Notice of Pre-AIA or AIA Status
The present application, filed on or after March 16, 2013, is being examined under the first inventor to file provisions of the AIA .
In the event the determination of the status of the application as subject to AIA 35 U.S.C. 102 and 103 (or as subject to pre-AIA 35 U.S.C. 102 and 103) is incorrect, any correction of the statutory basis (i.e., changing from AIA to pre-AIA ) for the rejection will not be considered a new ground of rejection if the prior art relied upon, and the rationale supporting the rejection, would be the same under either status.
Status of Claims
Examiner notes that in the instant application:
-Claims 1-3, 5-11, 13-16, 21-26 are pending.
-Claims 4, 12, and 17-20 are cancelled.
-Claims 1, 11, 21, and 24 are amended.
-Claims 25 and 26 are new.
Title
Acknowledgement is made of Applicant’s replacement of the title of the invention to a new title which is more clearly indicative of the invention to which the claims are directed. The objection to the title is hereby withdrawn.
Claim Objections
Acknowledgement is made of Applicant’s amendment to Claim 24 as it relates to the claim objection over informalities in the Office Action dated February 18, 2026. The objection over informalities is hereby withdrawn.
Response to Arguments
Applicant's arguments filed May 8, 2026 have been fully considered but they are not persuasive.
Applicant makes two arguments regarding the incorporation of the teachings of Pan into Huang (as in page 9 of the response), 1) argument against incorporation and 2) argument against the resultant structure as compared to the amended limitations.
Regarding argument 1, Applicant is reminded that one cannot show nonobviousness by attacking references individually where the rejections are based on combinations of references. See In re Keller, 642 F.2d 413, 208 USPQ 871 (CCPA 1981); In re Merck & Co., 800 F.2d 1091, 231 USPQ 375 (Fed. Cir. 1986). In this case, the fact that the isolation structure of Pan is not located in the same position relative to the surrounding elements as with Huang is immaterial to the teaching of the isolation structure itself, and one of ordinary skill in the art would recognize disclosed features of an isolation structure of Pan may be incorporated into an isolation structure of Huang. This is similarly true to how the isolation structure is utilized (from and to what it provides isolation for).
Regarding argument 2, Examiner’s understanding is that only the teaching of the relative values of the first and second dielectric constants would be incorporated from Pan into Huang, thus the positions of the structure of Huang after being modified by the teachings of Pan would remain unchanged, and thus the limitation of “isolation structures interposed between the fin and the source/drain regions” is necessarily taught.
Furthermore, Examiner notes that the use of a lower dielectric constant liner layer and a higher dielectric constant dielectric layer is motivated by Pan with improved device performance (specifically by reducing leakage and capacitance, Paragraph [0065]), which one of ordinary skill in the art would readily recognize as benefiting the isolation structure of Huang.
The rejection has been updated to address the newly amended limitations.
Claim Rejections - 35 USC § 103
The following is a quotation of 35 U.S.C. 103 which forms the basis for all obviousness rejections set forth in this Office action:
A patent for a claimed invention may not be obtained, notwithstanding that the claimed invention is not identically disclosed as set forth in section 102, if the differences between the claimed invention and the prior art are such that the claimed invention as a whole would have been obvious before the effective filing date of the claimed invention to a person having ordinary skill in the art to which the claimed invention pertains. Patentability shall not be negated by the manner in which the invention was made.
Claims 1-3, 11, 13, 16, 21, 22, 25 and 26 are rejected under 35 U.S.C. 103 as being unpatentable over Huang et al. (U.S. Pub. 2021/0202742), hereinafter Huang, in view of Pan et al. (U.S. 2022/0320088), hereinafter Pan.
Regarding Claim 1, Huang teaches a semiconductor device ((100c); Figs. 1A - 2D-2, and 5A-1 – 5B-2, Paragraph [0087]) comprising:
-a substrate ((102); Fig. 5B-2, Paragraph [0025]);
-a fin ((104B) later identified as below each transistor stack; Figs. 1E, 2A-2, 5B-1, and 5B-2, Paragraph [0028]) protruding above the substrate (102);
-a gate structure ((152) including (154), (156), and (158); Fig. 27B, Paragraph [0066]) over the fin (104B);
-source/drain regions ((142); Figs. 5B-1 and 5B-2, Paragraph [0055]) over the fin (104B) and on opposing sides of the gate structure (152);
-channel layers ((108’); Fig. 5B-1, Paragraph [0064]) over the fin (104B) and between the source/drain regions (142), wherein the gate structure (152) wraps around the channel layers (108’); and
-isolation structures ((136c); Figs. 5B-1 and 5B-2, Paragraph [0088]) interposed between the fin (104B) and the source/drain regions (142) (Compare Fig. 5B-1 to instant Fig. 13A), wherein the isolation structures (136c) separate the source/drain regions (142) from the fin ((104B), see Paragraph [0047]), wherein each of the isolation structures (136c) comprises a liner layer (136c-1) and a dielectric layer (comprising (136c-2) and (136c-3)) over the liner layer (136c-1), wherein the dielectric layer has a plurality of sublayers (see Fig. 5A-2 and Paragraph [0089]).
