Prosecution Insights
Last updated: April 19, 2026
Application No. 18/354,810

DISPLAY APPARATUS

Non-Final OA §103
Filed
Jul 19, 2023
Examiner
KUPP, BENJAMIN MICHAEL
Art Unit
2893
Tech Center
2800 — Semiconductors & Electrical Systems
Assignee
Samsung Display Co., Ltd.
OA Round
1 (Non-Final)
90%
Grant Probability
Favorable
1-2
OA Rounds
3y 5m
To Grant
99%
With Interview

Examiner Intelligence

Grants 90% — above average
90%
Career Allow Rate
9 granted / 10 resolved
+22.0% vs TC avg
Moderate +12% lift
Without
With
+12.5%
Interview Lift
resolved cases with interview
Typical timeline
3y 5m
Avg Prosecution
37 currently pending
Career history
47
Total Applications
across all art units

Statute-Specific Performance

§103
61.5%
+21.5% vs TC avg
§102
2.4%
-37.6% vs TC avg
§112
34.9%
-5.1% vs TC avg
Black line = Tech Center average estimate • Based on career data from 10 resolved cases

Office Action

§103
DETAILED ACTION This correspondence is in response to the communications received 01/05/2026. Claims 20-25 have been withdrawn. Claims 1-25 are pending. Notice of Pre-AIA or AIA Status The present application, filed on or after March 16, 2013, is being examined under the first inventor to file provisions of the AIA . Election/Restrictions Applicant’s election without traverse of species A in the reply filed on 01/05/2026 is acknowledged. Claims 20-25 are withdrawn from further consideration pursuant to 37 CFR 1.142(b) as being drawn to a nonelected species, there being no allowable generic or linking claim. Election was made without traverse in the reply filed on 01/05/2026. Priority Receipt is acknowledged of certified copies of papers required by 37 CFR 1.55. Information Disclosure Statement The information disclosure statements (IDS) submitted on 07/19/2023 and 03/15/2024 have been considered by the examiner and made of record in the application file. Specification The lengthy specification has not been checked to the extent necessary to determine the presence of all possible minor errors. Applicant’s cooperation is requested in correcting any errors of which applicant may become aware in the specification. Applicant’s Claim to Figure Comparison It is noted that this comparison is merely for the benefit of reviewers of this office action during prosecution, to allow for an understanding of the examiner’s interpretation of the Applicant’s independent claims as compared to disclosed embodiments in Applicant’s Figures. No response or comments are necessary from Applicant. PNG media_image1.png 633 692 media_image1.png Greyscale Regarding claim 1, a display apparatus, comprising: a first electrode ("second conductive pattern 2002") and a second electrode ("third conductive pattern 2003") that are disposed apart from each other on a substrate (100, see Fig. 21); a first insulating layer (" barrier layer 110") disposed on the substrate and overlapping the first electrode and the second electrode (see Fig. 21); a third electrode ("sixth conductive pattern 2102") disposed on the first insulating layer and overlapping the first electrode and the second electrode (see Fig. 21); a second insulating layer ("buffer layer 111") disposed on the first insulating layer and overlapping the third electrode (see Fig. 21); a fourth electrode ("fourth semiconductor pattern 2204") disposed on the second insulating layer, overlapping the third electrode, and electrically connected to the first electrode (see Fig. 21); a third insulating layer ("first insulating layer 113") disposed on the second insulating layer and overlapping the fourth electrode (see Fig. 21); and a fifth electrode ("11-th conductive pattern 2304") disposed on the third insulating layer, overlapping the fourth electrode, and electrically connected to the third electrode (see Fig. 21). Claim Rejections - 35 USC § 103 The following is a quotation of 35 U.S.C. 103 which forms the basis for all obviousness rejections set forth in this Office action: A patent for a claimed invention may not be obtained, notwithstanding that the claimed invention is not identically disclosed as set forth in section 102, if the differences between the claimed invention and the prior art are such that the claimed invention as a whole would have been obvious before the effective filing date of the claimed invention to a person having ordinary skill in the art to which the claimed invention pertains. Patentability shall not be negated by the manner in which the invention was made. Claims 1, 8, and 12 are rejected under 35 U.S.C. 103 as being unpatentable over Cha et al. (US 10,991,783 B2) in view of Isa et al. (US 8,324,018 B2). PNG media_image2.png 534 644 media_image2.png Greyscale Regarding claim 1, Figs. 1-5 of Cha disclose a display apparatus (“display device 100”, col. 7, line 48), comprising: a first electrode (“second storage electrode 341”, col. 9, line 43) and a second electrode (“second program electrode 383”, col. 10, line 56) that are disposed apart from each other on a substrate (as seen in Fig. 1, 341 and 383 are disposed apart from each other on “substrate 310”, col. 9, lines 19); a first insulating layer (“first insulation layer IL1”, col. 9, line 20) disposed on the substrate and overlapping the first electrode and the second electrode (as seen in Fig. 3, IL1 is disposed on 310 and overlapping 341 and 383); a third electrode (“first connecting pattern 363”, col. 10, lines 12-13, while Cha does not disclose 363 as an electrode, a secondary reference will be used below to define 363 as an electrode) disposed on the first insulating layer and overlapping the first electrode and the second electrode (as seen in Fig. 3, 363 is disposed on IL1 and overlapping 341 and 383); a second insulating layer (“second insulation layer IL2”, col. 9, line 34) disposed on the first insulating layer and overlapping the third electrode (as seen in Fig. 3, IL2 is disposed on IL1 and overlapping 363); a fourth electrode (“second connecting pattern 365”, col. 10, line 13, while Cha does not disclose 365 as an electrode, a secondary reference will be used below to