Prosecution Insights
Last updated: April 19, 2026
Application No. 18/352,269

SEMICONDUCTOR STRUCTURE

Non-Final OA §102
Filed
Jul 14, 2023
Examiner
CHOU, SHIH TSUN A
Art Unit
2811
Tech Center
2800 — Semiconductors & Electrical Systems
Assignee
UNITED MICROELECTRONICS CORPORATION
OA Round
1 (Non-Final)
76%
Grant Probability
Favorable
1-2
OA Rounds
2y 6m
To Grant
93%
With Interview

Examiner Intelligence

Grants 76% — above average
76%
Career Allow Rate
338 granted / 447 resolved
+7.6% vs TC avg
Strong +17% interview lift
Without
With
+17.1%
Interview Lift
resolved cases with interview
Typical timeline
2y 6m
Avg Prosecution
24 currently pending
Career history
471
Total Applications
across all art units

Statute-Specific Performance

§103
48.9%
+8.9% vs TC avg
§102
23.4%
-16.6% vs TC avg
§112
26.6%
-13.4% vs TC avg
Black line = Tech Center average estimate • Based on career data from 447 resolved cases

Office Action

§102
DETAILED ACTION Notice of Pre-AIA or AIA Status The present application, filed on or after March 16, 2013, is being examined under the first inventor to file provisions of the AIA . Claim Objections Claim 3 is objected to because of the following informalities: the text “one island-shaped conductive layer” is suggested to be changed to “the island-shaped conductive layer” for clarity. The text “one MRAM cell” is suggested to be changed to “the MRAM cell” for clarity. Appropriate correction is required. Claim 10 is objected to because of the following informalities: the text “one island portion” is suggested to be changed to “the island portion” for clarity. The text “one MRAM cell” is suggested to be changed to “the MRAM cell” for clarity. Appropriate correction is required. Claim Rejections - 35 USC § 102 In the event the determination of the status of the application as subject to AIA 35 U.S.C. 102 and 103 (or as subject to pre-AIA 35 U.S.C. 102 and 103) is incorrect, any correction of the statutory basis (i.e., changing from AIA to pre-AIA ) for the rejection will not be considered a new ground of rejection if the prior art relied upon, and the rationale supporting the rejection, would be the same under either status. The following is a quotation of the appropriate paragraphs of 35 U.S.C. 102 that form the basis for the rejections under this section made in this Office action: A person shall be entitled to a patent unless – (a)(1) the claimed invention was patented, described in a printed publication, or in public use, on sale, or otherwise available to the public before the effective filing date of the claimed invention. (a)(2) the claimed invention was described in a patent issued under section 151, or in an application for patent published or deemed published under section 122(b), in which the patent or application, as the case may be, names another inventor and was effectively filed before the effective filing date of the claimed invention. Claims 1-3 are rejected under 35 U.S.C. 102(a)(1) as being anticipated by Oka (US 2018/0033476). Regarding claim 1, Oka discloses, in FIG. 12 and in related text, a semiconductor structure, comprising: a circuit layer (308), disposed on a substrate (310); an island-shaped conductive layer (303), disposed on the circuit layer; a magnetoresistance random access memory (MRAM) cell (282), disposed between the island-shaped conductive layer and the circuit layer, and electrically connected to the island-shaped conductive layer and the circuit layer; a bit line (BL2), disposed on the island-shaped conductive layer; and a conductive via (302), disposed between the bit line and the island-shaped conductive layer, wherein the island-shaped conductive layer (303) is in contact with a top surface of the MRAM cell (282) (See Oka, [0061], [0097]). Regarding claim 2, Oka discloses the structure of claim 1., Oka discloses wherein a projection area of the island-shaped conductive layer (303) on the substrate (310) is larger than a projection area of the MRAM cell (282) on the substrate (see Oka, FIG. 12). Regarding claim 3, Oka discloses the structure of claim 1., Oka discloses wherein one island-shaped conductive layer (303) is connected to the top surface of one MRAM cell (282) (see Oka, FIG. 12, [0097]). Claims 1-7 are rejected under 35 U.S.C. 102(a)(1) as being anticipated by Wu (US 11,238,912). Regarding claim 1, Wu discloses, in FIG. 7 and in related text, a semiconductor structure, comprising: a circuit layer (M2), disposed on a substrate (including NFET); an island-shaped conductive layer (M4), disposed on the circuit layer; a magnetoresistance random access memory (MRAM) cell (MTJ and vias above and below MTJ), disposed between the island-shaped conductive layer and the circuit layer, and electrically connected to the island-shaped conductive layer and the circuit layer; a bit line (M5 BL), disposed on the island-shaped conductive layer; and a conductive via (VIA), disposed between the bit line (M5 BL) and the island-shaped conductive layer (M4), wherein the island-shaped conductive layer is in contact with a top surface of the MRAM cell (see Wu, column 1, lines 29-36; column 2, line 53 to column 3, line2; column 6, lines 17-31). Regarding claim 2, Wu discloses the structure of claim 1. Wu discloses wherein a projection area of the island-shaped conductive layer (M4) on the substrate (including NFET) is larger than a projection area of the MRAM cell (MTJ and vias above and below MTJ) on the substrate (see Wu, FIG. 7). Regarding claim 3, Wu discloses the structure of claim 1. Wu discloses wherein one island-shaped conductive layer (M4) is connected to the top surface of one MRAM cell (MTJ and vias above and below MTJ) (see Wu, FIG. 7, column 6, lines 17-31). Regarding claim 4, Wu discloses the structure of claim 1. Wu discloses wherein the island-shaped conductive layer (M4) comprises a metal layer (see Wu, column 6, lines 17-31). Regarding claims 5 and 6, Wu discloses the structure of claim 1. Wu discloses wherein a semiconductor device (NFET) is disposed on a surface of the substrate, and the circuit layer (M2) is electrically connected to the semiconductor device, wherein the semiconductor device comprises a transistor (see Wu, FIG. 7, column 2, lines 53 to column 3, line 2; column 6, lines 17-31). Regarding claim 7, Wu discloses the structure of claim 1. Wu discloses wherein the MRAM cell (MTJ and vias above and below MTJ) comprises a top electrode (via about MTJ), a bottom electrode (via below MTJ) and a magnetic tunnel junction (MTJ) structure (MTJ) disposed between the top electrode and the bottom electrode (see Wu, FIG. 7, column 2, lines 29-36; column 6, lines 17-31). Claims 8 and 18 are rejected under 35 U.S.C. 102(a)(1) as being anticipated