Prosecution Insights
Last updated: April 19, 2026
Application No. 18/336,678

3D HYBRID MEMORY USING HORIZONTALLY ORIENTED CONDUCTIVE DIELECTRIC CHANNEL REGIONS

Non-Final OA §102§103
Filed
Jun 16, 2023
Examiner
KIM, TONG-HO
Art Unit
2811
Tech Center
2800 — Semiconductors & Electrical Systems
Assignee
Tokyo Electron Limited
OA Round
1 (Non-Final)
95%
Grant Probability
Favorable
1-2
OA Rounds
1y 10m
To Grant
96%
With Interview

Examiner Intelligence

Grants 95% — above average
95%
Career Allow Rate
991 granted / 1040 resolved
+27.3% vs TC avg
Minimal +0% lift
Without
With
+0.4%
Interview Lift
resolved cases with interview
Fast prosecutor
1y 10m
Avg Prosecution
42 currently pending
Career history
1082
Total Applications
across all art units

Statute-Specific Performance

§103
42.1%
+2.1% vs TC avg
§102
31.5%
-8.5% vs TC avg
§112
8.6%
-31.4% vs TC avg
Black line = Tech Center average estimate • Based on career data from 1040 resolved cases

Office Action

§102 §103
DETAILED ACTION Notice of Pre-AIA or AIA Status The present application, filed on or after March 16, 2013, is being examined under the first inventor to file provisions of the AIA . Information Disclosure Statement The information disclosure statement (IDS) submitted on 7/12/2023 was filed. The submission is in compliance with the provisions of 37 CFR 1.97. Accordingly, the information disclosure statement is being considered by the examiner. Claim Rejections - 35 USC § 102 The following is a quotation of the appropriate paragraphs of 35 U.S.C. 102 that form the basis for the rejections under this section made in this Office action: A person shall be entitled to a patent unless – (a)(1) the claimed invention was patented, described in a printed publication, or in public use, on sale, or otherwise available to the public before the effective filing date of the claimed invention. Claim(s) 1, 3-7, 11-12, 15 and 17-19 is/are rejected under 35 U.S.C. 102(a)(1) as being anticipated by Lilak (US 2020/0098756). Regarding claim 1, Lilak discloses, in at least figures 1A-1B, 7-12, and related text, a semiconductor structure, comprising: one or more first nanostructures (132b, lower 138, [40], [41], [64]) extending along a first lateral direction (Y direction, figures); one or more second nanostructures (132a, upper 138, [40], [41], [64]) extending along the first lateral direction (Y direction, figures) and vertically disposed above the one or more first nanostructures (132b, lower 138, [40], [41], [64]); and a gate structure (140 (142/144/145), [37]) extending along a second lateral direction (X direction, figures) perpendicular to the first lateral direction (Y direction, figures), and disposed around each of the one or more first nanostructures (132b, lower 138, [40], [41], [64]) and each of the one or more second nanostructures (132a, upper 138, [40], [41], [64]), wherein the gate structure (140 (142/145/144), [37]) comprises: (i) a first metal material (145, [39]), (ii) a ferroelectric material (142, [90]), and (iii) a second metal material (144, [92]). Regarding claim 3, Lilak discloses the semiconductor structure of claim 1 as described above. Lilak further discloses, in at least figures 1A-1B, 7-12, and related text, the one or more first nanostructures (132b, lower 138, [40], [41], [64]) and the one or more second nanostructures (132a, upper 138, [40], [41], [64]) each include a semiconductor material ([40], [41], [64]). Regarding claim 4, Lilak discloses the semiconductor structure of claim 1 as described above. Lilak further discloses, in at least figures 1A-1B, 7-12, and related text, a first pair of source/drain structures (120b, [81]) in contact with the one or more first nanostructures (132b, lower 138, [40], [41], [64]) along the first lateral direction (Y direction, figures); and a second pair of source/drain structures (120a, [81]) in contact with the one or more second nanostructures (132a, upper 138, [40], [41], [64]) along the first lateral direction (Y direction, figures). Regarding claim 5, Lilak discloses the semiconductor structure of claim 4 as described above. Lilak further discloses, in at least figures 1A-1B, 7-12, and related text, the first pair of source/drain structures (120b, [81]) are vertically spaced from the second pair of source/drain structures (120a, [81]). Regarding claim 6, Lilak discloses the semiconductor structure of claim 1 as described above. Lilak further discloses, in at least figures 1A-1B, 7-12, and related text, the first metal material (145, [39]) includes a plurality of first closed-loops surrounding the one or more first nanostructures (132b, lower 138, [40], [41], [64]) and the one or more second nanostructures (132a, upper 138, [40], [41], [64]), respectively. Regarding claim 7, Lilak discloses the semiconductor structure of claim 6 as described above. Lilak further discloses, in at least figures 1A-1B, 7-12, and related text, the ferroelectric material (142, [90]) includes a plurality of second closed-loops surrounding the first closed-loops (loops of 145, [39], figures), respectively. Regarding claim 11, Lilak discloses, in at least figures 4A-4B, 7-12, and related text, a semiconductor structure, comprising: a plurality of first nanostructures (lower 132, 132b, lower 138, [40], [41], [64], [88]) extending along a first lateral direction (Y direction, figures); a plurality of second nanostructures (upper 132, 132a, upper 138, [40], [41], [64], [88]) extending along the first lateral direction (Y direction, figures) and