define 365 as an electrode) disposed on the second insulating layer, overlapping the third electrode, and electrically connected to the first electrode (as seen in Fig. 3, 365 is disposed on IL2, overlapping 363 and electrically connect to 341 via “third contact hole CH3”, col. 10, line 30, “driving gate electrode 331a”, col. 9, line 36, and “storage capacitor Cst”, col. 9, line 16); a third insulating layer (“third insulation layer IL3”, col. 9, line 41) disposed on the second insulating layer and overlapping the fourth electrode (as seen in Fig. 3, IL3 is disposed on IL3 and overlapping 383); and a fifth electrode (“first program electrode 371”, col. 10, lines 62-63) disposed on the third insulating layer, overlapping the fourth electrode, and electrically connected to the third electrode (as seen in Fig. 3, 371 is disposed on IL3, overlapping 365, and electrically connected to 363 via “program capacitor Cpr”, col. 9, line 17, 383, and “eighth contact hole CH8”, col. 11, line 7). Cha fails to specify “a third electrode; and a fourth electrode”. However, in a similar field of endeavor, Figs. 1A-1C of Isa teach a third electrode (“a component (also referred to as a pattern) refers to a conductive layer such as a wiring layer, a gate electrode layer, a source electrode layer, or a drain electrode layer”, col. 6, lines 31-33, thus 363 of Cha is an electrode); a fourth electrode (as discussed above, a pattern may refer to an electrode, thus 365 of Cha is an electrode). Therefore, it would have been obvious to one having ordinary skill in the art at the time the invention was effectively filed to implement “a third electrode; and a fourth electrode” as taught by Isa in the system of Cha for the purpose of defining a shaped conductive layer. Regarding claim 8, Figs. 1-5 of Cha in combination with Figs. 1A-1C of Isa disclose the display apparatus of claim 1, Figs. 1-5 of Cha further disclose further comprising: a semiconductor layer (“second active layer 350b”, col. 9, line 56) disposed between the third electrode and the fourth electrode (as seen in Fig. 3, 350b is disposed horizontally between 363 and 365) and including an oxide semiconductor material (“the second active layer 350b and 350c may be formed of polysilicon or an oxide semiconductor”, col. 10, lines 1-3). Regarding claim 12, Figs. 1-5 of Cha disclose a display apparatus (“display device 100”, col. 7, line 48), comprising: a first electrode (“second storage electrode 341”, col. 9, line 43) and a second electrode (“pixel electrode 391”, col. 11, line 31) that are disposed apart from each other on a substrate (as seen in Fig. 1, 341 and 391 are disposed apart from each other on “substrate 310”, col. 9, lines 19); a first insulating layer (“first insulation layer IL1”, col. 9, line 20) disposed on the substrate and overlapping the first electrode and the second electrode (as seen in Fig. 3, IL1 is disposed on 310 and overlapping 341 and 391); a third electrode (“first connecting pattern 363”, col. 10, lines 12-13, while Cha does not disclose 363 as an electrode, a secondary reference will be used below to define 363 as an electrode) disposed on the first insulating layer and overlapping the first electrode and the second electrode (as seen in Fig. 3, 363 is disposed on IL1 and overlapping 341 and 391); a second insulating layer (“second insulation layer IL2”, col. 9, line 34) disposed on the first insulating layer and overlapping the third electrode (as seen in Fig. 3, IL2 is disposed on IL1 and overlapping 363); a fourth electrode (“second program electrode 383”, col. 10, line 56) disposed on the second insulating layer, overlapping the third electrode, and electrically connected to the second electrode (as seen in Fig. 3, 383 is disposed on IL2, overlapping 363 and electrically connected to 391); a third insulating layer (“third insulation layer IL3”, col. 9, line 41) disposed on the second insulating layer and overlapping the fourth electrode (as seen in Fig. 3, IL3 is disposed on IL3 and overlapping 383); a fifth electrode (“second connecting pattern 365”, col. 10, line 13, while Cha does not disclose 365 as an electrode, a secondary reference will be used below to define 365 as an electrode) disposed on the third insulating layer, overlapping the third electrode, and electrically connected to the first electrode (as seen in Fig. 3, 365 is electrically connected to 341 via “third contact hole CH3”, col. 10, line 30, “driving gate electrode 331a”, col. 9, line 36, and “storage capacitor Cst”, col. 9, line 16); a fourth insulating layer (“fourth insulation layer IL4”, col. 9, line 48) disposed on the third insulating layer and overlapping the fifth electrode (as seen in Fig. 3, IL4 is disposed on IL3 and overlapping 365); and a sixth electrode (“first program electrode 371”, col. 10, lines 62-63) disposed on the fourth insulating layer, overlapping the fifth electrode, and electrically connected to the third electrode (as seen in Fig. 3, 371 is disposed on IL4, overlapping 365 and electrically connected to 363 via “program capacitor Cpr”, col. 9, line 17, 383, and “eighth contact hole CH8”, col. 11, line 7). Cha fails to specify “a third electrode; and a fourth electrode”. However, in a similar field of endeavor, Figs. 1A-1C of Isa teach a third electrode (“a component (also referred to as a pattern) refers to a conductive layer such as a wiring layer, a gate electrode layer, a source electrode layer, or a drain electrode layer”, col. 6, lines 31-33, thus 363 of Cha is an electrode); a fourth electrode (as discussed above, a pattern may refer to an electrode, thus 365 of Cha is an electrode). Therefore, it would have been obvious to one having ordinary skill in the art at the time the invention was effectively filed to implement “a third electrode; and a fourth electrode” as taught by Isa in the system of Cha for the purpose of defining a shaped conductive layer. Claim 13 is rejected under 35 U.S.C. 103 as being unpatentable over Cha et al. (US 10,991,783 B2) in view of Isa et al. (US 8,324,018 B2) in view of Cheng et