by Li (US 2012/0032287). Regarding claim 8, Li discloses, in FIG. 3 and in related text, a semiconductor structure, comprising: a substrate, having a memory region and a peripheral region; a circuit layer, disposed on the substrate, and comprising a memory circuit portion (Mx-1) located in the memory region and a peripheral circuit portion (M’x-1) located in the peripheral region that are separated from each other; a first conductive layer, disposed on the circuit layer, and comprising an island portion (Mx) located in the memory region and a first circuit portion (M’x) located in the peripheral region that are separated from each other; a MRAM cell (BE, MTJ, TE), disposed between the island portion and the memory circuit portion, and electrically connected to the island portion and the memory circuit portion; a first conductive via (V’x), disposed between said first circuit portion and the peripheral circuit portion; a second conductive layer, disposed on the first conductive layer, and comprising a bit line portion (Mx+1) located in the memory region and a second circuit portion (M’x+1) located in the peripheral region that are separated from each other; a second conductive via (Vx+1), disposed between the bit line portion and the island portion; and a third conductive via (V’x+1), disposed between the first circuit portion and the second circuit portion, wherein the island portion is in contact with a top surface of the MRAM cell (see Li, [0015], [0030]-[0032], [0043]). Regarding claim 18, Li discloses the structure of claim 8. Li discloses wherein the MRAM cell (BE, MTJ, TE) comprises a top electrode, a bottom electrode and a MTJ structure disposed between the top electrode and the bottom electrode (see Li, FIG. 3, [0015], [0030]-[0032]). Claims 8-17 are rejected under 35 U.S.C. 102(a)(1) as being anticipated by Tan (US 2017/0092693). Regarding claim 8, Tan discloses, in FIG. 1a and in related text, a semiconductor structure, comprising: a substrate (105), having a memory region (110a) and a peripheral region (110b); a circuit layer, disposed on the substrate, and comprising a memory circuit portion (135 in 110a) located in the memory region and a peripheral circuit portion (135 in 110b) located in the peripheral region that are separated from each other; a first conductive layer, disposed on the circuit layer, and comprising an island portion (166) located in the memory region and a first circuit portion (175) located in the peripheral region that are separated from each other; a MRAM cell (164), disposed between the island portion and the memory circuit portion, and electrically connected to the island portion and the memory circuit portion; a first conductive via (174), disposed between said first circuit portion (175) and the peripheral circuit portion (135 in 110b); a second conductive layer, disposed on the first conductive layer, and comprising a bit line portion (185 in 110a) located in the memory region and a second circuit portion (185 in 110b) located in the peripheral region that are separated from each other; a second conductive via (184 in 110a), disposed between the bit line portion (185 in 110a) and the island portion (166); and a third conductive via (184 in 110b), disposed between the first circuit portion (175) and the second circuit portion (185 in 110b), wherein the island portion (166) is in contact with a top surface of the MRAM cell (164) (see Tan, [0014]-[0015], [0032], [0035], [0041]-[0042], [0052]). Regarding claim 9, Tan discloses the structure of claim 8, Tan discloses wherein a projection area of the island portion (166) on the substrate (105) is larger than a projection area of the MRAM cell (164) on the substrate (see Tan, FIG. 1a). Regarding claim 10, Tan discloses the structure of claim 8, Tan discloses wherein one island portion (166) is connected to the top surface of one MRAM cell (164) (see Tan, FIG. 1a). Regarding claims 11 and 12, Tan discloses the structure of claim 8, Tan discloses wherein the island portion (166) and the first circuit portion (175) are located at the same level, wherein a top surface of the island portion is coplanar with a top surface of the first circuit portion (see Tan, FIGS. 1a and 3e-3f, [0079]-[0081]). Regarding claims 13 and 14, Tan discloses the structure of claim 8, Tan discloses wherein the bit line portion (185 in 110a) and the second circuit portion (185 in 110b) are located at the same level, wherein a top surface of the bit line portion is coplanar with a top surface of the second circuit portion (see Tan, FIGS. 1a and 3g, [0084]-[0086]). Regarding claim 15, Tan discloses the structure of claim 8, Tan discloses wherein a height of the second conductive via (184 in 110a) is the same as a height of the third conductive via (184 in 110b) (see Tan, FIGS. 1a and 3g, [0084]). Regarding claims 16 and 17, Tan discloses the structure of claim 8, Tan discloses wherein a semiconductor device is disposed on a surface of the substrate (105), and the circuit layer (135) is electrically connected to the semiconductor device, wherein the semiconductor device comprising a transistor (see Tan, FIG. 1a, [0019], [0030]-[0031]). Conclusion Any inquiry concerning this communication or earlier communications from the examiner should be directed to SHIH TSUN A CHOU whose telephone number is (408)918-7583. The examiner can normally be reached M-F 8:00-16:00 Arizona Time. Examiner interviews are available via telephone, in-person, and video conferencing using a USPTO supplied web-based collaboration tool. To schedule an interview, applicant is encouraged to use the USPTO Automated Interview Request (AIR) at http://www.uspto.gov/interviewpractice. If attempts to reach the examiner by telephone are unsuccessful, the examiner’s supervisor, Lynne Gurley can be reached at (571) 272-1670. The fax phone number for the organization where this application or proceeding is assigned is 571-273-8300. Information regarding the status of published or unpublished applications may be obtained from Patent Center. Unpublished application information in Patent Center is available to registered users. To file and manage patent submissions in Patent Center, visit: https://patentcenter.uspto.gov. Visit https://www.uspto.gov/patents/apply/patent-center for more information about Patent Center and https://www.uspto.gov/patents/docx for information about filing in DOCX format. For additional questions, contact the Electronic Business Center (EBC) at 866-217-9197 (toll-free). If you would like assistance from a USPTO Customer Service Representative, call 800-786-9199 (IN USA OR CANADA) or 571-272-1000. /SHIH TSUN A CHOU/Primary Examiner, Art Unit 2811
Read full office action