Huang further teaches: the liner layer has a first dielectric constant (of (136c-1)), and the dielectric layer has a second dielectric constant (of, e.g. (136c-2) made of e.g. silicon oxide).
Huang does not explicitly disclose:
-the second dielectric constant is higher than the first dielectric constant.
Pan teaches a semiconductor device ((200); Fig. 26, Paragraph [0015]) containing channel layers ((220’); Fig. 27B, Paragraph [0050]) surrounded by a gate structure ((370); Fig. 27B, Paragraph [0053]) above a fin ((206’); Fig. 27B, Paragraph [0016]) with an isolation structure ((280); Fig. 27B, Paragraph [0031]) comprising a liner layer ((262) ; Fig. 27B, paragraph [0026]) and a dielectric layer ((264) made of silicon dioxide; Fig. 27B, Paragraph [0026]), wherein:
-the second dielectric constant higher than the first dielectric constant (‘(262) include a dielectric material having a dielectric constant that is less than a dielectric constant of silicon dioxide’, Paragraph [0026])
It would have been obvious to one of ordinary skill in the art before the effective filing date of the claimed invention to incorporate the teachings of Pan into the device of Huang such that it has a second dielectric constant higher than a first dielectric constant. This would be due to the fact that doing so reduces the chances of void formation, thereby improving device performance (Pan, Paragraph [0065]).
For the following claim rejections, all references are directed towards Huang unless otherwise specified. For example, (136c-1) refers to (Huang, (136c-1)), while (Pan, (200)) refers to element (200) of Pan.
Regarding Claim 2, Huang as modified by Pan teaches a semiconductor device ((100c); Figs. 1A - 2D-2, and 5A-1 – 5B-2, Paragraph [0087]) of Claim 1, wherein:
-the liner layer (136c-1) extends along an upper surface of the fin (seen in Fig. 5B-2) and along sidewalls of the fin (seen in Fig. 5B-1).
Regarding Claim 3, Huang as modified by Pan teaches a semiconductor device ((100c); Figs. 1A - 2D-2, and 5A-1 – 5B-2, Paragraph [0087]) of Claim 2, wherein:
-the liner layer is a dielectric material (‘dielectric layer’ (136c-1), Paragraph [0089]) and has a U-shaped cross-section (As in both cross-sections of Figs. 5B-1 and 5B-2), and the dielectric layer ((136c-2) and (136c-3)) fills a space defined by the U-shaped cross-section (by the bounds of (136c-1)).
Regarding Claim 11, Huang teaches a semiconductor device ((100c); Figs. 1A - 2D-2, and 5A-1 – 5B-2, Paragraph [0087]) comprising:
-a substrate ((102); Fig. 5B-2, Paragraph [0025]);
-a fin ((104B) later identified as below each transistor stack; Figs. 1E, 2A-2, 5B-1, and 5B-2, Paragraph [0028]) protruding above the substrate (102);
-channel layers ((108’); Fig. 5B-1, Paragraph [0064]) over the fin (104B);
-a gate structure ((152) including (154), (156), and (158); Fig. 27B, Paragraph [0066]) over the fin (104B) and around the channel layers (108’);
-source/drain regions ((142); Figs. 5B-1 and 5B-2, Paragraph [0055]) over the fin (104B) and on opposing sides of the gate structure (152), wherein the source/drain regions (142), are at opposing ends of the channel layers (108’); and
-isolation structures ((136c); Figs. 5B-1 and 5B-2, Paragraph [0088]) between the source/drain regions (142), and the fin (104B), wherein the isolation structures (136c) comprise a dielectric layer (comprising (136c-2) and (136c-3)) and a dielectric liner layer (136c-1) around the dielectric layer (As in both cross-sections of Figs. 5B-1 and 5B-2), wherein the dielectric layer has a multi-layered structure (see Fig. 5A-2 and Paragraph [0089]).
Huang further teaches: the dielectric liner layer has a first dielectric constant (of (136c-1)), and the dielectric layer has a second dielectric constant (of, e.g. (136c-2) made of e.g. silicon oxide).
Huang does not explicitly disclose:
-the first dielectric constant is lower than the second dielectric constant.
Pan teaches a semiconductor device ((200); Fig. 26, Paragraph [0015]) containing channel layers ((220’); Fig. 27B, Paragraph [0050]) surrounded by a gate structure ((370); Fig. 27B, Paragraph [0053]) above a fin ((206’); Fig. 27B, Paragraph [0016]) with an isolation structure ((280); Fig. 27B, Paragraph [0031]) comprising a dielectric liner layer ((262) ; Fig. 27B, paragraph [0026]) and a dielectric layer ((264) made of silicon dioxide; Fig. 27B, Paragraph [0026]), wherein:
-the first dielectric constant lower than the second dielectric constant (‘(262) include a dielectric material having a dielectric constant that is less than a dielectric constant of silicon dioxide’, Paragraph [0026])
It would have been obvious to one of ordinary skill in the art before the effective filing date of the claimed invention to incorporate the teachings of Pan into the device of Huang such that it has a first dielectric constant lower than a second dielectric constant. This would be due to the fact that doing so reduces the chances of void formation, thereby improving device performance (Pan, Paragraph [0065]).