al. (US 20150214249 A1). Regarding claim 13, Figs. 1-5 of Cha in combination with Figs. 1A-1C of Isa disclose the display apparatus of claim 12. Cha in combination with Isa fails to disclose “wherein the fourth electrode includes an oxide semiconductor material.” However, in a similar field of endeavor, Figs. 2 and 3 of Cheng teach wherein the fourth electrode includes an oxide semiconductor material (“second region 402”, [0035] where “the second region 402 of the oxide active layer constitutes a first electrode plate of the storage capacitor”, [0035], and “For example, the material for oxide active layer may be IGZO (indium gallium zinc oxide), IZO (indium zinc oxide), InSnO (indium tin oxide) and InGaSnO (indium gallium tin oxide)”, [0042]. IGZO, IZO, InSnO, and InGaSnO are known in the art as semiconducting materials, thus as 371 of Cha is also a first plate of a capacitor, 371 can also be made of an oxide semiconductor layer). Therefore, it would have been obvious to one having ordinary skill in the art at the time the invention was effectively filed to implement “wherein the fourth electrode includes an oxide semiconductor material” as taught by Isa for the purpose of improving adhesion between conductive elements and the active regions made of oxide semiconductor material. Allowable Subject Matter Claims 2-7, 9-11, and 14-19 are objected to as being dependent upon a rejected base claim, but would be allowable if rewritten in independent form including all of the limitations of the base claim and any intervening claims. The following is a statement of reasons for the indication of allowable subject matter: The prior art of record does not teach or fairly suggest the X as recited in the claims of the instant application. Regarding claim 2, the prior art of Cha et al. (US 10,991,783 B2) in combination with Isa et al. (US 8,324,018 B2) discloses a display apparatus but fails to disclose the specific claims of the instant application regarding the geometry of the second electrode relative to the first electrode e.g. “wherein in a plan view, the second electrode substantially extends in a first direction and has a protrusion protruding in a second direction intersecting the first direction, and the first electrode is disposed adjacent in the first direction to the protrusion of the second electrode”. Regarding claim 3, the prior art of Cha et al. (US 10,991,783 B2) in combination with Isa et al. (US 8,324,018 B2) discloses a display apparatus but fails to disclose the specific claims of the instant application regarding the arrangement of the first storage and first hold capacitors relative to the electrodes, the gate of the first transistor, the source of the first transistor, and the power line, e.g. “wherein the first pixel circuit includes: a first storage capacitor electrically connected between a gate of the first transistor and a source of the first transistor; and a first hold capacitor electrically connected between the power line and the source of the first transistor, a first storage capacitance of the first storage capacitor is a sum of a first capacitance between the first electrode and the third electrode, a second capacitance between the third electrode and the fourth electrode, and a third capacitance between the fourth electrode and the fifth electrode, and a first hold capacitance of the first hold capacitor is a fourth capacitance between the second electrode and the third electrode”. Claims 4 and 5 are allowable by virtue of their dependence on claim 3. Regarding claim 6, the prior art of Cha et al. (US 10,991,783 B2) in combination with Isa et al. (US 8,324,018 B2) discloses a display apparatus but fails to disclose the specific claims of the instant application regarding the arrangement of the first storage and first hold capacitors relative to the electrodes, the gate of the first transistor, the source of the first transistor, and the power line, e.g. “wherein the pixel circuit includes: a storage capacitor including a first storage electrode and a second storage electrode, the first storage electrode being electrically connected to a gate of the first transistor, and the second storage electrode being electrically connected to a source of the first transistor; and a hold capacitor including a first hold electrode and a second hold electrode, the first hold electrode being electrically connected to the power line, and the second hold electrode being electrically connected to the source of the first transistor, the first storage electrode of the storage capacitor includes the first electrode and the fourth electrode, the second storage electrode of the storage capacitor includes a portion of the third electrode overlapping the first electrode, and the fifth electrode, the first hold electrode of the hold capacitor includes the second electrode, and the second hold electrode of the hold capacitor includes another portion of the third electrode overlapping the second electrode.” Claim 7 is allowable by virtue of its dependence on claim 6. Regarding claim 9, the prior art of Cha et al. (US 10,991,783 B2) in combination with Isa et al. (US 8,324,018 B2) discloses a display apparatus but fails to disclose the specific claims of the instant application regarding the geometry of the third electrode, and the connections between the first electrode and the fourth electrode, e.g. “wherein the third electrode includes an opening exposing at least a portion of the first insulating layer, and the first electrode is electrically connected to the fourth electrode through a contact hole passing through the opening of the third electrode.” Claim 10 is allowable by virtue of its dependence on claim 9. Regarding claim 11, the prior art of Cha et al. (US 10,991,783 B2) in combination with Isa et al. (US 8,324,018 B2) discloses a display apparatus but fails to disclose the specific claims of the instant application regarding the geometry of the fourth electrode, the third electrode, and the fifth electrode, e.g. “wherein the fourth electrode includes an opening exposing at least