Prosecution Insights
Last updated: April 19, 2026
Application No. 18/393,846

COPLANARITY ASSIST UNIT, SEMICONDUCTOR TESTING APPARATUS INCLUDING THE COPLANARITY ASSIST UNIT AND METHOD OF SETTING COPLANARITY

Non-Final OA §102§103
Filed
Dec 22, 2023
Examiner
SHAH, NEEL D
Art Unit
2858
Tech Center
2800 — Semiconductors & Electrical Systems
Assignee
Taiwan Semiconductor Manufacturing Company Limited
OA Round
1 (Non-Final)
87%
Grant Probability
Favorable
1-2
OA Rounds
2y 5m
To Grant
94%
With Interview

Examiner Intelligence

Grants 87% — above average
87%
Career Allow Rate
531 granted / 611 resolved
+18.9% vs TC avg
Moderate +7% lift
Without
With
+7.3%
Interview Lift
resolved cases with interview
Typical timeline
2y 5m
Avg Prosecution
19 currently pending
Career history
630
Total Applications
across all art units

Statute-Specific Performance

§101
8.5%
-31.5% vs TC avg
§103
50.1%
+10.1% vs TC avg
§102
24.8%
-15.2% vs TC avg
§112
13.3%
-26.7% vs TC avg
Black line = Tech Center average estimate • Based on career data from 611 resolved cases