For the following claim rejections, all references are directed towards Huang unless otherwise specified. For example, (136c-1) refers to (Huang, (136c-1)), while (Pan, (200)) refers to element (200) of Pan.
Regarding Claim 13, Huang as modified by Pan teaches a semiconductor device ((100c); Figs. 1A - 2D-2, and 5A-1 – 5B-2, Paragraph [0087]) of Claim 11, further comprising:
-inner spacers ((134); Fig. 5B-1, Paragraph [0046]) between adjacent channel layers (108’) and between a lowermost channel layer (bottom (108’)) and the fin (104B), wherein an upper surface of the isolation structures (top, flat surface of (136c), Fig. 5B-1) distal from the substrate (102) is between a first surface of a first inner spacer (top surface of a bottom (134), e.g. a bottom-right (134) of a stack) facing away from the substrate (102) and a second surface of the first inner spacer (bottom surface of bottom-right (134)) facing the substrate (102), wherein the first inner spacer (bottom-right (134)) is between the lowermost channel layer (bottom (108’)) and the fin (104B).
Regarding Claim 16, Huang as modified by Pan teaches a semiconductor device ((100c); Figs. 1A - 2D-2, and 5A-1 – 5B-2, Paragraph [0087]) of Claim 11, wherein:
-the channel layers (108) are nanosheets or nanowires (Paragraph [0120]).
Regarding Claim 21, Huang teaches a semiconductor device ((100c); Figs. 1A - 2D-2, and 5A-1 – 5B-2, Paragraph [0087]) comprising:
-a substrate ((102); Fig. 5B-2, Paragraph [0025]);
-a fin ((104B) later identified as below each transistor stack; Figs. 1E, 2A-2, 5B-1, and 5B-2, Paragraph [0028]) protruding above the substrate (102);
-source/drain regions ((142); Figs. 5B-1 and 5B-2, Paragraph [0055]) over the fin (104B)
-channel layers ((108’); Fig. 5B-1, Paragraph [0064]) over the fin (104B) and between the source/drain regions (142);
-a gate structure ((152) including (154), (156), and (158); Fig. 27B, Paragraph [0066]) over the fin (104B) and around the channel layers (108’), wherein the source/drain regions (142) are on on opposing sides of the gate structure (152); and
-isolation structures ((136c); Figs. 5B-1 and 5B-2, Paragraph [0088]) under the source/drain regions (142) and interposed between the source/drain regions (142) and the fin (104B), wherein the isolation structures (136c) comprise a dielectric layer (comprising (136c-2) and (136c-3)) and a dielectric liner layer (136c-1) around the dielectric layer (As in both cross-sections of Figs. 5B-1 and 5B-2), wherein the dielectric layer has a multi-layered structure (see Fig. 5A-2 and Paragraph [0089]).
Huang further teaches: the dielectric liner layer has a dielectric constant (of (136c-1)), and the dielectric layer has a dielectric constant (of, e.g. (136c-2) made of e.g. silicon oxide).
Huang does not explicitly disclose:
-the dielectric layer has a higher dielectric constant than the dielectric liner layer.
Pan teaches a semiconductor device ((200); Fig. 26, Paragraph [0015]) containing channel layers ((220’); Fig. 27B, Paragraph [0050]) surrounded by a gate structure ((370); Fig. 27B, Paragraph [0053]) above a fin ((206’); Fig. 27B, Paragraph [0016]) with an isolation structure ((280); Fig. 27B, Paragraph [0031]) comprising a liner layer ((262) ; Fig. 27B, paragraph [0026]) and a dielectric layer ((264) made of silicon dioxide; Fig. 27B, Paragraph [0026]), wherein:
- the dielectric layer has a higher dielectric constant than the dielectric liner layer (‘(262) include a dielectric material having a dielectric constant that is less than a dielectric constant of silicon dioxide’, Paragraph [0026])
It would have been obvious to one of ordinary skill in the art before the effective filing date of the claimed invention to incorporate the teachings of Pan into the device of Huang such that the dielectric layer has a higher dielectric constant than the dielectric liner layer. This would be due to the fact that doing so reduces the chances of void formation, thereby improving device performance (Pan, Paragraph [0065]).
For the following claim rejections, all references are directed towards Huang unless otherwise specified. For example, (136c-1) refers to (Huang, (136c-1)), while (Pan, (200)) refers to element (200) of Pan.
Regarding Claim 22, Huang as modified by Pan teaches a semiconductor device ((100c); Figs. 1A - 2D-2, and 5A-1 – 5B-2, Paragraph [0087]) of Claim 21, further comprising:
-inner spacers ((134); Fig. 5B-1, Paragraph [0046]), wherein the inner spacers are interposed vertically between adjacent channel layers (108’) and between the fin (104B) and a lowermost channel layer (bottom (108’)), wherein the inner spacers are interposed laterally between the gate structure (152) and the source/drain regions (142), wherein the inner spacers comprise a first inner spacer (bottom (134), e.g. a bottom-right (134) of a stack) closest to the substrate (102), wherein an upper surface of the isolation structures (top, flat surface of (136c), Fig. 5B-1) distal from the substrate (102) is between an upper surface of the first inner spacer (top surface of bottom-right (134) and a lower surface of the first inner spacer (bottom surface of bottom-right (134)).