a portion of the second insulating layer, and the third electrode is electrically connected to the fifth electrode through a contact hole passing through the opening of the fourth electrode. Regarding claim 14, the prior art of Cha et al. (US 10,991,783 B2) in combination with Isa et al. (US 8,324,018 B2) discloses a display apparatus but fails to disclose the specific claims of the instant application regarding the geometry of the second electrode relative to the first electrode e.g. “wherein in a plan view, the second electrode substantially extends in a first direction and has a protrusion protruding in a second direction intersecting the first direction, and the first electrode is disposed adjacent in the first direction to the protrusion of the second electrode”. Regarding claim 15, the prior art of Cha et al. (US 10,991,783 B2) in combination with Isa et al. (US 8,324,018 B2) discloses a display apparatus but fails to disclose the specific claims of the instant application regarding the arrangement of the storage and hold capacitors relative to the electrodes, the gate of the transistor, the source of the transistor, and the power line, e.g. “wherein the pixel circuit includes: a storage capacitor including a first storage electrode and a second storage electrode, the first storage electrode being electrically connected to a gate of the transistor, and the second storage electrode being electrically connected to a source of the transistor; and a hold capacitor including a first hold electrode and a second hold electrode, the first hold electrode being electrically connected to the power line, and the second hold electrode being electrically connected to the source of the transistor, the first storage electrode of the storage capacitor includes the first electrode and the fifth electrode, the second storage electrode of the storage capacitor includes a portion of the third electrode overlapping the first electrode, and the sixth electrode, the first hold electrode of the hold capacitor includes the second electrode and the fourth electrode, and the second hold electrode of the hold capacitor includes another portion of the third electrode overlapping the second electrode.” Regarding claim 16, the prior art of Cha et al. (US 10,991,783 B2) in combination with Isa et al. (US 8,324,018 B2) discloses a display apparatus but fails to disclose the specific claims of the instant application regarding the arrangement of the first storage and first hold capacitors relative to the electrodes, the gate of the first transistor, the source of the first transistor, and the power line, e.g. “wherein the pixel circuit includes: a first storage capacitor electrically connected between a gate of the first transistor and a source of the first transistor; and a first hold capacitor electrically connected between the power line and the source of the first transistor, a first storage capacitance of the first storage capacitor is a sum of a first capacitance between the first electrode and the third electrode, a second capacitance between the third electrode and the fifth electrode, and a third capacitance between the fifth electrode and the sixth electrode, and a first hold capacitance of the first hold capacitor is a sum of a fourth capacitance between the second electrode and the third electrode, and a fifth capacitance between the third electrode and the fourth electrode.” Claims 17 and 18 are allowable by virtue of their dependence on claim 16. Regarding claim 19, the prior art of Cha et al. (US 10,991,783 B2) in combination with Isa et al. (US 8,324,018 B2) discloses a display apparatus but fails to disclose the specific claims of the instant application regarding the geometry of the third electrode, and the fifth electrode, and arrangement of the connection between the first and fifth electrodes and the arrangement of the connection between the third and the sixth electrodes, e.g. “wherein the third electrode includes a first opening exposing at least a portion of the first insulating layer, the fifth electrode includes a second opening exposing at least a portion of the third insulating layer, the first electrode is electrically connected to the fifth electrode through a first contact hole passing through the first opening of the third electrode, and the third electrode is electrically connected to the sixth electrode through a second contact hole passing through the second opening of the fifth electrode.” Conclusion Any inquiry concerning this communication or earlier communications from the examiner should be directed to BENJAMIN M KUPP whose telephone number is (571)272-5608. The examiner can normally be reached Monday - Friday, 7:00 am - 4:00 pm PT. Examiner interviews are available via telephone, in-person, and video conferencing using a USPTO supplied web-based collaboration tool. To schedule an interview, applicant is encouraged to use the USPTO Automated Interview Request (AIR) at http://www.uspto.gov/interviewpractice. If attempts to reach the examiner by telephone are unsuccessful, the examiner’s supervisor, Yara Green can be reached at (571) 270-3035. The fax phone number for the organization where this application or proceeding is assigned is 571-273-8300. Information regarding the status of published or unpublished applications may be obtained from Patent Center. Unpublished application information in Patent Center is available to registered users. To file and manage patent submissions in Patent Center, visit: https://patentcenter.uspto.gov. Visit https://www.uspto.gov/patents/apply/patent-center for more information about Patent Center and https://www.uspto.gov/patents/docx for information about filing in DOCX format. For additional questions, contact the Electronic Business Center (EBC) at 866-217-9197 (toll-free). If you would like assistance from a USPTO Customer Service Representative, call 800-786-9199 (IN USA OR CANADA) or 571-272-1000. /BENJAMIN MICHAEL KUPP/Examiner, Art Unit 2893 /YARA B GREEN/Supervisor Patent Examiner, Art Unit 2893
Read full office action

