Prosecution Insights
Last updated: April 19, 2026
Application No. 18/364,578

DRIVING CHIP ACCOMMODATING CIRCUIT BOARD AND DISPLAY DEVICE HAVING THE SAME

Non-Final OA §103
Filed
Aug 03, 2023
Examiner
MCDONALD, JASON ANDREW
Art Unit
2898
Tech Center
2800 — Semiconductors & Electrical Systems
Assignee
Samsung Display Co., Ltd.
OA Round
1 (Non-Final)
100%
Grant Probability
Favorable
1-2
OA Rounds
2y 6m
To Grant
99%
With Interview

Examiner Intelligence

Grants 100% — above average
100%
Career Allow Rate
1 granted / 1 resolved
+32.0% vs TC avg
Strong +100% interview lift
Without
With
+100.0%
Interview Lift
resolved cases with interview
Typical timeline
2y 6m
Avg Prosecution
44 currently pending
Career history
45
Total Applications
across all art units

Statute-Specific Performance

§103
55.8%
+15.8% vs TC avg
§102
25.5%
-14.5% vs TC avg
§112
16.8%
-23.2% vs TC avg
Black line = Tech Center average estimate • Based on career data from 1 resolved cases

Office Action

§103
DETAILED ACTION Notice of Pre-AIA or AIA Status The present application, filed on or after March 16, 2013, is being examined under the first inventor to file provisions of the AIA . Election/Restrictions Claims 4-7 and 9-20 withdrawn from further consideration pursuant to 37 CFR 1.142(b) as being drawn to a nonelected species B, C, and D, there being no allowable generic or linking claim. Election was made without traverse in the reply filed on 1 December 2025. Information Disclosure Statement The Information Disclosure Statement (IDS) submitted on 3 August 2023 has been considered by the examiner and made of record in the application file. Claim Objections Claim 2 objected to because of the following informalities: The limitation --the connection part inside an edge of the circuit board-- is missing a verb. Appropriate correction is required. For the purpose of examination, the phrase has been changed to -- the connection part is spaced apart from outer edges of the circuit board in a plan view--, consistent with the specification ([00106]). Claim Rejections - 35 USC § 103 The following is a quotation of 35 U.S.C. 103 which forms the basis for all obviousness rejections set forth in this Office action: A patent for a claimed invention may not be obtained, notwithstanding that the claimed invention is not identically disclosed as set forth in section 102, if the differences between the claimed invention and the prior art are such that the claimed invention as a whole would have been obvious before the effective filing date of the claimed invention to a person having ordinary skill in the art to which the claimed invention pertains. Patentability shall not be negated by the manner in which the invention was made. Claims 1-3 and 8 are rejected under 35 U.S.C. 103 as being unpatentable over Jung (US 20200152896 A1, hereinafter “Jung”), in view of Eom et al (KR 20190131462 A1, hereinafter “Eom”). Regarding Claim 1 – Jung discloses a display device comprising: a display substrate (110 Jung [0084] and Fig. 3) including a display area (DA Jung [0062] and Fig. 2), a pixel in the display area (PX Jung [0062] and Fig. 2), a pad area adjacent to the display area (NDA1 Jung [0063] and Fig. 2), and a pad in the pad area (140 Jung [0064] and Fig. 2); a driving chip on the display substrate (130 Jung [0064] and Fig. 2), in the pad area; and a circuit board (FPC Jung [0072] and Fig. 2) which is on the display substrate and electrically connected to the display substrate at the pad (Jung [0072] and Fig. 2) Jung fails to disclose the circuit board defining a groove of the circuit board and covering the driving chip at the groove. However, Eom discloses a bracket (104 Eom [0029] and Fig. 1) defining a groove (141 Eom [0029] and Fig. 1) of the bracket and covering the driving chip (135 Eom [0023] and Fig. 1) at the groove (Eom Fig. 1). Eom discloses a similar display panel to Jung. Eom teaches placing a groove in the cover over the driving chip for the benefit of minimizing the thickness of the display device (Eom [0030]) while protecting the driver chip, display panel, and flexible printed circuit board as well (Eom [0029]). Therefore, it would have been obvious to one of ordinary skill in the art prior to the effective filing date of the claimed invention to combine the teachings of Jung and Eom to cover the driving chip with a circuit board