Regarding Claim 25, Huang as modified by Pan teaches a semiconductor device ((100c); Figs. 1A - 2D-2, and 5A-1 – 5B-2, Paragraph [0087]) of Claim 1, wherein:
-a first isolation structure (e.g. leftmost (136c) of Fig. 5B-1) of the isolation structures is interposed between the fin (104B) and a first source/drain region (e.g. leftmost (142) of Fig. 5B-1) of the source/drain regions, wherein an upper surface of the dielectric layer (Top of (136c-2) and (136c-3)) of the first isolation structure (leftmost (136)) distal from the substrate (102) is in contact with a lower surface of the first source/drain region (Bottom of leftmost (142)) facing the substrate (102).
Regarding Claim 26, Huang as modified by Pan teaches a semiconductor device ((100c); Figs. 1A - 2D-2, and 5A-1 – 5B-2, Paragraph [0087]) of Claim 25, wherein:
-a lower surface of the liner layer (Bottom of (136c-1)) of the first isolation structure (leftmost (136)) facing the substrate (102) is in contact with an upper surface of the fin ((104B), see Fig. 5B-1 and also 5B-2) distal from the substrate (102).
Claims 5-10, 14, 15, 23 and 24 are rejected under 35 U.S.C. 103 as being unpatentable over Huang and Pan in view of Jung et al. (U.S. 2024/0088150), hereinafter Jung.
Regarding Claim 5, Huang and Pan teach a semiconductor device ((100c); Figs. 1A - 2D-2, and 5A-1 – 5B-2, Paragraph [0087]) of Claim 2, wherein:
The dielectric layer ((136c-2) and (136c-3)) comprises
-a first sublayer comprising silicon nitride (‘silicon nitride’ (136c-2), Paragraph [0090]), wherein the first sublayer has a first atomic ratio between nitrogen and silicon (Necessarily as a consequence of (136c-2) being silicon nitride); and
- a second sublayer over the first sublayer, wherein the second sublayer comprises silicon nitride (‘silicon nitride’ (136c-3), Paragraph [0090]) and has a second atomic ratio between nitrogen and silicon (Necessarily as a consequence of (136c-3) being silicon nitride)
Huang nor Pan explicitly state:
-the second atomic ratio is different from the first atomic ratio.
Jung teaches a semiconductor device ((100); Fig. 2A, Paragraph [0019]) containing channel layers ((NSS); Fig. 2A, Paragraph [0026]) surrounded by a gate structure ((160); Fig. 2A, Paragraph [0031]) above a fin (upper region (FA); Fig. 2A, Paragraph [0022]) with an isolation structure ((190); Fig. 2A, Paragraph [0045]) comprising a liner layer ((192); Fig. 2A, Paragraph [0045]) and a dielectric layer (comprising (194), (196), and (198); Fig. 2A, Paragraph [0045]), wherein:
the dielectric layer ((194), (196), and (198)) comprises:
-a first sublayer comprising silicon nitride ((196) being nitrogen-rich silicon nitride; Paragraph [0052]), wherein the first sublayer has a first atomic ratio between nitrogen and silicon (Wherein the ratio is taken as nitrogen atoms to silicon atoms, therefore for (196) it’s greater than 4/3, corresponding to a higher amount of nitrogen or lower amount of silicon than stoichiometric); and
-a second sublayer (198) over the first sublayer (196), wherein the second sublayer comprises silicon nitride ((198) being stochiometric silicon nitride (Si3N4)); Paragraph [0052]), and has a second atomic ratio between nitrogen and silicon (Wherein the ratio is taken as nitrogen atoms to silicon atoms, therefore for (198) it’s 4/3), wherein
-the second atomic ratio is different (less than) from the first atomic ratio.
It would have been obvious to one of ordinary skill in the art before the effective filing date of the claimed invention to incorporate the teachings of Jung into the device of Huang and Pan such that the second atomic ratio is different from the first atomic ratio. Futhermore, the incorporation would be done such that the second atomic ratio is lower than the first atomic ratio (Jung, (198) has less nitrogen/more silicon than (196), thus the atomic ratio of nitrogen to silicon is less, Paragraph [0052]). This would be due to the fact that doing so would increase device performance and reliability (Jung, Paragraph [0063]).
Regarding Claim 6, Huang and Pan as modified by Jung teach a semiconductor device ((100c); Figs. 1A - 2D-2, and 5A-1 – 5B-2, Paragraph [0087]) of Claim 5, wherein:
- the second atomic ratio (Jung, of (198)) is lower than the first atomic ratio (Jung, of (196)) (As explained in the incorporation of Jung into Huang in Claim 5 above, see Jung Paragraph [0052])
Regarding Claim 7, Huang and Pan teach a semiconductor device ((100c); Figs. 1A - 2D-2, and 5A-1 – 5B-2, Paragraph [0087]) of Claim 2, wherein:
-each sublayer of the plurality of sublayers comprises silicon nitride (‘silicon nitride’ as material for both (136c-2) and (136c-3), Paragraph [0090])
Huang nor Pan explicitly state:
- each sublayer of the plurality of sublayers comprises silicon nitride and has a different respective atomic ratio between nitrogen and silicon, wherein there is a gradient in the atomic ratios of the plurality of sublayers.