Office Action

§102 §103
Notice of Pre-AIA or AIA Status 1. The present application, filed on or after March 16, 2013, is being examined under the first inventor to file provisions of the AIA . Claim Status 2. Claims 1-20 are pending in the application. Claim Rejections - 35 USC § 102 In the event the determination of the status of the application as subject to AIA 35 U.S.C. 102 and 103 (or as subject to pre-AIA 35 U.S.C. 102 and 103) is incorrect, any correction of the statutory basis (i.e., changing from AIA to pre-AIA ) for the rejection will not be considered a new ground of rejection if the prior art relied upon, and the rationale supporting the rejection, would be the same under either status. 3. The following is a quotation of the appropriate paragraphs of 35 U.S.C. 102 that form the basis for the rejections under this section made in this Office action: A person shall be entitled to a patent unless – (a)(1) the claimed invention was patented, described in a printed publication, or in public use, on sale, or otherwise available to the public before the effective filing date of the claimed invention. (a)(2) the claimed invention was described in a patent issued under section 151, or in an application for patent published or deemed published under section 122(b), in which the patent or application, as the case may be, names another inventor and was effectively filed before the effective filing date of the claimed invention. 4. Claims 1-11, 13-15 and 20 are rejected under 35 U.S.C. 102(a)(1) as being unpatentable by Aldaz et al. (US 2002/0050832). (“Aldaz”). 5. Regarding claim 1, Aldaz teaches A coplanarity assist unit [Figures 1-7, a coplanarity assist unit is shown; see P(0047-0049)], comprising: a plurality of distance sensors mounted on at least one of a lower body or a upper body at a plurality of locations, respectively, wherein each of the plurality of distance sensors are configured to detect a distance between the lower body and the upper body at the plurality of locations [Figures 1-7, a plurality of sensors 290 mounted on a lower body 300 or a upper body 20/60 is shown, distance sensors 290 are configured to detect a distance between the two bodies at a plurality of locations; see P(0047-0048)]; and a coplanarity assistant configured to determine based on an output of the plurality of distance sensors whether coplanarity exists between the lower body and the upper body and assist with a position of the lower body and the upper body in order to set the coplanarity between the lower body and the upper body [Figures 1-7, a coplanarity assistant 280 is shown to determine based on an output of the distance sensors 290 whether coplanarity exists between the two bodies (distance is the direct indication of coplanarity); see P(0047-0048)]. 6. Regarding claim 2, Aldaz teaches wherein the output of the plurality of distance sensors comprises a plurality of distance signals transmitted from the plurality of distance sensors, respectively [Figures 1-7, distance signals are outputted by distance sensors 290]. 7. Regarding claim 3, Aldaz teaches wherein the coplanarity assistant comprises a coplanarity determination module configured to determine whether coplanarity exists between the lower body and the upper body based on the plurality of distance signals [Figures 1-7, see coplanarity assistance 280]. 8. Regarding claim 4, Aldaz teaches wherein the coplanarity assistant further comprises a display unit configured to display adjustment data for adjusting a position of the upper body to set a coplanarity between the lower body and the upper body [Figures 1-7, see display unit “x” in Figure 6]. 9. Regarding claim 5, Aldaz teaches wherein the coplanarity determination module is configured to generate a planarity display signal based on the plurality of distance signals, and the display unit is configured to display the adjustment data for adjusting the position of the upper body based on the planarity display signal [Figures 1-7, see display unit “x” in Figure 6]. 10. Regarding claim 6, Aldaz teaches wherein the coplanarity determination module is configured to continuously update a display of the adjustment data on the display unit to reflect an adjustment to the position of the upper body by an operator [Figures 1-7, see display unit “x” in Figure 6]. 11. Regarding claim 7, Aldaz teaches wherein the coplanarity assistant further comprises an electromechanical planarity adjuster configured to adjust the position of the upper body [Figures 1-7, see shims 70 acting as an electromechanical planarity adjuster. See P(0048-0049)]. 12. Regarding claim 8, Aldaz teaches wherein the coplanarity determination module is configured to generate a planarity adjustment signal based on the plurality of distance signals, the electromechanical planarity adjuster is configured to adjust the planarity of the upper body based on the planarity adjustment signal [Figures 1-7, P(0047-0049) teaches the arrangement and functioning]. 13. Regarding claim 9, Aldaz teaches wherein the coplanarity determination module is configured to continuously update a display of the adjustment data on the display unit to reflect an adjustment to the planarity of the upper body by the electromechanical planarity adjuster [Figures 1-7, the coplanarity determination module 280 is taught]. 14. Regarding claim 10, Aldaz teaches A semiconductor testing apparatus [Figures 1-7, a semiconductor testing apparatus is shown], comprising: a prober configured to support a probe card [Figures 1-7, a prober is shown configured to support a probe card 60]; a tester head configured to support a device under test (DUT) [Figures 1-7, a tester head is shown to support a DUT 300]; and a coplanarity assist unit comprising a plurality of distance sensors and configured to determine based on an output of the plurality of distance sensors whether coplanarity exists between the prober and the tester head and to assist with setting a position of a lower body and a upper body in order to set the coplanarity between the lower body and the upper body [Figures 1-7, a coplanarity assist unit 280 is shown comprising distance sensors 290 to determine based on an output of the distance sensors 290 whether coplanarity exists (distance is the direct indication of coplanarity) between the prober and the tester head and to assist with setting a position between a lower body and a upper body; see P(0047-0048)]. 15. Regarding claim 11, Aldaz teaches wherein the plurality of distance sensors are mounted on at least one of the prober or the tester head and are configured to determine a distance between the tester head and the prober at a plurality of locations [Figures 1-7, P(0047-0048) teaches the distance sensors 290 arrangement]. 16. Regarding claim 13, Aldaz teaches wherein the coplanarity assist unit further comprises a plurality of sensor support frames and the plurality of distance sensors are located on the plurality of sensor support frames, respectively [Figures 1-7, the coplanarity assist unit, distance sensors arrangement is shown]. 17. Regarding claim 14, Aldaz teaches wherein the prober comprises a prober head plane on an upper surface of the prober, and the plurality of distance sensors are configured to determine a distance between the tester head and the prober head plane [Figures 1-7, the arrangement is shown]. 18. Regarding claim 15, Aldaz teaches further comprising: a guide hole on a lower surface of the tester head; and a guide pin on the prober head plane and configured to be inserted in the guide hole [Figures 1-7, a guide hole and a guide pin is shown]. 