Prosecution Timeline

Jul 14, 2023
Application Filed
Feb 12, 2026
Non-Final Rejection — §102 (current)

Precedent Cases

Applications granted by this same examiner with similar technology

Patent 12604459
SEMICONDUCTOR DEVICE AND METHOD FOR FABRICATING THE SAME
2y 5m to grant Granted Apr 14, 2026
Patent 12604672
MRAM REFILL DEVICE STRUCTURE
2y 5m to grant Granted Apr 14, 2026
Patent 12598920
MAGNETORESISTIVE ELEMENT AND MAGNETIC MEMORY DEVICE
2y 5m to grant Granted Apr 07, 2026
Patent 12598919
MRAM DEVICE WITH HAMMERHEAD PROFILE
2y 5m to grant Granted Apr 07, 2026
Patent 12593615
MRAM DEVICE WITH WRAP-AROUND TOP ELECTRODE CONTACT
2y 5m to grant Granted Mar 31, 2026
Study what changed to get past this examiner. Based on 5 most recent grants.

AI Strategy Recommendation

Get an AI-powered prosecution strategy using examiner precedents, rejection analysis, and claim mapping.
Powered by AI — typically takes 5-10 seconds

Prosecution Projections

1-2
Expected OA Rounds
76%
Grant Probability
93%
With Interview (+17.1%)
2y 6m
Median Time to Grant
Low
PTA Risk
Based on 447 resolved cases by this examiner. Grant probability derived from career allow rate.

Sign in with your work email

Enter your email to receive a magic link. No password needed.

Personal email addresses (Gmail, Yahoo, etc.) are not accepted.

Free tier: 3 strategy analyses per month