Jung teaches a semiconductor device ((100); Fig. 2A, Paragraph [0019]) containing channel layers ((NSS); Fig. 2A, Paragraph [0026]) surrounded by a gate structure ((160); Fig. 2A, Paragraph [0031]) above a fin (upper region (FA); Fig. 2A, Paragraph [0022]) with an isolation structure ((190); Fig. 2A, Paragraph [0045]) comprising a liner layer ((192); Fig. 2A, Paragraph [0045]) and a dielectric layer comprising a plurality of sublayers (e.g. (194) and (196); Fig. 2A, Paragraph [0045]), wherein:
- each sublayer of the plurality of sublayers comprises silicon nitride and has a different respective atomic ratio between nitrogen and silicon ((194) being stochiometric silicon nitride (Si3N4), a ratio of 4/3. And (196) being nitrogen-rich silicon nitride, a ratio greater than 4/3, corresponding to a higher amount of nitrogen or lower amount of silicon than stoichiometric; Paragraph [0052]), wherein there is a gradient in the atomic ratios of the plurality of sublayers. (Examiner understands “gradient” here as simply a change in value)
It would have been obvious to one of ordinary skill in the art before the effective filing date of the claimed invention to incorporate the teachings of Jung into the device of Huang and Pan such that each sublayer of the plurality of sublayers comprises silicon nitride and has a different respective atomic ratio between nitrogen and silicon, wherein there is a gradient in the atomic ratios of the plurality of sublayers. Futhermore, the incorporation would be done such that the atomic ratios of the plurality of sublayers increase along a first direction (Jung, Z-direction of Fig. 2A) from a sublayer closest to the substrate (Jung, (194)) to a sublayer furthest from the substrate (Jung, (196)). (Jung, (196) has more nitrogen/less silicon than (194), thus the atomic ratio of increases, Paragraph [0052]). This would be due to the fact that doing so would increase device performance and reliability (Jung, Paragraph [0063]).
Regarding Claim 8, Huang and Pan as modified by Jung teach a semiconductor device ((100c); Figs. 1A - 2D-2, and 5A-1 – 5B-2, Paragraph [0087]) of Claim 7, wherein:
- the atomic ratios of the plurality of sublayers increase along a first direction (Jung, Z-direction of Fig. 2A) from a sublayer closest to the substrate (Jung, (194)) to a sublayer furthest from the substrate (Jung, (196)). (As explained in the incorporation of Jung into Huang in Claim 7 above, see Jung Paragraph [0052])
Regarding Claim 9, Huang and Pan teach a semiconductor device ((100c); Figs. 1A - 2D-2, and 5A-1 – 5B-2, Paragraph [0087]) of Claim 2, wherein:
The dielectric layer ((136c-2) and (136c-3)) comprises
-a first type of sublayer (136c-2) and a second type of sublayer (136c-3), wherein the first type of sublayer comprises silicon nitride (Paragraph [0090]) and has a first atomic ratio between nitrogen and silicon (Necessarily as a consequence of (136c-2) being silicon nitride), and the second type of sublayer comprises silicon nitride (Paragraph [0090]) and has a second atomic ratio between nitrogen and silicon (Necessarily as a consequence of (136c-) being silicon nitride).
Huang nor Pan teach:
-the dielectric layer comprises a first type of sublayers and a second type of sublayers interleaved with the first type of sublayers, wherein each of the first type of sublayers comprises silicon nitride and has a first atomic ratio between nitrogen and silicon, and each of the second type of sublayers comprises silicon nitride and has a second atomic ratio between nitrogen and silicon, wherein the first atomic ratio is different from the second atomic ratio.
Jung teaches a semiconductor device ((100); Fig. 2A, Paragraph [0019]) containing channel layers ((NSS); Fig. 2A, Paragraph [0026]) surrounded by a gate structure ((160); Fig. 2A, Paragraph [0031]) above a fin (upper region (FA); Fig. 2A, Paragraph [0022]) with an isolation structure ((190); Fig. 2A, Paragraph [0045]) comprising a dielectric layer (comprising (192), (194), (196), and (198); Fig. 2A, Paragraph [0045]), wherein:
the dielectric layer ((192), (194), (196), and (198)) comprises:
a first type of sublayers ((192) and (196)) and a second type of sublayers ((194) and (198)) interleaved with the first type of sublayers, wherein each of the first type of sublayers comprises silicon nitride ((192) and (196) comprise nitrogen-rich silicon nitride, Paragraph [0049]) and has a first atomic ratio between nitrogen and silicon (Wherein the ratio is taken as nitrogen atoms to silicon atoms, therefore for (192) and (196) it’s greater than 4/3, corresponding to a higher amount of nitrogen or lower amount of silicon than stoichiometric, Paragraph [0051]), and each of the second type of sublayers comprises silicon nitride ((194) and (198) comprise stochiometric silicon nitride, Paragraph [0052]) and has a second atomic ratio between nitrogen and silicon (Wherein the ratio is taken as nitrogen atoms to silicon atoms, therefore for (194) and (198) it’s 4/3), wherein the first atomic ratio is different (greater) from the second atomic ratio.