vertically disposed above the plurality of first nanostructures (lower 132, 132b, lower 138, [40], [41], [64], [88]); a first gate structure (lower 140 (142/144/145), [37]) extending along a second lateral direction (X direction, figures) perpendicular to the first lateral direction (Y direction, figures), and disposed around each of the plurality of first nanostructures (lower 132, 132b, lower 138, [40], [41], [64], [88]); and a second gate structure (upper 140 (142/144/145), [37]) extending along the second lateral direction (X direction, figures) and disposed around each of the plurality of second nanostructures (upper 132, 132a, upper 138, [40], [41], [64], [88]), wherein the first (lower 140 (142/144/145), [37]) and second (upper 140 (142/144/145), [37]) gate structures each comprise: (i) a first metal material (145, [39]), (ii) a ferroelectric material (142, [90]), and (iii) a second metal material (144, [92]). Regarding claim 12, Lilak discloses the semiconductor structure of claim 11 as described above. Lilak further discloses, in at least figures 4A-4B, 7-12, and related text, the first (lower 140 (142/144/145), [37]) and second (upper 140 (142/144/145), [37]) gate structures are physically connected to each other. Regarding claim 15, Lilak discloses the semiconductor structure of claim 11 as described above. Lilak further discloses, in at least figures 4A-4B, 7-12, and related text, the first nanostructures (lower 132, 132b, lower 138, [40], [41], [64], [88]) and the second nanostructures (upper 132, 132a, upper 138, [40], [41], [64], [88]) each include semiconductor material ([40], [41], [64]). Regarding claim 17, Lilak discloses the semiconductor structure of claim 11 as described above. Lilak further discloses, in at least figures 4A-4B, 7-12, and related text, a first pair of source/drain structures (120b, [81]) in contact with the first nanostructures (lower 132, 132b, lower 138, [40], [41], [64], [88]) along the first lateral direction (Y direction, figures); and a second pair of source/drain structures (120a, [81]) in contact with the second nanostructures (upper 132, 132a, upper 138, [40], [41], [64], [88]) along the first lateral direction (Y direction, figures); wherein the first pair of source/drain structures (120b, [81]) are vertically spaced from the second pair of source/drain structures (120a, [81]). Regarding claim 18, Lilak discloses, in at least figures 3A-3B, 7-12, and related text, a method for fabricating semiconductor structures, comprising: forming a plurality of first nanostructures (lower 132, 132b, lower 138, [40], [41], [64], [88]) vertically spaced from one another and a plurality of second nanostructures (upper 132, 132a, upper 138, [40], [41], [64], [88]) vertically spaced from one another, wherein the plurality of first nanostructures (lower 132, 132b, lower 138, [40], [41], [64], [88]) and the plurality of second nanostructures (upper 132, 132a, upper 138, [40], [41], [64], [88]) each extend along a first lateral direction (Y direction, figures); exposing a middle portion of each of the plurality of first nanostructures (lower 132, 132b, lower 138, [40], [41], [64], [88]) and the plurality of second nanostructures (upper 132, 132a, upper 138, [40], [41], [64], [88]) ([85]-[88]); and wrapping the exposed middle portion of each of the plurality of first nanostructures (lower 132, 132b, lower 138, [40], [41], [64], [88]) and the plurality of second nanostructures (upper 132, 132a, upper 138, [40], [41], [64], [88]) ([85]-[88]) with a gate structure (140 (142/144/145), [37], [89]), wherein the gate structure (140 (142/144/145), [37], [89]) comprises: (i) a first metal material (145, [39]), (ii) a ferroelectric material (142, [90]), and (iii) a second metal material (144, [92]). Regarding claim 19, Lilak discloses the method of claim 18 as described above. Lilak further discloses, in at least figures 3A-3B, 7-12, and related text, forming a pair of first source/drain structures (120b, [81]) on opposite ends of the first nanostructures (lower 132, 132b, lower 138, [40], [41], [64], [88]) along the first lateral direction (Y direction, figures) and a pair of second source/drain structures (120a, [81]) on opposite ends of the second nanostructures (upper 132, 132a, upper 138, [40], [41], [64], [88]) ([85]-[88]) along the first lateral direction (Y direction, figures); wherein the pair of first source/drain structures (120b, [81]) are separated from the pair of second source/drain structures (120a, [81]). Claim Rejections - 35 USC § 103 The following is a quotation of 35 U.S.C. 103 which forms the basis for all obviousness rejections set forth in this Office action: A patent for a claimed invention may not be obtained, notwithstanding that the claimed invention is not identically disclosed as set forth in section 102, if the differences between the claimed invention and the prior art are such that the claimed invention as a whole would have been obvious before the effective filing date of the claimed invention to a person having ordinary skill in the art to which the claimed invention pertains. Patentability shall not be negated by the manner in which the invention was made. Claim(s) 2, 13-14 and 20 is/are rejected under 35 U.S.C. 103 as being unpatentable over Lilak (US 2020/0098756) in view of Dewey (US 2020/0105751). Regarding claim 2, Lilak discloses the semiconductor structure of claim 1 as described above. Lilak does not explicitly disclose the one or more first nanostructures