19. Regarding claim 20, Aldaz teaches A method of setting coplanarity [Figures 1-7, a method is taught], the method comprising: detecting a distance between a lower body and an upper body [Figures 1-7, P(0047-0048) teaches detecting a distance between a lower body 300 and an upper body 20/60]; determining whether coplanarity exists between the lower body and the upper body based on an output of the plurality of distance sensors [Figures 1-7, P(0047-0048) teaches determining whether coplanarity exists between the lower body and the upper body based on an output of the distance sensors 290]; and in response to determining that coplanarity does not exist: determining an adjustment to a position of the upper body for setting a coplanarity between the lower body and the upper body based on the output of the plurality of distance sensors [Figures 1-7, unit 280 determines whether coplanarity exists or not (distance is the direct indication of coplanarity) based on distance measurement and adjustment to a position is taught; see P(0047-0048)]; and adjusting the position of the upper body based on the determined adjustment to the adjustment to the position of the upper body [Figures 1-7, the position of the upper body is adjusted based on the determined adjustment to the position of the upper body 20/60]. Claim Rejections - 35 USC § 103 In the event the determination of the status of the application as subject to AIA 35 U.S.C. 102 and 103 (or as subject to pre-AIA 35 U.S.C. 102 and 103) is incorrect, any correction of the statutory basis (i.e., changing from AIA to pre-AIA ) for the rejection will not be considered a new ground of rejection if the prior art relied upon, and the rationale supporting the rejection, would be the same under either status. 20. The following is a quotation of 35 U.S.C. 103 which forms the basis for all obviousness rejections set forth in this Office action: A patent for a claimed invention may not be obtained, notwithstanding that the claimed invention is not identically disclosed as set forth in section 102, if the differences between the claimed invention and the prior art are such that the claimed invention as a whole would have been obvious before the effective filing date of the claimed invention to a person having ordinary skill in the art to which the claimed invention pertains. Patentability shall not be negated by the manner in which the invention was made. 21. Claim(s) 12 is/are rejected under 35 U.S.C. 103 as being unpatentable over Aldaz in view of Grube et al. (US 2006/0170434). (“Grube”). 22. Regarding claim 12, Aldaz teaches the distance sensors. Aldaz does not explicitly teach wherein the plurality of distance sensors comprises at least one of a laser sensor, an ultrasonic sensor, an infrared sensor, an inductive sensor, a light-emitting diode (LED) sensor, a light detection and ranging (LIDAR) device, or a vertical cavity surface emitting laser (VCSEL) sensor. However, Grube teaches wherein the plurality of distance sensors comprises at least one of a laser sensor, an ultrasonic sensor, an infrared sensor, an inductive sensor, a light-emitting diode (LED) sensor, a light detection and ranging (LIDAR) device, or a vertical cavity surface emitting laser (VCSEL) sensor [Figures 1-18. P(0085) teaches laser/light sensing for measuring distance; see claims 15-17]. It would have been obvious to one skilled in the art before the effective filing date of the invention to modify Aldaz with Grube. Doing so would allow Aldaz to use light sensor for measuring distance/planarity at different locations. Allowable Subject Matter 23. Claims 16-19 are objected to as being dependent upon a rejected base claim, but would be allowable if rewritten in independent form including all of the limitations of the base claim and any intervening claims. 16. The semiconductor testing apparatus of claim 10, wherein the plurality of distance sensors are located on a lower surface of the tester head which is divided into four quadrants by a first dividing line and a second dividing line perpendicular to the first dividing line, and an arrangement of the plurality of distance sensors comprises one of: a first arrangement in which the plurality of distance sensors are located in at least three quadrants of the four quadrants; a second arrangement in which one distance sensor of the plurality of distance sensors is located on the first dividing line, and a remainder of the plurality of distance sensors is located opposite the one distance sensor in two quadrants that are symmetrical with respect to the first dividing line; or a third arrangement in which one distance sensor of the plurality of distance sensors is located on the second dividing line, and a remainder of the plurality of distance sensors is located opposite the one distance sensor in two quadrants that are symmetrical with respect to the second dividing line. 17. The semiconductor testing apparatus of claim 10, wherein the plurality of distance sensors comprises: a first distance sensor on a first sensor support frame at a first location, wherein the first distance sensor and first sensor support frame have a first combined length, and the first distance sensor is configured to detect a first separation distance between a prober head plane and the first distance sensor at the first location; a second distance sensor on a second sensor support frame at a second location, wherein the second distance sensor and second sensor support frame have a second combined length, and the second distance sensor is configured to detect a second separation distance between the prober head plane and the second distance sensor at the second location; and a third distance sensor on a third sensor support frame at a third location, wherein the third distance sensor and third sensor support frame have a third combined length, and the third distance sensor is configured to detect a third separation distance between the prober head plane and the third distance sensor at the third location. 18. The semiconductor testing apparatus of claim 17, wherein the coplanarity assist unit further comprises a coplanarity assistant comprising: a display unit configured to display adjustment data for adjusting a planarity of the tester head to set a coplanarity between the prober and the tester head; and a coplanarity determination module configured to: compare a first sum of the first combined length and first separation distance to a second sum of the second combined length and second separation distance and to a third sum of the third combined length and third separation distance; determine that coplanarity is achieved when the first sum is substantially equal to the second sum and substantially equal to the third sum; and generate a planarity display signal based on a plurality of distance signals, wherein the display unit is configured to display the adjustment data based on the planarity display signal. 19. The semiconductor testing apparatus of claim 18, wherein the coplanarity determination module is configured to generate a planarity adjustment signal based on the plurality of distance signals, and the coplanarity assistant further comprises an electromechanical planarity adjuster configured to adjust the planarity of the tester head based on the planarity adjustment signal. Pertinent Prior Art The prior art made of record and not relied upon is considered pertinent to applicant's disclosure. Huang (US 2011/0267087), Figures 1-9 teaches a light detector, a probe card, a DUT arranged in a similar manner to that of the present application. Conclusion Any inquiry concerning this communication or earlier communications from the examiner should be directed to NEEL D SHAH whose telephone number is (571)270-3766. The examiner can normally be reached M-F: 9AM-5:30PM. Examiner interviews are available via telephone, in-person, and video conferencing using a USPTO supplied web-based collaboration tool. To schedule an interview, applicant is encouraged to use the USPTO Automated Interview Request (AIR) at http://www.uspto.gov/interviewpractice. If attempts to reach the examiner by telephone are unsuccessful, the examiner’s supervisor, Judy Nguyen can be reached at 571-272-2258. The fax phone number for the organization where this application or proceeding is assigned is 571-273-8300. Information regarding the status of published or unpublished applications may be obtained from Patent Center. Unpublished application information in Patent Center is available to registered users. To file and manage patent submissions in Patent Center, visit: https://patentcenter.uspto.gov. Visit https://www.uspto.gov/patents/apply/patent-center for more information about Patent Center and https://www.uspto.gov/patents/docx for information about filing in DOCX format. For additional questions, contact the Electronic Business Center (EBC) at 866-217-9197 (toll-free). If you would like assistance from a USPTO Customer Service Representative, call 800-786-9199 (IN USA OR CANADA) or 571-272-1000. /NEEL D SHAH/Primary Examiner, Art Unit 2858
Read full office action