It would have been obvious to one of ordinary skill in the art before the effective filing date of the claimed invention to incorporate the teachings of Jung into the device of Huang and Pan such that the dielectric layer comprises a first type of sublayers and a second type of sublayers interleaved with the first type of sublayers, wherein each of the first type of sublayers comprises silicon nitride and has a first atomic ratio between nitrogen and silicon, and each of the second type of sublayers comprises silicon nitride and has a second atomic ratio between nitrogen and silicon, wherein the first atomic ratio is different from the second atomic ratio. This would be due to the fact that doing so would increase device performance and reliability (Jung, Paragraph [0063]).
Regarding Claim 10, Huang and Pan teach a semiconductor device ((100c); Figs. 1A - 2D-2, and 5A-1 – 5B-2, Paragraph [0087]) of Claim 2, wherein:
The dielectric layer ((136c-2) and (136c-3)) comprises
-a first sublayer (136c-2) on the liner layer (136c-1), wherein the first sublayer comprises silicon nitride (‘silicon nitride’ (136c-2), Paragraph [0090]), and has a first atomic ratio between nitrogen and silicon (Necessarily as a consequence of (136c-2) being silicon nitride); and
- a second sublayer over the first sublayer, wherein the second sublayer comprises silicon nitride (‘silicon nitride’ (136c-3), Paragraph [0090]) and has a second atomic ratio between nitrogen and silicon (Necessarily as a consequence of (136c-3) being silicon nitride).
Huang nor Pan teach:
- a third sublayer over the second sublayer, wherein the third sublayer comprises silicon nitride and has a third atomic ratio between nitrogen and silicon, wherein the second atomic ratio is higher than the first atomic ratio and the third atomic ratio.
Jung teaches a semiconductor device ((100); Fig. 2A, Paragraph [0019]) containing channel layers ((NSS); Fig. 2A, Paragraph [0026]) surrounded by a gate structure ((160); Fig. 2A, Paragraph [0031]) above a fin (upper region (FA); Fig. 2A, Paragraph [0022]) with an isolation structure ((190); Fig. 2A, Paragraph [0045]) comprising a liner layer ((192); Fig. 2A, Paragraph [0045]) and a dielectric layer (comprising (194), (196), and (198); Fig. 2A, Paragraph [0045]), wherein:
the dielectric layer ((194), (196), and (198)) comprises:
-a first sublayer (194) on the liner layer (192), wherein the first sublayer comprises silicon nitride ((194) being stochiometric silicon nitride (Si3N4)); Paragraph [0052]), wherein the first sublayer has a first atomic ratio between nitrogen and silicon (Wherein the ratio is taken as nitrogen atoms to silicon atoms, therefore for (194) it’s 4/3);
-a second sublayer (196) over the first sublayer (194), wherein the second sublayer comprises silicon nitride ((196) being nitrogen-rich silicon nitride; Paragraph [0052]), and has a second atomic ratio between nitrogen and silicon (Wherein the ratio is taken as nitrogen atoms to silicon atoms, therefore for (196) it’s greater than 4/3, corresponding to a higher amount of nitrogen or lower amount of silicon than stoichiometric); and
-a third sublayer (198) over the second sublayer (196), wherein the third sublayer comprises silicon nitride ((198) being stochiometric silicon nitride (Si3N4)); Paragraph [0052]), and has a third atomic ratio between nitrogen and silicon (Wherein the ratio is taken as nitrogen atoms to silicon atoms, therefore for (198) it’s 4/3), wherein
- the second atomic ratio is higher (of nitrogen-rich (196)) than the first atomic ratio (of (194)) and the third atomic ratio (of (198)).
It would have been obvious to one of ordinary skill in the art before the effective filing date of the claimed invention to incorporate the teachings of Jung into the device of Huang and Pan such that a third sublayer over the second sublayer, wherein the third sublayer comprises silicon nitride and has a third atomic ratio between nitrogen and silicon, wherein the second atomic ratio is higher than the first atomic ratio and the third atomic ratio. This would be due to the fact that doing so would increase device performance and reliability (Jung, Paragraph [0063]).
Regarding Claim 14, Huang and Pan teach a semiconductor device ((100c); Figs. 1A - 2D-2, and 5A-1 – 5B-2, Paragraph [0087]) of Claim 11, wherein:
The dielectric layer ((136c-2) and (136c-3)) comprises
-a first sublayer (136c-2) and a second sublayer (136c-3), wherein the first sublayer and the second sublayer comprise silicon nitride (‘silicon nitride’, Paragraph [0090]) and have atomic ratios between nitrogen and silicon (Necessarily as a consequence of (136c-2) and (136c-3) being silicon nitride)
Huang nor Pan explicitly state:
-the atomic ratios are different.