and the one or more second nanostructures each include a material selected from the group consisting of: indium oxide (In2O3), tin oxide (SnO2), indium gallium zinc oxide (InGaZnO), zinc oxide (ZnO), tin oxide (SnO), and combinations thereof. Dewey teaches, in at least figure 2a and related text, the device comprising the one or more first nanostructures (205, [27], [29]) and the one or more second nanostructures (202, [27], [29]) each include a material selected from the group consisting of: indium oxide (In2O3) ([29]), tin oxide (SnO2) ([29]), indium gallium zinc oxide (InGaZnO) ([29]), zinc oxide (ZnO) ([29]), tin oxide (SnO) ([29]), and combinations thereof, for the purpose of providing stacked transistor structure configured with TFT nanowire or nanoribbon structures for the other device layer (e.g., top transistor) without requiring a native substrate to improved logic transistor density and performance ([20]). Lilak and Dewey are analogous art because they both are directed to semiconductor device and one of ordinary skill in the art would have had a reasonable expectation of success to modify Lilak with the specified features of Dewey because they are from the same field of endeavor. Therefore, it would have been obvious to one of ordinary skill in the art before the effective filing date of the claimed invention to have modified the structure disclosed in Lilak to have the one or more first nanostructures and the one or more second nanostructures each including a material selected from the group consisting of: indium oxide (In2O3), tin oxide (SnO2), indium gallium zinc oxide (InGaZnO), zinc oxide (ZnO), tin oxide (SnO), and combinations thereof, as taught by Dewey, for the purpose of providing stacked transistor structure configured with TFT nanowire or nanoribbon structures for the other device layer (e.g., top transistor) without requiring a native substrate to improved logic transistor density and performance ([20], Dewey). Regarding claim 13, Lilak discloses the semiconductor structure of claim 11 as described above. Lilak does not explicitly disclose the first and second gate structures are physically separated from each other. Dewey teaches, in at least figure 2a and related text, the device comprising the first (206/203, [27]) and second (204/201, [27]) gate structures are physically separated from each other, for the purpose of providing stacked transistor structure configured with TFT nanowire or nanoribbon structures for the other device layer (e.g., top transistor) without requiring a native substrate to improved logic transistor density and performance ([20]). Lilak and Dewey are analogous art because they both are directed to semiconductor device and one of ordinary skill in the art would have had a reasonable expectation of success to modify Lilak with the specified features of Dewey because they are from the same field of endeavor. Therefore, it would have been obvious to one of ordinary skill in the art before the effective filing date of the claimed invention to have modified the structure disclosed in Lilak to have the first and second gate structures being physically separated from each other, as taught by Dewey, for the purpose of providing stacked transistor structure configured with TFT nanowire or nanoribbon structures for the other device layer (e.g., top transistor) without requiring a native substrate to improved logic transistor density and performance ([20], Dewey). Regarding claim 14, Lilak discloses the semiconductor structure of claim 11 as described above. Lilak does not explicitly disclose the first nanostructures and the second nanostructures each include a material selected from the group consisting of: indium oxide (In2O3), tin oxide (SnO2), indium gallium zinc oxide (InGaZnO), zinc oxide (ZnO), tin oxide (SnO), and combinations thereof. Dewey teaches, in at least figure 2a and related text, the device comprising the first nanostructures (205, [27], [29]) and the second nanostructures (202, [27], [29]) each include a material selected from the group consisting of: indium oxide (In2O3) ([29]), tin oxide (SnO2) ([29]), indium gallium zinc oxide (InGaZnO) ([29]), zinc oxide (ZnO) ([29]), tin oxide (SnO) ([29]), and combinations thereof, for the purpose of providing stacked transistor structure configured with TFT nanowire or nanoribbon structures for the other device layer (e.g., top transistor) without requiring a native substrate to improved logic transistor density and performance ([20]). Lilak and Dewey are analogous art because they both are directed to semiconductor device and one of ordinary skill in the art would have had a reasonable expectation of success to modify Lilak with the specified features of Dewey because they are from the same field of endeavor. Therefore, it would have been obvious to one of ordinary skill in the art before the effective filing date of the claimed invention to have modified the structure disclosed in Lilak to have the first nanostructures and the second nanostructures each including a material selected from the group consisting of: indium oxide (In2O3), tin oxide (SnO2), indium gallium zinc oxide (InGaZnO), zinc oxide (ZnO), tin oxide (SnO), and combinations thereof, as taught by Dewey, for the purpose of providing stacked transistor structure configured with TFT nanowire or nanoribbon structures for the other device layer (e.g., top transistor) without requiring a native substrate to improved logic transistor density and performance ([20], Dewey). Regarding claim 20, Lilak discloses the method of claim 18 as described above. Lilak does not explicitly disclose the one or more first nanostructures and the one or more second nanostructures each include a material selected from the group consisting of: indium oxide (In2O3), tin oxide (SnO2), indium gallium zinc oxide (InGaZnO), zinc oxide (ZnO), tin oxide (SnO), and combinations thereof. Dewey teaches, in at least figure 2a and related text, the device comprising the one or more first nanostructures (205, [27], [29]) and the one or more second nanostructures (202, [27], [29]) each include a material selected from the group consisting of: indium oxide (In2O3) ([29]), tin oxide (SnO2) ([29]), indium gallium zinc oxide (InGaZnO) ([29]), zinc oxide (ZnO) ([29]), tin oxide (SnO) ([29]), and combinations thereof, for the purpose of providing stacked transistor structure configured with TFT nanowire or nanoribbon structures for the other device layer (e.g., top transistor) without requiring a native substrate to improved logic transistor density and performance ([20]). Lilak and Dewey are analogous art because they both are directed to method for forming a semiconductor device and one of ordinary skill in the art would have had a reasonable expectation of success to modify Lilak with the specified features of Dewey because they are from the same field of endeavor. Therefore, it would have been obvious to one of ordinary skill in the art before the effective filing date of the claimed invention to have modified the method disclosed in Lilak to have the one or more first nanostructures and the one or more second nanostructures each including a material selected from the group consisting of: indium oxide (In2O3), tin oxide (SnO2), indium gallium zinc oxide (InGaZnO), zinc oxide (ZnO), tin oxide (SnO), and combinations thereof, as taught by Dewey, for the purpose of providing stacked transistor structure configured with TFT nanowire or nanoribbon structures for the other device layer (e.g., top transistor) without requiring a native substrate to improved logic transistor density and performance ([20], Dewey). Claim(s) 8 and 16 is/are rejected under 35 U.S.C. 103 as being unpatentable over Lilak (US 2020/0098756) in view of Smith (US 2018/0040695). Regarding claim 8, Lilak discloses the semiconductor structure of claim 7 as described above. Lilak does not explicitly disclose the second metal material includes a plurality of third closed-loops surrounding the second closed-loops, respectively. Smith teaches, in at least figure 5 and related text, the device comprising the second metal material (515, [28]) includes a plurality of third closed-loops surrounding the second closed-loops (loops of 513, [28], figure), respectively, for the purpose of providing a configuration that enables true 3D logic devices and complementary FET 3D logic where NFET and PFET wires are stacked over-top of one another in order to realize significant area scaling benefit of such devices as they allow stacking of devices overtop of one another ([90]). Lilak and Smith are analogous art because they both are directed to semiconductor device and one of ordinary skill in the art would have had a reasonable expectation of success to modify Lilak with the specified features of Smith because they are from the same field of endeavor. Therefore, it would have been obvious to one of ordinary skill in the art before the effective filing date of the claimed invention to have modified the structure disclosed in Lilak to have the second metal material including a plurality of third closed-loops surrounding the second closed-loops, respectively, as taught by Smith, for the purpose of providing a configuration that enables true 3D logic devices and complementary FET 3D logic where NFET and PFET wires are stacked over-top of one another in order to realize significant area scaling benefit of such devices as they allow stacking of devices overtop of one another ([90], Smith). Regarding claim 16, Lilak discloses the semiconductor structure of claim 11 as described above. Lilak does not explicitly disclose the first metal material includes a plurality of first closed-loops surrounding the one or more first nanostructures and the one or more second nanostructures, respectively, the ferroelectric material includes a plurality of second closed-loops surrounding the first closed-loops, respectively, and the second metal material includes a plurality of third closed-loops surrounding the second closed-loops, respectively. Smith teaches, in at least figure 5 and related text, the device comprising the first metal material (513, [28]) includes a plurality of first closed-loops surrounding the one or more first nanostructures (lower 503, [28], figure) and the one or more second nanostructures (upper 503, [28], figure), respectively, the ferroelectric material (513, [29]) includes a plurality of second closed-loops surrounding the first closed-loops (loops of 513, [28], figure), respectively, and the second metal material (515, [28]) includes a plurality of third closed-loops surrounding the second closed-loops (loop of 513, [29], figure), respectively, for the purpose of providing a configuration that enables true 3D logic devices and complementary FET 3D logic where NFET and PFET wires are stacked over-top of one another in order to realize significant area scaling benefit of such devices as they allow stacking of devices overtop of one another ([90]). Lilak and Smith are