH PROBE PAD ARRANGEMENT AND STACKED MEMORY DEVICE
2y 11m to grant Granted Sep 01, 2026
Patent 12720843
SEMICONDUCTOR DEVICE WITH RECESSED GATE AND METHOD FOR FABRICATING THE SAME
2y 9m to grant Granted Aug 25, 2026
Patent 12713755
LED DISPLAY APPARATUS
3y 0m to grant Granted Aug 18, 2026
Study what changed to get past this examiner. Based on 5 most recent grants.

Strategy Recommendation AI-generated — please review before filing

Get a prosecution strategy drawn from examiner precedents, rejection analysis, and claim mapping.
Typically takes 5-10 seconds — AI-generated, attorney review required before filing

Prosecution Projections

3-4
Expected OA Rounds
78%
Grant Probability
66%
With Interview (-11.8%)
2y 9m (~0m remaining)
Median Time to Grant
High
PTA Risk
Based on 923 resolved cases by this examiner. Grant probability derived from career allowance rate.

Sign in with your work email

Enter your email to receive a magic link. No password needed.

Personal email addresses (Gmail, Yahoo, etc.) are not accepted.

Free tier: 3 strategy analyses per month