Jung teaches a semiconductor device ((100); Fig. 2A, Paragraph [0019]) containing channel layers ((NSS); Fig. 2A, Paragraph [0026]) surrounded by a gate structure ((160); Fig. 2A, Paragraph [0031]) above a fin (upper region (FA); Fig. 2A, Paragraph [0022]) with an isolation structure ((190); Fig. 2A, Paragraph [0045]) comprising a liner layer ((192); Fig. 2A, Paragraph [0045]) and a dielectric layer (comprising (194), (196), and (198); Fig. 2A, Paragraph [0045]), wherein:
the dielectric layer ((194), (196), and (198)) comprises:
-a first sublayer ((196) being nitrogen-rich silicon nitride; Paragraph [0052]) and a second sublayer ((198) being stochiometric silicon nitride (Si3N4)); Paragraph [0052]), wherein the first sublayer and the second sublayer comprise silicon nitride and have different atomic ratio between nitrogen and silicon ((196) has a ratio greater than (198))
It would have been obvious to one of ordinary skill in the art before the effective filing date of the claimed invention to incorporate the teachings of Jung into the device of Huang and Pan such that the atomic ratios are different. This would be due to the fact that doing so would increase device performance and reliability (Jung, Paragraph [0063]).
Regarding Claim 15, Huang and Pan teach a semiconductor device ((100c); Figs. 1A - 2D-2, and 5A-1 – 5B-2, Paragraph [0087]) of Claim 11, wherein:
The dielectric layer ((136c-2) and (136c-3)) comprises
-a first sublayer (136c-2) and a second sublayer (136c-3), wherein the first sublayer comprises silicon nitride (Paragraph [0090]) and has a first atomic ratio between nitrogen and silicon (Necessarily as a consequence of (136c-2) being silicon nitride), and the second sublayer comprises silicon nitride (Paragraph [0090]) and has a second atomic ratio between nitrogen and silicon (Necessarily as a consequence of (136c-) being silicon nitride).
Huang nor Pan teach:
- wherein the dielectric layer comprises a first set of sublayers and a second set of sublayers interleaved with the first set of sublayers, wherein the first set of sublayers and the second set of sublayers comprise silicon nitride, wherein the first set of sublayers have a first atomic ratio between nitrogen and silicon, and the second set of sublayers have a second atomic ratio between nitrogen and silicon that is different from the first atomic ratio
Jung teaches a semiconductor device ((100); Fig. 2A, Paragraph [0019]) containing channel layers ((NSS); Fig. 2A, Paragraph [0026]) surrounded by a gate structure ((160); Fig. 2A, Paragraph [0031]) above a fin (upper region (FA); Fig. 2A, Paragraph [0022]) with an isolation structure ((190); Fig. 2A, Paragraph [0045]) comprising a dielectric layer (comprising (192), (194), (196), and (198); Fig. 2A, Paragraph [0045]), wherein:
the dielectric layer ((192), (194), (196), and (198)) comprises:
a first set of sublayers ((192) and (196)) and a second set of sublayers ((194) and (198)) interleaved with the set of sublayers, wherein the first set of sublayers ((192) and (196) comprise nitrogen-rich silicon nitride, Paragraph [0049]) and the second set of sublayers ((194) and (198) comprise stochiometric silicon nitride, Paragraph [0052]) comprise silicon nitride, wherein the first set of sublayers have a first atomic ratio between nitrogen and silicon (Wherein the ratio is taken as nitrogen atoms to silicon atoms, therefore for (192) and (196) it’s greater than 4/3, corresponding to a higher amount of nitrogen or lower amount of silicon than stoichiometric, Paragraph [0051]), and the second set of sublayers have a second atomic ratio between nitrogen and silicon (Wherein the ratio is taken as nitrogen atoms to silicon atoms, therefore for (194) and (198) it’s 4/3) that is different (lesser) from the first atomic ratio.
It would have been obvious to one of ordinary skill in the art before the effective filing date of the claimed invention to incorporate the teachings of Jung into the device of Huang and Pan such that the dielectric layer comprises a first set of sublayers and a second set of sublayers interleaved with the first set of sublayers, wherein the first set of sublayers and the second set of sublayers comprise silicon nitride, wherein the first set of sublayers have a first atomic ratio between nitrogen and silicon, and the second set of sublayers have a second atomic ratio between nitrogen and silicon that is different from the first atomic ratio. This would be due to the fact that doing so would increase device performance and reliability (Jung, Paragraph [0063]).
Regarding Claim 23, Huang and Pan teach a semiconductor device ((100c); Figs. 1A - 2D-2, and 5A-1 – 5B-2, Paragraph [0087]) of Claim 2, wherein:
The dielectric layer ((136c-2) and (136c-3)) comprises
-a first sublayer of silicon nitride (‘silicon nitride’ (136c-2), Paragraph [0090]) over the dielectric liner layer (136c-1), wherein the first sublayer of silicon nitride has a first atomic ratio between nitrogen and silicon (Necessarily as a consequence of (136c-2) being silicon nitride); and
- a second sublayer of silicon nitride (‘silicon nitride’ (136c-3), Paragraph [0090]) over the first sublayer, wherein the second sublayer of silicon nitride has a second atomic ratio between nitrogen and silicon (Necessarily as a consequence of (136c-3) being silicon nitride).