Prosecution Timeline

Jul 19, 2023
Application Filed
Feb 20, 2026
Non-Final Rejection — §103 (current)

Precedent Cases

Applications granted by this same examiner with similar technology

Patent 12588199
NON-VOLATILE MEMORY DEVICE AND ELECTRONIC SYSTEM INCLUDING THE SAME
2y 5m to grant Granted Mar 24, 2026
Patent 12581669
VERTICAL MEMORY DEVICE
2y 5m to grant Granted Mar 17, 2026
Patent 12497710
METHOD FOR PRODUCING SEMICONDUCTOR WAFERS
2y 5m to grant Granted Dec 16, 2025
Study what changed to get past this examiner. Based on 3 most recent grants.

AI Strategy Recommendation

Get an AI-powered prosecution strategy using examiner precedents, rejection analysis, and claim mapping.
Powered by AI — typically takes 5-10 seconds

Prosecution Projections

1-2
Expected OA Rounds
90%
Grant Probability
99%
With Interview (+12.5%)
3y 5m
Median Time to Grant
Low
PTA Risk
Based on 10 resolved cases by this examiner. Grant probability derived from career allow rate.

Sign in with your work email

Enter your email to receive a magic link. No password needed.

Personal email addresses (Gmail, Yahoo, etc.) are not accepted.

Free tier: 3 strategy analyses per month