Prosecution Timeline

Dec 22, 2023
Application Filed
Jan 06, 2026
Non-Final Rejection — §102, §103 (current)

Precedent Cases

Applications granted by this same examiner with similar technology

Patent 12601682
OPEN RESONATOR
2y 5m to grant Granted Apr 14, 2026
Patent 12596115
SYSTEMS AND METHODS FOR CAPACITOR ACTIVATION OF CONCRETE SENSORS
2y 5m to grant Granted Apr 07, 2026
Patent 12590991
OPTO-ELECTRICAL PROBE CARD PLATFORM FOR WAFER-LEVEL TESTING OF OPTICAL MEMS STRUCTURES
2y 5m to grant Granted Mar 31, 2026
Patent 12591006
SEMICONDUCTOR DEVICE TESTER
2y 5m to grant Granted Mar 31, 2026
Patent 12590994
CANTILEVER PROBE CARD DEVICE AND SOLDER RECEIVING PROBE
2y 5m to grant Granted Mar 31, 2026
Study what changed to get past this examiner. Based on 5 most recent grants.

AI Strategy Recommendation

Get an AI-powered prosecution strategy using examiner precedents, rejection analysis, and claim mapping.
Powered by AI — typically takes 5-10 seconds

Prosecution Projections

1-2
Expected OA Rounds
87%
Grant Probability
94%
With Interview (+7.3%)
2y 5m
Median Time to Grant
Low
PTA Risk
Based on 611 resolved cases by this examiner. Grant probability derived from career allow rate.

Sign in with your work email

Enter your email to receive a magic link. No password needed.

Personal email addresses (Gmail, Yahoo, etc.) are not accepted.

Free tier: 3 strategy analyses per month