analogous art because they both are directed to semiconductor device and one of ordinary skill in the art would have had a reasonable expectation of success to modify Lilak with the specified features of Smith because they are from the same field of endeavor. Therefore, it would have been obvious to one of ordinary skill in the art before the effective filing date of the claimed invention to have modified the structure disclosed in Lilak to have the first metal material including a plurality of first closed-loops surrounding the one or more first nanostructures and the one or more second nanostructures, respectively, the ferroelectric material including a plurality of second closed-loops surrounding the first closed-loops, respectively, and the second metal material including a plurality of third closed-loops surrounding the second closed-loops, respectively, as taught by Smith, for the purpose of providing a configuration that enables true 3D logic devices and complementary FET 3D logic where NFET and PFET wires are stacked over-top of one another in order to realize significant area scaling benefit of such devices as they allow stacking of devices overtop of one another ([90], Smith). Claim(s) 9-10 is/are rejected under 35 U.S.C. 103 as being unpatentable over Lilak (US 2020/0098756) in view of Lin (US 2021/0083120). Regarding claim 9, Lilak discloses the semiconductor structure of claim 1 as described above. Lilak does not explicitly disclose the gate structure further comprises a high-k dielectric material interposed between the first metal material and each of the one or more first nanostructures and the one or more second nanostructures. Lin teaches, in at least figures 2, 3A, and related text, the device comprising the gate structure (205G, [42]) further comprises a high-k dielectric material (304, [42]) interposed between the first metal material (305, [42]) and each of the one or more first nanostructures (one of 213A, [42]) and the one or more second nanostructures (another one of 213A, [42]), for the purpose of providing devices (e.g., FETs) to operate in a negative capacitance regime (e.g., in a negative-capacitance FET, or NCFET) for improved device performance ([19]). Lilak and Lin are analogous art because they both are directed to semiconductor device and one of ordinary skill in the art would have had a reasonable expectation of success to modify Lilak with the specified features of Lin because they are from the same field of endeavor. Therefore, it would have been obvious to one of ordinary skill in the art before the effective filing date of the claimed invention to have modified the structure disclosed in Lilak to have the gate structure further comprising a high-k dielectric material interposed between the first metal material and each of the one or more first nanostructures and the one or more second nanostructures, as taught by Lin, for the purpose of providing devices (e.g., FETs) to operate in a negative capacitance regime (e.g., in a negative-capacitance FET, or NCFET) for improved device performance ([19], Lin). Regarding claim 10, Lilak in view of Lin discloses the semiconductor structure of claim 9 as described above. Lin teaches, in at least figures 2, 3A, and related text, the one or more first nanostructures (one of 213A, [42]), the one or more second nanostructures (another one of 213A, [42]), the high-k dielectric material (304, [42]), and the first metal material (305, [42]) partially operate as a transistor, while the first metal material (305, [42]), the ferroelectric material (306, [42]), and the second metal material (307, [42]) operate as a capacitor connected to the transistor in series ([48]), for the purpose of providing devices (e.g., FETs) to operate in a negative capacitance regime (e.g., in a negative-capacitance FET, or NCFET) for improved device performance ([19]). Conclusion The prior art made of record and not relied upon is considered pertinent to applicant's disclosure. Any inquiry concerning this communication or earlier communications from the examiner should be directed to TONG-HO KIM whose telephone number is (571)270-0276. The examiner can normally be reached Monday thru Friday; 8:30 AM to 5PM. Examiner interviews are available via telephone, in-person, and video conferencing using a USPTO supplied web-based collaboration tool. To schedule an interview, applicant is encouraged to use the USPTO Automated Interview Request (AIR) at http://www.uspto.gov/interviewpractice. If attempts to reach the examiner by telephone are unsuccessful, the examiner’s supervisor, Lynne Gurley can be reached at 571-272-1670. The fax phone number for the organization where this application or proceeding is assigned is 571-273-8300. Information regarding the status of published or unpublished applications may be obtained from Patent Center. Unpublished application information in Patent Center is available to registered users. To file and manage patent submissions in Patent Center, visit: https://patentcenter.uspto.gov. Visit https://www.uspto.gov/patents/apply/patent-center for more information about Patent Center and https://www.uspto.gov/patents/docx for information about filing in DOCX format. For additional questions, contact the Electronic Business Center (EBC) at 866-217-9197 (toll-free). If you would like assistance from a USPTO Customer Service Representative, call 800-786-9199 (IN USA OR CANADA) or 571-272-1000. /TONG-HO KIM/Primary Examiner, Art Unit 2811
Read full office action