having a groove to protect the driving chip, display panel, and flexible printed circuit board while minimizing the thickness of the display device. PNG media_image1.png 495 506 media_image1.png Greyscale PNG media_image2.png 621 483 media_image2.png Greyscale PNG media_image3.png 276 344 media_image3.png Greyscale Regarding Claim 2 – Jung modified by Eom discloses all the limitations of claim 1. The combination of Jung and Eom further discloses the circuit board includes: a connection part (170 Jung [0075] and Fig. 2) which electrically connects the circuit board to the pad of the display substrate (Jung [0076] and Fig. 2), and the connection part is spaced apart from outer edges of the circuit board in a plan view (Edges of 170 inside edges of FPC). Regarding Claim 3 – Jung modified by Eom discloses all the limitations of claim 1. The combination of Jung and Eom further discloses an inner wall of the circuit board defines the groove of the circuit board, and the driving chip is in the groove of the circuit board and is spaced apart from the inner wall of the circuit board (Space observed between inner wall and driving chip in Eom Fig. 1). Regarding Claim 8 – Jung modified by Eom discloses all the limitations of claim 1. The combination of Jung and Eom further discloses the display substrate further includes: a first area including the pixel (Area1 in annotated Jung Fig. 5); a second area which extends from the first area (BA Jung [0063] and Fig. 5), the display substrate being bendable at the second area to have a curvature (at BA Jung [0063] and Fig. 5); and a third area extending from the second area and including the pad (Area3 in annotated Jung Fig. 5), the display substrate which is bent at the second area includes the third area facing the first area (Area1 and Area3 parallel to each other in annotated Jung Fig. 5). PNG media_image4.png 354 531 media_image4.png Greyscale Conclusion Any inquiry concerning this communication or earlier communications from the examiner should be directed to JASON MCDONALD whose telephone number is (571)272-5944. The examiner can normally be reached M-F 7:30a-5p Eastern, alternating Fridays out of office. Examiner interviews are available via telephone, in-person, and video conferencing using a USPTO supplied web-based collaboration tool. To schedule an interview, applicant is encouraged to use the USPTO Automated Interview Request (AIR) at http://www.uspto.gov/interviewpractice. If attempts to reach the examiner by telephone are unsuccessful, the examiner’s supervisor, Julio Maldonado can be reached at (571) 272-1864. The fax phone number for the organization where this application or proceeding is assigned is 571-273-8300. Information regarding the status of published or unpublished applications may be obtained from Patent Center. Unpublished application information in Patent Center is available to registered users. To file and manage patent submissions in Patent Center, visit: https://patentcenter.uspto.gov. Visit https://www.uspto.gov/patents/apply/patent-center for more information about Patent Center and https://www.uspto.gov/patents/docx for information about filing in DOCX format. For additional questions, contact the Electronic Business Center (EBC) at 866-217-9197 (toll-free). If you would like assistance from a USPTO Customer Service Representative, call 800-786-9199 (IN USA OR CANADA) or 571-272-1000. /JASON MCDONALD/Examiner, Art Unit 2898 /JULIO J MALDONADO/Supervisory Patent Examiner, Art Unit 2898
Read full office action

Prosecution Timeline

Aug 03, 2023
Application Filed
Jan 20, 2026
Non-Final Rejection — §103
Mar 24, 2026
Interview Requested
Apr 02, 2026
Examiner Interview Summary
Apr 02, 2026
Applicant Interview (Telephonic)

AI Strategy Recommendation

Get an AI-powered prosecution strategy using examiner precedents, rejection analysis, and claim mapping.
Powered by AI — typically takes 5-10 seconds

Prosecution Projections

1-2
Expected OA Rounds
100%
Grant Probability
99%
With Interview (+100.0%)
2y 6m
Median Time to Grant
Low
PTA Risk
Based on 1 resolved cases by this examiner. Grant probability derived from career allow rate.

Sign in with your work email

Enter your email to receive a magic link. No password needed.

Personal email addresses (Gmail, Yahoo, etc.) are not accepted.

Free tier: 3 strategy analyses per month