Huang nor Pan explicitly state:
-the second atomic ratio is higher than the first atomic ratio.
Jung teaches a semiconductor device ((100); Fig. 2A, Paragraph [0019]) containing channel layers ((NSS); Fig. 2A, Paragraph [0026]) surrounded by a gate structure ((160); Fig. 2A, Paragraph [0031]) above a fin (upper region (FA); Fig. 2A, Paragraph [0022]) with an isolation structure ((190); Fig. 2A, Paragraph [0045]) comprising a liner layer ((192); Fig. 2A, Paragraph [0045]) and a dielectric layer (comprising (194), (196), and (198); Fig. 2A, Paragraph [0045]), wherein:
the dielectric layer ((194), (196), and (198)) comprises:
-a first sublayer of silicon nitride ((194) being stochiometric silicon nitride (Si3N4)); Paragraph [0052]) over the dielectric liner layer (192), wherein the first sublayer of silicon nitride has a first atomic ratio between nitrogen and silicon (Wherein the ratio is taken as nitrogen atoms to silicon atoms, therefore for (194) it’s 4/3); and
-a second sublayer of silicon nitride ((196) being nitrogen-rich silicon nitride; Paragraph [0052]) over the first sublayer of silicon nitride (194), wherein the second sublayer of silicon nitride has a second atomic ratio between nitrogen and silicon (Wherein the ratio is taken as nitrogen atoms to silicon atoms, therefore for (196) it’s greater than 4/3, corresponding to a higher amount of nitrogen or lower amount of silicon than stoichiometric), wherein the second atomic ratio is higher (of nitrogen-rich (196)) than the first atomic ratio (194).
It would have been obvious to one of ordinary skill in the art before the effective filing date of the claimed invention to incorporate the teachings of Jung into the device of Huang such that the second atomic ratio is higher than the first atomic ratio. This would be due to the fact that doing so would increase device performance and reliability (Jung, Paragraph [0063]).
Regarding Claim 24, Huang and Pan as modified by Jung teaches a semiconductor device ((100c); Figs. 1A - 2D-2, and 5A-1 – 5B-2, Paragraph [0087]) of Claim 23, wherein:
The dielectric layer (Jung, (194), (196), and (198)) further comprises:
-a third sublayer of silicon nitride ((198) being stochiometric silicon nitride (Si3N4)); Fig. 2A, Paragraph [0052]) over the second sublayer of silicon nitride (196), wherein the third sublayer of silicon nitride has a third atomic ratio between nitrogen and silicon (Wherein the ratio is taken as nitrogen atoms to silicon atoms, therefore for (198) it’s 4/3), wherein the third atomic ratio is lower (of stochiometric (198)) than the second atomic ratio (of nitrogen-rich (196)).
Conclusion
THIS ACTION IS MADE FINAL. Applicant is reminded of the extension of time policy as set forth in 37 CFR 1.136(a).
A shortened statutory period for reply to this final action is set to expire THREE MONTHS from the mailing date of this action. In the event a first reply is filed within TWO MONTHS of the mailing date of this final action and the advisory action is not mailed until after the end of the THREE-MONTH shortened statutory period, then the shortened statutory period will expire on the date the advisory action is mailed, and any nonprovisional extension fee (37 CFR 1.17(a)) pursuant to 37 CFR 1.136(a) will be calculated from the mailing date of the advisory action. In no event, however, will the statutory period for reply expire later than SIX MONTHS from the mailing date of this final action.
Any inquiry concerning this communication or earlier communications from the examiner should be directed to DMITRI MIHALIOV whose telephone number is (571)270-5220. The examiner can normally be reached weekdays 7:30 - 17:30 US Eastern Time.
Examiner interviews are available via telephone, in-person, and video conferencing using a USPTO supplied web-based collaboration tool. To schedule an interview, applicant is encouraged to use the USPTO Automated Interview Request (AIR) at http://www.uspto.gov/interviewpractice.
If attempts to reach the examiner by telephone are unsuccessful, the examiner’s supervisor, Davienne Monbleau can be reached at (571) 272-1945. The fax phone number for the organization where this application or proceeding is assigned is 571-273-8300.
Information regarding the status of published or unpublished applications may be obtained from Patent Center. Unpublished application information in Patent Center is available to registered users. To file and manage patent submissions in Patent Center, visit: https://patentcenter.uspto.gov. Visit https://www.uspto.gov/patents/apply/patent-center for more information about Patent Center and https://www.uspto.gov/patents/docx for information about filing in DOCX format. For additional questions, contact the Electronic Business Center (EBC) at 866-217-9197 (toll-free). If you would like assistance from a USPTO Customer Service Representative, call 800-786-9199 (IN USA OR CANADA) or 571-272-1000.
/D.M./Examiner, Art Unit 2812
/DAVIENNE N MONBLEAU/Supervisory Patent Examiner, Art Unit 2812