Prosecution Timeline

Jun 16, 2023
Application Filed
Oct 16, 2025
Non-Final Rejection — §102, §103 (current)

Precedent Cases

Applications granted by this same examiner with similar technology

Patent 12598777
LOW TEMPERATURE, HIGH GERMANIUM, HIGH BORON SIGE:B PEPI WITH TITANIUM SILICIDE CONTACTS FOR ULTRA-LOW PMOS CONTACT RESISTIVITY AND THERMAL STABILITY
2y 5m to grant Granted Apr 07, 2026
Patent 12598764
SEMICONDUCTOR DEVICE STRUCTURE AND METHODS OF FORMING THE SAME
2y 5m to grant Granted Apr 07, 2026
Patent 12598787
FIELD EFFECT TRANSISTOR WITH DUAL LAYER ISOLATION STRUCTURE AND METHOD
2y 5m to grant Granted Apr 07, 2026
Patent 12598831
PIXEL SHIELDING USING AIR GAPS
2y 5m to grant Granted Apr 07, 2026
Patent 12598802
High-Voltage Tolerant Device and Detection Circuit
2y 5m to grant Granted Apr 07, 2026
Study what changed to get past this examiner. Based on 5 most recent grants.

AI Strategy Recommendation

Get an AI-powered prosecution strategy using examiner precedents, rejection analysis, and claim mapping.
Powered by AI — typically takes 5-10 seconds

Prosecution Projections

1-2
Expected OA Rounds
95%
Grant Probability
96%
With Interview (+0.4%)
1y 10m
Median Time to Grant
Low
PTA Risk
Based on 1040 resolved cases by this examiner. Grant probability derived from career allow rate.

Sign in with your work email

Enter your email to receive a magic link. No password needed.

Personal email addresses (Gmail, Yahoo, etc.) are not accepted.

Free tier: 3 strategy analyses per month